{"id":187325,"date":"2010-09-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010"},"modified":"2015-02-26T11:33:37","modified_gmt":"2015-02-26T06:03:37","slug":"bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Bharath Gold Mines Ltd vs Balakrishna on 30 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Bharath Gold Mines Ltd vs Balakrishna on 30 September, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ram Mohan Reddy<\/div>\n<pre>\n\n \n '  \n\n ARE R\/AT No.5, OLD ASSAY QUARTERS\n\n..I_\n\nIN THE men COURT 012*  _ V: k  \n\nDATED THIS THE 30m DAY OF sEFI'l\u00e9NIB=.E3*. 2aiof%    T\n\nBEFORE  \nTHE HON'BLE 1\\m.JUsT1cE  Rl.\u00a7I}D',YH  \n\nWRIT PETITION No. 122-IQGF'-2(}O'6'4 J\n\nBETWEEN\n\nBHARATH GOLD MI_I\\TF;SA ~ 'j_  \nOORGAUM posT,KGF~_5\u00ab:f\u00bb312(z.    \n\nBY ITS MANAG11\\:qDHgECTQR   \" \u00ab._._-_.H.PETITIONER\n(By M\/S.: RSBQ LAW _V _  \n\nAND\n\n1. BALAKRJSHNAV \n 's11\\:cE..'p~EQEAsED BY' 3:133 LRS\n\n1 Km A   \n\n RANT'. \n\nCOROMANDEL PO, KOLAR GOLD FIELDS\nKOLAR DISTRICT.\n\n2 KOTHANDAPNI\n\nM\n\n \n\n\n\n8 C MARIMUTHU\nAGE 72 YEARS   \u00e9 \nR\/AT C \/O. ANANDAN, MANAGER A Y. .3\nCORAMNDEL POST  \nKOLAR GOLD FIELDS +5-6_3 120._ \"\nKOLAR DISTRICT.   A\n\n\u00a9\n\nARUN DOSS SINCE DEAB\"BfHiS,_LRS \n\nC SUSHEELA{D1ED)- \"  A A\nPREMA. MAJOR \nSHANTH1;'MAJQ'R\"g _  \nA VINCEf~?f]f- BAEU, MAJOR  \"V \nREGINA, MAJOR;  \" \"  \u00bb\n\nF1UOCU3&gt;\n\nALL A,RE_RV\/A'f;?:.1Q,6,,jS\ufb011VI1\\tIINC:.BATH LAINE,\nOORGAUM .;ROS'F_ _  .\nKOLAR --.GOLDV.F\"IELDS;._KOLAR DISTRICT.\n\n10 MOH.AMED\"1BI{Ai\u00ab1I\u00a7\/:~SY\nAGE 60 YEARS ' _ \nA _; R\/AT NO';'25, P S JALEEL LAYOUT\n- 'M:_INI {ERA}-\u00abIIM-\"ROAD\nROBRTISQNPET POST\n\n'  Sf \"KO[_;AF\u20ac*GC~--_LD FIELDS 553 122\n  AKOLAR DEISTRICT.\n\n1'1 P DORA; RAJ\n\nAGE 72 YEARS\nR\/AT NO.2, N T BLOCK, OORGAUM POST\n\n  '=.KOLAR GOLD FIELDS 563 120\n  ..~KOLAR DISTRICT.\n\n 12 PURUSHOTHAM SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS\n\nA KANCHANA\nW\/O. LATE PURUSHOTHAM\nAGE 55 YEARS.\nB REVATHY\nC YEMANI PURNATHILAKAM, MAJOR\n\nD\"-i\n\n\n\nD MURALI, MAJOR\nE JAGADEESHAN, MAJOR\n\nALL ARE R\/AT NO. 1390, NEAR\nLMC, OORGAUM POST . ' \nKOLAR GOLD FIELDS, 563 1--2_1\"~~\nKOLAR DISTRICT.  '\n\n13 RAMA SINGH S1NG._E'j;:&gt;EAD   _\nA SARASWATHI EA1,,__f' V   * 1,. .-\nW\/O. LATE SR1.  - \nAGE 4G\"'YE9f'sRS..':~.'  \" \nB GAY\u00a3$.THRI;.~_I.%E\ufb01\",  \nC .1ViG'H'IN1?f2ER\n1:) SURENDER'S;RGI{{\"MAJ0R\n\nE V _ LAKSHM1 EAL MAJOR\n\n V.  _    MAJOR.\n\n     MAI-IANTHI MUTT\n\" .1\\7I?j;TEZ'NP'I:,'T,'I:}IOSKOTE\n\nBANGALOREVHDISTRJCT PIN 562 4.14.\n\n14 M~~EJOSEPH GEORGE SINCE DEAD BY LRS\n\nA if A  FRANGINA\n\n\"  W\/O. LT M LJOSEPH GEORGE\nAGE 50 YEARS.\n\nA B MARY IMACULATE, MAJOR\n\nC FLORA JAIN, MAJOR\n\nD TONNY PREMA KANYAL, MAJOR\n\nM\n\n \n\n\n\nE PRAKASI-I GEORGE. MAJOR.\n\nALL ARE R\/AT NO.3, MAE} SHOP LANE\n\nOORGAUM POST, KOLAR GOLD FIELDS  ' \n\n563 120 KOLAR DISTRICT.\n\n15 G01'-'ANNA\nMAJOR \nR\/AT TAILOR SHOP LANE _ _ .\nOORGAUM POST, KGE\"-S63 1--2O;;. L\n\n16 K SEGARAN\n\nR\/AT NO. \n\nROBER1'$ONPET,.'KGF_'5_B;3.. 12:2.  V .\n\n17 ' *\n\nAGE75 YEARS 4' _  _\n\nR\/A'f_ C\/O. SR3'.-A P CHANTDRASHEKAR\nT T E 'NO... 1373\/A'; .3RD  ROAD\n\n4TH CROSS; PRAKASH NAGAR\nBANGALO'I--?E} _  ~ \"\n\n   %%%%% \n\n, \u00abAGE 73 YEARS\n  R;'A'I\"'-NO..,D:3 :7.\n .  'B' CROSS\n' AIV'BLOCK;j_ RAJAJINAGAR.\n -- 10.\n\n O MV.LU.R'I'HU1\\\u00a7A'I'HAN\n\n'~ V SINCE DECEASED BY I-HS LRS\n\n A] SMT. MARGAREITE,\nE W\/O. LATE M V LURTHUNATHAN\nAGE 60 YEARS.\n\n13] SMT. SH EELA\nMAJOR\n\nC] JAISHEELAN\n\nEEK\n\n\n\n-6-\n\nMAJOR. \nD) PRAMILA\nMAJOR.\n\nE] SMT. SHAMALA\nMAJOR\nALL ARE R\/AT No.Io9, NEW A _ \nELECTRIC COLONY. OORGAUM Po.'-3T\": -_\nKOLAR GOLD FIELDS -- 563 120 ' ' *\nKOLAR DISTRICT.  ._\n20 A    *    \nAGE\u00ab'60..YEARS Q  \"    H\u00bb\nR\/AT cg\/D. B\"\"SAGA\u00a5ANATfLAN\n_D.EC'GI\\_I 'sE;\u00a7;URITz__AGENCY\n KHBL*CoL0I's;Y, KORAMANGALA\n';_LAYO!.J'I\";BANGALORE --' 95.\n\n21 BAs'I--IAIsHAR1I\u00e9'E ~ _ \nV _ _ AGE\" '75 YEARS; \n, __ R.\/AT  13, CHANNAPALLI VILLAGE\n :_V.1A:vI.ROBEI\"&lt;&quot;TL&#039;5ONPET, PATHEPALLI POST\n GOLD FIELDS, KOLAR DISTRICT.\n\n&quot; ._ &#039;22,T&quot;AI&quot;IGU&#039;S;TEN\nA &#039; R_\/A-T C\/0. METILDA VISWANATH\n---- IsI0.-4:1, RAJU STREET\n~ HOSUR -- 635 109\nTAMIL NADU _\n\n&quot;  2.3=K A MUNISWAMY\n: SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS\n\nA] M RUKMANI\nW\/O. LATE K M MUNISWAMY\nAGE 60 YEARS.\n\nB] SMT. -SELVALEELA\nMAJOR.\n\nLA\n\n \n\n\n\nC) M RAJENDRAN   \nMAJOR. \n\nD] SULOCHANA M\nMAJOR\n\nE) M SAMPATH\nMAJOR.\n\nF} M MANJULA\nMAJOR.  \n\nALL ARE 1_2.,!.\u00e9xT ,;13, 113 _$AW MILL Lgixii\u00e9:\nMARIKUPPAl\\I_iP__OS&#039;I&#039;-- .     \nKOLAR QoL1)&quot;1&quot;&lt;&#039;i\u00ab:..r-;\u00bb:_.;;)S,,_&#039;1&lt;:S__ LAB. .D;Srr.\n\n24.  &quot; &#039;V\n\nSINCE DECEASED__ HIS LRS\n\nA) 1SMT;&quot;MARYVELt::_ABE\u00a7IH\n_; W\/o.  SR1. 3.3 GEORGE\n AQ1a;VS0 YE &#039; \n\n    _ \n\n&#039;{.W&#039;.QR\n\nC)&quot;: .J.QcK7~1N JOHN KENNEDY\n..MA,;0R_\n\n~ VALLAARE R\/AT NO.752.\nea&quot;-UBILEE HALL STREET,\n _&#039;  &#039;KOLAR GOLD FIELDS -- 563 119\n&quot; &#039;V ._ JKOLAR DISTRICT.\n\n25) A ARULNATHAN\nR\/AT NO.1238, III CROSS\nPIPELINE. ROBERTSONPET\nKGF \u00bb~ 563 122. g\n\n!2%*&#039;~K\n\n \n\n\n\n  EIELDS -. 563 122&#039;;&quot;KOLAR DISTRICT.\n\n&#039;  27;, \n\nS&#039;  28;&#039; P GURUSWAMY\n\n26 S MOHAN RANGAIAH \nSINCE DECEASED BY HIS ZLRS&quot; .\n\nA) SMT. SAROJAMMA  C    =\nW\/O. LATE S MOHAN EAIVGIAI-:i&#039; &quot;  \nAGE 65   &#039;  \n\nI3] VENKATE3SHAL.U&#039;&quot;&#039;  \n\nMMOR I  \nD]   \nI &#039; _ vNWlQR!%   _\n\nALL  4_R\/A&#039;l*&quot;C_   SRINIVASA GUPTA\nNO, I894,&quot;COROrIATIOI\\I TOWN\nRQBERTSONPET POST, KOLAR GOLD\n\nAGE: TQYEARS\nR\/ATNO. 63, NEAR BGML\n GU EST HOUSE, OORGAUM POST\n~.  GOLD FIELDS -- 563 120\nKOLAR DISTRICT.\n\nAGE 70 YEARS\n\nR\/AT NO.18, NEW ELECTRIC COLONY\nOORGAUM POST\n\nKOLAR GOLD FIELDS ~ 563 120\nKOLAR DISTRICT.\n\n29) RKODDAND \nAGE 70 YEARS \n\n\n\nA  _   NO.26 &#039;A&#039; WEST\nBLOCK; &#039;MARIKURRIRM POST\n\n2&#039; &#039;.._&quot;-3,.I4(2), 6-7, 9(D), 10-11, 12[A-3), 13(A,C,D,J), 141 -E),\nI 15,16,18,19(A--E), R1, 23{D--F), 24(1), 26(A-E), 28, 31[A~~C)\n: K KRISHNA FOR R2&quot;? SD\n\n-9-\n\nR\/AT NO. 1586\n\nSEENAPPA COMPOUND\n\nV CROSS, ROBERTSONPET POST\nKOLAR GOLD FIELDS -- 563 122.\n\n30) K VARADARAJ N I\nAGE 73 YEARS \nR\/AT NO. 10, STED BI.-OCK I\nOORGAUM POST &#039; _ &#039;- \nKOLAR GODL FIELDS  \nKOLAR DISTRICT.\n\n31) PSEVARAJ  _   I \nSINCE DECEASEDBY HIS: LI-RS &#039;- .  \n\nA) \u00a7..SI\u00a7IT;. PUSHJRARANII ..  I\n\n&quot; -- .. if&#039;w\/   &quot;D13 SRLVARAJ\nI AG&#039;:-&#039;._\u00bb -\n\nB)&#039;---_&#039; - PUNIYA1v%I\u00a5URTHYS\n\n   S \n&#039; &#039;LMAJOR.\n\n GOLD FIELDS -- 563 119\nKOLAR DISTRICT.  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p>[By : M\/S SUBBA RAO &amp; CO FOR C\/R1) 81 16<\/p>\n<p>KAN&#8217;I&#8217;I~:IA FOR R4(1)]<\/p>\n<p>THESE WPS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 81 227 OF<br \/>\nCPC PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DT.6.4.2005<br \/>\nPASSED BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL<br \/>\nGOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRII*3UNAL-CUM-LABOUR<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p>-18.\n<\/p>\n<p>and documentary and examined the order.\u00a7irnpti.gned__,_&#8221;_<\/p>\n<p>the only question, for decision making is &#8211;&#8216;&#8221;whetf_h,er&#8217;~.inthe &#8221; &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>facts and circumstances, the ordefr&#8217;=impugne&#8217;d&#8217;of=&#8211;._the:<\/p>\n<p>Labour Court, is just, iegairvand valid what r i&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>order?&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>9. Admittedly ~ ipi\u00e9inongst others,<br \/>\nwere daily  and in terms<br \/>\nof the   Bhatt, submitted by<br \/>\nway  and implemented w.e.f. 1.4.1969<br \/>\nwhence&#8217;   designated as monthly<\/p>\n<p>ratedworkei&#8217;s; ~._VA:1thoi1gh settiement between the parties<\/p>\n<p> arvrivefd~,_at on 24.10.70 and thereafter on<\/p>\n<p> M R4, revising the pay scale to<\/p>\n<p>j Rs..;7Og2V2O&#8217;4&#8242;.and fixing the respondents in Grade D3,<\/p>\n<p>A certain differences having cropped up, the revision of<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  pgay\ufb02scale was agreed to be referred to Mr. R N Basu, a<\/p>\n<p>one-man committee who submitted his recommendation<\/p>\n<p>revising the pay scale to Rs.240~355 for &#8216;D&#8217; group<\/p>\n<p>N<\/p>\n<p>.20<\/p>\n<p>the Central Government over the implementationclcifethe<\/p>\n<p>said recommendation.\n<\/p>\n<p>10. In the backdrop of the itiso<\/p>\n<p>the case of the petitioner that the  <\/p>\n<p>monthly rated workman, in particuylar <\/p>\n<p>who are Fitters &#8212; I and  finvvfgthe first<br \/>\ninstances as Group ~a11d&#8217;e;;tending the pay<br \/>\nscale of Rs.70w2~_20,   in Group<\/p>\n<p>C in Grade\u00e9llvl   &#8216;Grade &#8216;D&#8217; in the pay<\/p>\n<p>scale ofwhilel those in Group C in the pay<\/p>\n<p>_ scale?&#8217; of recommended by the one man<\/p>\n<p> \u00bbeornmittee&#8217;\u00abheaded by Sri. Basu, which is pending<\/p>\n<p> the Central Government and hence<\/p>\n<p> cannotvlbelimplemented. It is the further case of the<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217; lffpVetli&#8217;tioner that the respondents are not entitled to<\/p>\n<p>G  \ufb01tment into the pay scale of Rs.330\u00bb470 as applicable to<\/p>\n<p> Grade C employees, even if the recommendation is<\/p>\n<p>approved by the Central Government. In addition it is<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p>BA<\/p>\n<p>jurisdiction under Sec. 33(C](2) to arrogate<\/p>\n<p>function of an Industrial Tribunal&#8211;ancE_ enterlfainv..Claim 9<\/p>\n<p>which is not based on an e&gt;dsting&#8221;r_ight b&#8221;L1%t&#8217;w}:.icifi&#8221;rnVay<\/p>\n<p>approptiately be made V  of an V<\/p>\n<p>Industriai dispute in:&#8221;a..v_reference&#8221;iiinder Sec&#8217;t&#8217;ion&#8217;l 10 of the<br \/>\nAct. So also is the   in MCD vs.<\/p>\n<p>Ganesh  1  V<\/p>\n<p>V15,&#8217;  of Sri. Basu the one<br \/>\nman committee&#8217;:&#8217;bAe&#8217;ing&#8221;siib_iect matter of consideration by<\/p>\n<p>the Cenltrall C}oixerninen&#8217;t. the Respondent cannot insist<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;they  existing right to the pay scales<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; ,fe&#8217;c.on1niendlcd.&#8217;and therefore cannot seek to enforce the<\/p>\n<p>said&#8217; recofijiiiendation. So also the claim for the pay<\/p>\n<p> scale. lo? lRs.330~47O recommended by Sri. Basu for<\/p>\n<p>A  Gfoup C employees, is not an existing right in the<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; respondent so as to seek its enforcement more so,<\/p>\n<p>having not ciystalized into a right. This leads to the<\/p>\n<p>only conclusion that the claim being an Industrial<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p>l  &#8216;pay scale of Rs.330&#8211;470, cannot but be perverse and<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;lunsust.ai1iabie. \u00e9 i (-\n<\/p>\n<p>_2(1<\/p>\n<p>the respondent workmen, without examiningjlirelpjexiant<\/p>\n<p>facts and applicabiiity of the iaw. The   <\/p>\n<p>aware of its limitations in thelmexerryise of.lj&#8217;L&#8217;ufisdi~ctiori<\/p>\n<p>under See.33{C}{2} of the Act, proceeded  <\/p>\n<p>is in the naiuie of an InduStri&#8217;ai Dispuiteiandivihence the<\/p>\n<p>order impugned sufieirs   jurisdiction and<br \/>\nfrom pe1&#8243;\\\u00bb&#8217;ers3it.y of pro&#8217;ceVdu&#8221;_rVe}lv he[_&#8217;eLab0ur Court in<br \/>\nparagraph ilvgl\u00e9ffiithih\u00e9:iord.e1&#8243;;irn;pu\u00a7r1ed..haVing noticed that<br \/>\nthe respc)iid_cV:?1ts.'&#8221;&#8216;ivere:f_i  extended the pay scale<br \/>\nattached &#8221; to &#8216;  employees, called upon the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner&#8217;toclarif3f;- which was sufficient to realise that<\/p>\n<p>l  .thelV.sEe&#8221;op\u00e9i~oi&#8217; adjudication ought to be limited to one of<\/p>\n<p> . e:&gt;:ecu-t:io:i  not an adjudication of rights of parties.<\/p>\n<p>The fi,;&#8217;1din\u00a7gla1t paragraph 14 that it is not the case of the<\/p>\n<p> ..petitio-rle1- i3Gl\\\/[L that the respondents were not entitled<\/p>\n<p>I<\/p>\n<p>.2&#8243;\n<\/p>\n<p>if?\n<\/p>\n<p>.21<br \/>\nAs a consequence the further finding that the<br \/>\nrespondents should be placed in pay scale of R___s.330&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>470 instead of Rs.240&#8211;355 in terms <\/p>\n<p>recommendation is not in the nature of Coi11p1iti.nge:th.ei&#8211;V\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>benefits in terms of money but .thc\u00bb.dec1;\ufb01r&#8217;\u00e9ttio&#8211;n&#8217; of <\/p>\n<p>in the respondent which couid ibeihidorie\u00e9i&#8217; only&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>adjudicatiori of a reference .Se_ctio_r1&#8217;%:10;:of&#8221;&#8216;the Act&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>and hence iiieggal.\n<\/p>\n<p>V*.._I11&#8217;\u00abt&#8217;1e&#8217;1e succeeds. The order<br \/>\nimpugneddhcf  Court is quashed and CGA<\/p>\n<p>Nois \/1939 o1\u00a2i.No_,&amp;7\/76 stands rejected.<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-*<br \/>\nIudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Bharath Gold Mines Ltd vs Balakrishna on 30 September, 2010 Author: Ram Mohan Reddy &#8216; ARE R\/AT No.5, OLD ASSAY QUARTERS ..I_ IN THE men COURT 012* _ V: k DATED THIS THE 30m DAY OF sEFI&#8217;l\u00e9NIB=.E3*. 2aiof% T BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE 1\\m.JUsT1cE Rl.\u00a7I}D&#8217;,YH WRIT PETITION No. 122-IQGF&#8217;-2(}O&#8217;6&#8217;4 J BETWEEN BHARATH GOLD [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-187325","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bharath Gold Mines Ltd vs Balakrishna on 30 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bharath Gold Mines Ltd vs Balakrishna on 30 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-02-26T06:03:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bharath Gold Mines Ltd vs Balakrishna on 30 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-26T06:03:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":758,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Bharath Gold Mines Ltd vs Balakrishna on 30 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-26T06:03:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bharath Gold Mines Ltd vs Balakrishna on 30 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bharath Gold Mines Ltd vs Balakrishna on 30 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bharath Gold Mines Ltd vs Balakrishna on 30 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-02-26T06:03:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bharath Gold Mines Ltd vs Balakrishna on 30 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-26T06:03:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010"},"wordCount":758,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010","name":"Bharath Gold Mines Ltd vs Balakrishna on 30 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-26T06:03:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bharath-gold-mines-ltd-vs-balakrishna-on-30-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bharath Gold Mines Ltd vs Balakrishna on 30 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187325","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=187325"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187325\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=187325"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=187325"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=187325"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}