{"id":187435,"date":"2009-04-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009"},"modified":"2017-03-21T04:54:56","modified_gmt":"2017-03-20T23:24:56","slug":"smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt Leelavathi vs The Karnataka State Financial … on 9 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Leelavathi vs The Karnataka State Financial … on 9 April, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KAREVEATAKA, BANGALQRE\n\nBATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL  . V\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE H0N'BLE MR. RB. IZ)I\u00a7~IA}_1:\u00a3i:, ' '  \" ' V\nBar1gai0re+\"\u00a76{3 O6--1.\"1  ..  \u00e9 .. Appeiiant\n\n (By  M \u00a32 vagyaja, Aav.)\n\n1. A  'The .KTa;r\ufb02ata\u00a3{a State\n\"F'iJ:1ancia1 C0rp.,\n. 1'{:'o';.}. \/ 1, 'Thizmrnaiah\n\" * 4_ Road, Near Cantonment\nr __ fRa;1}.way Station,\n\"BaI1ga1ore-660 0512,\nBy 11:5 Managng Diregter.\n\n\n\nM}\n\n2. The R\u20acC\u20ac}V(\ufb01{'\u00a7? Qf\ufb01cer,\n\nKarnataka State\n\nEinamcial Corp. ,\n\nNa. 1\/ 1, Thjmmaiah\n\nRoad, Near Cantonment\n\nRaiiway Station,   \nBangaio\u00e9re~52. I\n\n3. Karnaaka Ind}. Area\n\nDeveziopmemz Board,\n\n14\/3, Q\ufb01d Fiaor,\n\nR P Building,   _\n\nNmpathunga FI0a::1,\"g-- _\n\nBaI2ga1oz\"e--360 O01,'    _   -.\n\nRep. By its Chaixtxzsm,   \" \"'= _;~.'Respondents<\/pre>\n
(\ufb02y Sr: 8 \u00a5%uc1r\u00e9.gQ*5\u00a5?c}.a,V3~\u00a7,dii_. for V’ <\/p>\n
This W~.A’.*–\u00a333:n\ufb01led’-.1}:1rier”‘Se\ufb01:tion 4 of the Karnataka
\nHigh C.\u00a21.3E36_;’f2(305 passed by the learned
\nSingle Jigdga.’ .\n<\/p>\n
This ‘iX”:A.VVC{)VBE1iI:ig”  for Preliminary H\u20acaIiI1g before<\/p>\n
 ()ou1;’t_\u00a7”tE1i:: day,”‘SABHA.EiIT J., gassed the foilowingz<\/p>\n
JUI’)3I\ufb01’.ENT<\/p>\n
 is filed by {hf} pretitioraar in<\/p>\n
V -V W.P!.N\u00ae.,4 356;l’2Q{}$ being agieved by the {}3{‘(i\u20ac2I’ dated<\/p>\n
 Wh\ufb01r\ufb01i\ufb02 the iaarnad Si\ufb02gle Judge has declined<\/p>\n
–“E\u00a3: V \u00e9u\u00e9sh the crrder dated 6.12.2004 passed by the 15′:<\/p>\n
” f\u00e9 sp0nc1e11t — Kar\ufb01ataka State Fimanciai Corpmratiori<\/p>\n
\\,J~<\/p>\n
(hsreinafter I’\u20acff:I”I’\u20acCi 1:9 as ‘KSF’C’) and dismissed the writ<\/p>\n
petitiem.\n<\/p>\n
:2. W.P.Na.43E\u00a76\/12805 was \ufb01led by the appa\ufb01gi\ufb01lut’:<\/p>\n
It is averred in the petition that the petitiq:1\u00e9K_:a;\u00a7pfi\u00a7a\u00a7\u00a7C1{%\u00a7Ci’V’ <\/p>\n
8316 Sm respondent —-   “\u00a3x1du\ufb01fii;:\ufb01 ‘~.,’;%314g:3 7<\/p>\n
Deveiopment Bcarti for 1:116 pu;rpt)s <:– 'C151' V. ailotmeiit   'Vin<\/p>\n
the iixdustrizetl area fer the  of \u00e9\u20ac;t\ufb01Q\u00a7t;}.ist1zi;1gVVVPo111tr3?
\nFeed factery. The pe\ufb01ti\u00a7i:.e1"13i%asts\u00a7i}Qt\u00a7&d_<}11eV\ufb01\u00e9f\u00e9 9:" land; in
\nKumbalgadu ind11su'ia}'VV_Af_ea  Meanwhile,<\/p>\n
the petiviio':1a1;A: \u00a7:if\u00a3L:a'.*3.\u00ab'3i3:a:*:*16:%r'sl*1ip with one Sri Abdul
\nRazak {'3-1: "  "purpose of carrying an the:<\/p>\n
piastic   -7:x:c,_i19;ii:e and style of L R Plastics in the<\/p>\n
  si'i;\u00a7;*\u00a7."v–\u00ab–~*33}.'1e cost cf land was deposited and<\/p>\n
 _p:\u20acs3$?\u20ac:".'~3$'i<)_ii ..\u00e9e.fti\ufb01Cate in favour of L R Plastics was issued<\/p>\n
031*  that tbs L R Plastics spent more than<\/p>\n
  ' v.Rs.3,G3,'i3{)0\/~ for construction of buiiding and development<\/p>\n
 Since there was difference cf epinien between<\/p>\n
"  petitioner and the said Sri Abdu} Razak, the<\/p>\n
 partnership was dissolved on 2.5.1992. Therefore, the<\/p>\n
petiticner was unable to rezpaggr the 10311 amount regulariy<\/p>\n
\\?"\n<\/p>\n
and the let respendent issued notices dateci 18.39.1993 and<\/p>\n
26.11.1993 demanding the {;’t&’_VI11\u20acI11T. of lean ava\ufb02edee ~ 1e\u00a7yV_the<\/p>\n
petitioner. Since the petitioner could net re\ufb01ei\ufb01r’ <\/p>\n
amount, the steps were taken 1.111c}e1\u00a7A,VS_eetigsI’1″:3:.”3;:: .VE’s’iZ-‘e”\u00a3f’3″  <\/p>\n
Financial Corporation Act, 1951 (1?1ere;i11efte:*_V1*eferfe\u00a7i~…te::.;;zs<\/p>\n
the ‘Act? by order dated 8.    wee *<\/p>\n
authorised to take over theV_._aeeete._v ef 133:evV_pe\u00a5*iitic)z1er in .<\/p>\n
respect of the iz1dus’\u00a7ii’i2\u00a7}-. eez}\u00a7ceri1– ffjfef the purpose of<\/p>\n
recovering tl1e4_:Ve,3:r1eL:.rit””ef ~ instead of<\/p>\n
228.33   J\n<\/p>\n
3. It  “i:3 “fu:’ther:eexfezieeeizj the petitioner was teta\ufb02y<\/p>\n
mislead anti-. Withe1_1\u20ac–.\u00a7vii1g any prayer gL1idanee for the<\/p>\n
 V’  Seie ef”the’\u00a7r0pe\ufb02:y, the property has been said<\/p>\n
fer  ~\u00bb and the market mine of the preperty<\/p>\n
 Ks.20,GO,\u20ac}(}{)\/~ on the said day. The<\/p>\n
  ‘;3etitienef1~ apyreaehed the Government being aggieved by<\/p>\n
   illegality in the said sale eendueted by the I{SF’C:<\/p>\n
 therea\ufb01er received a cheque for Rs.3,55,2G’7\/-\u00ab on<\/p>\n
V’ 15.6.1998 after a period of thrm years from the date of<\/p>\n
auetien along with the statement shewing the payment<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
made by the Corporation to different authorities.-“‘—-.\u00bb It is<\/p>\n
further averted that the sale conducted   <\/p>\n
accordance with law and is opposed   V’ <\/p>\n
issued by the W respondent as   \u00abivriet  tzf\u00e9e<\/p>\n
statements and number of p:>eepeetix{e’V:p1;re}\ufb01:31eere: <\/p>\n
industry has not been ‘peepei’1y
\nauction. The auction’  \u00a73\u20ace;te dep0site\u00e9 in
\naccordance with law  \ufb01led the
\nwrit pe1:\u00a3t:i0z1_   th\ufb01 01-(13,. dated
\n5.12.2003  \ufb01g    \u00e9feependent rejecting the
\nreq.;1est.:ef __  _3:eendamus directing the is:<\/p>\n
responde\ufb01tfe  Qef ” the loss by the petitioner due<\/p>\n
 to  aeti0Ii’e,f”t’he jfespondent by invoii\u00e9gzg Section 2% of<\/p>\n
    the petih’eeer’s preperty.\n<\/p>\n
4.    was resisted by the respondents<\/p>\n
  ‘eeIite11:1ij’i,g that the peti\ufb02o\ufb01er did I’}.(}t repay the 10311<\/p>\n
n   avaiie\u00e9 fxem the 3″‘ respondent and therefore the<\/p>\n
   eiieps were ‘\u00e9aken under Section 29 of the Act. The<\/p>\n
V’ petitioner gave consent for sale of the property ef<\/p>\n
Re. 16,50,000 \/- and a\ufb01ger receverizag the amount due to the<\/p>\n
\\q\u00ab;,\u00a7-\n<\/p>\n
KSFC, the petitioner has been refunded the aiiigauiit of
\nRs.3,55,20″? on 16.6.1998 and the sale has bee;fi._\u00a7ki:iei.:i;eied’<\/p>\n
in accordance with law.\n<\/p>\n
5. Learned Single Judge, ‘ai’te_’I”e 3* \u00a2ces:\u00a2i*e:i;\u00a7g.ii\u00ab <\/p>\n
cententions of the Iearrieci etrziurisel Hfei’ <\/p>\n
p\u20ac’\u00a3i’tiO}’16I’ and the    for
\nrespondents N0. i and   appearing
\nfor :(‘esponderi\u00b0t_ I*%\u00a7i.f3, matter pertains;\n<\/p>\n
to the    p\ufb01titioner and the
\nKSFC  “i..7r:ge. petition is based on
\neaie  Apiace in the year 1994 and<\/p>\n
Carma: be  iiitsi at” this point, of time and it is open to<\/p>\n
 ” ~.l;he ..’;\u00a7eti\u00a7:i\u00a7)1ier texaaz-eii’ of such other remedies available in<\/p>\n
 1932.?  the benefit of peiidency” of this writ<\/p>\n
petiiien  this eeurt ever since the date of filing on<\/p>\n
 3..2(3\u00a7\u00a7;EE and aecerdingiy dismissed the writ petition in<\/p>\n
  eiiove said observations. Being aggieved by the order<\/p>\n
 giaite\u00e9 25.9.2008, the Writ petitioner has preferred {hie<\/p>\n
 appeal,<\/p>\n
K\/’<\/p>\n
6. We have heard {:13 }\u20acaI’I1\u20acd counsel appearing for the
\nappa\ufb02ant and $111!? iearned counsel appaaring far r\u20acS.}: 0\ufb01<i\u00a2nt<\/p>\n
No.2.\n<\/p>\n
7. Learned counsal appeatt\ufb01ig    :4<\/p>\n
reiterated the argumsnt n1ad{:_ b\u20acf{Z.*1_'(\u00a7’ the ,V}5\u00a7$1;’.’1’fV’,if3:d \u00b0\u00a7$i’r1g1<'::v }y<\/p>\n
Judge anci submitted that the  Iias  \ufb01\u00e9gn held in
\naccordance with law:    f\ufb01ssad  ff}:-: learned<\/p>\n
Single Judge is Hgble t;c} b,je T' V 1 <\/p>\n
8. On    counsel appearing for
\nthe 2mfv..’re–spL31i{i6Hf:”%sii’d\u00a7\ufb01t;ii.ttei’_i that the grovision under<\/p>\n
Section Z29″ be invoked si\ufb02ce the p\u20acfifi()11SI’<\/p>\n
 . \ufb01did V_a3$–;3.3; :_'<~;:paj,\u00bb'  .a,3_:_;;Q.*ant, the sale has been czorzdutztet\ufb02 in<\/p>\n
 a\u00a2CGrda::ca'ex#\u00e9i\u00a3%h law after obtaining the constant of the<\/p>\n
p\u00e9titi\u00e9ner 5'1"-_2<::if=1:V1o gamma whatever E133 been made out far<\/p>\n
 iI1E\u20acI'f63."(3u:i;'}..{3\u20acV in exercising the writ jtixisdictioii.<\/p>\n
   \ufb01fe have @3611 car\u00e9fui czarzsideratimz 1:0 the<\/p>\n
  "Ct;1}t\u20acIItiO\ufb02S of 1:116 learned caunsei appearing fer the paj\ufb01es<\/p>\n
and gcm\ufb01nized the material on record.\n<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
10. The material on record Wouid cleariy Shaw that the<\/p>\n
petitianerf appellant herein availed the loan from <\/p>\n
is 1710?; disputed and r;o:1–repaymeI1t of the  <\/p>\n
Iaetitioner\/appeila\ufb01t is also not dispgie\u00e9’ 1j.\u00a31r:i<$:j t1\ufb01.\u00e9:" \u00bb <\/p>\n
(3iI'C\u00a5.1I11Sti3IiC-ES, the materiai on ;'=.Ife(;'::1"w:1 $ho'~;x.%$ the<\/p>\n
petitioner gave her consei1\u00a7~..for  sa1e\u00bb (Sf 'prspefty of'<\/p>\n
Rs.10,50,000\/- and \u00a31162. saleVA.h$:{:iv-tak\u00e9n  pZEac.<:  the year
\n1994 and the writ pez:i:io\u00a3;.%v$a.sf%}%.:}1edV.[.\u00a7;;i' 13.1.2005 and no
\ncause what\u20acve1fii'a_s_ b-:=;\u00e9'1'r:%."I's\u00a7\u00a72'z.~':i. e'~..\u00a7\u00a7;f;!.\u00a7'::. {I16 delay in filing
\nthe writ ;f1ret,.i;:v:;i;'<;"3*i':…,__V   '\n<\/p>\n
11. Tli\u00e9’  ixzouid cleariy Shaw that the<\/p>\n
petitiozxer has I1:2’i;V’a:ii1ig<:3.'1t in approaching this Court<\/p>\n
 V'  pr: tfi\u00e9'haSis of censer\ufb02: given by the patitionar,<\/p>\n
  sold for Rs.10,5G,GO{)\/~. No geund<\/p>\n
whag\u00e9ver. .'is':~_. '\ufb01xa\u00e9e cut. for interference of the order<\/p>\n
'impug\ufb01c\u00e9z\ufb01 $321 {$16 writ petition. Thae learned Single Judga<\/p>\n
V'  TV.'\u00a7ia;s,_I'\u00a7?Serv\u20acd iiberiy to the petitizmar to avai} of such other<\/p>\n
   f\ufb01fnedies available to the petitioner in law and to claim the<\/p>\n
 benefit of pendency of the writ petition before this 0013::<\/p>\n
ever since the date 0ff'11i11g an 28.1.2005. Accordingly, we<\/p>\n
\\,.\/\\<\/p>\n
hold that {ha ertier passed by the iearrmd Single: J\ufb01iige is<\/p>\n
justified and does not stiffer from 3.113; arror 0;j"\ufb01–1%\u00a7g*,,\u00a7:\u00a7_\ufb01t'j{_VAa.s<\/p>\n
to call for mterfererace in this imira court   giasg <\/p>\n
the foiiowing:\n<\/p>\n
GREEK<\/p>\n
‘\ufb01le writ appeal is disInis$:ied; _<\/p>\n
    sd\/..\n<\/p>\n
 V’   Chief justice<\/p>\n
Sd\/-9
\nIudg\u00e9<\/p>\n
 . inde3:~\u00a7’.:Y%y”.N75w\u00e9 ”  . ,
\n ‘I ,_  . E’  I  if\/A . . . . . ..\n<\/p>\n
 V x%;\u00a2i:\u00bb\u00ab. I:;Ipsfc_:\n<\/p>\n
:3;::1ia.-._:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Leelavathi vs The Karnataka State Financial … on 9 April, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit IN THE HIGH COURT OF KAREVEATAKA, BANGALQRE BATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL . V PRESENT THE H0N’BLE MR. RB. IZ)I\u00a7~IA}_1:\u00a3i:, ‘ ‘ ” ‘ V Bar1gai0re+”\u00a76{3 O6–1.”1 .. \u00e9 .. Appeiiant (By M \u00a32 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-187435","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Leelavathi vs The Karnataka State Financial ... on 9 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Leelavathi vs The Karnataka State Financial ... on 9 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-20T23:24:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Leelavathi vs The Karnataka State Financial … on 9 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-20T23:24:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1360,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt Leelavathi vs The Karnataka State Financial ... on 9 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-20T23:24:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Leelavathi vs The Karnataka State Financial … on 9 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Leelavathi vs The Karnataka State Financial ... on 9 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Leelavathi vs The Karnataka State Financial ... on 9 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-20T23:24:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Leelavathi vs The Karnataka State Financial … on 9 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-20T23:24:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009"},"wordCount":1360,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009","name":"Smt Leelavathi vs The Karnataka State Financial ... on 9 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-20T23:24:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavathi-vs-the-karnataka-state-financial-on-9-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Leelavathi vs The Karnataka State Financial … on 9 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187435","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=187435"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187435\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=187435"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=187435"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=187435"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}