{"id":187409,"date":"2008-10-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008"},"modified":"2016-05-06T11:25:20","modified_gmt":"2016-05-06T05:55:20","slug":"shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Shri Rohtas Chand vs Delhi Police on 27 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Shri Rohtas Chand vs Delhi Police on 27 October, 2008<\/div>\n
               CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                 Appeal No. CIC\/WB\/A\/2007\/00531 dated 27-5-2007\n                   Right to Information Act 2005 - Section 19\n\nAppellant:          Shri Rohtas Chand\nRespondent:         Delhi Police\n\n\nFACTS<\/pre>\n
      By an application of 19-12-06 Head Constable Rohtas Chand of Palam
\nColony, New Delhi applied to the Dy. Secretary (Finance), Budget Dep’t.
\nGNCTD seeking the following information:\n<\/p>\n
      “Under Right of Information Act u\/s 6 (3) of this act if it is not
\n      related to you please send it to the officer related to this matter.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      (i)    ACP scheme benefit.\n      (ii)   Last 2 years.\n<\/pre>\n
      (iii)  Letter Regd. Post No. RL-1409 dated 29.7.2006 & RI-905
\n             dated 11.2.2006.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      I state that the information sought does not fall with in the
\n      restrictions contained in section 6 of the Act and to the best of
\n      my knowledge it pertains to your office D. A. Branch.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      To this he received a reply dated 22-2-2007 from Shri Deependra
\nPathak, PIO & Addl. CP, General Administration claiming that the application
\nhad been received from the Home Department, GNCTD on 29-1-07 as follows:\n<\/p>\n
      “The opinion has been received in this regard from the MHA
\n      vide letter No. 14011\/181\/05-UTP, GOI\/MHA dated 21.12.2006:-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      “So long as RRs describe such appointment to the post of HC
\n      (AWO) on promotion, there is no scope for a re-consideration of
\n      our earlier stand. Also, direct recruitment is not restricted to
\n      particular categories, and the RRs prescribe the method of
\n      recruitment as ‘By promotion, failing which by direct recruitment,
\n      failing which by transfer on deputation’. It would appear that
\n      ‘absorption’ as a matter was not envisaged which prescribing
\n      the RRs.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      The matter has again been taken with GNCT of Delhi stating
\n      therein that amendment of Rule 17-B (IV) for the post of HC
\n      (AWO). As per MHA’s decision that those appointed as HC
\n      (AWO) from the rank of Constable shall be deemed to be on
\n      “Promotion” and not “Fresh appointment”, which has placed
\n      them in an adverse position vis-\u00e0-vis their counterparts in the IB,
\n      in whose cases appointment of Security Asstt. (Constable) to
\n      JIO-II (HC-WT) is shown as on “Transfer of service” basis vide<\/p>\n
                                       1<\/span>
\n       this Hdqrs. D. O. No. 1067\/P\/Br.\/PHQ (AC-VI) dated 12.1.07 in
\n      favour of HC (AWOs).”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      Upon this Shri Rohtas Chand moved his first appeal on 13-3-07 and
\nreceived a reply on 15-5-07 again from Shri Deependra Pathak, PIO & ACP,
\nGeneral Administration stating that his first appeal has been disposed of and
\nthe copy of the order had already been sent to him. A copy of this order was
\nendorsed to Police HQ office asking that the original copy together with its
\nenclosure be delivered to appellant Shri Rohtas Chand against a proper
\nreceipt. However, Shri Rohtas Chand moved his second appeal before us on
\n26-5-07 with the following prayer:\n<\/p>\n
      “Kindly grant me 2nd benefit of ACP Scheme after 24 years
\n      due to Govt. of India’s order.”\n<\/p>\n
The appeal was heard on 27-10-2008. The following are present.\n<\/p>\n
      Appellants
\n      Shri Rohtas Chand.\n<\/p>\n
      Shri Hitesh Narayan.\n<\/p>\n
      Respondents
\n      Shri Naved Mumtaz, DCP\/Commn.\n<\/p>\n
      S. I. Kewal Krishan, D-55.\n<\/p>\n
      Shri Ashwani Kumar,<\/p>\n
      The prayer of appellant, as can be seen, is well beyond the purview of
\nthe RTI Act and therefore the jurisdiction of this Commission.      Besides,
\nappellant submitted before us that he had by now received the benefits of the
\nACP scheme, but that in providing this Department had deducted some other
\nbenefits. DCP Shri Naved Mumtaz submitted that the information sought and
\nthe grievance expressed in the present case has, in fact, been addressed.
\nThe delay in response has resulted from the fact that the Finance Department
\nforwarded the application of 19-12-06 to the Home Department by letter of 12-
\n1-07 which was transferred by the Home Department to the Addl.
\nCommissioner of Police on 29-1-07 after which the response was given by the
\nDCP well within the mandated period of 30 days allowed him.\n<\/p>\n
                             DECISION NOTICE<\/p>\n
                                     2<\/span>
\n        Clearly the prayer moved by appellant Shri Rohtas Chand in his
\nsecond appeal places this well outside our jurisdiction.     There is now no
\nfurther information pending in that sought by appellant in his original
\napplication of 19-12-06. Any further grievance he may have accruing from
\nthis will have to be addressed to the normal grievance redress machinery of
\nthe Delhi Police or to the Delhi Public Grievances Commission. There is no
\nfurther cause of action by this Commission with regard to the information
\nsought by appellant Shri Rohtas Chand.\n<\/p>\n
       On the other hand there is little doubt that the information provided to
\nthe appellant Shri Rohtas Chand had been provided exceeding the time limit
\nprescribed under the RTI Act. PIO Shri Daljit Singh, Dy. Secretary, Finance
\n(Exp.) by forwarding the application to Addl. Secretary (Home) only on 12-1-
\n07 has far exceeded the time limit prescribed for transfer within Section 6 (3)
\nof the RTI Act 2005. Similarly Shri Anil Kumar Agarwal, Dy. Secretary (Home)
\nGNCTD has, in forwarding this application to DCP (Hqrs.) only on 29-1-07
\nagain violated Section 6 (3) of the RTI Act. Both Shri Daljit Singh and Dr. Anil
\nKumar Agarwal will show cause why this should not be held liable for penalty
\nbetween the lapse of 5 days from receipt of the application and its transfer
\nfrom their offices @ Rs. 250\/- a day till the date when the application was
\nactually forwarded by each. This they may do in writing within 15 days of the
\ndate of issue of this decision notice to Shri Pankaj K.P. Shreyaskar, Jt.
\nRegistrar, CIC.\n<\/p>\n
       The appeal before us in substance falling clearly outside our
\njurisdiction is hereby dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
       Announced in the hearing. Notice of this decision be given free of cost
\nto the parties.\n<\/p>\n
(Wajahat Habibullah)
\nChief Information Commissioner
\n27-10-2008<\/p>\n
                                       3<\/span>
\n Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against
\napplication and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO
\nof this Commission.\n<\/p>\n
(Pankaj K.P. Shreyaskar)
\nJoint Registrar
\n27-10-2008<\/p>\n
                                     4<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Shri Rohtas Chand vs Delhi Police on 27 October, 2008 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC\/WB\/A\/2007\/00531 dated 27-5-2007 Right to Information Act 2005 – Section 19 Appellant: Shri Rohtas Chand Respondent: Delhi Police FACTS By an application of 19-12-06 Head Constable Rohtas Chand of Palam Colony, New Delhi applied to the Dy. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-187409","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nShri Rohtas Chand vs Delhi Police on 27 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Rohtas Chand vs Delhi Police on 27 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-06T05:55:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Rohtas Chand vs Delhi Police on 27 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-06T05:55:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":965,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Shri Rohtas Chand vs Delhi Police on 27 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-06T05:55:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Rohtas Chand vs Delhi Police on 27 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Rohtas Chand vs Delhi Police on 27 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Rohtas Chand vs Delhi Police on 27 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-06T05:55:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Rohtas Chand vs Delhi Police on 27 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-06T05:55:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008"},"wordCount":965,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008","name":"Shri Rohtas Chand vs Delhi Police on 27 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-06T05:55:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-rohtas-chand-vs-delhi-police-on-27-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Rohtas Chand vs Delhi Police on 27 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187409","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=187409"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187409\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=187409"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=187409"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=187409"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}