{"id":187937,"date":"2011-03-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011"},"modified":"2016-08-27T14:00:07","modified_gmt":"2016-08-27T08:30:07","slug":"jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011","title":{"rendered":"Jayesbhai vs State on 25 March, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Jayesbhai vs State on 25 March, 2011<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Anant S. Dave,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/905\/2011\t 3\/ 3\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 905 of 2011\n \n\n \n \n=================================================\n\n\n \n\nJAYESBHAI\nNATVARLAL MODHA - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT THROUGH SECRETARY &amp; 2 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=================================================\n \nAppearance : \nMR\nAR SHAIKH for Petitioner(s) : 1, \nMS VS PATHAK AGP for\nRespondent(s) : 1, 3, \nRULE SERVED BY DS for Respondent(s) :\n1, \nSERVED BY RPAD - (R) for Respondent(s) :\n2, \n================================================= \n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 25\/03\/2011 \n\n \n\nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p>Heard<br \/>\n\tlearned counsel for the parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>This<br \/>\n\tpetition is directed against the order of detention dated 26.11.2010<br \/>\n\tpassed by the respondent No. 2 in<br \/>\n\texercise of powers conferred under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat<br \/>\n\tPrevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (for short &#8220;the<br \/>\n\tAct&#8221;) by detaining the detenue as a &#8220;bootlegger&#8221;<br \/>\n\tas defined under Section 2(b) of the Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>Learned<br \/>\n\tcounsel for the detenue submits that order of detention impugned in<br \/>\n\tthis petition deserves to be quashed and set aside on the ground<br \/>\n\tthat solitary incident alleged against the<br \/>\n\tdetenu is not of such magnitude and intensity as to have the effect<br \/>\n\tof disturbing the public order so as to pass an order under Section<br \/>\n\t3(1) of the PASA Act. He has further submitted that the detaining<br \/>\n\tauthority has not applied his mind to the vital facts and there was<br \/>\n\tnon-application of mind before recording the order of detention. In<br \/>\n\tsupport of the above contention, the learned counsel has relied upon<br \/>\n\tthe following case-laws:\n<\/p>\n<p>Judgment<br \/>\n\tand order dated 22.8.2000 of the Division Bench of this Court<br \/>\n\t(Coram: M.R. Calla &amp; R.R. Tripathi, JJ.), in Letters Patent<br \/>\n\tAppeal No.223 of 2000 in Special Civil Application No.554 of 2000<br \/>\n\t<a href=\"\/doc\/1069201\/\">(Ashok Balabhai Makwana vs. State of Gujarat)<\/a>;\n<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/doc\/1169973\/\">Piyush<br \/>\n\tKantilal Mehta vs. Commissioner of<\/a> police, AIR 1989 Supreme Court<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">\t491<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/doc\/195612027\/\">Om<br \/>\n\tPrakash vs. Commissioner of Police and others<\/a>, JT 1989 (4) SC 177<\/p>\n<p>Kanuji<br \/>\n\tS. Zala vs. state of Gujrat ando thers, 1999 (2) GLH 415.\n<\/p>\n<p>Learned<br \/>\n\tAGP for the respondent-State supported the detention order passed by<br \/>\n\tthe authority and submitted that sufficient material and evidence<br \/>\n\twas found during the course of investigation, which was also<br \/>\n\tsupplied to the detenue, indicating that the detenue is in the habit<br \/>\n\tof indulging into activities as defined under Section 2(b) of the<br \/>\n\tAct and, considering the facts of the case, the detaining authority<br \/>\n\thas rightly passed the order of detention and the detention order<br \/>\n\tdeserves to be upheld by this Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>Having<br \/>\n\theard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and<br \/>\n\tcircumstances of the case, it appears that the subjective<br \/>\n\tsatisfaction arrived at by the detaining authority cannot be said to<br \/>\n\tbe legal, valid and in accordance with law inasmuch as the offences<br \/>\n\talleged in the four  FIRs cannot have any bearing on the public<br \/>\n\torder since the law of the land i.e. Indian Penal Code and other<br \/>\n\trelevant penal laws are sufficient enough to take care of the<br \/>\n\tsituation and that the allegations as have been levelled against the<br \/>\n\tdetenue cannot be said to be germane for the purpose of bringing the<br \/>\n\tdetenue within the meaning of Section 2(b) of the Act unless and<br \/>\n\tuntil the material is there to make out a case that the person<br \/>\n\tconcerned has become a threat and a menace to the society so as to<br \/>\n\tdisturb the whole tempo of the society and that the whole social<br \/>\n\tapparatus is in peril disturbing the public order at the instance of<br \/>\n\tsuch person.  In view of the ratio laid down by the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme<br \/>\n\tCourt in the decisions cited by the learned counsel for the<br \/>\n\tpetitioner, the<br \/>\n\tCourt is of the opinion that the activities of the detenue cannot be<br \/>\n\tsaid to be dangerous to the maintenance of the public order and at<br \/>\n\tthe most fall under the maintenance of &#8220;law and order&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n<p>In<br \/>\n\tthe result, this Special Civil Application is allowed. The impugned<br \/>\n\torder 26.11.2010 of detention  passed by respondent No.2 is hereby<br \/>\n\tquashed and set aside.  The detenue is ordered to be set at liberty<br \/>\n\tforthwith if not required in any other case.  Rule is made absolute<br \/>\n\taccordingly. Direct service is permitted.\n<\/p>\n<p>(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) <\/p>\n<p>*pvv<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Jayesbhai vs State on 25 March, 2011 Author: Anant S. Dave,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCA\/905\/2011 3\/ 3 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 905 of 2011 ================================================= JAYESBHAI NATVARLAL MODHA &#8211; Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH SECRETARY &amp; 2 &#8211; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-187937","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Jayesbhai vs State on 25 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jayesbhai vs State on 25 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-03-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-27T08:30:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Jayesbhai vs State on 25 March, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-27T08:30:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011\"},\"wordCount\":617,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011\",\"name\":\"Jayesbhai vs State on 25 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-27T08:30:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jayesbhai vs State on 25 March, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jayesbhai vs State on 25 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jayesbhai vs State on 25 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-03-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-27T08:30:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Jayesbhai vs State on 25 March, 2011","datePublished":"2011-03-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-27T08:30:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011"},"wordCount":617,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011","name":"Jayesbhai vs State on 25 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-03-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-27T08:30:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayesbhai-vs-state-on-25-march-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jayesbhai vs State on 25 March, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187937","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=187937"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187937\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=187937"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=187937"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=187937"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}