{"id":186842,"date":"2006-08-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-08-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006"},"modified":"2017-06-03T04:01:48","modified_gmt":"2017-06-02T22:31:48","slug":"anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006","title":{"rendered":"Anil Kumar Jaiswal S\/O Sri Kishori &#8230; vs The State And Ashoka Kumar &#8230; on 23 August, 2006"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Allahabad High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Anil Kumar Jaiswal S\/O Sri Kishori &#8230; vs The State And Ashoka Kumar &#8230; on 23 August, 2006<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: III (2007) BC 240<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: B A Zaidi<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: B A Zaidi<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>Barkat Ali Zaidi, J.<\/p>\n<p>1. This is an application for relief under Section 482 Cr.P.C.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. In this application the grouse of the complainant is that Complaint Case No. 171 of 1998 Ashoka Kumar Bhargawa v. Anil Kumar Jaiswal under Section 138, The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (here-in-after called the Act) against the applicant pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VI, Allahabad filed on basis the of 6 cheques, one of which is only in the name of complainant and the rests in the name of different payees, is not maintainable. The reasons being the complainant cannot be said to be the &#8220;payee or holder in due Course&#8221; of those 5 cheques which are in the name of different payees and the trial Court was therefore not competent to take cognizance under Section 142 of the &#8220;Act on basis of those 5 cheques. The order of the trial Magistrate passed on the application of the applicant given in this behalf, on 15.3.1999 is, therefore, not sustainable.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. I have heard Sri Sharad Malviya Advocate for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Rameshwar Nath Advocate for Opposite-party No. 2\/ complainant.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. Section 118 of the &#8216;Act&#8217; in Clause (g) of which the phrase &#8220;that holder is a holder in due course&#8221; has been defined is as follows:\n<\/p>\n<p>(g) that holder Is a holder in due course-that the holder of a Negotiable instrument is a holder in due course.\n<\/p>\n<p>Provided that, where the instrument has been obtained from the lawful owner, or from any person in lawful custody thereof, by means of an offence or fraud, or has been obtained from the maker of acceptor thereof by means of an offence or fraud, or for unlawful consideration, the burden or proving that the holder is a holder in due course lies upon him.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. The Magistrate rejected the objection of the applicant with the observation that it is only after evidence has been recorded that it will be possible for the Court to decide whether the applicant is the holder of the five cheques in question within the meaning of the &#8216;Act.&#8217; The view of the Magistrate needs to be endorsed, because it is only after the full facts have been revealed by evidence, that, it will be possible to decide whether the opposite-party No. 2 is the holder within the meaning of the Act or not?\n<\/p>\n<p>6. The applicant&#8217;s counsel referred to the case of Meeta Rai (Smt.) v. Gulshan Mahajan 1999 (3) Crimes 621 of Punjab and Haryana High Court, where the Court held, that the husband could not be the holder of cheque within the meaning of the &#8216;Act&#8217; because a mere letter of authority issued by the wife, was not sufficient, for that purpose. It was in view of the facts and particular circumstances of the case, that the decision was given. It cannot be applied indiscriminately, to all kind of cases, because, facts and circumstances of each case, can be different.\n<\/p>\n<p>7. In this case the position is not precisely the same, as in the case &#8216;supra&#8217; and, therefore, it will have to be decided on the facts and circumstances of the case as revealed by evidence whether the opposite-party No. 2 is a holder of the 5 cheques in question which are in names of different payees, within the meaning of Section 118(g), and proviso (b) to Section 138 and Clause (a) of Section 142, of the Act or not?\n<\/p>\n<p>8. The counsel for the applicant has argued that opposite party No. 2 cannot be a &#8216;payee or holder in due course&#8217; within the meaning of the &#8216;Act is a question of law. This contention is not valid because in view of the definition of &#8216;the holder in due course&#8217; given in Sub-section (g) of Section 118 of the &#8216;Act&#8217; will have to be investigated whether the requisites given in definition have been fulfilled or not, which can only be done after the evidence has been recorded and all the circumstances have come to light.\n<\/p>\n<p>9. There can be umpteen diverse situations and they will have to be assessed on the basis of the evidence and circumstances of the case. The contention of the applicant&#8217;s counsel that this is a pure question of law, only, is unacceptable. The Magistrate&#8217;s order, must therefore, be upheld.\n<\/p>\n<p>10. The application fails and is dismissed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court Anil Kumar Jaiswal S\/O Sri Kishori &#8230; vs The State And Ashoka Kumar &#8230; on 23 August, 2006 Equivalent citations: III (2007) BC 240 Author: B A Zaidi Bench: B A Zaidi JUDGMENT Barkat Ali Zaidi, J. 1. This is an application for relief under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 2. In this application [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-186842","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allahabad-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Anil Kumar Jaiswal S\/O Sri Kishori ... vs The State And Ashoka Kumar ... on 23 August, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Anil Kumar Jaiswal S\/O Sri Kishori ... vs The State And Ashoka Kumar ... on 23 August, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2006-08-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-02T22:31:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Anil Kumar Jaiswal S\\\/O Sri Kishori &#8230; vs The State And Ashoka Kumar &#8230; on 23 August, 2006\",\"datePublished\":\"2006-08-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-02T22:31:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006\"},\"wordCount\":752,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Allahabad High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006\",\"name\":\"Anil Kumar Jaiswal S\\\/O Sri Kishori ... vs The State And Ashoka Kumar ... on 23 August, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2006-08-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-02T22:31:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Anil Kumar Jaiswal S\\\/O Sri Kishori &#8230; vs The State And Ashoka Kumar &#8230; on 23 August, 2006\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Anil Kumar Jaiswal S\/O Sri Kishori ... vs The State And Ashoka Kumar ... on 23 August, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Anil Kumar Jaiswal S\/O Sri Kishori ... vs The State And Ashoka Kumar ... on 23 August, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2006-08-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-06-02T22:31:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Anil Kumar Jaiswal S\/O Sri Kishori &#8230; vs The State And Ashoka Kumar &#8230; on 23 August, 2006","datePublished":"2006-08-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-02T22:31:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006"},"wordCount":752,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Allahabad High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006","name":"Anil Kumar Jaiswal S\/O Sri Kishori ... vs The State And Ashoka Kumar ... on 23 August, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2006-08-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-02T22:31:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/anil-kumar-jaiswal-so-sri-kishori-vs-the-state-and-ashoka-kumar-on-23-august-2006#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Anil Kumar Jaiswal S\/O Sri Kishori &#8230; vs The State And Ashoka Kumar &#8230; on 23 August, 2006"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186842","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=186842"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186842\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=186842"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=186842"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=186842"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}