{"id":187836,"date":"2010-06-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-06-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010"},"modified":"2017-01-23T22:58:38","modified_gmt":"2017-01-23T17:28:38","slug":"mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Hansraj Kumar vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 29 June, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Hansraj Kumar vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 29 June, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                              Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n                       File\u00a0No.CIC\/SM\/A\/2009\/001446\u00a0dated\u00a022\u00ad05\u00ad2009\n                   Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0(19)\n\n\n                                                                           Dated:\u00a029\u00a0June\u00a02010\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0                    :    Shri\u00a0Hansraj\u00a0Kumar\n                                               Vill\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Post\u00a0-\u00a0Amarpur,\n                                               Bhaya\u00a0-\u00a0Baro\u00a0(Barauni),\n                                               Distt\u00a0-\u00a0Begusarai,\u00a0\n                                               Bihar\u00a0-\u00a0851\u00a0118.\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0            :    CPIO,\u00a0UCO\u00a0Bank,\n                                               Head\u00a0Office,\u00a010,\u00a0\n                                               Biplabi\u00a0Trailokya,\u00a0Maharaj\u00a0Sarani,\n                                               Brabourne\u00a0Road,\u00a0Kolkata\u00a0-\u00a0700\u00a0001.\n\n\n        The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0spite\u00a0of\u00a0notice.\n\n        On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0were\u00a0present:\u00ad<\/pre>\n<pre>        (i)      Shri\u00a0C.P.\u00a0Gupta,\n        (ii)     Shri\u00a0Sudhir\u00a0Kumar,\n        (iii)    Shri\u00a0S.P.\u00a0Das\n\n\u00a0\n<\/pre>\n<p>2.      In\u00a0this\u00a0case,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had,\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0application\u00a0dated\u00a022\u00a0May\u00a02009,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>requested\u00a0the\u00a0Branch\u00a0Manager\/CPIO\u00a0for\u00a0a\u00a0few\u00a0pieces\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0regarding\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>a\u00a0cheque\u00a0deposited\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Karvy\u00a0Stock\u00a0\u00ad\u00a0broking\u00a0Firm.\u00a0The\u00a0Branch\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Manager\u00a0\/CPIO,\u00a0 in\u00a0 his\u00a0 letter\u00a0 dated\u00a0 9\u00a0 July\u00a0 2009,\u00a0 denied\u00a0 the\u00a0 request\u00a0 on\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>ground\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0bank\u00a0could\u00a0not\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0its\u00a0customer&#8217;s\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>account.\u00a0The\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0in\u00a0another\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a08\u00a0July\u00a02009,\u00a0had\u00a0also\u00a0informed\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>based\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0details\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0possible\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>desired\u00a0information.\u00a0The\u00a0reply\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0came\u00a0after\u00a0the\u00a0expiration\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0time\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>limit \u00a0 as \u00a0 given \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 Right \u00a0 to \u00a0 Information \u00a0 (RTI) \u00a0 Act. \u00a0 In \u00a0 the \u00a0 meanwhile, \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Appellant\u00a0preferred\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0on\u00a027\u00a0June\u00a02009.\u00a0It\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0clear\u00a0if\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Authority\u00a0had\u00a0passed\u00a0any\u00a0order\u00a0or\u00a0not.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0however\u00a0has\u00a0preferred\u00a0a\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>second\u00a0appeal\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0CIC.\n<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/SM\/A\/2009\/001446\n<\/p>\n<p> 3.      The \u00a0 case \u00a0 was \u00a0 fixed \u00a0 for \u00a0 the \u00a0 hearing \u00a0 through \u00a0 videoconferencing. \u00a0 The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Appellant \u00a0 was \u00a0 not \u00a0 present. \u00a0 The \u00a0 Respondents \u00a0 were \u00a0 present \u00a0 both \u00a0 in \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Begusarai\u00a0and\u00a0Kolkata\u00a0studios.\u00a0We\u00a0heard\u00a0their\u00a0submissions.\u00a0We\u00a0also\u00a0carefully\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>considered\u00a0the\u00a0original\u00a0application\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>reply\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO.\u00a0We\u00a0are\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0that\u00a0based\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>details\u00a0given\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0possible\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0Branch\u00a0or\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>produce\u00a0the\u00a0desired\u00a0information.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4.      However,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0noted\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0case\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0sent\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>nearly\u00a02\u00a0weeks\u00a0after\u00a0the\u00a0stipulated\u00a0period.\u00a0Regarding\u00a0this,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0delay\u00a0was\u00a0largely\u00a0on\u00a0account\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0nature\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>sought\u00a0and\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0scanty\u00a0details\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0regarding\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>cheque,\u00a0it\u00a0took\u00a0some\u00a0time\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0Branch\u00a0to\u00a0investigate\u00a0and\u00a0find\u00a0out\u00a0the\u00a0facts;\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0process\u00a0sometime\u00a0was\u00a0lost.\u00a0They\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0deliberate\u00a0or\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>intentional.\u00a0They\u00a0further\u00a0assured\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0would\u00a0be\u00a0no\u00a0such\u00a0delay\u00a0in\u00a0future.<\/p>\n<p>5.      We\u00a0have\u00a0also\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0passed\u00a0no\u00a0order\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>appeal\u00a0 filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0 Appellant;\u00a0instead,\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0himself\u00a0replied\u00a0treating\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>appeal\u00a0as\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application.\u00a0This\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0the\u00a0right\u00a0way\u00a0to\u00a0go\u00a0about\u00a0dealing\u00a0with\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>appeals. \u00a0 The \u00a0 copy \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 should \u00a0 have \u00a0 been \u00a0 transferred \u00a0 to \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>designated\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0forthwith.\u00a0We\u00a0hope\u00a0this\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0noted\u00a0for\u00a0future.<\/p>\n<p>6.      The\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0is,\u00a0thus,\u00a0disposed\u00a0off.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>7.      Copies\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0be\u00a0given\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0parties.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                 (Satyananda\u00a0Mishra)<br \/>\nCIC\/SM\/A\/2009\/001446<br \/>\n                                                        Information\u00a0Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>        Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy.\u00a0\u00a0Additional\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0orders\u00a0shall\u00a0be\u00a0supplied\u00a0against\u00a0<br \/>\napplication\u00a0and\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0charges\u00a0prescribed\u00a0under\u00a0the\u00a0Act\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0<br \/>\nCommission.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                        (Vijay\u00a0Bhalla)<br \/>\n                                                                  Assistant\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/SM\/A\/2009\/001446\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Hansraj Kumar vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 29 June, 2010 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission File\u00a0No.CIC\/SM\/A\/2009\/001446\u00a0dated\u00a022\u00ad05\u00ad2009 Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0(19) Dated:\u00a029\u00a0June\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0 : Shri\u00a0Hansraj\u00a0Kumar Vill\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Post\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0Amarpur, Bhaya\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0Baro\u00a0(Barauni), Distt\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0Begusarai,\u00a0 Bihar\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0851\u00a0118. Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0 : CPIO,\u00a0UCO\u00a0Bank, Head\u00a0Office,\u00a010,\u00a0 Biplabi\u00a0Trailokya,\u00a0Maharaj\u00a0Sarani, Brabourne\u00a0Road,\u00a0Kolkata\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0700\u00a0001. The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0spite\u00a0of\u00a0notice. On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0were\u00a0present:\u00ad (i) Shri\u00a0C.P.\u00a0Gupta, (ii) Shri\u00a0Sudhir\u00a0Kumar, (iii) Shri\u00a0S.P.\u00a0Das \u00a0 2. In\u00a0this\u00a0case,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had,\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0application\u00a0dated\u00a022\u00a0May\u00a02009,\u00a0 requested\u00a0the\u00a0Branch\u00a0Manager\/CPIO\u00a0for\u00a0a\u00a0few\u00a0pieces\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0regarding\u00a0 a\u00a0cheque\u00a0deposited\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Karvy\u00a0Stock\u00a0\u00ad\u00a0broking\u00a0Firm.\u00a0The\u00a0Branch\u00a0 Manager\u00a0\/CPIO,\u00a0 in\u00a0 his\u00a0 letter\u00a0 dated\u00a0 9\u00a0 July\u00a0 2009,\u00a0 denied\u00a0 the\u00a0 request\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-187836","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Hansraj Kumar vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 29 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Hansraj Kumar vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 29 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-06-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-23T17:28:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Hansraj Kumar vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 29 June, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-23T17:28:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010\"},\"wordCount\":472,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.Hansraj Kumar vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 29 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-23T17:28:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Hansraj Kumar vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 29 June, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Hansraj Kumar vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 29 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Hansraj Kumar vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 29 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-06-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-23T17:28:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Hansraj Kumar vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 29 June, 2010","datePublished":"2010-06-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-23T17:28:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010"},"wordCount":472,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010","name":"Mr.Hansraj Kumar vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 29 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-06-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-23T17:28:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-hansraj-kumar-vs-united-commercial-bank-uco-on-29-june-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Hansraj Kumar vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 29 June, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187836","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=187836"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187836\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=187836"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=187836"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=187836"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}