{"id":187523,"date":"2008-09-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008"},"modified":"2016-06-13T17:52:47","modified_gmt":"2016-06-13T12:22:47","slug":"karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Karnataka International … vs The Bangalore University on 17 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Karnataka International … vs The Bangalore University on 17 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer<\/div>\n
 \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT  %  A \nDATED THIS THE 17'\"*DAv o1r_s.EPrEMBI3I{      V'\nBEFORE V A' L %  V'   A\n\nTHEHON'BLE      \n\n \n\nRGIITPEHTIONNQILQIZZ' .\n\nRem B3\/its   . * *  \nMsLAyesha.VJart::-.de;i: \"fig  _  .\nR}oBanga10I\u00a7--%;29; .V   Petitioner.\n\n\"   lg\n' To\ufb01hs Govan:nentofKzirnatakx,\n*  M.S.Bldgs., Vi&1anaVee&1i,\n[ -~Bangalore--560001.\n\n as\/2{'  .7\n\n\n\n2. Brief facts of the case are as under:\n\nThe petitioner is a registered Trust, which has  ii 3  _  \n\nto the educational needs of the students  it-Q rift  'V J \n\ninstIt:' xtions. The petitioner has esta!)Iisl1ed2i'eellege foif'i:ng5ariing\u00a2 \n\ninstructions in B.Ed. course from theli\"i'aiei1den1icii}Oe\u00a5;Otl?.\nThe petitioner has made an \nCommittee ofthe Natieiial Co1ir;eil'   {the third\nrespondent herein)   course with an<\/pre>\n
annual intake 052;   2008-2099. The
\nthird    Annexure ‘A’ dated<\/p>\n
6.3.2008   petitioner for M.Ed. course<\/p>\n
with an gimme! if 25  subject to \ufb01xl\ufb01llment of such<\/p>\n
reciutremi  mayilllie prescribed by other regulatory bodies<\/p>\n
like’  af.ti’iietiiigv.?i;Tnive1*sit3’\/bodies, State Govemment etc, as<\/p>\n
V applicable.  i<\/p>\n
i V’ .. ” Siniiiitaneously, \ufb01re petitioner made an application to the<\/p>\n
V _  the second respondent herein to grant af\ufb01liatirm<\/p>\n
Kt<\/p>\n
of five years for B.Ed course. The petitioner has called ix;    <\/p>\n
the said eetnxnunication in this writ petition,  ._<\/p>\n
4. The Un,iversi13,z has filed its objectione;   ‘  <\/p>\n
that the petitioner has started  eoui*se_  its 1ee.llege: off; <\/p>\n
1.7.2096. Thus, it does not meet the ‘of  years of
\ncontinuous affiliation of the Uuitrersi\ufb01 eeurse. Thetefore,
\nit is not entitled for gran t of a\ufb01iliation  use game<\/p>\n
5. Iliave heaidii\ufb01fi Jois, learned Senior Counsel<\/p>\n
for the petitioiiezgiSxill}’:e\u00a7.;.i._Dee?;i,4 learned Counsel for the first<\/p>\n
 _iSri  “Ma:;o_har, learned AGA for the second<\/p>\n
H ‘-   Counsel appearing for the petitioner<\/p>\n
 ‘ submits tEzz;ti”t_he.itIniversity is not justified in rejecting the request<\/p>\n
petitioner for grant of affiliation for M.Ed course. It is<\/p>\n
  that the National Council for Teachers Education (for<\/p>\n
it<\/p>\n
N<\/p>\n
satisfaction recorded by the NCTE with regard to the a*sraila.l.i_ilvitj\u00a7!’l   A’ <\/p>\n
lam  <\/p>\n
iry\ufb01asmfucture in the aforesaid college as is evident    ‘ ” it <\/p>\n
(I. m”‘””‘   _ ll
\n” order\ufb01is as under: : 4’ ~ ” rd”\n<\/p>\n
“AND WHEREAS on  of the. .applifcatiL?tlii
\nsubmitted by the institution:  “etta_eheei
\ntherewith the aftidav\ufb01 the “reeei”v~e\u00a2_:l \ufb01em the
\nvisiting team in the form-lief   eigteegraphy,
\nthe Co1mnitteei’is’sats’etieti’tlaet::the’_~institt2tien twins
\nthe  t_he_#pm_viS;iei1s  Act,
\nRules   the Norms
\n ii    education
\n   tee  instmctional facilities,
\nmeasireeenei iiifaeiiitiesf library, accommodation,
\neeaeeiai eeeeee, ieeomories, etc. for rumiing the
\nA V V” ‘and  duly quali\ufb01ed teaching
\nV  Vi  E norms.”\n<\/p>\n
liintveirer,’ the said order makes it clear that the recognition is<\/p>\n
\u00a7i,:{ijeeie.t0 the \ufb01xl\ufb01llment of such other requirements as may be<\/p>\n
   by the regulatory bodies like af\ufb01liating university and<\/p>\n
 . it I V _ _v i  Governrnent as applicable. It is also an admitted feet that<\/p>\n
E<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
“62. From the above decisions, in our judgnent, the”: <\/p>\n
law appears to be very well settled. So fa_t:..asiA  *’
\neoordination and determination of standsse-mt;  A<\/p>\n
institutions for higher education or izhreseatcito iscie1ttific’– _   ‘<\/p>\n
and technical institutions are  suhje.ct’~is \u00ab. ”   A
\nexclusively covered by  List”! ‘of.  <\/p>\n
VII to the Constitution and  has no.’  to
\nencroach upon the legisiatureiiiihrliaxneitt. it
\nis only when the subject coirerediibgiie\ufb01iitijriii\ufb01 of List
\n111 of Scheda1le’V__’II tothe .:h\u00a7i.there is a
\nconcurrent   asiiseli-~’es {he State<\/p>\n
Legislatiiztjesi\u00e9\ufb01     made by the
\n  lirrtit\u00e9itions and restrictions
\n the Constitiitiois.   n  i V,<\/p>\n
is  in the case, admittedly, Parliament has<\/p>\n
A  the  which is in force. The preamble<\/p>\n
V   of   proxddes for establishment of National<\/p>\n
.  Education (NCTE) with a View to<\/p>\n
V  planned and coordinated development of the
\n .. I e_ tesetiereduca\ufb01on system throughout the countiy, the
\nit =  ifegixletion and proper maintenance of norms and<\/p>\n
standards in the teacher-education systems and for
\nmatters connected therewith. With a View to achieving<\/p>\n
‘xx;\n<\/p>\n
x<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
that objection, the National Council for Teacher
\nEducation has been established at four places by the<\/p>\n
Central Government. It is thus clear that the \ufb01eld is
\n\ufb01zlly and completely occupied by an Act of Parliament
\nand covered by Entry 55 of List I of Schedule trite j 2
\nis, therefoze, not open to the State V’
\nencroach upon the said \ufb01eld. Parliament’ alcs\ufb02i\u00e9iieoeld   _
\nhave exercised the power by makiiig  ~li1t=’e’.ii  <\/p>\n
In the circumstances, it isezxot openfto the 2
\nGovernment to refuse   <\/p>\n
Act or on “policy ecnsi;1eratiozf’–.—-   <\/p>\n
It  the \ufb01bre cannot be deprived<\/p>\n
of its authofitg egpowier   ‘en appropriate decision under<\/p>\n
the Act itrespectitieab\u00e9eziee of ‘no objection cezti\ufb01cate’ by the<\/p>\n
 Geitregni”i:gy;i\u00a71:t{I\u00a7fnioiiiW;lle1’ritoi’3r. The Supreme Court has<\/p>\n
     granted by the NCTE under Section 14(6) of
\nit ” ‘ii  eire:-jg’ Llniversity is obliged to grant a\ufb01iliation to such<\/p>\n
 The relevant paragraphs in the judgnent are as under:<\/p>\n
peinieeie%lieue.[‘gee\u00a2estiper the Scheme of the NOTE Act, once<\/p>\n
1%<\/p>\n
K<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
“68. In View ofthe fact, however, that according fQ..1l_Si,
\nthe \ufb01nal authority lies with NCTE and we iarel
\nsupported in taking that View by vagjoos   V<\/p>\n
this Court, NCTE cannot be aepriifed o f’A::s  it<\/p>\n
or power in taking an appropriate   ” it i<\/p>\n
Act irrespective of absence _ob_iec’tio__n ‘eefti\ufb01oete  <\/p>\n
by the State  Absence
\nnomproduetion of by -the,  therefore?\n<\/p>\n
was immaterial and    of<\/p>\n
74. Vt: is mus.  ,CentraI Govermnent has
\n the iisubjeotgof secondaxy education and<\/p>\n
 educetioniet the naiionai level. The Act of 1993<\/p>\n
. V “eieo  to consider teaeheoeduceiion
\n   the country”. NCTE, therefore, in
\n” . “oer  expected to deal with applications for<\/p>\n
 new B.Ed colleges or allowing increase in<\/p>\n
 x ; Lixrtake “capacity, keeping in View the 1993 Act and
\n 2  and coordinated development of teacher-
\ni_j; education system in the country. It is neither open to<\/p>\n
the State Government nor to a University to consider<\/p>\n
16<\/span><\/p>\n
the Eocal conditions or apply “State policy” to re\ufb01me<\/p>\n
such permission. In fact, as held by this Court in cases:  ” ‘
\nreferred to hereinabove, the State Govemrnent  5   <\/p>\n
power to reject the prayer of an  \u00ab<\/p>\n
overrule the decision of NOTE. The of’\u00a311e’i   ”
\nGovernment, therefore, was eont3’a.fyV__to-_1_\u00e91w  \u00ab. ” <\/p>\n
rightly been set aside bythe Hi\u00a7rCotu1;”- A<\/p>\n
xxxx xxxx XXXX xxxx xxxx  _<\/p>\n
80. In our opinion, the
\nof Sections 82 and 83 ofJt.’1e <\/p>\n
Actiere  not be said to be correct.
\nTo us:,,. it  High Court wanted to
\nconvey tvazs that t%__1eA’pfo”iaieions of Sections 82 and 83<\/p>\n
1w}\u00a7>1tlti~not apfrige to anjnstitution covered by the 1993<\/p>\n
    ;T}jer.__the scheme of the Act, once recognition
\n    by NCTE under Section 14(6) of the
\nt’ A  evez\ufb01ua\ufb01xrem\ufb02y (“examining body”) is obliged to<\/p>\n
g;i+apt’*g\ufb02\u00a71i3tion to such institution and Sections 82 and<\/p>\n
 A. ,  oftixe University Act do not apply to such cases.”<\/p>\n
E<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n
=.\n<\/p>\n
E\n<\/p>\n
-.\n<\/p>\n
18′<\/p>\n
requirement of the said college having five years of  ” <\/p>\n
a\ufb02\ufb01liation for B.Ed. course. The said resolution is as   I<\/p>\n
“PROVISION TO START M \u00a31).   = ”  M”\n<\/p>\n
PRIVATE C’0\u00a3.LEGES.- _ issue
\npermitting private colleges to: ~
\nDuring the discussion,  the
\nUniversities are issuing to.:_oiii{:3te’_’_::olleges
\nfor establisl1ine;f:t.gf   it
\nwas decided?’-to   to colleges to
\nstart    such<\/p>\n
as   library, etc. with the<\/p>\n
recommendation VLTtii’vei*sities only.”<\/p>\n
vT\u00a3iteliViee-Chene*ellof_ot’the University has participated in the<\/p>\n
lseid ‘of’tli\u00e9”In_ter-Uxzixrersity Board. The State Government<\/p>\n
by dated 25.11.2007 at Annexure-I has sent a<\/p>\n
 ‘ copy  eforesaid resolution to the Registrars of all the<\/p>\n
‘V V.  il\ufb01ixiefsities with a direction to implemem the same. Therefore, the<\/p>\n
   consideration is whether the University is bound by the<\/p>\n
V ‘ ‘ ‘  A p it “said resolution?\n<\/p>\n
ik<\/p>\n
20<\/span><\/p>\n
coerdinatisg agency fer the financial programme of the universities<\/p>\n
\ufb01mded by the UGC and by the State Gevernrnent respectively, .. V  ~  T ~ <\/p>\n
Sub-section (5) of Section 72 of the Act states  .<\/p>\n
recommendations: resolutions or the decisieps of    i <\/p>\n
be subject to the approval of the State  <\/p>\n
University. It is as under:\n<\/p>\n
“The  [.the_   or the
\ndeeisions ofthe_Board Ashaiil subjeee\u00e9,Lte’.ihee\u00a7.:p:’evaI of<\/p>\n
the  Be’i3ii1diii:’g’en”ithe Universities
\nin thie_AStz.\u00a3e aiiiisiiail’ bee  forthwith and a
\nemnplienee report be sent to the Member<\/p>\n
    taken by the Inter-University Beard dated<\/p>\n
i’2._4.9.20\ufb017 was’  3 View to regulate proper maintenance of<\/p>\n
ii     in the teacher education system and the said<\/p>\n
i ‘egeisggn iein eonfonnity with the decision ofthe NCTE. The stand<\/p>\n
 tb_.eiLTnive:-sity is contrary to the aforesaid decision of the Inter-<\/p>\n
kg.\n<\/p>\n
 u   ”  . _____ .. n<\/p>\n
University Boani. The University is bound to implement the said<\/p>\n
decision ofthe Inter-University Board.<\/p>\n
17. In the result, writ petition succeeds and  u  <\/p>\n
allowed. The communication of the   .1. <\/p>\n
‘G’ dated 7.8.2008 is hereby  Th\u00e9VU_1iiive1’sity\u00bb   tll\u00e9ll .<\/p>\n
\ufb01lmish an application form to
\na\ufb01iliation for M.Ed. course  is  rtted’ to
\nfile the said application    immediately<\/p>\n
therea\ufb01ef;   of ‘t\ufb01e’ lUm’versity is dimcted to
\nconsider  ‘ A ~ in  observatitms made in the
\ncourse of    with law as expedtiously as<\/p>\n
Sd\/..\n<\/p>\n
Iudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Karnataka International … vs The Bangalore University on 17 September, 2008 Author: S.Abdul Nazeer IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT % A DATED THIS THE 17′”*DAv o1r_s.EPrEMBI3I{ V’ BEFORE V A’ L % V’ A THEHON’BLE RGIITPEHTIONNQILQIZZ’ . Rem B3\/its . * * MsLAyesha.VJart::-.de;i: “fig _ . R}oBanga10I\u00a7–%;29; .V Petitioner. ” […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-187523","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nKarnataka International ... vs The Bangalore University on 17 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Karnataka International ... vs The Bangalore University on 17 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-13T12:22:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Karnataka International … vs The Bangalore University on 17 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-13T12:22:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1384,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Karnataka International ... vs The Bangalore University on 17 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-13T12:22:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Karnataka International … vs The Bangalore University on 17 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Karnataka International ... vs The Bangalore University on 17 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Karnataka International ... vs The Bangalore University on 17 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-13T12:22:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Karnataka International … vs The Bangalore University on 17 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-13T12:22:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008"},"wordCount":1384,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008","name":"Karnataka International ... vs The Bangalore University on 17 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-13T12:22:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karnataka-international-vs-the-bangalore-university-on-17-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Karnataka International … vs The Bangalore University on 17 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187523","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=187523"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187523\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=187523"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=187523"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=187523"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}