{"id":186929,"date":"2010-08-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010"},"modified":"2018-01-02T20:40:46","modified_gmt":"2018-01-02T15:10:46","slug":"the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"The Branch Manager United India … vs Sri Mahesh on 23 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Branch Manager United India … vs Sri Mahesh on 23 August, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Aravind Kumar<\/div>\n
.1.\n\nR 13% \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 @953'? Q? K$%&'.\u00a3\".\u00a3s.3A 4&1' \n\nnasrm rms 1% 33% 13.33: aw auaaaw 2\u00a7;_;;:e   ~\n\n\ufb01\ufb02t\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\n\nrm Earn: xmms\ufb02cm    \n\nam. xa.  T\ns\ufb01wgmar V -   '\n\nmgammca R\ufb01fih\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01    2\n33mm mam msmagxzsa 232$. gm\"  ..\n\u00a2EI?&a.n\"\u00a7mA$RE9. swig \u00ab ._ \u00ab  ;\n\nmg nygmazezsaz wsgaagg  :  -\nrmrran mam m'&*\u00a33\u00a5:a.HcEA.<.;*.--:%,_  \n9IVE3\u00a7.I.'5\u00a7\u00a7;L mmcg   _,   \n1=.B.\u00a7G\u00a723?,34;:-_1  .   _  * \n   V ._     '\nma Q'-3#I$LE\u00a7';X, 3%?\u00bb mcnrag  '_  \n\n          \n\n1?.&.E:$ze'\u00a32r3$:$\u00a7\u00a3..%_"'-\u00ab;;:._  ._ \n\ufb01\u00a3aV.&\u00a7&:;"\u00a7ERE;~. _  _  _ '..\ufb01P?ELI.&\u00a7T\n\n  " _ $'*:f_i<.\u00a73;"\u00e9;:'\u00a7z'1t;\u20ac._}1%:3:3?\u00a7s;c\u00a7.aa,,ma.r.;\n\n  ..... \n<\/pre>\n
 =;>;s:s $\u00a7E.4\u00a7i3I1PsZ\u00a5?\u00a3?P\u00e9;<\/p>\n
K “E G E.’3’\u20aci’EERf?’@\u00a7i’\n<\/p>\n
-._\u00a7gar;1:;a.K:\u00a3\u00a7i.a\u00a3m.*:R mw
\nQ\u00a7Q’I’\u00a7&\u00a7E\u00a7\u00b0R$A<\/p>\n
ii<\/p>\n
H ”    AA :  am\u00a7”\u00e9 V 3gm..2″:3g&*ma<\/p>\n
_ “$f$ S \u00a7VEER8\u00a7’I9\ufb01s
\n ‘\ufb01\u00e9saf\ufb01\ufb01 RfA?$ 1\u00a7&
\nE\ufb01\ufb01i\ufb01\ufb01 3EK’%?1CE
\n\ufb02\ufb01\u00bb 1% \ufb01\ufb01
\nQ\ufb01fl\ufb01ii\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01  R\u00a3$1’\ufb023.’3’3ER”‘I’S<\/p>\n
$3’ $361 m ‘I’ J\ufb01\ufb01fi\ufb01 E\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01a\ufb01, ABE?’ \u00a7’\u20ac\u00a5R RI
\n\u00a3533}? 22 – KQQCE \u00a7\ufb01?E\ufb013E;\u00a7} WETEE<\/p>\n
iii-sir<\/p>\n
.2.\n<\/p>\n
THIS mm mm: UIUJER 3Ec’1’Io1I 30(1) or wc’T’..5c.r<\/p>\n
maamsr 1:513 JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 2;3_1′;’~2’0Q6,
\nPASSED III we 110310102 02: THE FILE or ‘I\ufb02E’*’L!_\u00a3BQ’tIR_
\nomcnn Am) COMIHISSIOHER FOR
\ncoupnusxnox, cnrrnnmmen, Awnnmzsm
\nCGIIPEHSATSOE 0? RS.1,62,655}- wr111″mmp3ST”@’_’v12% EA. <\/p>\n
AHD <\/p>\n
THIS APPEAL comma on FOR   DAY,<\/p>\n
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWIEQ: ~ ”<\/p>\n
This appeal
\nin WC.No.21\u00a7)if’:v2C\u00a7;1″;\u00a3’_’V …;s;i1mem1der claim
\npetition    been allowed in
\npart   :2 \u00a7kv1,52,655;- has been
\nawmiad.’  dated 15.03.2003 has<\/p>\n
 adxn;::ec1F%%nhe’k  V Ii: View of the same, falbawirxg<\/p>\n
 ;  of law amuse’ for conmdera’ tion in<\/p>\n
 W1-1′  ether the Comma’ sinner has
\n_ overlooked tha material evidence on record<\/p>\n
V’  awarding com;nensat’n3n amount of<\/p>\n
Ra.1,62,655\/- ‘2<\/p>\n
2. Whether the Commissioner was right in
\nholding that tin has of earning; capacity at<\/p>\n
-3.\n<\/p>\n
  in the awarias sf mi}? ma\ufb01ieai rmmrcEs_7.._ *.__
\n35%? ‘ ” ”\n<\/p>\n
exmpi thsa wcun\u00e9 <\/p>\n
2. Facts kaa\u00e9gixg ‘\u00a36 \ufb01\ufb01ng    <\/p>\n
“Egg it A _ . _
\nCiakm pe\ufb01z\ufb01an wag   1% ‘
\nhcrmin kefarra Laban:  = far
\n‘worhaasrfs C:3m@i:; a1\ufb01\u00a7A’\u00a3’i;;  ‘4 in
\nW.C.\ufb01,\u00a7a.21G{.3\u00a7;.\u00a7Y%’  1   empleyad
\nas a  bus baarirzg
\n an 29.12.2001 at
\nabsent    wnrlcing an a<\/p>\n
skamr  $113. the \ufb01ua, az\ufb01 it was<\/p>\n
   ‘Think far \ufb01rm<\/p>\n
  ank\ufb01 ax ihat tima cit was<\/p>\n
 ‘  F\ufb01mm ‘mp af the baa afmr <\/p>\n
  ‘ iugg\ufb01  passesgers am am awmmt efjaerk muses\ufb01, N<\/p>\n
%   M awn frrcm bus and angered iz1}11r:ea’ ‘ on<\/p>\n
%  ggumnt sf wmh claim peactm wag ma.<\/p>\n
3. Qt: $  aszf mama, rmpesrzdarrta apwe\ufb01 am\u00e9
\n\ufb02ed {Emir 3tatm@n% sf abjswtirzns, Emphyw am<\/p>\n
mpkyae mk\ufb01am\ufb01\ufb01g wag alas \ufb01eniwds, Remgandant<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
.4.\n<\/p>\n
50.2 — Ezwiirsi’ aiw d\u00e9nicd the avarmnm <\/p>\n
?\ufb02:*’\u00a35;’\ufb01.:$2’1. Rmyon\ufb01mt Em}; in B\u00b0\u00a7.’i\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01Z’i of  <\/p>\n
mm’ aif \ufb01x’ ami\ufb01ga as; W1 and gat <\/p>\n
$13 an\ufb01 aim  d the <\/p>\n
9%’? Wm has: iasu\ufb01 .’\u00a3’%2:?;_ \ufb01\u00e9rg\ufb01\ufb02iigy  .<\/p>\n
Rmpxain\u00e9ent   csxw   the<\/p>\n
wlicry i\ufb01gue\ufb01 in mapc\u00a2\u00a7; \u00a7i\u00e9f   theA amidcnt.
\nG22 th\ufb01 \ufb01asia af    an r\ufb01rd.
\n   an\ufb01 he\ufb02
\nthat
\nand a\u00a7a;\u00a7a\u00a7  er Rs.1,6Q,\ufb0155:’~. It is
\nthis  ‘  \u00e9whiciz is quss\ufb01mzed. in \u00a317.23<\/p>\n
  …..\n<\/p>\n
     in ma apwi mm\ufb01rran\ufb01um by the<\/p>\n
4     af mdiua ‘hang abm was gnavu’ us<\/p>\n
  ethccr  am simk in zmtzurc ar\ufb01<\/p>\n
V’    ‘\u00a31 \u00e9isah\ufb01ity’ at 50% as assmaa\u00e9 by Baum: ?m<\/p>\n
 it is  tmg\u00a2d that an bmia cf said<\/p>\n
V ” E923 ease, Cammm’ ai\u00a7r3m* err\ufb01 in afzammg’ m G\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01l\ufb02\ufb01i\ufb02\ufb02<\/p>\n
tlzmt diwa\ufb01iity is at ‘\u00a7G% mx\ufb01 ta am 352$ mtent ear7nn1g
\ngmpazz\u00e9ty af the \u00a2 t ig ra\ufb01umdg <\/p>\n
.5,<\/p>\n
5. There is rm re\ufb01enta\ufb01sn on <\/p>\n
rmpen\u00e9arz\ufb01 3.133% Eiav\ufb01g Iauazmzsaai @*mun\u00a7s_ <\/p>\n
agwai and aim % \ufb01camzzxi’ xg the 5vi&j\u00ab;e:f:e \u00a7~\u00bb  > <\/p>\n
by \ufb01w mf\u00e9ea, s\u00bb1;%ta:z\ufb01a1 <\/p>\n
hash: abmre am bdm aI’i$Wfi”‘$_i’3. as\/fr\u00a7\u00a7fa~W$    .  3<\/p>\n
5s 6      5*”\n<\/p>\n
\ufb01f\ufb01i\ufb02\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01ifi\ufb01  _Wi\u00a7:;v  Court 53
\ncf mmi\u00e9\ufb01ad  am wauid
\novaez’ Lap    ‘\u00a3:agetI1er for
\noormia:$e\u00a7’\u00a7\ufb01,\u00a7 :3;:   Emrein who was
\n  my warzmnk<\/p>\n
C\ufb01mgmt\u00e9giia\u00e9\ufb01 V-3? ;a;%\ufb01”‘:;s3\u00a3*:t;&:5n\u00e9e;:1 that he was wctrlmg as a<\/p>\n
     behrz\ufb01 f\ufb02 Impan\u00e9em N92.<\/p>\n
 cf empiaym anti ampkayae has Ewan<\/p>\n
 _  .355-#5pA\ufb01I}.::i% ;’\u00a5::n.Q – ixmmar by  statement<\/p>\n
 \u00e9\ufb01bjac\ufb01\u00e9rm, it is awn tbs; rmponde\ufb01: Em} has mt<\/p>\n
 T a’ wimew ‘sax and has met tan\u00e9w\ufb01 any <\/p>\n
T  1:295 a::’m:az.\u00a7\u00a5,ig:\u00a3a its claim ma\ufb01a 52:: time staizemmat of<\/p>\n
V U abjaec\ufb01srm. \ufb01n the mtkmr im\ufb01 gmpicy\ufb01xm 3;” rmpaxaxiant<\/p>\n
— T=::[- timt await {#5 raxpen\ufb01mt hamitx} was<\/p>\n
\ufb01x<\/p>\n
..\u00a7..\n<\/p>\n
the inarrx\ufb01zzcmr esf {ha bus iiimixm :73′; aaeidezm. A
\ncaf rewrds ‘s&., EX.?1  EXP? <\/p>\n
re\ufb01wt that aw\ufb01ent in cgumtfmm had \ufb01c;<j"_;e;u  <\/p>\n
$122381 at a&z-it $.15 pm,   ' <\/p>\n
hwy: \u00e9erxia\ufb01 by rwpxmdmzt   <\/p>\n
atatint sf cbjaamsns  vie\ufb01spsf  af "<\/p>\n
wrsi\u00e9cz\ufb01s cf gxmi azga  the
\nmmg\u00e9amd vim    f_\u00bb\u00ab.:1f7?e;3\u00bb;at:ia:::15I'1ip {sf
\nnemphsyer ma:  H03 and
\n " "\n<\/p>\n
“‘3’.  “‘::m.:a:zsei far appa\ufb01arzt that<\/p>\n
azaaggazgg a:\u00e9’4″2.\u00a7Vs\u00a2ss:\u00e9e\ufb01’*.b\u00a7”..ttze swag: at 59% cannst be<\/p>\n
 V.  ha’ mt; the \u00e9mter whn had treated.<\/p>\n
 ‘V x   <\/p>\n
\u00a7% ym\u00e9uce\u00e9 tim SP1?) slip<\/p>\n
  % mum ‘E:-3:’  assaermams Grarzera}; agagatax, Hm.’ ‘rut,<\/p>\n
   man mm as mm and aim amhaiw<\/p>\n
  pxodueezi 33$ mmk& as Ex.A8, anti tha<\/p>\n
  ” W\u00a7ZL\ufb02I1d amer\ufb01fmahe at EXAB. \ufb01m cmurz\ufb01 carti.fia::a’:2e \u00e9ated<\/p>\n
% ‘ 29.a:2’.2@<::r2 g mm by gm Ef\ufb01trici i*Ir;:spimL<\/p>\n
Ek\ufb01ua\ufb01urga\u00e9 it Era ssm\ufb01\ufb01 t1'mr%un that amp: injury 'Nn.1<\/p>\n
@\/<\/p>\n
.7-\n<\/p>\n
namasly ths \ufb01castzzm \ufb01f radius berm ali Gih\ufb01” mama are<\/p>\n
s\u00e9mpk in namre. The srighmi G? EXP? has <\/p>\n
p’\u00a3’&(\u00a7\u00a5,.1%\u00a7; \ufb01\ufb01faf\ufb01 12\u00a2. an-:…?\u00e9<\/p>\n
mar. ‘I’h\u00a2 093 szii1z;%’_:'”9′?i\ufb01_t”;g1?\u00a7__j’.i$ <\/p>\n
marka\u00e9 33 E391} saxmt &  .4 ‘* <\/p>\n
tha raasmn iimt Basia: win 2135 <\/p>\n
e
\n 3′ 35’ ‘I  <\/p>\n
in hia zzzzgmw<\/p>\n
th\ufb01 has ‘max:\n<\/p>\n
8. Hszaswasmr, an  my the
\nwamzd   mug reflect<\/p>\n
that t%z_.\u00e91″‘\u00e9 is  radius. in atrium’ to
\nsubata\ufb01\u00e9ggie \ufb01r’  \ufb01’az:t:.\u00a7ra 7% mt united first<\/p>\n
r*$\u00a7\ufb01?’\u00a7Eh.:   3}1:a\u00a3   .\u00bb.-.-%. tim mcmr who<\/p>\n
   \ufb01sspitai, chirxaduzm, but<\/p>\n
 namiy Qrg\ufb01f\ufb01va\ufb02 Raddy whs<\/p>\n
A   m\u00e9\u00e9gam\u00e9 f:1e;g\u00a2z:;m’ni1e;2,g,\u00ab mar” mm ta mrzteml and czlaim<\/p>\n
 \u00e9iaa.hih’.t\u00a7 tn the first<\/p>\n
x   Q12 amtxsicieratian am pmsal of me<\/p>\n
 sf \u00a7rs  Ra\u00e9dg it is seen that said<\/p>\n
 \u00e9  \ufb02acwr Em aamzm gm: mm: and P?’ as: rammed.<\/p>\n
H3 aka a\u00e9mim timi: he has met ‘\u00ab-.=a:– the X-ra}=s<\/p>\n
faint: a\ufb01\ufb01 “pig  ai;&tz\u00e9:  –. V L’<\/p>\n
W,<\/p>\n
.3.\n<\/p>\n
takm an {ha 6.332% Qf am\ufb01ent in 3% at a <\/p>\n
as m wizat wag the namw cf irsjuxy  <\/p>\n
exam: mi am am $3′ awi\ufb01mt mg: what   p\u00e9ewam: * x <\/p>\n
atams gm” msaiy 43.2.: $3 wlrwzhser \ufb01ne ‘\ufb01agfg\ufb01e  <\/p>\n
umted’ $1′ mt. Thcugh   <\/p>\n
gm ar\u00e9e:-ad m be  as ax.x?:::%gc\u00a7m gig’), tfm
\nma X-my hm mt  gay mm the:\n<\/p>\n
Cammtiaaisnerv   TIE:\n<\/p>\n
Dwtor aim.    is a simple\n it wmz\ufb01 get\n<\/pre>\n
mm  \u00a3vw}w. It is $1339 adzmzittcscl<\/p>\n
by the %c:%a$* th\u00a7.\u00a3__\u00a7i$\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7ty that Ema \ufb01zz. asamsa\ufb01 by<\/p>\n
 –  tn  limb mg 2192: \ufb01r: am Wiwia ha\ufb01y.<\/p>\n
  eszidasam &*9a\u00a7\u00a3a}<31$ on ram-rd, this<\/p>\n
  :3: gave may in  <\/p>\n
$:) %3J';\u00a7i 12$ i\u00a2;if__*;5%m mmide\ufb01 121% that Camissinoxxer<\/p>\n
; at the dfmab\ufb01itg; waif<\/p>\n
A  rmpm\ufb01exzt by 353-ws\ufb01xg it at 4391?; Exam:<\/p>\n
V'  \u00a31513 e\ufb01de\ufb01w at' Easter 'Chg whaia body<\/p>\n
 \u00bb  dimahiiity cmmt smwazd 3.5%; in ze\u00e9w af\ufb01m same an\u00e9<\/p>\n
aka fa\ufb01ng irate mm\u00e9s\ufb01ara\ufb01nn \ufb01rm dizsab\ufb01itg wr\u00e9iifiseata
\nimauad by  Re\u00e9\ufb01y which is 3.1: Ex.?3 this<\/p>\n
$2<\/p>\n
.9.\n<\/p>\n
Cam is at” am cmmi\ufb01era\ufb01 vim that aaammgzgt-gs’<\/p>\n
dkab\ufb01ity” by rim \ufb01nmmkaismaar is an tzhe   %<\/p>\n
ragukw ta ha msdi\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01.\n<\/p>\n
\u00a7\u00a7 ‘\ufb01zezzgh \ufb01mter has  <\/p>\n
a@ gamma’ s\ufb01mm ham”ng %3g5::g\u00a3\u00a7%e\ufb01i   at ‘V V<\/p>\n
4% ma raaaaz\ufb01s am  t\u00e9   an
\nwhimh \u00e9imbiiitjg ?m    as pm’ \ufb02ue
\nAmrxac   bady wctxld
\nbe 113m mag   am and
\n mm be amaasaci in
\nrag: 19335 \ufb01mxz austairxed by t…&
\nc2aim:za;w\u00a7iacz    arm 15%. amrdsngly the.<\/p>\n
  aawar\u00e9w by the iliammss’ ianer 1&3!”<\/p>\n
 rmguir\ufb01 :9 ha res-corwuiawk<\/p>\n
‘ _ as\u00a7\u00e911a=w%s7\u00a7 <\/p>\n
3;\u00a72\u20ac3iX2L;\u00a3?\u00a7.’\u00e9{ 15 ‘- 6\u00a7,\u00a7*95[–
\nl\ufb01\ufb01<\/p>\n
3%. A$%f’  , 1%: wmpazmtien as awar\u00e9eci by<\/p>\n
fag<\/p>\n
V A. the Sammimianeri at R\u00a7$.\u00a762,655f– is r\ufb01tmed tr:<\/p>\n
Rsm,9\u00a7\u00a7;-t <\/p>\n
.1g,
\nE1. Ensafar as the award sf Miami in zzaruaaesrrzad it<\/p>\n
is wet: ihaiz Go -sigsrmr has awarded EV<\/p>\n
— –= ‘–  awar\ufb01 cf irzmrmi
\nthe E-iaxafbk Supzrme Emir: in
\nLat. :33. \u00a7  Rad:\n<\/p>\n
ems Am saw .s*z’.z*.r    %V V
\nizztamt Em award\ufb01.    <\/p>\n
\n:2. in mew (sf   above,<\/p>\n
 Qf\ufb01\ufb01f   –.    ..\n<\/p>\n
‘IEEJR<\/p>\n
\u00bb…..\u00a2.-….,.\n<\/p>\n
(53 \ufb01p\ufb01iux >  Suktantial gum\ufb02cans sf<\/p>\n
   fasamzr vi’ ayg\ufb01ant’<\/p>\n
  k awaf\ufb01 dam 32.: 3.29% passed by<\/p>\n
‘A  Wlgtriezmnfs  at\u00a3am Cammlsimnar in<\/p>\n
 zwmaw is maism by realmring ma<\/p>\n
” ,   m Ra\u00e9\ufb02-\u00a7%5f -.\n<\/p>\n
V.  It is QI”\u20ac1&”‘@\u00a31 that \ufb01at rmpoxzdarit Wmzld be<\/p>\n
mm\ufb01e\u00e9 tn izztmmt at ‘aim rate af ‘?,S% pa. fmm
\nth\ufb01 \ufb01aiza of eiaim ggtiticen :53: $8.13 :32’ aavax\ufb01 am! at
\nticze ram af 12% pan frsm {Em date af award. till<\/p>\n
W.\n<\/p>\n
.11..\n<\/p>\n
\u00e9atsz $5 \u00e9amsiizg gaymmizi Whz\u00e9\u00e9kmm is: ear\ufb01a. <\/p>\n
ar\u00e9er as ‘$26 mam,<\/p>\n
gal;\n<\/p>\n
X\u00a7*!\ufb01\u00a7<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Branch Manager United India … vs Sri Mahesh on 23 August, 2010 Author: Aravind Kumar .1. R 13% \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 @953′? Q? K$%&’.\u00a3”.\u00a3s.3A 4&1′ nasrm rms 1% 33% 13.33: aw auaaaw 2\u00a7;_;;:e ~ \ufb01\ufb02t\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 rm Earn: xmms\ufb02cm am. xa. T s\ufb01wgmar V – ‘ mgammca R\ufb01fih\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 2 33mm mam msmagxzsa 232$. gm” […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-186929","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Branch Manager United India ... vs Sri Mahesh on 23 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Branch Manager United India ... vs Sri Mahesh on 23 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-02T15:10:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Branch Manager United India … vs Sri Mahesh on 23 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-02T15:10:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1410,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010\",\"name\":\"The Branch Manager United India ... vs Sri Mahesh on 23 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-02T15:10:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Branch Manager United India … vs Sri Mahesh on 23 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Branch Manager United India ... vs Sri Mahesh on 23 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Branch Manager United India ... vs Sri Mahesh on 23 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-02T15:10:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Branch Manager United India … vs Sri Mahesh on 23 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-02T15:10:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010"},"wordCount":1410,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010","name":"The Branch Manager United India ... vs Sri Mahesh on 23 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-02T15:10:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-united-india-vs-sri-mahesh-on-23-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Branch Manager United India … vs Sri Mahesh on 23 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186929","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=186929"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186929\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=186929"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=186929"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=186929"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}