{"id":186419,"date":"2008-02-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-02-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008"},"modified":"2014-11-29T16:08:57","modified_gmt":"2014-11-29T10:38:57","slug":"latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008","title":{"rendered":"Latha P.P vs State Of Kerala on 22 February, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Latha P.P vs State Of Kerala on 22 February, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C) No. 5193 of 2008(R)\n\n\n1. LATHA P.P.,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. CHIEF ENGINEER (ADMINISTRATION),\n\n3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER,\n\n4. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (VIGILANCE),\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.J.JULIAN XAVIER\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI\n\n Dated :22\/02\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                                 V.GIRI,J.\n\n                           -------------------------\n\n                      W.P ( C) No.5193 of 2008\n\n                          --------------------------\n\n                Dated this the 22nd  February, 2008\n\n\n                             J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>      Petitioner  is  a First Grade Overseer working in  the Public<\/p>\n<p>Works Department.   According to her, she was in charge of the<\/p>\n<p>works in the Kodungallur town and this had facilitated her taking<\/p>\n<p>effective  steps to remove illegal  encroachments on  the  national<\/p>\n<p>highway.   According to her,   due to political pressure of several<\/p>\n<p>persons,     a   complaint   came   to   be   filed   by   one     Noushad,<\/p>\n<p>S\/o.Kunju   Mohammed,     before   the     Chief   Secretary   raising<\/p>\n<p>certain   allegations   against   the   petitioner   and   other   officers.<\/p>\n<p>Petitioner   submits   that   the   Superintending   Engineer   (National<\/p>\n<p>highway)   Central   Circle,   Kochi   &#8211;   the   3rd  respondent   was<\/p>\n<p>appointed as the enquiry officer and he submitted Exhibit P1 on<\/p>\n<p>28.7.2006,   inter   alia,  concluding  that  the   allegations  raised  are<\/p>\n<p>baseless.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      2.     It   seems   that   the   Chief   Engineer-   the   2nd  respondent<\/p>\n<p>appointed the 4th respondent to conduct another enquiry.  The 4th<\/p>\n<p>respondent   submitted   Exhibit   P2   enquiry   report   taking   a   view<\/p>\n<p>W.P ( C) No.5193 of 2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>different   from   that   of   the   Superintending   Engineering.<\/p>\n<p>According to the petitioner, Exhibits P1 and P2 are by officers<\/p>\n<p>of co-ordinate authority in the PWD.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.     Petitioner   has   submitted   Exhibit   P3   detailed<\/p>\n<p>representation before the Chief Engineer.   This was directed<\/p>\n<p>to   be   considered   by   the   Chief   Engineer,   as   per   Exhibit   P4<\/p>\n<p>judgment.    According   to   the   petitioner,   the   Deputy   Chief<\/p>\n<p>Engineer   had   conducted     the   personal   hearing     but   orders<\/p>\n<p>came to be passed by the Chief Engineer.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.     Ultimately, Exhibit P7 order came to be passed by<\/p>\n<p>the   Chief   Engineer   directing     the   transfer   of   the   petitioner<\/p>\n<p>from   her   present   station   at   North   Paravur.     By   Exhibit   P8,<\/p>\n<p>petitioner   is   transferred   to   the     Buildings   Sub   Division,<\/p>\n<p>Chittur, Puthunagaram in Palakkad District.   Exhibits P7 and<\/p>\n<p>P8 are under challenge in this writ petition.<\/p>\n<p>      5.     Learned   counsel   for   the   petitioner   Sri.   Julian<\/p>\n<p>Xavier raises two contentions.  He firstly submits that Exhibit<\/p>\n<p>P1 report seems to have been completely ignored by the Chief<\/p>\n<p>Engineer.   In fact, reading of Exhibit P7 shows, according to<\/p>\n<p>him   that   the   Chief   Engineer   has   not   applied   his   mind     to<\/p>\n<p>W.P ( C) No.5193 of 2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                      3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Exhibit   P1.     He   then   submits   that   though   the   personal<\/p>\n<p>hearing, as such was not specifically directed by this Court in<\/p>\n<p>Exhibit   P1   judgment,   nevertheless,   hearing   was   conducted.<\/p>\n<p>Then   the   person   who   conducted   the   hearing   should   have<\/p>\n<p>passed   an   order.     In   other   words,   the   Chief   Engineer   alone<\/p>\n<p>could pass an order complying with Exhibit P4 judgment.  The<\/p>\n<p>Chief Engineer should have  heard her, it is submitted.<\/p>\n<p>      6.     I heard the  learned Government Pleader Mr.Bejoy<\/p>\n<p>Chandran also.   Learned Government Pleader submits that it<\/p>\n<p>is   true   that   the   Deputy   Chief   Engineer   heard   the   petitioner<\/p>\n<p>and submitted a report before the Chief Engineer, but orders<\/p>\n<p>were passed by the Chief Engineer.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      7.     Transfer on pure administrative exigencies will not<\/p>\n<p>invite   interference     by   this   Court.     Transfer   in   the   present<\/p>\n<p>case   evidenced   by   Exhibits   P7   and   P8   is   apparently   on     the<\/p>\n<p>acceptance   of   recommendations   contained   in   Exhibit   P2.<\/p>\n<p>There are two contra versions in the form of  Exhibits P1 and<\/p>\n<p>P2.     I   agree   with   the   submission     made   by   the   learned<\/p>\n<p>Government Pleader that  both are  fact finding enquiries and<\/p>\n<p>it is open to the Department to consider both the reports and<\/p>\n<p>W.P ( C) No.5193 of 2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                       4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>take a suitable decision.  But I am constrained to take note of<\/p>\n<p>the fact that apparently the Chief Engineer  has proceeded on<\/p>\n<p>the premise that there is only one report, namely Exhibit P2.<\/p>\n<p>In my view, the issue is to be appropriately considered by the<\/p>\n<p>Government.     It   is   obviously   open   to   the   Government   to<\/p>\n<p>consider   Exhibits   P1   and   P2   and   any   other   materials   which<\/p>\n<p>are considered as relevant .\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      In the result, the writ petition is disposed of permitting<\/p>\n<p>the   petitioner   to   file   a   representation   before   the   1st<\/p>\n<p>respondent   in   the   form   of   objection   to   Exhibit   P2   as   also<\/p>\n<p>Exhibit P7.  If it is done, within four weeks from today, it shall<\/p>\n<p>be   considered   on   merits   and   appropriate   decision   shall   be<\/p>\n<p>taken   by   the   1st  respondent   within   two   months   thereafter.<\/p>\n<p>Petitioner   shall   be   heard     in   person   by   the   appropriate<\/p>\n<p>authority of the Government before a decision is taken in this<\/p>\n<p>regard.  Taking note of the submission on either side that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner   is   yet   to   be   relieved   from   her   present   station   at<\/p>\n<p>North Paravur,  I further direct that she shall be permitted to<\/p>\n<p>continue    in the present station    till the  Government takes a<\/p>\n<p>decision   as   aforementioned.     I   make   it   clear   that   I   have   not<\/p>\n<p>W.P ( C) No.5193 of 2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                              5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>expressed any opinion on the merits of the contentions of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner and it is obviously up to the Government to take an<\/p>\n<p>appropriate decision, in accordance with law.<\/p>\n<p>                                           (V.GIRI, JUDGE)<\/p>\n<p>ma<\/p>\n<p>W.P ( C) No.5193 of 2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                            6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                                  K.THANKAPPAN,J<\/p>\n<p>                                 CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999<\/p>\n<p>                                       ORDER<\/p>\n<p>                                     25th May, 2007<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Latha P.P vs State Of Kerala on 22 February, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C) No. 5193 of 2008(R) 1. LATHA P.P., &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY &#8230; Respondent 2. CHIEF ENGINEER (ADMINISTRATION), 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, 4. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (VIGILANCE), For Petitioner [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-186419","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Latha P.P vs State Of Kerala on 22 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Latha P.P vs State Of Kerala on 22 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-02-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-11-29T10:38:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Latha P.P vs State Of Kerala on 22 February, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-02-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-11-29T10:38:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008\"},\"wordCount\":791,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008\",\"name\":\"Latha P.P vs State Of Kerala on 22 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-02-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-11-29T10:38:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Latha P.P vs State Of Kerala on 22 February, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Latha P.P vs State Of Kerala on 22 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Latha P.P vs State Of Kerala on 22 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-02-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-11-29T10:38:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Latha P.P vs State Of Kerala on 22 February, 2008","datePublished":"2008-02-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-11-29T10:38:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008"},"wordCount":791,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008","name":"Latha P.P vs State Of Kerala on 22 February, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-02-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-11-29T10:38:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/latha-p-p-vs-state-of-kerala-on-22-february-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Latha P.P vs State Of Kerala on 22 February, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186419","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=186419"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186419\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=186419"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=186419"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=186419"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}