{"id":186687,"date":"2009-03-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009"},"modified":"2016-11-14T00:45:23","modified_gmt":"2016-11-13T19:15:23","slug":"krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Krishna Pillai Sreekantan Nair vs Isreal on 25 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Krishna Pillai Sreekantan Nair vs Isreal on 25 March, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRSA.No. 318 of 2009()\n\n\n1. KRISHNA PILLAI SREEKANTAN NAIR,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. ISREAL,S\/O.JOSEPH,AGED 85 YEARS,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. ISREAL WILFRED,S\/O.ISREAL,AGED 48 YEARS,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.D.SAJEEV\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.P.BALACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :25\/03\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n              K.P.BALACHANDRAN, J.\n          ------------------------------------------------\n                  R. S. A. No.318 of 2009\n          ------------------------------------------------\n          Dated this the 25th day of March, 2009\n\n                        JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
    This is appeal arising out of O.S.214\/07<\/p>\n
on  the   file         of       the         Munsiff’s        Court,<\/p>\n
Neyyattinkara. Defendant is the appellant and<\/p>\n
the plaintiffs are the respondents. What is<\/p>\n
assailed is concurrent decree passed by the<\/p>\n
courts   below        declaring               title        of  the<\/p>\n
respondents over plaint ‘B’ schedule building<\/p>\n
and  directing        the        appellant\/defendant            to<\/p>\n
surrender vacant possession of the scheduled<\/p>\n
building within 60 days from the date of the<\/p>\n
decree passed by the trial court. Though the<\/p>\n
respondents claimed that ‘B’ schedule building<\/p>\n
constructed in ‘A’ schedule property was let<\/p>\n
out by them to the appellant\/defendant, as<\/p>\n
tenancy arrangement was not proved, the court<\/p>\n
below found against the rental arrangement<\/p>\n
alleged by the respondents. Mesne profits also<\/p>\n
R. S. A. No.318 of 2009            -2-<\/span><\/p>\n
       was not decreed as no evidence was adduced as<\/p>\n
       regards the mesne profits derivable from the<\/p>\n
       ‘B’ schedule building.\n<\/p>\n
               2. On the pleadings of the parties, the<\/p>\n
       trial court had raised necessary issues for<\/p>\n
       trial and considering the case in the light of<\/p>\n
       the evidence adduced at trial which consisted<\/p>\n
       of      oral     evidence  of    PW1  and   DW1 and<\/p>\n
       documentary evidence Exts.A1 to A5 and Exts.B1<\/p>\n
       to B10 as also Ext.C1 and C1(a) decreed the<\/p>\n
       suit O.S.214\/07 and the suit O.S.34\/07 filed<\/p>\n
       by     the      appellant as   plaintiff  which was<\/p>\n
       jointly         tried  along   with  O.S.214\/07 was<\/p>\n
       allowed in part granting a decree restraining<\/p>\n
       the respondents from causing damage to the<\/p>\n
       shop        rooms    and  from    dispossessing the<\/p>\n
       plaintiffs otherwise than in due process of<\/p>\n
       law      and     in  execution  of   the  decree in<\/p>\n
       O.S.214\/07        which  was   disposed  of  by the<\/p>\n
       common judgment.\n<\/p>\n
R. S. A. No.318 of 2009           -3-<\/span><\/p>\n
               3. Against the decrees both in O.S.214\/07<\/p>\n
       and      O.S.34\/07   the  present  appellant  filed<\/p>\n
       first appeal before the first appellate court<\/p>\n
       respectively as A.S.82\/08 and A.S.83\/08 and<\/p>\n
       both the appeals were dismissed and hence,<\/p>\n
       this RSA against the concurrent verdicts in<\/p>\n
       O.S.214\/07.\n<\/p>\n
               4. It is vehemently contended before me<\/p>\n
       by the learned counsel for the appellant that<\/p>\n
       decrees        passed concurrently  by  the  courts<\/p>\n
       below       declaring   title of   the  respondent\/<\/p>\n
       plaintiffs        over  ‘B’  schedule  building  is<\/p>\n
       incorrect and that recovery of possession of<\/p>\n
       the building should not have been allowed by<\/p>\n
       the      courts    below.  The  contention  of  the<\/p>\n
       appellant is that the shop room with old door<\/p>\n
       No.263\/2 and present Door No.35\/3 with one<\/p>\n
       room had been in possession of the defendant<\/p>\n
       for      a     long time;  that  he   has  obtained<\/p>\n
       permission from the Panchayath to conduct a<\/p>\n
R. S. A. No.318 of 2009          -4-<\/span><\/p>\n
       stationary       shop under  the  name  and  style<\/p>\n
       “Krishna Traders” that either over the shop<\/p>\n
       rooms or over the land, the plaintiffs never<\/p>\n
       had any right and the suit is a counter blast<\/p>\n
       to O.S.34\/07 filed by the appellant; that the<\/p>\n
       plaintiffs have no title or possession over<\/p>\n
       the plaint schedule property; that the shop<\/p>\n
       room is not constructed by the first plaintiff<\/p>\n
       and there was no tenancy arrangement and there<\/p>\n
       was no agreement to pay rent of Rs.250\/- per<\/p>\n
       month; that the plaintiffs have won over the<\/p>\n
       Panchayath authorities and managed to change<\/p>\n
       the      door   numbers; that  no  declaration  or<\/p>\n
       injunction       can   be   given;  that   earlier<\/p>\n
       O.S.922\/03 was pending with respect to plaint<\/p>\n
       ‘A’ schedule property with Indira Bai Ananda<\/p>\n
       Kumari as plaintiff and the present plaintiffs<\/p>\n
       as defendants 1 and 2; that in the written<\/p>\n
       statement       filed in  that  suit  the  present<\/p>\n
       plaintiffs never contended on the basis of the<\/p>\n
R. S. A. No.318 of 2009           -5-<\/span><\/p>\n
       present documents; that as per the plan in<\/p>\n
       that case ‘B’ schedule shop room is not inside<\/p>\n
       the plaint ‘A’ schedule property; that even if<\/p>\n
       plaintiffs ever had any right over plaint ‘B’<\/p>\n
       schedule shop building, the same has been lost<\/p>\n
       by open, hostile, continuous and assertive<\/p>\n
       possession and enjoyment of the plaint ‘B’<\/p>\n
       schedule shop rooms by the defendants.<\/p>\n
               5. The learned counsel for the appellant<\/p>\n
       further submits that the respondents have not<\/p>\n
       produced any document to prove title over ‘B’<\/p>\n
       schedule building; that the building stands in<\/p>\n
       a     Puramboke      land  which belongs to   the<\/p>\n
       Panchayath and that the predecessor of the<\/p>\n
       appellant was obtaining permission from the<\/p>\n
       Panchayath and constructing a building and was<\/p>\n
       conducting        business therein and  that  the<\/p>\n
       building does not belong to the respondents.<\/p>\n
               6.     Evidence  in  the case  was  being<\/p>\n
       recorded by the trial court treating O.S.34\/07<\/p>\n
R. S. A. No.318 of 2009            -6-<\/span><\/p>\n
       filed by the appellant as the leading case and<\/p>\n
       the documents produced on the side of the<\/p>\n
       appellant are Exts.A1 to A5. Ext.A1 is the<\/p>\n
       licence         issued  from   the Parassala   Grama<\/p>\n
       Panchayath        dt.30\/01\/06   and Ext.A2   is  the<\/p>\n
       building         tax    receipt   dt.28\/01\/06   both<\/p>\n
       immediately preceding institution of the suit.<\/p>\n
       The other documents produced are Exts.A3 to A5<\/p>\n
       which          are    respectively   a    membership<\/p>\n
       certificate, a true photo copy of the re-<\/p>\n
       survey plan and the extract of the building<\/p>\n
       tax register. The above documents are quite<\/p>\n
       insufficient to establish the contentions now<\/p>\n
       advanced before me that obtaining permission<\/p>\n
       from the Panchayath, a building was put up by<\/p>\n
       the predecessor in interest of the appellant<\/p>\n
       and shop was being conducted in the said rooms<\/p>\n
       by     his     predecessor  and  thereafter  by  the<\/p>\n
       appellants.        The  contention  in  the  written<\/p>\n
       statement also is that the building had been<\/p>\n
R. S. A. No.318 of 2009           -7-<\/span><\/p>\n
       in possession of the defendant for long and he<\/p>\n
       obtained permission from the Panchayath to<\/p>\n
       conduct a stationary shop under the name and<\/p>\n
       style        “Krishna  Traders”.  The   respondents<\/p>\n
       produced Ext.B1 sale deed executed in favour<\/p>\n
       of the first respondent\/first plaintiff by<\/p>\n
       Nalla Thampi Manas on 14\/02\/61 assigning ‘A’<\/p>\n
       schedule property to him. The case of the<\/p>\n
       plaintiffs is that ‘B’ Schedule building is<\/p>\n
       put up by them in ‘A’ schedule property.<\/p>\n
       Ext.B5 series are building tax receipts and<\/p>\n
       Exts.B6 and B6(a) are true photostat copies of<\/p>\n
       assessment        register  from  Parassala   Grama<\/p>\n
       Panchayath showing assessment of the building<\/p>\n
       in the name of the plaintiffs. Ext.B7 is tax<\/p>\n
       receipt        and Exts.B7(a),  B8  and  B8(a)  are<\/p>\n
       building        tax receipts  in  relation to   the<\/p>\n
       scheduled building. It is considering the oral<\/p>\n
       as well as documentary evidence adduced on<\/p>\n
       both sides that the courts below have come to<\/p>\n
R. S. A. No.318 of 2009           -8-<\/span><\/p>\n
       the conclusion that respondents\/ plaintiffs<\/p>\n
       have title over ‘B’ schedule building and it<\/p>\n
       is therefore, that recovery of possession was<\/p>\n
       granted         in  favour    of  the    respondents<\/p>\n
       concurrently by the courts below. There is no<\/p>\n
       merit in this RSA and there is no question of<\/p>\n
       law and much less any substantial question of<\/p>\n
       law arising for consideration in this RSA         by<\/p>\n
       this Court on the contentions set up in the<\/p>\n
       Written Statement and the arguments advanced<\/p>\n
       before         me. Substantial  question    of   law<\/p>\n
       attempted        to be  formulated in    the  appeal<\/p>\n
       memorandum are not questions of law and much<\/p>\n
       less any substantial question of law. This RSA<\/p>\n
       in the circumstances, is devoid of merit and<\/p>\n
       is dismissed in limine.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                          K.P.BALACHANDRAN,
\n                                                      JUDGE
\n       kns\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Krishna Pillai Sreekantan Nair vs Isreal on 25 March, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RSA.No. 318 of 2009() 1. KRISHNA PILLAI SREEKANTAN NAIR, … Petitioner Vs 1. ISREAL,S\/O.JOSEPH,AGED 85 YEARS, … Respondent 2. ISREAL WILFRED,S\/O.ISREAL,AGED 48 YEARS, For Petitioner :SRI.D.SAJEEV For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon’ble MR. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-186687","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nKrishna Pillai Sreekantan Nair vs Isreal on 25 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Krishna Pillai Sreekantan Nair vs Isreal on 25 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-13T19:15:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Krishna Pillai Sreekantan Nair vs Isreal on 25 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-13T19:15:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1180,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Krishna Pillai Sreekantan Nair vs Isreal on 25 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-13T19:15:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Krishna Pillai Sreekantan Nair vs Isreal on 25 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Krishna Pillai Sreekantan Nair vs Isreal on 25 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Krishna Pillai Sreekantan Nair vs Isreal on 25 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-13T19:15:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Krishna Pillai Sreekantan Nair vs Isreal on 25 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-13T19:15:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009"},"wordCount":1180,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009","name":"Krishna Pillai Sreekantan Nair vs Isreal on 25 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-13T19:15:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/krishna-pillai-sreekantan-nair-vs-isreal-on-25-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Krishna Pillai Sreekantan Nair vs Isreal on 25 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186687","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=186687"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186687\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=186687"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=186687"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=186687"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}