{"id":186545,"date":"2009-05-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009"},"modified":"2017-02-12T08:28:01","modified_gmt":"2017-02-12T02:58:01","slug":"viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009","title":{"rendered":"Viswanathan vs Rajeesh Kumar on 27 May, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Viswanathan vs Rajeesh Kumar on 27 May, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 3719 of 2008()\n\n\n1. VISWANATHAN, AGED 38 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. RAJEESH KUMAR, S\/O.RAVINDRAN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. PRAJEESH.K.P, S\/O.HARIDASAN, AGED 25 YRS\n\n3. HARIDASAN.K.P, AGED 58 YEARS,\n\n4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.R.SUDHISH\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :27\/05\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                             THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.\n                            --------------------------------------\n                              Crl.R.P.No.3719 of 2008\n                            --------------------------------------\n                      Dated this the 27th day of May, 2009.\n\n                                         ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>       Public Prosecutor takes notice for respondent No.4.<\/p>\n<p>       2.     Acquittal of respondent Nos.1 to 3\/accused Nos.1 to 3 for offences<\/p>\n<p>punishable under Sections 341 and 324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal<\/p>\n<p>Code, under Section 248(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short, &#8220;the<\/p>\n<p>Code&#8221;) is questioned in this revision at the instance of the defacto complainant.<\/p>\n<p>Petitioner&#8217;s case is that on 30.12.2002 at about 9 p.m. on the public road in front<\/p>\n<p>of Mahatma Arts Club respondent Nos.1 to 3 assaulted him and PW5 with<\/p>\n<p>wooden sticks and cricket bat.        Prosecution examined PWs1 to 5 and proved<\/p>\n<p>Exts.P1 series and P2. Learned magistrate after consideration of the evidence<\/p>\n<p>found that the case alleged against respondent Nos.1 to 3 is not proved beyond<\/p>\n<p>reasonable doubt and acquitted them.           It is contended by learned counsel that<\/p>\n<p>material witnesses were not examined and that acquittal of respondent Nos.1 to<\/p>\n<p>3 is not legal or proper.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       3.     In proof of alleged incident, prosecution examined the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>(PW1) and PW5,       allegedly injured persons.          But inspite of learned magistrate<\/p>\n<p>taking steps, CW6, medical officer who is said to have treated PWs 1 and 5<\/p>\n<p>could not be traced since he was not available in the address given. Summons<\/p>\n<p>issued to CW6 in her residential address also could not be served and it was<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.3719\/2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>returned. CW3, the independent witness was out of India and hence could not<\/p>\n<p>be examined. What remained is the evidence of PWs 1 and 5, allegedly injured<\/p>\n<p>persons. In the first information statement what PW1 stated is that respondent<\/p>\n<p>No.2 wrongfully restrained him and one Sudheesh (he is not an accused) and<\/p>\n<p>respondent No.2 beat him with cricket bat, he cried out, then respondent No.3<\/p>\n<p>came there and beat him with wooden reaper. At that time PW5 came there<\/p>\n<p>then respondent No.2 beat PW5 also. In the first information statement there<\/p>\n<p>was no reference to the alleged involvement of respondent No.1. As against the<\/p>\n<p>version of PW1 that it was respondent No.2 who beat PW5, the latter stated in<\/p>\n<p>his evidence that Sudheesh ( not an accused in the case) beat him. It also came<\/p>\n<p>out that though according to PW1 as stated in the first information statement,<\/p>\n<p>himself and PW5 were assaulted with cricket bat, in the statement of PW5 to the<\/p>\n<p>Investigating Officer under Section 162 of the Code, the weapons stated are<\/p>\n<p>sticks and not cricket bat or reaper. Either way the stick or cricket bat were not<\/p>\n<p>or could not be recovered. According to PWs 1 and 5 there was sufficient light at<\/p>\n<p>the place of occurrence from the Club. Learned magistrate found that in the<\/p>\n<p>mahazar for scene of occurrence or in the previous statement of PWs 1 and 5<\/p>\n<p>there is no mention about the availability of light at the place of occurrence. It is<\/p>\n<p>in these circumstances, learned magistrate gave benefit of doubt to respondent<\/p>\n<p>Nos.1 to 3 and acquitted them.\n<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.No.3719\/2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                           3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       4.      Interference with an order of acquittal is called for in revision only<\/p>\n<p>in glaring cases of injustice resulting from violation of fundamental principles of<\/p>\n<p>law or exceptional cases of defect of procedure or manifest error resulting in<\/p>\n<p>flagrant miscarriage of justice. Learned magistrate has considered all materials<\/p>\n<p>available and found that it is not sufficient to warrant conviction of respondent<\/p>\n<p>Nos.1 to 3.    Even if it is assumed that a different view was also possible, that<\/p>\n<p>is not sufficient to interfere in revision.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       Revision petition fails. It is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                THOMAS P.JOSEPH,<br \/>\n                                                          Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>cks<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Viswanathan vs Rajeesh Kumar on 27 May, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3719 of 2008() 1. VISWANATHAN, AGED 38 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. RAJEESH KUMAR, S\/O.RAVINDRAN, &#8230; Respondent 2. PRAJEESH.K.P, S\/O.HARIDASAN, AGED 25 YRS 3. HARIDASAN.K.P, AGED 58 YEARS, 4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-186545","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Viswanathan vs Rajeesh Kumar on 27 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Viswanathan vs Rajeesh Kumar on 27 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-12T02:58:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Viswanathan vs Rajeesh Kumar on 27 May, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-12T02:58:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009\"},\"wordCount\":583,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009\",\"name\":\"Viswanathan vs Rajeesh Kumar on 27 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-12T02:58:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Viswanathan vs Rajeesh Kumar on 27 May, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Viswanathan vs Rajeesh Kumar on 27 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Viswanathan vs Rajeesh Kumar on 27 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-12T02:58:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Viswanathan vs Rajeesh Kumar on 27 May, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-12T02:58:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009"},"wordCount":583,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009","name":"Viswanathan vs Rajeesh Kumar on 27 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-12T02:58:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/viswanathan-vs-rajeesh-kumar-on-27-may-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Viswanathan vs Rajeesh Kumar on 27 May, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186545","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=186545"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186545\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=186545"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=186545"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=186545"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}