{"id":187910,"date":"2008-11-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008"},"modified":"2018-12-25T07:02:24","modified_gmt":"2018-12-25T01:32:24","slug":"ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Tiger Security Service vs Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara … on 26 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S Tiger Security Service vs Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara … on 26 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Ravi Malimath<\/div>\n
%.WJ =\n\nEN '\"1'}\"\u00a3\u00a3:i Hi{,}H CUUMI' OF }<;ARNA*1'A\u00a3iA AT BAN GALORE.\n\ni\u00a7)A'Tii3D THIS THE} 26"' DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2i=!\u20ac__3&\u00a7\n\n'THE: I~\u00a3ON'BL}:3 M\u00a7~2.JUS"i'1CE RAVI 1v\u00a7Ai;4'i.:\u00a3Vd\u00a3&'i'i{:'\\'    \n\nWRIT PL\u00a5:}'i'1'i'\u00a3{)\u00a7{*3 No.15'? (; '\u00bbi'+"'"';;\u00e9i{}1}$'\u00a7LB%}f3;\u20ac\u00a7\ufb01L.;i;jV:  \nBi*3"i"WEE\u00a7N: J A T T T   %\n\ni\\r'i;"$. Tiger Security Service,\n\nAt Sri Sanjay Towe-rs,\n\n540.216, Shop E*~\u00a30.GE3 & \nSubbamma Shctty Read,   _ \nBasavailagudi,  A \nBaI:fgaiore~56G {'}G4.    _ j V\nRepresented by ijt;s';E3_fr'::.+p1'i\u00a7.*-,=_:*1:__z' _\nShI'i.PI'8.bhEikaIf..  5j'   ~ 3 \n\n. . . . PE;\"1\"l'i'iON1i}R\n\n&(B\u00a7r-31%;'; ;sz1%;:',\u00a7,.{%;:gi;';%;\u00e9.V1\u00bb<;1;-:*r1~;;., AL'JV()(;:A'l'11.'.j\n\n._ 'ABa;ij1gajore Mahanagara Paljke,\n' Sq\ufb01are', \u00a3'la1f;:ga}Gi'6---368 O02,\nRefprcsent\ufb01-:1  its Commissicrner.\n\n 2, Eixefiutiizg Ezftxgineer,\n\n'-Prajeci .C<'-:I1'a"a}~I,\n\n \u00bb;B'.5...:a\/1.9., N.J:{.Square,\n\n '\u00a53anga1orew56\u20ac) 032.\n\n    Vigiance Security,\n'"4 V No. 151, Defzm-:36 %}ony,\n\nV V 4&1 )3\/l'ain inciiranagar,\n\n\n\nBa:1ga1ore~38,\nRepm-seated by its Manager.  ' \u00bb.    ' ..\n. . . ,.-:_}<13::~::\u00a7.'{QN:;1;:::s;'I'$\n\ngm' s;<L;<.N.PU'i'w:u0wDA, Ai_,')\u00a7.fQ(3A'\u00a7'}3\u00a7'  R4112  " *   \nsMT.M.c.NAGAsI1;2EE,' nicer? 1='=i'{3f~2  : .\n\ns1-}x~ 9: 21-  \nThi\ufb01 Writ Petitian is 1iie\u00e9'%-\ufb01naer Am\u00a7\u00a21e sL 226:\u00bb Qanc: 22? or\nthe ijenstimtion of India pray1n'g__m._\u00bb quas\u00a31__t_f;\u00a7=* order Ciat\u00e9d\n15.12.2630'? Visit': AI3.1"1eXu:'c;_II issued j\ufb01jyf  and etc.\n\nThis pe\ufb01twu coming c_)rL."i'\u00a7*19 131x\u00e9ii\u00a3;11\ufb01ary hearing in 'B'\nGroup this day,  {20uzf'i:1:;a.d3_-: t.};\u00a7~:\u00a7% %  \n'1'he_ ::;\u00a7f_;\u20ac}\u00a7$ for\" a...sgs?rif1: of certtorari to quash the\norder dai;<=:ci"   by the second respondent in<\/pre>\n
r~za.1:;;e:g:>.c:.;,+w\u00a7:,33;1}2z\u00a7%:;:?-.03.<\/p>\n
    “\ufb01’1{3 case of the getitioner that 111 terms 0ft1t1e<\/p>\n
by the second respondent, he bid for the same<\/p>\n
V aiongkvitri’ Vmious other’ Contractors. 011 considera\ufb01on of the<\/p>\n
 !3i<::is, 't}2e second respondent accepted the bid 01111:: third<\/p>\n
 1j;\u00a2s5\u00a7_rd:1d–ent and awarded the same to him and an ageement<\/p>\n
T  entered into and 3. work order dated 15. 112.200'? was<\/p>\n
'\u00e9issuezi. The same is questieneci in this petition.<\/p>\n
\u00e9L__..\n<\/p>\n
.. 3 ._\n<\/p>\n
3. SI’i.\u00a3sd.C.&ayak:rLh1, the learned eeuzasei appearing ibr<\/p>\n
the petitiener submitted {E19}: the respendents have vielated the<\/p>\n
law while awarciing the tender in favour of the third respon.e_1_e:m:..<\/p>\n
He speci\ufb01ca\ufb01y pieacie that II11I1’m1u1z1 wages not being g1vei1._i:a.7<\/p>\n
the empieyees of the thlrd reepencient, thereiere,  ~<\/p>\n
the tender ef the third respo\ufb01dent. is eppeseciAte’_if’ie”  K V’<\/p>\n
Wages Act. He also refers to the e1igi;L*111tj\u00a7T “erifer\u00a7\u00e9…’.at V <\/p>\n
provided by the respondents to e0Ii’E;–e1:\u00e9d_%t.E’xa’t p1’eIei*eIiee””wei1id<\/p>\n
be given to agencies with ISO eeruIieati*0\u00a7i_’.’-‘fize thifd ‘i7\u20ac3Sj_\u00a7;OI1(l\u20acI}t<\/p>\n
does not possess :heVeer1it\ufb01ie2;_t.e_and aeeemmgly the award
\nef contract to  eppaee\u00e9i’ \ufb01ery e1ig1i::i,ii’ty criteria of the
\nresperzdelxtsej’ ”\n<\/p>\n
 .A  the learned counsel appearmg for<\/p>\n
Ii”-ifne respeh\u20acie11t?7L;fe”:*p0;9\u00e9ii3en submitted the: so far as the grant<\/p>\n
efkeaeagee’ {G the eznpieyees of the third respemiezat is<\/p>\n
 cen.eef1:ed,’T’\u00a7\u00a3;e eame is in accordance wlth iaw. He refers te the<\/p>\n
  V. ;~;ite.:eI\ufb01eIii\u00a7 ofebjeetiexzs te contend that there is me vielation of<\/p>\n
‘V  of the Minimum Wages Act and there are sut”f1c:1eI1i:<\/p>\n
. QJLW<\/p>\n
cioeumentatien to eseabiish the same. He timber sue11;.i.1;e~.\u00a7het if<\/p>\n
ail other requirements are ftliiiiied, the  <\/p>\n
accepted even though the Company View net “iS_{)’V”ee1f:1I1ed <\/p>\n
institution since it is emy a question’-.Qf’ ;g3’1eierenee_”‘e3id”e-116$]ia<\/p>\n
question ofI;:1anda’\u00a3:e.\n<\/p>\n
5. I have heard the ieeirned  the efieiivfiozler and<\/p>\n
the respondents.\n<\/p>\n
6. lI’respeet11;e4_’  by the ieamed
\neounsei for t_\u00a3’:.e..,.t\u00a7\u20ac\u00e9\ufb01i\u00a7::\u00a7d1i&\u00a7;r,   herein is that the
\nperiod of cenixfaet’ ene year. The contract would
\nexpire 0:1 14.   ever; 11′ the eemeritiens of the
\nleerzized  fer  ipetitioner is accepted, no positive order<\/p>\n
conic! “be V ‘;:as:_~:ed~ i:1.fiis_ Iavour.\n<\/p>\n
 ‘?. ‘1″‘.he \u00a7_1:1p1i’g11eCE order herein is 3 W\u20ac)}I’K order issued to<\/p>\n
‘  respezident. Interference of the said were order by this<\/p>\n
 .\u00a7.\u00a70\u00a3i:t’e:e1:;i::i\u00e9 be 015110 avail t0 the petitioner until and uniess the<\/p>\n
  .  agfeeme\ufb01t exeeute\u00e9 between the third respondent and the<\/p>\n
 ‘~V.V%L”‘{:eji*1:$o1*a{ieI1 is urlder ehaiienge. The question 01’ considering the<\/p>\n
JL”-F<\/p>\n
_ 5 ..\n<\/p>\n
validity of the work order which 15 in pursuance to the
\nageemem, does not can to any raasoxaa. “me: question ofgfr-_a_11t:i11g<\/p>\n
minimum Wages or not has been answered by the <\/p>\n
in their statemem of ebjectiozzs to contend t:hat.__”t;i1;eTr\u00e9L’ EST\u00bb  <\/p>\n
vielation at ali, thereibre, to put thy:1;o..’te;:=,1:_;”tE::is”\u00a3\u00a7o{1rt 9<\/p>\n
would have: ta go 1:11:43 the merits Q1′ nt\u00a3\u00e9’:\u00a71:1r\u00a7:{13.V<\/p>\n
of bath the partiezs on this ciisputeti, :\u20ac1’134es\u00a5:io1*2._\u00a3_)’i*\u00bb:%::t\u00a7’ ‘}ffi\u00e9 same<\/p>\n
is uncalled far in a writ petiiian w\u00abh’\u00a7\u00a7:{r\u00e9: -:ri;s’ p{11:ed qiiesiien of fact
\n\ufb02eed not be gone into, The Iea1*-\ufb01V\u00a22v’Iif1at the Corporation has %<\/p>\n
viciated ali the”\u00a2o11\u00ab:iiii%\u00a711.s=1\u00a7iT’T..:\u00a7iafgafd1ng the t:em:ie1′. $11106: this
\nCourt has d<:clj.}i1\u20ac:\u20aci'v\u00a5io  the merits er omerwxse 0:" the\n<\/p>\n
-::{:_Tt,41\u00e9;\u00a3:=,711t;i(::\u00a715\u00a2A.~’. raised in i}i\u20ac::*–.r<)f' the iikely expixy of the contract, it<\/p>\n
wotiid' s!1;'t2.at every action of the Llerporation wauld<\/p>\n
 '-Ji1a.ve t\ufb01i  dQI;\u00e9D'iirx:; accordance wi\u00a711 the yroceciure envzsageci<\/p>\n
 'c,Qntern;3;a:ed under law and cannoi: be vioiated under any<\/p>\n
 4 \u00a7\u00a7i1*c1I:.*-'i13.1;1a"1\ufb023';r:t2s. The itorporation therefbre being gevem\ufb01d by<\/p>\n
. \ufb02aws inciuding the Mimrnum Wages Act, wauid have to<\/p>\n
o\u00e9k…\n<\/p>\n
stirictly compiy Wlffl the same. \u00a3\u00ab’a1i:.1re to conzply W131 V_t_?:1\u00ab\u00e9~ ._sa3:ne,<\/p>\n
wzmid there-ibre :”1e{:essar1i3: amact mte\ufb02\u00e9renoe t;r\u00a7\u00e9?__ ticii\u00e9 <\/p>\n
With these observations, the u.i:’\u00a7i ‘f)\u20acJ’?Z}iiii’}I*};”?3{%;i.1″1;V;’.VvtVii’f\u00a7$’V\u00a7fV()1V'{Z’i oi’T___ <\/p>\n
merits is accordingly regecied.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S Tiger Security Service vs Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara … on 26 November, 2008 Author: Ravi Malimath %.WJ = EN ‘”1′}”\u00a3\u00a3:i Hi{,}H CUUMI’ OF }<;ARNA*1'A\u00a3iA AT BAN GALORE. i\u00a7)A'Tii3D THIS THE} 26"' DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2i=!\u20ac__3&\u00a7 'THE: I~\u00a3ON'BL}:3 M\u00a7~2.JUS"i'1CE RAVI 1v\u00a7Ai;4'i.:\u00a3Vd\u00a3&'i'i{:'\\' WRIT PL\u00a5:}'i'1'i'\u00a3{)\u00a7{*3 No.15'? (; '\u00bbi'+"'"';;\u00e9i{}1}$'\u00a7LB%}f3;\u20ac\u00a7\ufb01L.;i;jV: Bi*3"i"WEE\u00a7N: J A T T T % […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-187910","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S Tiger Security Service vs Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara ... on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Tiger Security Service vs Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara ... on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-25T01:32:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Tiger Security Service vs Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara … on 26 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-25T01:32:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":787,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Tiger Security Service vs Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara ... on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-25T01:32:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Tiger Security Service vs Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara … on 26 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Tiger Security Service vs Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara ... on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Tiger Security Service vs Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara ... on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-25T01:32:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Tiger Security Service vs Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara … on 26 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-25T01:32:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008"},"wordCount":787,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008","name":"M\/S Tiger Security Service vs Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara ... on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-25T01:32:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-tiger-security-service-vs-bruhath-bangalore-mahanagara-on-26-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Tiger Security Service vs Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara … on 26 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187910","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=187910"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187910\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=187910"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=187910"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=187910"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}