{"id":187270,"date":"2010-11-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010"},"modified":"2018-07-07T18:15:21","modified_gmt":"2018-07-07T12:45:21","slug":"t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"T.K.Balan vs A.Padmanabhan on 16 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">T.K.Balan vs A.Padmanabhan on 16 November, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 2826 of 2004(C)\n\n\n1. T.K.BALAN, S\/O.APPU,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. A.PADMANABHAN, S\/O.KARUNAKARAN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. STATE OF KERALA,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.SUNNY MATHEW\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI\n\n Dated :16\/11\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                           P.Q.BARKATH ALI, J.\n                       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                           Crl.R.P.No.2826 OF 2004\n                   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                  Dated this the 16th day of November, 2010\n\n                                     ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>       Revision petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.285\/1999 on the file<\/p>\n<p>of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court V, Kozhikode and appellant in<\/p>\n<p>Crl.Appeal No.689\/2001 of Sessions Court, Kozhikode.                      He was<\/p>\n<p>convicted under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and was<\/p>\n<p>sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three months by the<\/p>\n<p>learned Magistrate by judgment dated November 29, 2001. On appeal,<\/p>\n<p>by judgment dated September 13, 2004, the lower appellate court<\/p>\n<p>confirmed his conviction, but modified the sentence to simple<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment for one month and to pay a compensation of Rs. 25,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>to the complainant, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a<\/p>\n<p>further period of one month. The accused has now come up in revision<\/p>\n<p>challenging his conviction and sentence.\n<\/p>\n<p>       2.   The case of the revision first respondent\/complainant as<\/p>\n<p>testified by him as PW1 before the trial court and as detailed in the<\/p>\n<p>complaint was that accused borrowed Rs. 25,000\/- from him on<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.R.P.No.2826\/2004              2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>October 15, 1999 and to discharge that liability, he issued the cheque<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P1 dated November 21, 1998 which when presented for collection<\/p>\n<p>was returned dishounoured for want of sufficiency of funds in the<\/p>\n<p>account of the accused in the bank and that in spite of notice Ext.P3,<\/p>\n<p>the accused did not repay the amount which is an offence punishable<\/p>\n<p>under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.<\/p>\n<p>      3.     On receipt of the complaint, the learned Magistrate<\/p>\n<p>recorded the sworn statement of the complainant and took cognizance<\/p>\n<p>of the offence. The accused on appearance before the trial court<\/p>\n<p>pleaded not guilty to a charge under Section 138 of Negotiable<\/p>\n<p>Instruments Act. PW 1 was examined and Exts.P1 to P6 were marked<\/p>\n<p>on the side of the complainant. When questioned under Section 313 of<\/p>\n<p>Cr.P.C., the accused denied the entire transaction. Accused himself<\/p>\n<p>was examined as DW1 before the trial court.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.     The learned Magistrate on an appreciation of evidence<\/p>\n<p>found the revision petitioner guilty of the offence punishable under<\/p>\n<p>Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, convicted him thereunder<\/p>\n<p>and sentenced him as aforesaid. On appeal, the lower appellate court<\/p>\n<p>confirmed his conviction, but modified the sentence as mentioned<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.R.P.No.2826\/2004                 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>above. The accused has now come up in revision challenging his<\/p>\n<p>conviction and sentence.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5.     Heard the counsel for the revision petitioner\/accused and<\/p>\n<p>the counsel for the revision first respondent\/complainant.<\/p>\n<p>      6.     The following points arise for consideration :<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                 1)   Whether the conviction of the revision<br \/>\n           petitioner  under    Section   138     of   Negotiable<br \/>\n           Instruments Act rendered by the trial court which is<br \/>\n           confirmed in appeal can be sustained ?\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<pre>                 2)   Whether     the   sentence     imposed    is\n           excessive or unduly harsh ?\n\n      Point No.1\n\n<\/pre>\n<blockquote><p>      7.     Complainant as PW1 testified in a convincing manner<\/p>\n<p>before the trial court regarding the transaction. Nothing was brought<\/p>\n<p>out during his cross examination to disbelieve his evidence. Further his<\/p>\n<p>evidence is supported by Exts.P1 to P6.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>      8.     The specific case of the accused as testified by him as DW1<\/p>\n<p>before the trial court was that it is true that he has borrowed<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 25,000\/- from the complainant and issued Ext.P1, but he has<\/p>\n<p>already paid some amount in discharge of that liability and only<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 9,700\/- is due to the complainant from him. But no document is<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.R.P.No.2826\/2004                  4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>produced to prove his plea of partial discharge. Therefore, in my view,<\/p>\n<p>both the courts below are justified in rejecting the above case of the<\/p>\n<p>accused. Further, as the execution of Ext.P1 cheque was admitted by<\/p>\n<p>the accused, presumption as envisaged under Section 118 and 139 of<\/p>\n<p>Negotiable Instruments Act is available to the complainant. No reliable<\/p>\n<p>evidence was adduced by the accused to rebut the above presumption.<\/p>\n<p>      9.     For all these reasons, I am of the view that the trial court as<\/p>\n<p>well as the lower appellate court are perfectly justified in accepting the<\/p>\n<p>evidence of PW1 and finding that the accused has committed the<\/p>\n<p>offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore I confirm the conviction of the revision petitioner under<\/p>\n<p>Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Point No.2<\/p>\n<p>      10.    As regards the sentence, it is admitted that in respect of the<\/p>\n<p>same transaction, a suit was filed by the complainant and the same was<\/p>\n<p>settled on condition that the accused will pay the amount due to the<\/p>\n<p>complainant in this case. Therefore, a lenient view is taken and I feel<\/p>\n<p>that a sentence of imprisonment till the rising of court and a<\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs. 25,000\/- with default sentence would meet the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.R.P.No.2826\/2004                  5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>ends of justice.\n<\/p>\n<p>       In the result, revision petition is allowed in part. The conviction<\/p>\n<p>of the revision petitioner under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments<\/p>\n<p>Act is confirmed. The sentence is modified to the effect that revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is sentenced to undergo imprisonment till the rising of court<\/p>\n<p>and to pay a compensation of Rs. 25,000\/- to the complainant, in<\/p>\n<p>default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month. The amount,<\/p>\n<p>if any, deposited by the revision petitioner before the trial court shall be<\/p>\n<p>adjusted towards the compensation amount ordered to be paid. The<\/p>\n<p>complainant is permitted to withdraw that amount. Two month&#8217;s time is<\/p>\n<p>granted for payment of the balance amount of compensation. The<\/p>\n<p>revision petitioner is permitted to pay the balance amount of<\/p>\n<p>compensation direct to the complainant and produce memo before the<\/p>\n<p>trial court. The revision petitioner shall surrender before the trial court<\/p>\n<p>on or before 20\/12\/2010 to receive the sentence. His bail bonds are<\/p>\n<p>cancelled.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                   P.Q.BARKATH ALI<br \/>\n                                                            JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>sv.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.R.P.No.2826\/2004    6<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court T.K.Balan vs A.Padmanabhan on 16 November, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2826 of 2004(C) 1. T.K.BALAN, S\/O.APPU, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. A.PADMANABHAN, S\/O.KARUNAKARAN, &#8230; Respondent 2. STATE OF KERALA, For Petitioner :SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN For Respondent :SRI.SUNNY MATHEW The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI Dated :16\/11\/2010 O R D [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-187270","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>T.K.Balan vs A.Padmanabhan on 16 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"T.K.Balan vs A.Padmanabhan on 16 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-07T12:45:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"T.K.Balan vs A.Padmanabhan on 16 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-07T12:45:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":904,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010\",\"name\":\"T.K.Balan vs A.Padmanabhan on 16 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-07T12:45:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"T.K.Balan vs A.Padmanabhan on 16 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"T.K.Balan vs A.Padmanabhan on 16 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"T.K.Balan vs A.Padmanabhan on 16 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-07T12:45:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"T.K.Balan vs A.Padmanabhan on 16 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-07T12:45:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010"},"wordCount":904,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010","name":"T.K.Balan vs A.Padmanabhan on 16 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-07T12:45:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-balan-vs-a-padmanabhan-on-16-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"T.K.Balan vs A.Padmanabhan on 16 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187270","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=187270"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187270\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=187270"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=187270"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=187270"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}