{"id":187975,"date":"2009-08-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009"},"modified":"2015-12-19T06:47:45","modified_gmt":"2015-12-19T01:17:45","slug":"sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri K Umesh vs Beml Limited on 13 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri K Umesh vs Beml Limited on 13 August, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Anand Byrareddy<\/div>\n<pre>3\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BALVGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE :3?\" DAY OF AUGUST  %\n\nBEFORE:\n\nTHE HON $3135 MR. JUSTICE :i:Nz3;}~1D   L\n\nWRYI' PETITION No.3 Isza\ufb01z\u00e9os  = %  \nBETWEEN:  % % %   k\n\nSri. K. Umesh V   E     \nSit) K. S. Kxishnamurthy\" '  \"   f\n\nAged about 41 ygars   '\n\nResiding at   V     \n4*\" Main, 2n;i3.g'jr0\u00a73*:i V J   A     * \nMat11ii&lt;:ere      &quot;  \n\nBaz1g;a1a$i&#039;s:_-S60 054     PETITIONER\n\n(B}g.;jS3I11*\u00a7, P.  \ufb01adtjy, Adxrmt-aitz)\n\n if --EEi\u00a3rfi}&quot;_i.iti\u00a7.iL\u00a3;d\n\n&#039;-.44Rcpres\u00a2fg:zed by its\n &amp; Managing Eirwctur\nCulgxdrate O\ufb01ice, BEML Soudha.\n\n&quot; &#039; *:;o.23z1, 43* Main, 3. R, Nagar\n\n Barxgaiofe-\u00abS60 02&#039;?\n\nBEML Liniiicd\nRepresented by Chief\nGenera} Manager and\nDisciplinary Aaiheritfy\n\nQ\n\n\n\nBEML Nagar\n\nKGF-563 1 15\n\n3. The Deputy General Manager  \n(Perscnnef) BEML Limited\nBEML Nagar\nKGF ~ 563 $15\n\n4. The Sczniur Manager (HR)   &#039;\nBEML Limited  \nBEML Nagar _T &#039;      _\nKGF--~5631.}\u00a7    \n\n(By Shri.    iv:3f&#039;V.&#039;\u00a7%it::;}3;ondcnis nos. 1 in 4)\n\n   \n\n This  filcgti undttr Ariicies 226 and 227 of\nthe C0a:s&#039;.;itution~. &quot;e.{ indie; &#039;pragyring to quash the charge sheet\ndated 29.1.2003 i\u00e9s\ufb01e\ufb02 {he resspmudent 110.2 (\ufb01xnrtamzre M)\nand _ the Qrder. Vgiaied 7~~--.&#039;12.20n07 (Anncxure-3) issued by the\nxeffp\u00e9xident Iii;-xi&#039; as the same are iiisgai, arbitrary&quot; and contrary to\ni\ufb01\u00e9 (E&#039;.DA&#039;~-Ruitzs Lif&quot;iii\u20ac~: rtsspondxzznis and ii is in viulaiiun of ihc\n\n\u00bb  &#039; PI&#039;\u00a7:li\u20ac}i\u00a7&#039;\u00bb1$S Natural Justice.\n\n&#039; T Viifii Peziiliun coming mt: fur Preliminary Htsaring in\n\nA Cfrczzfj this day, the Court made the fellowingz w\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>The peiiiicm cumirlg can 113: Fmiimi\ufb01azjg H\ufb01ari\ufb01g {B-<\/p>\n<p>T Gmup) is wnsidcrcd for final L\ufb01sposai having, regani 10 lbs<\/p>\n<p>{lists and circumzeianccs.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>attend of\ufb01cc and {hat his resignation submitted on <\/p>\n<p>be accepted.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The: second rcs&#8217;;3ondcnL:&#8217;\u00a7iiiwev;:r;.A is_gui:c\u00a7&#8217;._L1Vc}ia.rg\u00a7e&#8217;iLi1&#8217;i*:z st.-vvtm days.\n<\/p>\n<p> .T\u00a7w  \u00a7iac! 2;uug}rL 1hr 2: copy L15 ihe: Standing<\/p>\n<p>.   A~*\u00a7I.ondt1::&#8221;&#8216;}x;fuf2::2\u00a3iio:2 Act, simsc {he paliiiuncr was unaware mi&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>ih\u00a3&#8217;:&#8217;*&#8211;sam:t\u00a7- \ufb01e zmspondcnis having issued a furihar notice mi&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>V.   &#8216;a;-:1s;4uir}V,?&#8221;&#8216;.\u00a2.iait:(\u00a7 24.92.2088 appuiniing an Enquiry 011302: to<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;u&#8217;:.:t.\u00a7$z\u00a7&lt;.\u00a7A:.za;1 an enquiry cm 28.82.2098; the pcziiiinncr is irxzfurcz {his<\/p>\n<p>V  &#039;c\ufb02iifi.\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<p>4. It is 31:: pt:ii\u00a3iunt:r&#8217;:_~: cuntcniion lhai in terms o\u00a7.C}at3sc:<\/p>\n<p>16.1 of Rule 16 of the Service: Rules, the: pcliligfs\u00e9f&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>option cf resigning from the sesrviuc uf U16 x&#8217;?:::,~_:&#8221;}::\u00ab&lt;;~nai.&amp;i1\u00a3&#039;s* &quot; <\/p>\n<p>giving one mr.mih&#039;s nuiicc, whim-hhc \u00a7ia3._d:1ne&#039;an_ii&#039;-gixjce&#039; the<\/p>\n<p>respondent have wiihuul assiglling rc:aso11&#039;2s.rej\u00e9cl\u20ac-xi &quot;l\u00a71\u00a2.*\u00a7&#039;a<\/p>\n<p>same and have pmcccded {L3 i:2iVi\u00a7:1_Tie an cziqalify&#039;  {he gmund<br \/>\nthat ha: has mmaincd -&#039;_unga::v{i1:.;ri\u00a7\u00e9d}y, the peiiiiuncr is<\/p>\n<p>bcfum this Couri,    Vv<\/p>\n<p>Vin -ihig Court had grzmltsd an inierim<\/p>\n<p>order u1&#039;$i:1.yVV&lt;:f1;ii2f\u00a3fie:;&quot;pfgicccdings by the rcspundenis and 111::<\/p>\n<p> V. A_ savtriig is; __?;&#039;:er;1inu\u00e9:d; i31..f\u00a3.1:&#039;;:c iii\ufb01 data.<\/p>\n<p>  5v.4vr\u00e9spuz1dcnL having entered appearance, have:<\/p>\n<p>cufiiesia\u00e9tii. Eli}: pcl\ufb01ion to slam that iht: petition suffszrs fmm<\/p>\n<p> V. saapggrtss\u00e9iun of facts mad if. is devoid of mttriis. Ii is cunizznded<\/p>\n<p>Lhai the \u00a7ml\u00a3\u00a3incf was 0:2 pmb\ufb01iun fer (mt: year and<\/p>\n<p>immediaieiy upcn his cun\ufb01rmaizbn, 22:: was dcpuicd as 21 Care<\/p>\n<p>Tsam Ivimnbwr Lu work undrs:-3* Siemens Imi\u00e9a Limiicd and in this<\/p>\n<p>:6&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>regard, the _r&lt;:spundt:r:i had incuntd huge  __&lt;&quot;;-:i.d\u00e9i&quot;_v<\/p>\n<p>[:3 provide specialized [raining lu_W\u00a3hc  b j:\ufb023\u00a2j*_;,:p.grri<\/p>\n<p>Lzumpirsliun of itaining, {he pc{ili;v&amp;z;cr::&#039;wV:5;\u00a7s lb, <\/p>\n<p>prujcci known as SAP ERP n\u00a3Q\u00a7iu\u00a7\u00a2 in Eaglh  of &#039; V<\/p>\n<p>the rcspondcni as a Cqfc   pciiiiuncr<br \/>\nhad completed abuui  in the midst of<br \/>\nthe training, v ca:.z:st:s prxztjudicc la:<br \/>\nihc  V&quot;i:&lt;1\u00a3\u00a7&quot;f:cs;jond&lt;:zi\u00a3~cL3znpai2}f had to<br \/>\n cag\ufb01\u00e9h\ufb01ilum upon the: p\u00a2:ii\u00a3iuncr&#039;s<br \/>\nRaining. \u00a5 [\u00abisV  why the resignaiiun of the<\/p>\n<p>pcl\ufb01iensr was nuiva{:cef:\u00a3c(i.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   1 ises\u00e9\ufb01ixad reaz\u00e9mz is ihai {he Rafa as smicd 53; ihc<\/p>\n<p> The said Raziwi\u00e9 of BEML Service:\n<\/p>\n<p>Ri\ufb02es&#8221; been amended as early as us&#8217;: 25.i{}.2{}O5. The:<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;_Aa17;3;::::ii;ic:Li Ruiz: reads as under:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;:3: pernlaxierzi of\ufb01cez&#8217; may msigiz his; 6f11\u00a7)IG}&#8217;m\u20ac:f1i by<br \/>\ngiving \ufb02xreze months zzetice in wri\ufb01xxg at by paying<\/p>\n<p>t.h1*ee 1110:1313 pay in lieu ef xwtice to the caixtnpaxxyf&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>\/3<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;3<\/p>\n<p>Hence, the pr;-:iiLi0ucr\u00b0s contention that h::..~h::ti:f&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>resignaiiun by giving (me: mmzih&#8217;s notice is Ijmi, _i_&#8217;r.&#8217;-;:.1Vai3i:\u00e9 and ii\ufb01vzzu <\/p>\n<p>same has been rejected for the abmigr sai.d;\u00a7:aS\u00a3;1i5.   &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>The petitioner having m;\u00b0\ufb01a,insd 3;-\u00a7:\u00a7;t:ni:.&#8217;_=un 2:~uiIii3:*iz:c:&lt;i1g,?<\/p>\n<p>without sacking i&#039;urihc:-1&quot;&quot;*;;g\u00a2:1zr3i$&#039;\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7x5r\u00a7 &#039;Ei&#039;\u00a7\u00a7irz_Athe f\u00a7\u00a7&#039;.$ip{)Vndcnis, [he<br \/>\nrespondents had righliy \u00a32?-\u00a3{V_ivai r.\u00a5:&#039;_d  pfbccedings for his<\/p>\n<p>ut:a,uihuriscdSifm:\u00e9: l4\u00a7&#039;2\u00a3:  &#039;];37&lt;\u00a7i\u00a7\u00a7;i:3;}cr was: huiding a<\/p>\n<p>rtssporlvsiif\ufb01cs&#039; [p\u00a7;\u00e9:;i\u00a3iu&#039;\u00a7; unav\u00e9iiitxriscd absence: was causing<br \/>\ngreat incon&#039;xsenienL.L{a;ni\u00a7&#039;  51; {he rczspundcnizs.<\/p>\n<p> Ii l\u00e9ii&#039;  bezczkground {hai the pcijiiencr had<\/p>\n<p>, iippfu\ufb01\u00e9iilh\ufb01d&#039; Aihivs Cam! and in View :3? the inic:rinf1 order :z,1&#8217;t, \u00a72i\u00a7&#8221;_&#8221;f6Sj\u00a7)(\u00a7\ufb02(if:n[S have bccn prcvezziczd fmm going afxtzari<\/p>\n<p>with \u00a7hi\u00a7.\u00a2c:\u00a7i\u00a7&#8217;uiry prucscdings and in {his siage: L3}: {be m:;2\u00a3ir::r, that<\/p>\n<p>f_&#8221; \u00a73eiii.iQncr&#8217;.s.~; case: being considcrcd wuuid piauc the respundcnig<\/p>\n<p> 3. poasiiiun of disadvantage, whiie prvicuiing the pciiiiimer,<\/p>\n<p>%<\/p>\n<p>who is cc-riajniy a dciinqucnl and had &lt;:u,:%&#039;111&#039;:iii{=:5-\/{_\u00a7&#8211;.<\/p>\n<p>misc&#039;.-cmdtusi as is clear fmm ihc a\u00a73ovMt;Vsequcn&#039;(:\u00e9:&#039; &#039;\u00a22It\u00a7it!$&#039;;~ <\/p>\n<p>7. The Senior Cuunstaf  fwr\ufb01};-cg<\/p>\n<p>whiic rei\u00e9emiing this circum\ufb01iiag\ufb01gc _}vez;\u00a7d&#8211;  \ufb01rxai apari<br \/>\nfrom punishing ihc:  \u00a3I;c&#8221;re:~;pc.&gt;nd::nis<br \/>\nare 3330 c\ufb01zziillced in r\u00a7:;,f.e.\u00bb;;=1jy iai\ufb01uuni by way uf<br \/>\ndamages,    have incurred<br \/>\n  training in {he pctiiiuner<br \/>\nand    ~  rcspundenis are my lmlgcr<br \/>\nprux=idcLix\u00a31Iizc;d absence -:21&#8243; the pctiiiamcr<\/p>\n<p>and-3&#8242;.:hi3_LA&#8217;\u00a7n\u00a3en\ufb01&lt;.\u00a7i1f\u00abzmivio continua: his emgioymeni wiih \ufb02u:<\/p>\n<p> &#039; \u00a3;\u00e9&#039;spund.;\u00a7t1i:Va.r:\ufb01i&#8212;-i.hercJf\u00a32rc wuuid submii ihai iiwre is no cause<\/p>\n<p> uni .IE;2\u00a5.V_i2i:L\u00ab3ri&#039;&amp;:rc1:ct: and that the peiiiiun be dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>&#039; s 4_ 8.&quot; In the above facts and circumstances; as: ihc pciiiiuncr<\/p>\n<p> ri\ufb02e! prucat-{tied on a G\ufb01if\ufb01\ufb01i View of the amemicd Rafa, guing<\/p>\n<p>&#039;by {he avcrmenis made: in 31:: writ peiiiixm, esvcn assuming ihai<\/p>\n<p>{his peii\ufb01oncr was unawans: of time amended Ruia, {he<\/p>\n<p>Q<\/p>\n<p>rsspundcnls wtrrc obiiged in infbrm him abuu\ufb02 E\u00a7it:&#039;~.*\u00ab1jm,tf:1i:(\u00a7;:&#039;?V<\/p>\n<p>Rule and in pfacz: ihc pciitiuncr V132\u00bb nuiigsti&quot;21:\u00a7: _&#039;:\u00a7:;V&quot;&#039;l})\u00a7:A.VR-sgi\u00e9&quot;<\/p>\n<p>requiring Ehmc months notice of  firuziec\u00e9iings..i13iEiz%_icd &#039;E3r<\/p>\n<p>resignaiiun and also ihai ih\u00e9&quot;-.pciiiic\u00a7&#039;11t;rVhaVxri_z3g &quot;:\u00a7r::\u00a7%:rgun\u00a2&#039;<\/p>\n<p>iraining, the benefit of whichV.u:;gh.i&quot;&#039;agji 11:56&#039;-.:iv.s;\/ijirsd \u00a39 {he<\/p>\n<p>respondents in impfernexiiitzg,&#039; Eh:-._  <\/p>\n<p>9-     xvheiilcf the<br \/>\n   \ufb01n the: pt\ufb01iiiuner and {his<br \/>\nCuurl \u00a7&#039;%Y1_&#039;3.vingA;A  siayrsd all furihex&quot; pruucadings,<br \/>\nii 1:-annoi&#039;  3. fur\ufb01lcsr iapsc on the pari of {he<\/p>\n<p>pcii.&amp;i?gnea&#039;~ having&quot;rt::3f;;;_irsc&lt;\u00a7 absent unauiilunlszediy, in this view<\/p>\n<p> &#039;\ufb01n: ina&#039;iic\u00a7;,;&#039;i&#039; \\.w:.:\u00a7d \ufb01e opzsn for {hrs rcspondcznls to wi\ufb01lhuid<\/p>\n<p>&#039; . V.V\u00a3\u20acI\u00a5}*t3I&#039;4l&quot;(i:E&#039;:\u00a33l Rafe,<\/p>\n<p> \ufb02ay in lien :21&#039; noiice as garovided undtzr ii}:<\/p>\n<p>   The: further aficgaiion {hat ihe: rmpundeni-cempany<\/p>\n<p>&quot; &quot;Bad {2} suiTcr hugs Iosscs insurred as cxpcndiiura in prwiafing<\/p>\n<p>{raining 19 {ha pcii\ufb01oner, the mspondcnl weuhi ccriainiy be<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>N}<\/p>\n<p>cnii\ufb01cd {&lt;3 prezfar 2; civii suii and claim dmnagp\u00e9\ufb01t&quot;ag\u00e91\u00a7\u00a31$ii-:!}ii:_<br \/>\npttiiliunczr. Therefore, it is approgr\u00e9gie iha\u00e9&#039; &quot;like .:_pt:[i&#039;iioi;.\u00a2r <\/p>\n<p>directed tax pay three mun\u00e9hs&#039; pay in&quot; Tiieu &quot;u_f&quot;&#039;ng&#039;,\u00a7iicVc:\u00bb &quot;is;\ufb01ic<\/p>\n<p>respundtmiueumpany. Vs&#039;hile ._v&quot;\u00a7~\u00a3.E;x~:riyA&quot;&#039; is V wii\ufb01 ih\u00a2&#039; <\/p>\n<p>res ndenis to iniiialt: _ raceediz2s:sv&#8211;1&#039;\ufb01;~:u1hr aS&#039;ihr:..v3amaacs is<br \/>\n.7&quot;. V_ c&#8230;\u00bb  D<\/p>\n<p>Lance-med and other duc\u00e9 as svislif <\/p>\n<p>Insofa_f._%Ls   that he is; cnliiicd to<\/p>\n<p>L-:t:vcI&quot;aI Lezrzzzin\u00e9ii  &quot;i3____IE:r .\u00a7&#039;ihe pciiiiuner is made: at<\/p>\n<p>rcprcseniaifo\ufb01 \u00a30, Eh:-:V &quot;c\u00a5aim\u00a7ng the same and the<\/p>\n<p>reazpundcszis {L3 is-\u00a3323;-gitisr {her s3zI:&quot;c;:j 1*z auasordanccz with fawn<\/p>\n<p>  &#039;T\u00a7}ti&quot;pc\u00a3i:i.\u00a5(:\u00bbn;\u00a7isp~:3ssd ufin terms; as abmm.<\/p>\n<p>scu-\n<\/p>\n<p>IUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri K Umesh vs Beml Limited on 13 August, 2009 Author: Anand Byrareddy 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BALVGALORE DATED THIS THE :3?&#8221; DAY OF AUGUST % BEFORE: THE HON $3135 MR. JUSTICE :i:Nz3;}~1D L WRYI&#8217; PETITION No.3 Isza\ufb01z\u00e9os = % BETWEEN: % % % k Sri. K. Umesh [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-187975","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri K Umesh vs Beml Limited on 13 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri K Umesh vs Beml Limited on 13 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-19T01:17:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri K Umesh vs Beml Limited on 13 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-19T01:17:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1207,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri K Umesh vs Beml Limited on 13 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-19T01:17:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri K Umesh vs Beml Limited on 13 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri K Umesh vs Beml Limited on 13 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri K Umesh vs Beml Limited on 13 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-19T01:17:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri K Umesh vs Beml Limited on 13 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-19T01:17:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009"},"wordCount":1207,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009","name":"Sri K Umesh vs Beml Limited on 13 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-19T01:17:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-umesh-vs-beml-limited-on-13-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri K Umesh vs Beml Limited on 13 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187975","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=187975"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187975\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=187975"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=187975"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=187975"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}