{"id":187000,"date":"2008-06-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008"},"modified":"2015-08-13T10:20:36","modified_gmt":"2015-08-13T04:50:36","slug":"maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Maruthi Manjunath Nilekani vs Surhir Madev Naik on 3 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Maruthi Manjunath Nilekani vs Surhir Madev Naik on 3 June, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Anand Byrareddy<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>man uvum vr RAKNAIHRA mu:-1 puuul U!&#8217; Ixnummnlun mun Luulu Ur KAKNAIAKA I-ms:-1 COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH 1<\/p>\n<p>124 THE HIGH ceum er mnam-ram 3%&#8217;? nnn;\u00a21a_. i;.r; 3x<\/p>\n<p>nmsn &#8216;n:-ns &#8216;ms 323 my cm auu\u00a75&#8243;~-2&#8217;ac\u00a7\u00a7_&#8217;;'&#8221;&#8216;.;&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>THE &#8216;E-iON&#8221;B\u00a3aE 2\u00ab11:.Jus&#8217;:&#8217;:\u00a7:;cz \u00a7u-iasx\ufb02ir; <\/p>\n<p>M.F.B.Nq514933{2Qh7(H\ufb01! &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>BETYEEN:\n<\/p>\n<p>!-iaruti Manj unat&#8217;h-&#8230;_\u00a7i1i1ei;a:;_i.L&#8221; &#8221;  &gt; &#8216;<br \/>\n3&#8217;! years, Mwcata      &#8211;.\n<\/p>\n<p>Rf\u00ab::.N:i.1.ekani, Si;&#8217;:gi_&#8217;ra1uk_. &#8216; * &#8221; .. .m=rx:.z.m&#8217;r<\/p>\n<p>(By Sri. shripad  \u00a7h;a,et\u00a3*i, i<br \/>\nma: _ .. _ ._  .,<\/p>\n<p>3.. Sadhir Hadaa\ufb02 &#8216;  ;;  _,<br \/>\nC::&#8221;\u00a2.r-:.r:.acaik cczmplaxw &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Devikere, 31:317. \u00ab.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.&#8217;rha N-aw India Ass&#8221;ur.&#8217;.&#8221;mcVa&#8217; _ ._<br \/>\nCompany {;imitge\u00a2i,L..Brant:hV_ \u00a2.f.fi::e<br \/>\nshrauqw &#8220;P..F:a3ari &#8220;5u:i.__m:L_ng,  .<br \/>\nChuz&#8217;ch_ Read,&#8221; mm:\n<\/p>\n<p>By its &#8216;:~g1a:m:gar    <\/p>\n<p>\u00e9f.&#8217; vagsnindra. m.s2&#8242;:%sg:;x<br \/>\nGaz_&#8217;\u00a7&#8217;g&#8217;-:1. !i&#8217;ark,*-.;,_1nnemat\u00a7s Galli<\/p>\n<p>Siirai. &#8216;iittara &#8216;Ramada. . .RE3PCNnENTS<\/p>\n<p>  Rae, Advacata for F.&#8211;2<br \/>\n&#8216;&#8221;=.F&amp;*:j1&#8217;&#8212;-.and &#8220;Ra-&#8216;3__I&#8217;j{:}tiOB dispensed with?<\/p>\n<p>-o~o&#8211;a~o-\n<\/p>\n<p>4.  appaal is filed under sactian 1?3(1:a at<br \/>\nHand: Vehiclas Act: against: the judgment and avar\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>dat\ufb01d 7.9.2007 passad in u.v.c.a:a.a9xes on tho<\/p>\n<p>%<\/p>\n<p>filc at Number, Additional mew, s3.z,sui&#8217;r&#8217;,_ gg:a:t1y<br \/>\nallcwing the claim petitien for c\ufb01mgg\ufb01a\u00e9tig\ufb01 and<br \/>\nsaaking anhancamnnt of compansation,f7 2 H&#8217; l<\/p>\n<p>This appeal coming e\u00a7mf\u00a7r.\u00a7inal\u00bb\u00a7aar\u00a7\ufb01g_\u00a3hi\u00a7_ll<\/p>\n<p>day, tbs Caurt passed thal\u00a3oil&amp;wing\u00a2$__ _&#8221;<br \/>\nJu\ufb01tsmamh &#8216;<br \/>\naward the l\ufb01\ufb01rn\ufb01d g\u00e9uns\u00e9l tor the appellant<\/p>\n<p>and the learned gqqhsal fr: thgfr\u00e9spandents.<\/p>\n<p>2r&#8221;r,f\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7;\u00a2a\u00a7a Va\u00a3Vfth5V_a\u00a7pa1lant is that he<br \/>\nwag ri\ufb01i\ufb01\u00e9iallli\u00a7n]\u00a7h\u00bb\u00a7mmhtor cycle and the sans<\/p>\n<p>ha\ufb01 mat \ufb01lth in a\u00e9\u00e9iaaht resulting in Iractura at<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;nun Luun: ur RAKNAIAISH rm.-.vr: pupa: Ur I\\nxNAtAI\\A HIUI1 CUUKI of KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH I<\/p>\n<p>his lef\u00a3&#8217;=\u00a7high;\u00ab %\ufb01i\u00a7h3l\u00a7rded in hospitalization<\/p>\n<p>V and _\u00a7reatm\u00e9nt,D\u00a7\ufb01dl having laid a claim for<\/p>\n<p>r_V\u00e9am\u00a7En$$\u00a7i\u00a7h&lt;_baIorr the Motar Accidents Claims<\/p>\n<p>Erihu\ufb01glra\ufb01nrjfrihunal has awarda\ufb01 a total sum or<\/p>\n<p>x &#039;V Rs.i,#0,GG$fA under various heads. It is this,<\/p>\n<p>l&quot;*v_\u00a7hich is \u00e9aught to ba ahallenged.<\/p>\n<p>V&quot;3} The counsel for the appellant wuuld<\/p>\n<p>l arca\ufb01tan\ufb01 that the Tribunal has awarded a total sum<\/p>\n<p>A&quot;&quot;&quot;af R3.33,000!- under the head of meaical<\/p>\n<p>expensas, incidental charges like convuyance,<\/p>\n<p>%<\/p>\n<p>:93 count&#039;: or KARNATAKA HIGH cgugr or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH couxr or KARNATAKA HIGH :2<\/p>\n<p>fig gamma: ef R3.\u00a7,\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3&#8211; qxantea is an t\u00e9a lever<br \/>\nEi\ufb01\ufb01w Farzh\ufb01r, in 3% far a3 t%% ;m33&quot;@f2futurs<\/p>\n<p>i\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 \u00a33 \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01f\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01, tag T:ib;nai.&quot;%a3_&quot;@r\u00a2\u00a7ee\u00a73\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01g ada;t tha nciianal \ufb01igabiiity&quot;\u00e9\u20ac\u00bb?n5% whe:\u00e9a3 <\/p>\n<p>t%a a:$\u00e99$maa: 3? s ma\u00e9i\u00e9al:g3\u00a7\u00a3t$:i\ufb01\ufb01sf\u00a7\u00a5a\u00a7?tka: A&quot;<\/p>\n<p>t;ara wag 23% \ufb01ias\ufb01i\u00e9irya ?%$ra\u00a7az\u00a7; it i$3wh\u00a2;ry<\/p>\n<p>unfair ea t\ufb01a gart \u00a3f  ihg  ?ri\u00a7aa$i 3&amp;6 tha<\/p>\n<p>?\u00a7i\u00a7g5\u00a7i \ufb01a\ufb02\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7=$%\u00a76\u00a7ia$$S% i\u00a7E,\ufb01\u00a7iBi\ufb02\ufb01 a3 ta the<\/p>\n<p>%xt%mt af \ufb01iE\u00a7hi\u00a7if?Vi\u00a7:th%\ufb01\u00a71\u00a7\u20ac$ af the maaisal<\/p>\n<p>grgatit\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9rf\ufb01 :\u00e9\u00a7inian&quot;&#039;$a\u00a7*-Rana\u00e9, tha award af<\/p>\n<p>3. \ufb01n\u00a3\u00e9E3xt\u00a7ap Essa af Emtara lass af<\/p>\n<p>. 2\u00a7\u00a2aQ\ufb01: sf i\u00a7\u00e9 disability sught ta ha<\/p>\n<p>*\u00a7h\u00e9*@\u00e95;5 $h@t t\ufb01a diaahility wag 20%<\/p>\n<p>53 ms? ?;\u00a7%;\n<\/p>\n<p>  ;; _ Far cmgtra, tha \ufb01\ufb02\ufb02\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01l, far the<\/p>\n<p>V.gr&amp;3\u00a7m3g&amp;\u00a7:\u00a5w\u00a2ul\u00e9 mgpeaa tha \ufb01\ufb02\ufb01t\ufb01\ufb01ti\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 and wmul\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>A,;aia? \ufb01g: that tag Tribunai has graceadad an the<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01\u00e9s\u00e9\u00e9 af tha matariai ihat wag ma\ufb01a availabla sn\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>,_ i\ufb01a $\u00a7\u00a7%ii\u00a7\ufb01t is \u00a7\u00e9Qki\u00a7\u00a7 snhamsamsnt mf<\/p>\n<p>cagg\u00e9z\ufb01stian withsmt any iaum\ufb01atian being lai\ufb01 in<\/p>\n<p>3ug\u00a7w~$ mi the same. 33 as far as the<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p>5$\ufb01t%3ti\u00a7: \ufb01aat aha lass af fature insame ought<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>IGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH CQ&#8217;U3T OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA I-HG?-I COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C<\/p>\n<p>%$\ufb01%li$ht :3 hald \u00e9\ufb01tiil\u00e9\ufb01 ta R3.1Q,\ufb01a\ufb01f~<br \/>\ntharama. E3 3% far 53 tk\ufb01 iaas mi in\u00a2\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9e&amp;uring<\/p>\n<p>aga \u00a7%fi\u00a7@&#8211;Gf \ufb01f\ufb01ata\ufb01\ufb01t is sancez\ufb01a\ufb01} a\ufb01e\ufb01t\ufb01\u00e9agh.<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01h\ufb01 ?3ihuna1 hag pre5ume\u00a7,:\u00a7g n$%i\u00a7n\u00e9l figuzg bf&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>E$.\u00e9P$\ufb01$E~ gag&#8217; manih, Ehaf gang _au\u00a7ht&#8217;ft\u00a2&#8217;?mav\u00a7z&gt;&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>xggn gzanzaa at Raga: \ufb01gs f\ufb01mf mani\u00a73;,M$ihcay,it<br \/>\n\ufb01g :%$\ufb01:i\u00a3\u20ace\u00a3 ta twa Om\u00a7nt&amp;a,'&#8221;:h\u00a7&#8217; agpallant i3<br \/>\nEai\ufb01 %2tit;e\u00a7 V\ufb01\u00e9f a\u00a7\ufb01i\u00a7i\u00a7n\u00a7iOv$am Qf R3.$,G\ufb016f~<\/p>\n<p>a\ufb01\ufb01er the&#8217; \u00a7%a\ufb01AW\u00a7f._;\u00a73$ &#8216;%fV%i3t9me during the<\/p>\n<p>g\u00e9xia\u00e9 sf \ufb01iraa\u00e9maht; &#8220;AOz%*-$\u00a7 far as 1355 af<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8221;v:=.;me&#8217; ;=:wa.:*d mi R.s.5,:m;-<\/p>\n<p>s&#8217;:y:*:E% i%\u00a7\u00a2zV.\u00a3i\u00a7a O\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01. tha aggeiiant is hal\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7n\ufb01iti\u00a7\ufb01V.t@O1f\ufb01:\u00a7Ee:. sum. sf Rs.1G,\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01f~ tawards<\/p>\n<p>L333 O\u00e9f &#8220;%m$\ufb01i%i%3} is am far as the claim<\/p>\n<p>vfi\ufb02ggx\ufb01g 3$\u00a73 mi future incame is csacarned, there<\/p>\n<p>i?\u00bb &#8216;giag\ufb01\ufb01 ma\ufb01a am: far am\ufb01anaemant. in 5a fa:<\/p>\n<p>7;\u00a7 f\ufb01Eu:\u00a7Vmadica; axyaagas ar\ufb01 mangerned, it ia<br \/>\n4\u00a7$\ufb01p;i&#8221;\u00a7i3\u00a7ute that i@\u00a7l\u00a7\ufb01$\ufb01 are gut aha tha same<br \/>\nA:,:%g$i\u00a7&amp;5 ta be ram\ufb01va\ufb01, ?\u00a7% ?ribunal nag not<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u00a7\ufb01\ufb013i\ufb01%f&amp;\ufb01 t\ufb01g aai\ufb01 haa\ufb01, w%i$% is unfair. $3 a<\/p>\n<p>\u20ac\u00a7\ufb01$%fW\u00a7ii\u00a5\u00e9 aa\ufb01a\ufb01aman\u00e9. Qf auah future medics;<\/p>\n<p>&amp;\ufb01\u00a7@E\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7 R5s:\u00a7,\u00a7%&amp;K~ $\u00a7\u00a7 h\u00e9 safely taken as<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>IGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COOURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C<\/p>\n<p>%3&#8243;;&#8221;2:&#8217;;:l\ufb01;;.E.\u00bb-3=\u00a7  23% gems,<\/p>\n<p>awn<\/p>\n<p> agagzaiiant ii: grgtitiazi [ta&#8221;&#8216;:ac::5,it1;.:;ia.&#8217;;._&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;<\/p>\n<p> sf I*?:&#8217;$.\u00a73,i.?-\u00a53f\u00a72&#8242;- with izstesest 5%<\/p>\n<p>:.?&lt;:;::  mtg &lt;32&#039; awarz\ufb01g<\/p>\n<p>*a&#039;3.fbg&#039;-\u00bb.\n<\/p>\n<p> z2zza::\u00a7.i\u00a733; Qxgarg\ufb01sas. &#8216;z&#8217;E&#8221;::.-ya agspallan\u00e9: is ham.&#8211;.__<\/p>\n<p> ;%:::\u00a2r\u00a7i:*;\u00a7l=g, ma gyms; is _aa.vJ._Vi_\u00e9&#8217;:3:.\u00a3_~a;i*.i:.A_.Of4<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Maruthi Manjunath Nilekani vs Surhir Madev Naik on 3 June, 2008 Author: Anand Byrareddy man uvum vr RAKNAIHRA mu:-1 puuul U!&#8217; Ixnummnlun mun Luulu Ur KAKNAIAKA I-ms:-1 COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH 1 124 THE HIGH ceum er mnam-ram 3%&#8217;? nnn;\u00a21a_. i;.r; 3x nmsn &#8216;n:-ns &#8216;ms 323 my cm [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-187000","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Maruthi Manjunath Nilekani vs Surhir Madev Naik on 3 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Maruthi Manjunath Nilekani vs Surhir Madev Naik on 3 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-13T04:50:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Maruthi Manjunath Nilekani vs Surhir Madev Naik on 3 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-13T04:50:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1039,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Maruthi Manjunath Nilekani vs Surhir Madev Naik on 3 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-13T04:50:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Maruthi Manjunath Nilekani vs Surhir Madev Naik on 3 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Maruthi Manjunath Nilekani vs Surhir Madev Naik on 3 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Maruthi Manjunath Nilekani vs Surhir Madev Naik on 3 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-13T04:50:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Maruthi Manjunath Nilekani vs Surhir Madev Naik on 3 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-13T04:50:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008"},"wordCount":1039,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008","name":"Maruthi Manjunath Nilekani vs Surhir Madev Naik on 3 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-13T04:50:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/maruthi-manjunath-nilekani-vs-surhir-madev-naik-on-3-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Maruthi Manjunath Nilekani vs Surhir Madev Naik on 3 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187000","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=187000"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187000\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=187000"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=187000"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=187000"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}