{"id":186797,"date":"2008-04-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-04-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008"},"modified":"2017-05-14T19:53:55","modified_gmt":"2017-05-14T14:23:55","slug":"sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri Venkatarayappa S\/O … vs Sri G Muniyappa S\/O Late … on 4 April, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Venkatarayappa S\/O … vs Sri G Muniyappa S\/O Late … on 4 April, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
.-gun mm\n\n151111\n\n\u00ab:2 T \"F pr \nHIS TI-IE 4m DA_Y..0__I'f' Ar-RH;   %\n\nnEFoREf*\n\nmm I-ION'BLE MR. JusT1c\u00a7\u00a7A,_N.  . \"\n\n2\n\n \n\n(I\n\\. vi'\n\n \n\nawis 4.-1\" k\u00bbgr_r:.n:- 3,\n\ng\u00a7T\"\ufb02fE[E\",\n\nS11 Vellkatalayappa, \nAqr:-rl ahni 11' FL'? 1};-wart; \n\n.5 shun r-I.r..-\\Ju..n.u.-H\\.1':..a  o. 2' ' it\n3\/0 Ha11L11r1aJ._;111a1Jpa,-._ ...__  V _\nC\"nannake ahavaspura' 'xzfiilvagcg '  1.\nKasbav Hob1i,\"j;C11ii;.&:an'1aI1i Tait:.k--,' \"\nKo1ar?District..--     '\n\n(By Sri AC'i.__Papi   \n\n uni__yappa.,\n  ,4\\gar]\"s3h'n11t 60 years,\n'  l\u00a3:.t\u00a3;.N.a4.ya_ya_nappa,\n' Nidaigurld Village,\n ;!l\\'\\-I; (\"Pa-Enfnrnvan;\nlxmnyq 1Ivuu., \\..zu..|.u.x.1:I.|.|.J.\u00a2:4.Lu.\n\nH' \" z i{glai' District.\n\n Sh Munishamappa,\n Aged about '7 8 years,\nS10 Eerappa.\n\nS-1i Iiallappa,\nAged about 40 years,\n\nC3 I '''L 151-: n. :cl.1.'|.-I n-'mm I'lI'II'2n\nI-1',' L5 IVI. LI.1I..I.\u00a7L1Cl:IllQ-IJIJCI'\n\n\n\nIx.)\n\n4. Sri Ecmppa,\nAged about 38 yeam,\nS\/0 Munisllamappa, \n\n5. Sri Krishuappa,\nAged about 38 years,\n\nS] :3 Vcnkatarappa,\n\n6. Sri A.K. Nalayanappa,\nAged a'nm!f. 65 yemffz,\nS] 0 Dasappa, V V'\n\n7. Sri Vcllkatappa-1,  H _ _\nAged ahouit\ufb01\ufb02 yegiam, \" * _ _ _ V_ Z\n3.1-;     \" _  \n\nQ 62...: n..\"r...1..-'1'\".'._,.}Vt.'  [.4-..,--.;'., \n\nUV IJJJ.   ..IfI3J C4 Jlltjvl'\nAgngl ra\"vno11t\"--f\u00a7.5_ yam$;_,\nI 0 I\\'ii'tiT]1fiS.'t1a.l]1\u00a3:t})})EEL,\n\n9. 311'. Pilla Vt;1i}rA\u00a7t\ufb01;}12ay:35t11z;;a,\nAgc=.-Id 4_a'ho11t 'F30 Ayenr\ufb01\u00bb,\n. S] 0 Mupiahamappa,\n\n l'\u00a7\u00a2_3s.2 to 9 a11:\"i'tiSit1cntB of\nr\"~1..,',.-';.'.1.._,..1.,............-. w;11....u\n\\.r'J._'\u00bb.'C1.\u00a24.I--I-.lC>Ll'.\\':\u00a73.IIQ.V W LII (51 V I-I-I35'-.r,\n\n3  _ Kaah\u00e9itt\ufb02vrxhli, ('2l1in1amani'I'al11k,\n. Kain; D;i\u00a7.ii'cit.\n\n  -V   Rcspozxdcnts\n( B_y'S1:nt. S. Sushc-.ela_. Adv.)\n\n _ A This Writ Petition \ufb01led u11dc1'A1'tic1us 226 and 227 of the\nCuljslitutioxx of India pmying to quash the older dated\n'\u00a3.2.2005 passed by the Cirmrt ofM1msi\ufb01\" 8:. JMFC, Chintamani\n\n\"  Execntion No.18;'2{)02 vista .A..n:3.exur.e \n\n\n\nU)\n\n\"T\"|.:u .u;\u00a3\u00a3l-1.... 'l.,...\u00a3..... 1...\"... 1...... .. I .....\n111.15 1JCL.lL1U1l. 11:1 .1115 US Ll IUD IVFU.\n\niiii\n\n-.;\u00ab .V.L'- ._ ,.:.. .f. \ufb01.'.-.\n 'ill I v \n\npronouncement, this day,   \n\npI'0Il0LII1Ct3d the l'ullowi11g: \n\nIn this writ, pctitioll, 'VL4le$\u00a7a}i.Ly   o 1}*dc:1' dated\n\n01.02.2005 passed i11--....V}:'3);\u00a7::. no. 113i 1.98'? in 'uh:-:\n\n Cou1'i. 01' the then Mu11siIl', at. Chilltalmmri, for decrct: of\n\npcznuanent injunction against. 1'espo11dt:11L N052 to 9,\n\n\\\/\n\nK .\n\n\n\nwhich was dt-JL1't:t3d on 25.03.1995. The  \n\nt\\ 1'\n\ndismizsseti on 07.12.2301. 1* l1'iiUIl:\u20ac:3,1T'i'_Ej1{:'l4l:5 iiietii  EXt:(f:i.3u('JI1 '\n\nNo.18\/2002 to lake acLiu1x   Lo \n\nalleging willful (1iS0b6diBI1C.t;   'tile  ;16t.'.I'('JC for\npt:1'ma11cnL  {11;::u1. In Lhc\ncxecutiun cast, 1*\" 1',-::s~~of:\"-\"hi'*'--V'A1I.:~_  11 -:1 I\nLiI1d(3I'        and adj udicatc\nhis 1'ig11_L.W V'   had posted IA No.6\nfor llt\u00a7.i\u00ab\u00a7I'i11g\u00a5 has \ufb01led IA No.7 l_lIldt3I' Section\n151  \ufb02uid:   u.i'.'uiu1st:ll' and his wilxicsses\nu.0.pruvc L11' i:;I3's\"1;.g,c'r'fI'.\ufb01'.\"t\"\".-\u00a3135 1i1a\"-as in L?' NLL6 ' '11} L\" decide the\n IA No.7 was co11Le:sLt:d by the\n 1u.Jldc1'. Co11sidc1'i:ng IA No.7 and\no123(:s;ti\u00a79';1.eVs\".VLl1c1'cLo, Executing Court. llas allowed IA No.7\n\nt__I_1'\u00a2:\u00a2_:I..,ug Lhc: applicant and dt:L:1't:e I10ldt3l' to pl'0Ct'.(:d with\n\n\n\n\ufb01ogtentions:\n\n3. S151 G. Papi Ruddy, lealncd    \npelituer conteudtzd that, the dc1gs. I'-'lt:'...e.:t:>11L\u00ab::11dt:d that 1'e:spom.1c11l,\n\npos$c\u00a7*.sic;11~\u00ab by producing u1ai.t':1riai pr<3oi',\n   S\ufb01tikh into the 11011 existing right and\n   the claim is wholly u1111t:cc.-ssary. H6\n provision under Rule 97 ofOrde1' 21 is not\n  'Par a pcmuu 'mm is net 9. }.:.1'Ly in E11...\n i3#,Q:'5cdi11gs and 1161106 IA No.6 \ufb01led by 1" 1'_acLing\"i'11\u00a7ga1i_\u00a7\u00bb  a_11ti uii1. \n\nexcess of the ju1'isdicl.io11, 11as -alltajwezil  \" W~i1Li1it;_a:1.1i\n\nconsidclmg the rights o1't11:5_}'m_tiLiu11e1'.\n\n4. Per co11t1~g,, '_   COU.1lSt'3l\nappearing for  l11e  that, \u00a3116\npt:.LiLiL)11t_:1' 1:445'  Ll1aL mlbsequellt\nevents  it has 11%' 11 a.:i*-sway i ~\nthat,   right, Lille and ilxtcrcst\novcar Lhfz' ..p1 'ope1'~L\u00a7  O.S. Nu.113\/ 1987, that there\n\nis ;sL1pp1'cssim1\" or \u00e9natclial [ants and :rcco1'd by the\n\ngwtiiiezzcz :-41-1 inif.is.a.I._.,u; uf t:.>gt:.maI.in11 111 at: miiltsas before\n\n .Li'I<':_ .E}\u00a3\u00e9U1_1JL37."{1g" Cuuri. is  and uicgm  She-; 1"'uif:'\n\ncdi'1Lcu('it':d""L11at., sinct: tlxcrt: was abuse of due p1'oc,'.\n\n\n\nA ate.-.9-3., ills: rruilzi \"mi. mi-as  1' 1'\n\n'H-I\n\nhold an enquiry into the 1naLl.e12... to ess[abliSl1  \n\npleaded in IA No.6. She eolltel\ufb01ed   \ufb02it:\n\nfact. that, an enquiry in IespTeC-L01' the V1uaLLL\u00a71'S'~\u00abig5:i-eigeel in EAL'\n\nIA No.6\n\n-\n<\/pre>\n
r<\/p>\n
Nc_>,6 i: (.3-_1_let,1. I01′  wiilV;Q.1L;1VViLA’*v:l_1t)’1g1LAiI1s\u00a3..2,.’
\nca11’uui_ he decided,  11:-ass passed the
\nimpugned o1’\u00a7ie\u00a7”,  as illegal nor
\npassed in    Counsel relied
\non the of   {;}(>u1’L and this Court in
\nsup? L’. :11-91′ A ‘<\/p>\n
5. g ‘ C\u00a2)11side1’_i1ig”l.l1e. rival contentious and record of the<\/p>\n
.. …..,. .,.. -.. .11}! c\u00ab_I11.~:i\u00a2.ie1’M lit 11 i..’:<\/p>\n
.   ” Wheiher the Exet:u.Li11g C;uu1’i. has<\/p>\n
‘jcommitted any illegality in ordering to hold<\/p>\n
= “enquiry into the claim\/objectiolls raised by a
\nthird party to the execution?\n<\/p>\n
  Reg, us.\n<\/p>\n
V%  =   15* respondellt has \ufb01led IA No.6 under Order 21 Rule<\/p>\n
9?’ GPC1 in the Executi11g Court, objecting the execution of<\/p>\n
” “”\ufb01di~1’v’ii a\ufb01i\ufb01iilpaiiy\ufb01ig<\/p>\n
I.\n<\/p>\n
.\/.1<\/p>\n
;1,___ _1.___:_._. 1… 11… ._._.1.’.4:._-.. , 1’__ :1
\nL116 UUUI CC Dy U163 1Jt3l..1l.1U.l.l 1. Hi L1<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
1.. “n.6, it, its 51.:-.a_I.t:.\u00ab.}. 1..1i:.:I.L ht: w_._ 1_.)L :1 :_.Lhc<\/p>\n
moctzediligs, he has got an ilxdepeiideixi;\u00bb:i\u00a7;E.1i’~<\u00a7vt:I\u00b0 _1}:i::\u00bb 'V<\/p>\n
petition sclicdulc pI\u00b0upt:rLy a1u11g4wit:;l1Titigxi\u00e9z g\ufb01xc<\/p>\n
suit property is a tank bed  ove1*..v&hic11~,[V:i1uj '}!(\u00a71}S\u00a3\u00a7I1 11:15\u00bb<\/p>\n
got absolute right, _U1aL  iiciicieiii and the<\/p>\n
53<\/span><\/p>\n
judgmmii. d<:l..u1's by 5\u00a3;s;l1u.~s;\u20ac.$.ig: '4 have \u00a3.L……L1_1.1
\n\ufb01'auduleI1L dctrrctj.  i11a.i"i1is light. has to be
\nadjL1diCai.t'__3.".1' by i;1.ui.,1i11g__a1;.cl-1qif1i1y,,as he was not a party<\/p>\n
to meiiiii  -…,Vp1\u00bb'\ufb01tx:ccdiI1gs. The said<\/p>\n
applicatioxii wtis by' the peliliolier.<\/p>\n
'7'.  -I1;   \ufb01led against the t.it:c1't:e passed<\/p>\n
   and con\ufb01mitzd in RA 1311995, in<\/p>\n
WI-5 1<\/p>\n
 tizii-3-ietiiiu1'c1', this '"icu1'!. in L18 juL.,gm:::1\u00a5_ uaicd<\/p>\n
r'<\/p>\n
6.4-.2004  held as Follows:\n<\/p>\n
“However, it is ObSt31’Vt3d that any deems
\nthat has been granted by tn-.5: ‘I’rial Court 01”
\nwhich has been coulimied by the lower
\nappellate Court will not ensure to the bene\ufb01t of
\ntin: 1’cspo11de11L–plai11ti[i’, if ullzinlately the grant.
\nmade in favour of the plaintiff is set. aside by<\/p>\n
1… …–……L. .,… ‘tn . . ‘ #5
\n‘uic: uuiup-:’u:,ut W’  L 61 auilmnty.\n<\/p>\n
.\n<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
-r<\/p>\n
8. Pts{.i1.iu11t:1* and a.110L11e1′ pt3l’SUI1    <\/p>\n
1 l1’nQt-*.r-1:351:05 gt )1 It ‘.f_-‘_.’l”I’ Ti’! H)\n<\/p>\n
1. V . _ H ..-c, V . . V . , H -05\u00b0<\/p>\n
C’;hi11i,a111a1I1i, agaimsi. $01116 uf ‘Lhc: ‘1’e:$p011dt:1\u00a7S.:sA i”1<i1't-:i)z1.'*T'1'1'e:*?<\/p>\n
TallS\ufb02(1E11-, Chintamaixi by "V\u00e9\u00a7I1.vi: '!fJI_V.lt31l"   ;\u00a71.V\u20ac)1.2001
\npassed in case  V'{;aAiv1cc]lcd the<\/p>\n
grant dated 24:5.1985_  18 gulxlas of<\/p>\n
('F {"'.1I:I.\\1'i'1:I.1I4'r=-s:.}" u\\n.nw.nI1-u 1'n;.uh-\\ '31: Iuntru :1'
\nIn' _ L-ll 'JV. l.LI '\u00a7' lulu' 'J LI' I. N!<\/p>\n
(7.5: ,.\n<\/p>\n
If.-I’ll “E1
\nJ.I–aInlL\\dI, L1 1. \\..\u00abu. .1.|<\/p>\n
1 S34. .E*_~1’u.i.?.\n<\/p>\n
of the pevliviidlit\ufb01j’. ” F'<:Vi;ivi;_iu_1Vit':1:' am anolhcl' pt:I'S011 had
\np1'efc1:rcd_  agai11.-st. the said order in<\/p>\n
RA(C1dii)V.:_-\u00a335:20-2)()4'i)'i  lht: Assistant Cu1u111issio11t:1',<\/p>\n
C1njlgkaball\u00e9ip-mjV_ S'ub;Di\u00a7isiun. The said auLho1"il.y by an<\/p>\n
'1\u00ab\\'I|lI'\u00a2'_"l'1 2'!'-nfaiw' 0 P7  'nxu :}':|_-1rr:_L\\_L.~:.u:| ('sun rnrnwsunml
\n' \\J."'\\'.l\\.u\u00bb '..:l\u00a2–'.'..LL;  \u00a31 . I o \u00a3l\\J\\J ,I. LMICD \\|.J\u00bbt'.'.'J-$.11-C'\\'.'.'\\.–\u00bbl.:I. L1 ILA _EJl\u00a2(3.I.u<\/p>\n
 s3a'pseq:'icz%M;1u\u00a7gL'ijctiuona had filed RA 152\/2001-02 be['o1'c<\/p>\n
l11tE* D\u00a2;.pu'ty" Co1Im1is:sionc:1', Kolar District, under Section<\/p>\n
.   50 .91"  KaI'I1\u20aci.L':1k%i Land RBVBIIUC Act, 1964 qucesljoijing<\/p>\n
i4:lj'\u00a3:' 't:a11cel1atjo11 of the grmit. by 'I'al1sildar and its said<\/p>\n
Co111mi3si011c1' by an o1'dt:1' dated 3.6.2006 has dislnissed<\/p>\n
p…\n<\/p>\n
C)<\/p>\n
“1..-\n<\/p>\n
the appeal and has or(‘1eI=ed in ‘r e 0’v”‘”i’ i.}i.e__ <\/p>\n
the custody of the Gove111n.1enl. a_11d_i.o Ins:-ii1’1’t::ii11  l’;he’ _:sa111ex<\/p>\n
as “tank bed”. The said. o1’de1′ ;\u00a7.ppe’a1.’3 Le._ Imve <\/p>\n
finality as no matelial is 1J1’uyit;ee(1 belb1’e_1iie,e\u00a7i1ewii:g <\/p>\n
9. From the said p:fQeeecii1_igs leleal’ that, there is<\/p>\n
p1′””a .:..eie {die-m L —\n<\/p>\n
peLilio11er1 ._tef d.\u00a2\u00a2i.6e Passcd in U_S_
\nNo.11?3\/ figied  .1995. Pel;il1’une1′ has not
\nb1’ot1g1i\u00a3   “Lhe Executing Court. the said<\/p>\n
p1’0eeedi11gs, ‘w,l1_V1iel1 have lakeli place in respect of the suit<\/p>\n
, 1;1’_i)pe1′{.” ikemre the nevenue ..u!l1u1″m.,e. bmm \u00a311.. ;._.1’u:.~:-;;1.l<\/p>\n
 uI” Lhe”S:iid_u;i;(ie1’s passed by the Revenue Aui.i1o1’i’t.ies, it is<\/p>\n
p1’ii11avf::.~icie”t:lea1′ Lhal, the claim made by the peli1.ione1’ Lo<\/p>\n
 3 i.he4_esuiL p1’ope1’l._y has become questiomxble since the grant<\/p>\n
7.-{>f  the p1’ope1’Ly made in hits favour has been cancelled,<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
 pl.-‘I. 31,’;-. 1–4.31.\u00bb-nu .-.l”\ufb01-.-uu_u1 111: I an ‘II 11!!-Tl’ Lil!’ Il\\’|”;t’.ll-‘G. 11! ‘I’ll’
\nW111 11 11:1 bL\u00bb.|.1 C.Ll.1J..l.I..u.l.4\\4l. IJ L.11La 11.1&5.s\\.u. \u00a24I.l_I.|—.l1\\.J.1a.(.L\\..I’I..rn JJA -…..-u<\/p>\n
ii<\/p>\n
A .1′ _ n.,.;’Hi_
\n1-1 9%; uu ,u11o_–.~’:_)1<\/p>\n
5.\u00bb. ” I -‘AA ,
\nJ_II-\n<\/p>\n
,4 r”lJ’\\l”\\.\n<\/p>\n
 ,,_, r _ A ., W ‘.~__ ,
\nIIIHUC DI1 D.”l.\u00a3U ‘f 1 V<\/p>\n
 .j1’7i<\/p>\n
Exticuiilzg Court. by the 1%’<\/p>\n
uonsidtsralioll. Since the lower   <\/p>\n
1″: _.\n<\/p>\n
1.13.\n<\/p>\n
Icspuiidtzz\ufb01.  ‘I’t5t}I.1iJ.’t\u00a7S \u00bb 1 <\/p>\n
for 11ca1*i11g of a1’gu111t:11Ls_, I\ufb01L_V.I*lp.7 was \ufb011ed.pwi_ii1–V~a *p1’ay{-:19<\/p>\n
in lmld an 9:111.” if’! to H1′<\/p>\n
uH._I?’n \u00bb’3HMuuI”1:i 1:.’ twin P. ‘ I I\n<\/p>\n
1.. J, 3.. ._,.-., ,.fvt,…….-:,, ,…….., – – ..-<\/p>\n
No.6 and to decide L116’1;1::I.iLig:i?\u00bbV\ufb0211t\u00a7i’tr\u00a7a1′”fqc3f, The Excculillg
\nCourt, has gi;-;,11{.ly   t;#.;;i1clu:si011, that for
\nproving (11.6a\u00a3’i_lt:gat[;ipi’1S_;.1ja<1\u00a2'–"by; the applicant. in IA No.6,<\/p>\n
an clxcguiity. i.S::.I-e(1:\u00e9;:i17Cd'.LD- be ."1'1\u00a2:ld;: to \ufb01nd out as to WIIGUICI'<\/p>\n
wiielhel'  "appiiC:e;i1'L.-"\u00bbLVl1as got light. which could be<\/p>\n
  01115\/'"b3'Vco11dLu:tj11g an cllquiry and without<\/p>\n
   right, of the applicant cannot. be decided.<\/p>\n
1() ."*  .t1*;\u00a7'\u00e9-;' case of Jearqj Ghasimal (supra) decided by<\/p>\n
  ita1;;1ei1" \u00a7si11gle Judge of this Cou1'l., the facts were that the<\/p>\n
'"gx:\u00bbl.ii.i011e1' lhczrtzin, had obtajxled an order of eviction<\/p>\n
 …….. .. _ – .. –..1.-. .. r3 . _. .,
\ni:1g,&:u.L1::n. 11;: puuuI::n'L nu.-.1 uuxu u.u.c1 A y<\/p>\n
' 1 .. .. .. . 'M ……l um… .. ….:-\n<\/p>\n
uuuuu .\\<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
for deiively oi’ possession, the Execuiillg Co1_,ui 1:aai,’%j~.s:se\u00e9ee<\/p>\n
wa1’1’a11L for delively of possession, feitf””wi;ie”‘1\ufb02stage \u00bb L4 <\/p>\n
applicatioll under Order 21 Rt.11e.’9’7’_A_A T ai11d’~98  ‘L11’.-‘\u00a3}V’:’$*J.as<\/p>\n
\ufb01led by Iespondents 1 and 2:”‘tJ:;e1’ei1′;,whiC}.;  .objeetedt’<\/p>\n
‘I1: 1″: I
\nL’) I} L.\n<\/p>\n
dismissed holding t.11aL”iAt_s v\u00bb’asVii1:1:\u00e9:oii1\u00a7)et.ei,:L. ‘Tile order was<\/p>\n
questioned 1’1; ap’pea1,j;Aw1yjie}1 y\u00a7as’\u00aballow\u00abed set.ti1xg set. aside<\/p>\n
the order  1334 V__t;t’te:~’t\u00a73xeeuti11g Court. The said
\no1’de1j~oi’n’   (itj'{11*t–.,’ was el1a1ie11ged in the
\n petitif’i1,,” ‘s’u::-‘ide3j\u00a711** which, the lwsxee Smgle
\nJudge lxssniemnitgs Lbtloesz<\/p>\n
 “‘I’11ei’ei’ei’e, Lhe only persolls, who can \ufb01le an<\/p>\n
. , ta-pplieatien rnder Order 2 1 Rule 97 of the
\n .  of Civil Procedure, are (1) the holder of a
\ndecree for possession and (2) the purchaser of
\n.  -sity such property sold in execution of a
\n” ” decree. No other person has got. a right to \ufb01le
\nsuch an appiieatrion. In  ease LA. 1 i \ufb01led<\/p>\n
by respondents I and 2, who claim. to have
\npurchased 1\/431 share in the p1’ope1\u00b0t..y and
\nclaim to have been put in possession of the
\np1’opert.y by judgment-debt.o1′ respondent No.3
\non 1.4.1986. Therefore, respondents 1 and 2
\ncannot be said to be the holders of the decree
\nfor possession, because they have not obtained<\/p>\n
me decree,  respondents 1 and 2<\/p>\n
ml” moi. be considered to be the <\/p>\n
the property sold in execution ofVVthe~.dec1’ee, V’ V
\nbecause ad1ni1.t.edly  …iJ1_t_:y o\u00a21aim;$ to ” .V.l1ave”.<\/p>\n
purchased the gpropertyz_   ._ip1*ivsLi7.e
\na1’1’a11ge111e1 1L ‘I’l 1e1’el'(:=1’e,1 _i’e:’spo1.1_de1_1t.s 1″ iii ‘ 2\n<\/p>\n
4. ‘ V<\/p>\n
do not fall within any-eoiie of?\u00bbth.e”eaL.e–gorie:’y
\nmentiolled in 1eu1_e9f7 ol”\u20ac)V1’dee~:_1’ “L3 1 V!.l1.e1  ‘<\/p>\n
of Civil Proeed 1.11t:.”\u00bb  ”\n<\/p>\n
11. In the case of  :75 Riehik\u00e9-sh
\nPrasad  in AIR 1997 SC
\n856, the  .1lags,l1e1;iVae,Iollowe:\n<\/p>\n
 “””   &:11o1;’L”–l11e’a;{“.sresaid sLatut.o1’y provieiolls
\n‘ .of=.().1:de.1f  lay’ down a complete code for<\/p>\n
._1-eaoiv\ufb01isg’ollezlisoutee pe1’*…aini11g Lo exeoui.io11 of<\/p>\n
 I:leerec'”‘for “possession obtained by a deere.e–
\n’11o1<_1eI'._ a1.1d'~.~w11ose attempts at execuiixlg the
\n 'decree meet with rough weather. Once
\n 1'e:siSl'a–Ii-to is olTe1'ed by a pu1])o1't<:d s11'a11ge1' Lo<\/p>\n
. .4 {he cleeree 2111:}. which comes to be noted by me
\n WVE_x\u00e9;\u00a7:utj11g Court as well as by the decree-
\n holder the remedy available to the decree-
\n" —-_.ht_)1t_le1' agaillst such an ubslluciiollisi. is only<\/p>\n
" under Order XXI, Rule 97 sub–rule (1) and he
\ncauinol. E:-y–p:;ieses Sliiili ol;e\u00a71'u<:lion and moist on
\nre–issuanee of warrant for possession under
\nOrder XXI, Rule 35 with the help of police
\nforce, as that course would amount to by-
\npassillg and -::i1'cL1111ve11l:ing the p1'o<:edu1'e laid
\ndowri under Order XX}, Rule 97 in conrloction
\nwith I'('JIl10Val of obsinxtioxl of pl.11'p0."i'i.t3d
\nstrangers to the decree. Once such an
\n\u00ab…,\u00bb.s.111t_;l_io11 its gm the 1'eco1'd of the Executing,<\/p>\n
|'_'t\\l II" 'N 'Eu (HIT H1" {rm l,_\\'lI'l\\'I'V–il"; xi4.\u00a7'*.ISr\\.tn:" .'-'Vi:-A
\nxzuua l.- :1. ;u \\.I.l.IJ'. ;I_x.11. Lu \u00a2:Lj_.J1.u \\.,.o\\.\u00bb.|_$.~ up j._I\\.y-If?' -,:._.|_1.1.;<\/p>\n
Executing Court can tell such "'4:1bstrL1\u00a3:ticr1ist"
\nthat he must. i'11's'L lose posses'si1.11V1, 1e11.1(i_ their . .
\nonly his remedy is Cto "nicvvke a11V_"app1i'catiL1n 7<\/p>\n
u11de1'_O1'de1' XXI, 121,111: 99,CPC"a_1'1:i i}1"1-ayT1.n._if(J1'<\/p>\n
u '. ' , 3 .  "-\n<\/p>\n
restoration of p(:ssessi0r1.–._ The .i.;ii\u00a71 com {L-‘1 by<\/p>\n
the impugned clfdar &111d- jutig111e11.t’f\u00abi11:1s-Vitaken’<\/p>\n
the View that theaciily reriiedj\ufb01avaiilable to a
\nsl.1’aI1ge1′ to L11;-;____ decree wh9__ <;_l\u00a3ai111s any
\nindependent…A_ right, *title"v,or interest. in the
\n.1._……11,n1 ..n".;……,…1.-,1 4;} V1.1"-..';~. 14,. r'\\…Im.. VV1 13.4.,
\n\\.lLa\\.a.|.k1-|.Q.l 1Jl.\\JillE.-'3. L')  .i.lJ   \\J1'J.CI -\/\\I\\…l, 1'\\u.1U\n<\/p>\n
99. This View cf: the Higti czourt on the
\nalbifes-aid  s1at;u1o;:y.% scilerxie is clearly
\nL111sU;Stain\u00e91b1e.”” ltlis “r-:’a;sy.– to visuaiise that <\/p>\n
 $1′-1’i=11i\u00a7gt3fI’ ” Le  \u00bbL_}.1t:.” ‘ti-2:(.,’]\u00bb’t:(i who .u1ai111s an
\n1inaieperitieritr’-51%ght; eae and interest in the
\n. .A(iec1’e’b:;1.1 _p1-‘g1pe1’Ly’ 1211.1 ‘oi1″er his 1’esisla11ce be1″0re
\n.act,11alIy dispossessed. He can equally<\/p>\n
a:_.;il,a!.\u00a7s..11is g1:i_eva:_11ce and ci:=1_i11_1. [.’:_>r mijiitiicgalieii<\/p>\n
“of h.is inde*per1-dent” right, title ancl interest in<\/p>\n
V L… ,1…’,….’. ..!~ -….-…… .. …….. .-1′ .\\.. 1…-;….-
\n4- L1 us uIv.:\\..,1 U  yi. u}_Jc.1 ‘Ly U V (:1 1 an it:-I Jucsu. 15<\/p>\n
possession as per Order XXI, Rule 99. Order<\/p>\n
XXI;”‘}%.:1le~97 deais with at stage wilich is priur<\/p>\n
in the -E?LC.’.1_’.1_J,\u00abEl.1 execution 91′ 1.;he d.ecree for<\/p>\n
_  _’pg5ssessio11 whereili Lhe grievance cl’ Lhe
\n cb’st1’L1ctio1\ufb01st can be adjur;iicat.ed upon before
\n\ufb01acztual delively 01′ pussessioli to the decree-
\n‘ ~.l1oIder. While Order XXI, Rule 99 on the other<\/p>\n
11211111 d_es11s with the sL111s\u00a2;x_y_.1e11I_., stage in the
\nexecution proceedings where a stranger
\nciailniug any 11\u00b0gi1’L, iiiie mid i11i,e1’es’L in the
\ncleeretal property might have got. actually
\ndisposed and claims 1’esL0r::1tiu11 of possession
\non acijudication of his inciependent right, title
\nand i11Le1’esL dehors the” i11Le1’est of the
\njudg111t:11’L–<iei1'Lo1'. Both these types oi'
\nenquiries in connection with the right, title and<\/p>\n
….-\n<\/p>\n
Uh<\/p>\n
. I  ‘ V ” V’ V’\n<\/p>\n
-. .4 – _, I f I . [ | ‘ -. ‘ .. ‘ – ‘
\n1111161631. G1 at stranger LG Jae <ie<:1.'_ee as  o_lt.:~:_1'13:_<\/p>\n
contemplated by the aforesaid sczheine-of Orderi'
\nXXI and it is not as if\ufb02ttiiat 5u"Ui'1'~–&;1.'~8l1'\u00a3d11geIf. to.<\/p>\n
the decree can comeixl the ._pict111*e:"on}y' at the
\n\ufb01nal stage after losilirg. thee ~poseee~s_io11' 1,i'1-1d'*13:_1oL<\/p>\n
before it if he is vigg-,;i1a11t'–eI1ou{.*;'it':_;Att;a 'raisezhie<\/p>\n
objection and ohsiijuetioil hefoiie 'V!,t1e…\\Ma11'a111i'<\/p>\n
for possession gets 'e.ctL1ali3'__ executecl against
\n111111, with 1'espe\u00a3:.t :ti.1e'~i;1ig1 1'3o.1,_1rt has totally
\nignored the"~V.seh_emeA of Orcier XXI, 'Rule 9'? in
\nthis (:013iif:2C'p'it,ii1.1"ijyi';.ii:va}:iiiig i.i1iti  t.i1a{. oniy
\nremedy of H_s_L'1c_.h  the decree lies
\n1111Liei'.__C)1'd_e1' XX}, Rt1'ieV 99 etliti he has no 100113
\ns1_;\u00e91..T1:}ii1- to get \u20aca.L'ij111iic;9;tio11….of his 1.2131111 prior to<\/p>\n
 "l'ii'e._ 11-t:iiv.e1'y" 0iT_'1JQ&iS(3SSi()I1 to {he decree-<\/p>\n
.ij1o1i.Ci%3I' in 't;'11e~.,e:;ect1tic:er1' proceedirigs. The 'v'ic–:w<\/p>\n
~ . 1a1ke:'1::1.\u00bb\u00a2.= t;i.1e=1-ili.g[1'~-C:o1f11'l. in this conneetioxi also<\/p>\n
1res1;1;siv.1npa1em;1 breach of principles of natural
\n'  H1-::" _ot1-1-1l.1'111:i,i1111.i1.~:-L who alleges to
\n_ 'i1av'e._a'njy* ;' "111ep"e1'1c1ent. right, title and interest
\nL'win-the-__Lie1:1'ei1\u00a71i property anti who  atiliiittedly<\/p>\n
not epaxtjy t.o the decree even though making a<\/p>\n
 g1ieifa:.1.<..:e'1'igl1t in time before the wairaiii. for<\/p>\n
A3-ave:\n<\/p>\n
. \\..a\u00ab.{L\\..\n<\/p>\n
.\n<\/p>\n
ution<\/p>\n
is .e1et1J.9.11y executed, 11201116. be told.<\/p>\n
_ ” ,,”o1_T”-li1e gates and his grievance would not be
\n eon\u00e9\u00e9itiered or heard on me1’i’t.s and he wouici be\n<\/p>\n
7.ih3’ow11 off lock, stock and barrel by use of<\/p>\n
‘V “police force by the decree–holder. ‘I’h.at would<\/p>\n
oiwioueiy 1’ee11i’.. in i1’1e}.1e.1’aE1le i11ju1’y to 31.1511
\nobst.ruc.tionist Whose grievance would go<\/p>\n
overboard without being considered 011 me1’ii.s
\nand such obstructionist; would he COI]dCII’1I1Cd<\/p>\n
to{.all_y 1111hea:1’d. Sl1c.h an order of the
\nE:-ietzttting Co’1.11’t, therefore, would fail also on<\/p>\n
the ground of 11011-compliaxlce with basic
\nprinciples of natural justice. On. the oontrcxry
\nthe statutory scheme envisaged by Order XXL<\/p>\n
‘\/<\/p>\n
the Executing Court and it is that acljudioatvbn<\/p>\n
…r.. no r-\u00abnrr .. .1.’ ……….., ‘  -.A –. H.
\nRule: :71, urn…\u00bb ua u:.’Suu-an-ad \u20ac\ufb01?”3i\u00e9’T-gw\ufb01fd<\/p>\n
against such a pitfall and provide; ajstamtoryy’ <\/p>\n
remedy both to the degree-Raider weii_a.5~3 to.<\/p>\n
the obstmctionisf to I:.ave”tkezir7*. respect\u00a3v.e”.2:vay”‘.ir1 7<\/p>\n
the matter and to get f9ro;;9ere’acijudio\u00a3ztio2ie’\u00abbefore
\nthe  Court afcd it  t:”;c:’.;-_:,’,’o ‘czca’_;”-eae;’~f\u00a3c’;\u00e9:tr’o:i.L
\nwhich subject we hierarchy of.ap1p\u20acaL?–‘1wou\u00a3d’
\nremain binding Iiietiveen fhe_9″‘p\u00e9xr1ie’s to such
\nprooeedizzgu  sepicrote\u00bb suit  be barred
\nwith a view to that mul\ufb02plicity of
\nprocieediiigs ‘ oaiid  j.:artzEj\u20acei%  proceedings are
\navoided ancjthe gonivut-“\u20acaid.I’Vc!own by Order XXI,
\nRuleSa_97 to  uucufd remain a complete code
\n  .s2o;’e reinedyfof t!’2e~– ooneemed parties to
\n,hinge~~..tI:eir\u00abjgr1e12a:iees once and for all \ufb01nally
\n‘ fa.-\u00a7o;:zeci’   tfr’:.e’r.’r’cse\u20acves.”<\/p>\n
2 (i–1e;ii1;_’e_is by me for emphasis)<\/p>\n
12. in the cease-_O”‘.S’.-\ufb02ee!”  “”‘ “”‘ “‘- “‘”” ‘<\/p>\n
\u00e9i-” rumrv:.~u:a., van lid’<\/p>\n
   reported in AIR 1998 SC 1754 the<\/p>\n
    held as follows:\n<\/p>\n
. _ “12– 13. IL is clear that. ext-:cuLi11g Court.
\nv ‘c.9.n decide whether the resistor or obstructor
\nis 9. pe1_’-.~:o11 !.;-ouzzd. by the deozee :.;:.11t.1 he 1’e1′:_1eee_=
\nto vacate the properly. That question also
\nsquarely fails w;ii.i1i11 the atijutiicaioly p1’ocees
\ncontemplated in Order 21, Rule 97(2) of the
\nCode. ‘ The adjudication 1ue11iju11ecl Lhertairu
\nneed not necessarilv involve 5-2. dcigailerl enrmirv<\/p>\n
. ‘ J * ” *1′-“*..r<\/p>\n
or collecllon of evldence. Court can make the
\nadjudication on a(.’uuiiJu:(i facts or even on the
\naverments made by the resistor. Qf course the<\/p>\n
0 \/’<\/p>\n
 can direct the pa7*”s to
\nfor such determination if the Ce1,Lr\u20acjV’e<:leem;~2.".. it'
\nnecessary-" ' '   '- .\n<\/p>\n
(1 tajitfs is by 11_1e~ 11119′ elzipi i:a.\u00e9;i\u00a75}. A .  7-1 ‘<\/p>\n
13. In the case of Sreeneitiiearnd Rqjeslt
\nand others reported’ :.$(;”~1827 eerleidering the
\nquezstion, wlletjtel’ l11Ae_f'(‘:3\u00bb1_fF1 jpessessioll of the<\/p>\n
1-;-1<\/p>\n
 H.’ . . . .1 :, __.  ‘ _’ _ V
\n“1’o”e1”.v clafttiguw 11.:d.e1..=e1y.ie1;i 1301′:-LVVV’ .., .,.. .. .. -I
\nt’ E’ .7 .  , . ‘ 1 1 ~. 1′<\/p>\n
rs<\/p>\n
pally to the T_ ;_’t;eL’1’ee’ .1.iiiii,_ie1* “exe’c;:1itioI1 cm.LiL’t 1’e$.i5’L such
\nd(:’CI’6ij3   at,\ufb01ugiiI;e1t.iu11 of his objection under
\nOrder 2’1.._I~?{L.1le 97 “CAP(_.'{,”aitt”lias been held as fuliuws:<\/p>\n
” 1’0, ” VU11(\u00a7.eI’ sub–c1au:5e ]. (.)1’tie1′ 21, Rule 35,
\n the ‘Ex-ec\u00ab’uth1g Court delivers actual physical<\/p>\n
_  p:o5eeeeion of H1 disputed pmperty Le the
\n ” fdvectree holder and, if neczessary, by removing
\n attlj\/”})t2I’S()Ii bound by the decree who 1.’ei’ueee to
\n“3.v\u00e9icat.e the said property. The SigI1i\ufb01<:a11twords
\n'*"are by relnoviug any person bound by the
\ndecree. Order 21, Ru} 36 eenceives of
\nilnmovable pmperty when in occupancy of a
\ntenant or other person not bound by the
\nde(:1'ee_, the Couri. delivers poasm-:ssio11 by \ufb01xixlg,<\/p>\n
a copy of the warrant in some conspicuous
\nplace of the  pmperty and p}'{}{J}ai}iii1}g to
\nthe occupant by beat. of drum or other
\n<:uet0111a1'y Inode at some convenielli. piece, the
\nsubst,a11ce of the dccrep in regard to the<\/p>\n
A<\/p>\n
-_ .- 1-.._.  1..- .i”.;.’.’.–.1.;;.–..
\nin ui.uc:1 wmua, int: .m__c;m<s -'–};u'1a__}i';i<\/p>\n
prope\ufb01y .\n<\/p>\n
gets the Symbolic possession. f3Lf\u00a7le3\ufb01’e’2n1, Rule’
\n99 conceives of 1’esieLa1;ce or o’bS’I1?u_m:lio11pt,olhe.
\n}_u_n_sr_:t_:2st_ait,)1; of ijmuovable ‘_L:1f0pe1~ti.y _\\}v\u00a7:e11″i:1aLie –<\/p>\n
in execution of a decree ‘\u00a7:iy>*”‘an;r pefeo1i”.–..\u00e9 ‘fthie
\nmay  either try’ the. persoii \u00bb,’t;:ru”1;d ‘t:;y”‘vti&1eL<\/p>\n
decree, clain1ing _ti’l”1e th1*oL1ghju.dg:(ne.1’1t–‘debtor’<\/p>\n
or clailning i11(l6po1:L1e11LV”right-I oi: his own
\ninolucling t,e:r1e_11t ;1ot1’pe;\u00a2ty to t;11e_\u00a7L;i;t or even a
\nsL1’a:uge1′. ‘ ._dc:ci1ee V I1o_ic_.1ei~*,. in such case, Inay
\nmake an e1ppiioa_J:i}:m t.he\u00bb_Exec11ti11g Court
\nco1nplai11i11gV_V’suVe}t1 3iV’eei’e.laI\u00a7ico;’ for d.e1ive1’_y of
\npossessiorit of -the ‘~.p1foperty’; Sub-clause (*2)\n<\/p>\n
5.,*l5’t.-V’…”2.’!;’:l:_~–\u00bb\u00bb” 19′”.?6=i “”e1_1.”i,;i:~:-I.it..i_’1l;’t.c._>.:; eurpowers the<\/p>\n
  \u00abQ_1-Q.i1rt.s’—‘ur’}1en_ such claim is made to<\/p>\n
.p1*;jeeeLi ” to  upoil the appiii:aIi’1.”s<\/p>\n
~ . oiaimztf 311:: &ec’ordaI1ce’with provisions (:.ontai11ec1
\n_ _ l1ez–*ei;1a[1.e1:,”‘~\u00ab.3’i’:is_’ refers to Order 21, Rule 101
\n‘ 4 {es  by 1975 Act} under which all
\n_  _rel_at’\u00a3izg to right, title or interest in the<\/p>\n
._proper_ty1_ arising between the parties uncter<\/p>\n
order’ 21, Rate 97 or Rule 99 shall be<\/p>\n
 detennined by the Court and not by a separate<\/p>\n
‘suit. By the or.r-..e.n.dme-nt, one 319.5 not to go for -:2.<\/p>\n
 ” .,\u00b0fre;=h suit but all matter pertaining to that
\n  even if obstructed by a stranger\n<\/p>\n
7._ot2__i::Ldtcated and \ufb01nality given even in the<\/p>\n
* ‘executing proceedings. We find the expression<\/p>\n
“any person” under $3.522-c!w.4.se {1} ts uses!
\ndeliberately for widening the scope of power so
\nthat the Exe<::uting Court couici adjudicate the
\nclaim made in any such application under Order
\n21, Rule 97. Thus by the use of the words 'any
\nperson" it
\ndelivery of possession, claiming right in the
\nproperty even those not bound by the decree,<\/p>\n
'\/<\/p>\n
13-: {$11 J Han<\/p>\n
……….,w.. 9.5! persons reetssting the<\/p>\n
' 2 ,1 .4 +   u – 2
\nan .u.uee .enan…'s 02* {:ther ;',*erser..-;_.e:.a1:mr:-A,' :\ufb01a5.,'".$<\/p>\n
on their own including G'. strcmger\ufb01'.  . <\/p>\n
(Ila l1'c'e is by 111eiJfe1*'ez!;pl1aei5):" <\/p>\n
14. In the case of c. Sor\u00a7;e~~ as.\n<\/p>\n
  reported__ ‘in  ” Vebnei{].e\ufb0111g<\/p>\n
wiieiher Lhil’ ext’ “uuV igxi  i.’ 2
\nthe applicalieu  deLer1.nini11g the
\nquestion 91” ‘  i)rupe1*Ly as e11visage\u00a2.i<\/p>\n
u11cie1′,v’\u00a3)–1’d.ei”{2’1 E2:\u00a7,tle  has been held as follows:<\/p>\n
“”7,  I_lJe”~e\ufb02ie11L’ of 1’esi:sla11oe or ubsL1’uct.io11<\/p>\n
_ ” Qffered—4.by ‘.::1_1y “pe1’so11 the remedy available to
\nihe DeC1’eee’\u00abE~f0ic1e1* is under Order 21 Rule 9′?
\nI’0r_1\u00a7;oSseSsion. Order 21 Rule 97 is a elatutoly
\n re1’n’ed3I.._b:3tl1 to the Decree Holder as well as to<\/p>\n
V _ “iJ..;e o’;.Ijec1.r.11′ Lu have I._l1ei1” 1’e:spe\u00a2_:t.i.ve say in the
\n  and get the proper ac’\u00a3judicatien before
\n.  i-.he””exeuuii11g  This }Ji”UVi\u00a7:’iii\ufb01’1  eriaeted
\n‘with a View to see that Irlultiplicity of<\/p>\n
‘ \u00bb *’jp1’ocee<.li11gs and parallel proceedings are
\naveided, It is also possible that a stranger to
\nthe decree could claim an independent. right,
\ntitle and interest. in the ciecretai property and
\ncan ol'I'e1' his 1'esistam:e before getting actually
\ndispossessed. He could also equally agitate his
\nglievmzce 5.11;! 931311;; 1'01' 9.1.13 1_1\u00a2_iit_:e_I,.1'e1; cf his
\nright, title and irlterest in the clecretal property.
\n'Ti1i:s is precisely whai happeiied in the preeeiii.
\nCase. The 0bSt1"L1Cti0I'1iStS filed their<\/p>\n
\\,
\n\/<\/p>\n
l\\)
\n(3<\/p>\n
nu J. … . ..\n<\/p>\n
.\n<\/p>\n
. 3… ;……. “IL\\lh’:’I- .. 1…   _”_~:… I:
\n\u00a21y1JuL,i-1{1LJ11-:3 brhcvuxg, iuui. ‘timy .-.5__1uu .;’.1\u00a75;};L,V<\/p>\n
title and int.ere:_=.t ove ‘ the prop<:rty,'' '<\/p>\n
Frmn the primzipleas laid d0w11 ~'a\ufb01l1t:'"':1t\u00a7cj+Sioij\u00bb\u00a7\u00a7'–~1jiiV!.{:(i<\/p>\n
above, it is clear that Wil\ufb01Ii &\u00a7_"~.})CI'S(i1JvCiHi1iijl1g 'i1i{lti":L0 1116<\/p>\n
}_J1'0pt:I'L_y in his post-:e\u00a7;:s1c)1; <)_1__).s{_,'1*:_;_\u00a2_:'i;.j; gg L_lg\u00a7:.;-;;A,L_i1v5;;1;t L}; 111::<\/p>\n
d(iCI'i3(3 holder 'L0   "L':_u-: suit p1'opt:1'i.y,
\nLhc Executing COL_11'l. i\u00a7:3 C"c$I11,it_Jt:_'t'\ufb02i:;’i:ta_g db5_L1’u_(:t1’u11 against extzculiull<\/p>\n
of the,de:t:3ft;6g.a11{iii::,pa.S$.\u00bbapp:’Op1\u00e9::i:tt: 0I’dt’.I’ which Lmdcr the<\/p>\n
p1v.1\\.Ii..~_=i’s;;_1;.?;4t..1′(.):’d\u00a31f.2\u00bb14uR_Li\u00a7t:_ 1L3 9!’ CPD is in be !.1′.,a!.I.:.. at-;<\/p>\n
a dt:c1t:e.'”i?.V1’u1.x; i-I:_1e’..pe1.:iisaj oi’ the ave1’1nt:nLs made in LA<\/p>\n
  by Elie’~–1.–5t*1’espo11dt:nL, in the .l\u00a3’.xct:uLi11g Court,<\/p>\n
 L’ C}-.z:}iI:.viin:g *1″igl1l. to the pruptzrty in dispute. l+’1’o111 the<\/p>\n
 oi Llm t.1-*.:*.::1′.,-:3 hul…,1′ .0 LL: pr<\/p>\n
ii1.a_ L\u00e9:1ia1_ on record by Lht: 15* 1’t:spo11dc:11L, 111:: light<\/p>\n
(3<\/p>\n
pcmy 1:1 qua.-51.10.: “}”}111\u00a3–.’. lama<\/p>\n
 L0 be clouded. ‘The pxnccedings belbw the<\/p>\n
   R\u20acV6I1UB Authorities were an the ineslamsc of the tlt:Cl’t1(;’<\/p>\n
holder, wh\u00a2:1’ei11 \ufb01ndings 1’t:cu1’ded art: advtmse Lo him.<\/p>\n
HCIICC, the order of the ExecuLi112 Clourt posting the cast:<\/p>\n
r 1′ 1 1 I H
\n401 au_}u<,.1ca..1am in me claim xnazis Hi EA J <\/p>\n
held to be illegal. In my view, tlwj \u00a3-});ecL1ifii1g"C{_':\u00aba1i"t:Inns \ufb01at. <\/p>\n
3",<\/p>\n
comlliitted any excess ju1'isdi<;Li011 V\ufb02bh\u00e9d 'B1;  iii :i::.~1:\u00a7s_%i_11g<\/p>\n
Lhe impug11ed order. In viL?w"-qf L116\u00bb decla1'\u00e9_1liQ1'1'v uf \ufb02aw 'my'<\/p>\n
the I-Iun'blt: Sup1'e111c__ C3oL11'L__.i1x:1' ~._i_.11t:_v dcCiSi\u00a3)1}s__ifvIE11'ed to<\/p>\n
the Co115LiLL1tiq1i' Q1" Illitiiii; 'v=Jfi1l.idL1r;: Itasp\u00e9ct, I am Luxahle to<\/p>\n
follow {11t\u00a7;"'\u00a3i::\u00a2f}\u00a75i\u00a3*g11'..1'::1}~:l(:1'eE:(jf." in\u00bb the case 01' Jesrqi<\/p>\n
T Ghastmal, pm; V<\/p>\n
in i.iLs:*_, 1'c'.5L1i_'L, -.r_v"1'i\u00abi..& ~7pt':Liif1o11 is devoid of meiii. auu <\/p>\n
" '~  di:.\u00a7ji:isg3\u00a2c1.v%wilii'(:t;\u00a7.l_,_2e3\u00ab.' Advocate fee is \ufb01xed at. Rs. 1,000 \/ ~.<\/p>\n
  Il..A.i\u00a7;L:'i.V_11.iadc clear that the lZ='.xccuLi11g Cmlrt shall<\/p>\n
\\.=-.ri|.1y.2uL Lrcizzg in\ufb02uenced. in<\/p>\n
 z\u00ab1I_;y"'_\u00ab 111a1111e1' by the \ufb01ndings ami o'usc1'va'1io11s manic<\/p>\n
U he1't:i11, which are limitcsd for cu11sidt:1'aLiun of the<\/p>\n
coxlteuliuils raised befure 1.11:: and! the sauna shall not be<\/p>\n
B'\/'
\n\/,.\n<\/p>\n
[..;r
\nt-an<\/p>\n
  I’:3X:1_Ji’t’:’:SSiOi1 of any opii\ufb01on on i.i1_\u00a2::._1116I\ufb01L:’–4.51’Eht:<\/p>\n
matter, pending bcfun-: the Exet:L;I.j11g_Coui’L” ” 1: <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Venkatarayappa S\/O … vs Sri G Muniyappa S\/O Late … on 4 April, 2008 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda .-gun mm 151111 \u00ab:2 T “F pr HIS TI-IE 4m DA_Y..0__I’f’ Ar-RH; % nEFoREf* mm I-ION’BLE MR. JusT1c\u00a7\u00a7A,_N. . ” 2 (I \\. vi’ awis 4.-1″ k\u00bbgr_r:.n:- 3, g\u00a7T”\ufb02fE[E”, S11 Vellkatalayappa, Aqr:-rl ahni 11′ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-186797","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Venkatarayappa S\/O ... vs Sri G Muniyappa S\/O Late ... on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Venkatarayappa S\/O ... vs Sri G Muniyappa S\/O Late ... on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-14T14:23:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"26 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Venkatarayappa S\\\/O … vs Sri G Muniyappa S\\\/O Late … on 4 April, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-14T14:23:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008\"},\"wordCount\":4360,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri Venkatarayappa S\\\/O ... vs Sri G Muniyappa S\\\/O Late ... on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-14T14:23:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Venkatarayappa S\\\/O … vs Sri G Muniyappa S\\\/O Late … on 4 April, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Venkatarayappa S\/O ... vs Sri G Muniyappa S\/O Late ... on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Venkatarayappa S\/O ... vs Sri G Muniyappa S\/O Late ... on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-14T14:23:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"26 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Venkatarayappa S\/O … vs Sri G Muniyappa S\/O Late … on 4 April, 2008","datePublished":"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-14T14:23:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008"},"wordCount":4360,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008","name":"Sri Venkatarayappa S\/O ... vs Sri G Muniyappa S\/O Late ... on 4 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-04-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-14T14:23:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-venkatarayappa-so-vs-sri-g-muniyappa-so-late-on-4-april-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Venkatarayappa S\/O … vs Sri G Muniyappa S\/O Late … on 4 April, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186797","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=186797"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186797\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=186797"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=186797"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=186797"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}