{"id":187982,"date":"2011-05-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011"},"modified":"2016-06-07T22:35:39","modified_gmt":"2016-06-07T17:05:39","slug":"dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011","title":{"rendered":"Dr.Shashi Prabhakailash vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 30 May, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Dr.Shashi Prabhakailash vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 30 May, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                     at\n                                               New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                             File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000833\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a030,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a030,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Dr.\u00a0Shashi\u00a0Prabha\u00a0\u00a0Kailash\n           Deputy\u00a0Director\u00a0(AR)\n           Room\u00a0No.202,\u00a02nd\u00a0Floor\n           All\u00a0India\u00a0Radio\n           Akashwani\u00a0Bhawan\n           New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0001\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\n\n           Respondents\n\n           O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Director\n           DG:\u00a0AIR\n           Audio\u00a0Research\u00a0Unit\n           Sansad\u00a0Marg\n           New\u00a0Delhi\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0K.K.Sundaram,\u00a0CPIO\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Director(AR)\n                                     Shri\u00a0S.R.Pandey,\u00a0Consultant\n                                     Shri\u00a0L.S.Bajpai,\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0AIR,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\n                                     Shri\u00a0Masood\u00a0Javed,\u00a0Sr.A.O,\u00a0AIR,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\n                                     Shri\u00a0Sunil\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0UDC,\u00a0AIR,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\n                                     Shri\u00a0Jahan\u00a0Singh,\u00a0HC,\u00a0AIR,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\n\n           The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0were\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0\n\nInformation\u00a0Commissioner     :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n\n\n                                              Decision\u00a0Notice\n As\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision\n                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                          at\n                                                  New\u00a0Delhi\n                                                                                       File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000833\n                                                       ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.10.11.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0DG:AIR\u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       14\u00a0points\u00a0including\u00a0            File \u00a0 notings \u00a0 from \u00a0 which \u00a0 transfer \u00a0 order \u00a0 dt.4.11.10 \u00a0 have \u00a0 been \u00a0 issued, \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                 Copies\u00a0of\u00a0representations\u00a0received\u00a0(if\u00a0any)\u00a0based\u00a0on\u00a0which\u00a0her\u00a0transfer\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0ordered\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       vide\u00a0 above\u00a0order,\u00a0reason\u00a0 for\u00a0taking\u00a0out\u00a0her\u00a0transfer\u00a0order\u00a0and\u00a0action\u00a0taken\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0circulation\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       pamphlet\u00a0by\u00a0Shri\u00a0Arvind\u00a0Dhanvick\u00a0on\u00a05.4.04.\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0R.C.Singh,\u00a0CPIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a03.12.10\u00a0furnishing\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       point \u00a0 wise \u00a0 information. \u00a0 The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 an \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 dt.15.12.10 \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       complaining\u00a0that\u00a0 inspite\u00a0 of\u00a0 depositing\u00a0Rs.6\/\u00ad,\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0notings\u00a0have\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       information\u00a0against\u00a0point\u00a0No.5,\u00a0is\u00a0incorrect.\u00a0\u00a0She\u00a0also\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0reply\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0received\u00a0against\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       points\u00a06,\u00a07,\u00a08,\u00a012\u00a0and\u00a013\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0despite\u00a0visiting\u00a0the\u00a0section\u00a0several\u00a0times,\u00a0nobody\u00a0was\u00a0available\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       allow\u00a0inspection\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Directorate&#8217;s\u00a0file.<\/p>\n<p>2.     Shri\u00a0L.S.Bajpai,\u00a0CPIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a06.1.11.\u00a0\u00a0With\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0points\u00a06,\u00a07\u00a0and\u00a08,\u00a0he\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0action\u00a0has\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       been\u00a0taken\u00a0(Memo\u00a0issued)\u00a0and\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0points\u00a012\u00a0and\u00a013,\u00a0\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0sent\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Competent \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 for \u00a0 enquiry. \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 then \u00a0 filed \u00a0 another \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 dt.20.1.11 \u00a0 with \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0points\u00a06,\u00a07,\u00a012\u00a0and\u00a013\u00a0reply\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0satisfactory\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       copies\u00a0of\u00a0action\u00a0taken\u00a0reports\u00a0have\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.\u00a0\u00a0Ms.T.Dolkar,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0forwarded\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0appeal\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0against\u00a0point\u00a05.\u00a0\u00a0With\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0points\u00a06,\u00a07,\u00a08,\u00a012\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       13,\u00a0she\u00a0directed\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0AIR,\u00a0Delhi\u00a0to\u00a0re\u00adexamine\u00a0the\u00a0points\u00a0and\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0action\u00a0taken\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       report\u00a0\u00a0on\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0additional\u00a0charges\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0RTI\u00a0rules.\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.22.2.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>3.     During \u00a0 the \u00a0 hearing, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents \u00a0 handed \u00a0 over \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 presence \u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       undersigned,\u00a0the\u00a0action\u00a0taken\u00a0reports\u00a0and\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0memos\u00a0\u00a0sought\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0against\u00a0\u00a0points\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       6,\u00a07,\u00a08,\u00a012\u00a0and\u00a013.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4.       With\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0points\u00a02\u00a0and\u00a05,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0provided\u00a0\u00a0is\u00a0incorrect\u00a0since\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         she \u00a0 is \u00a0 aware \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 fact \u00a0 that \u00a0 the\u00a0 representation \u00a0 from \u00a0 SC\/ST\u00a0 association\u00a0 has\u00a0 been \u00a0 received\u00a0 by\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         DG:AIR. \u00a0 \u00a0 She \u00a0 produced \u00a0 documentary \u00a0 evidence \u00a0 to \u00a0 this \u00a0 effect \u00a0 before \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission. \u00a0 The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Respondents\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0they\u00a0are\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Audience\u00a0Research\u00a0Unit\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0representations\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         have\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0received\u00a0by\u00a0them\u00a0from\u00a0DG:AIR\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0informed\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         about\u00a0this.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>5.       The\u00a0Commission\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0of\u00a0both\u00a0sides\u00a0is\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0view\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0 \u00a0DG:AIR\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         should\u00a0 be\u00a0 given\u00a0 an\u00a0 opportunity\u00a0to\u00a0present\u00a0his\u00a0point\u00a0of\u00a0view\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0while\u00a0giving\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         reasons\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0 \u00a0a\u00a0penalty\u00a0should\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0imposed\u00a0upon\u00a0him\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0replying\u00a0in\u00a0time\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         application.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>6.       The\u00a0case\u00a0is\u00a0therefore\u00a0adjourned\u00a0till\u00a07th\u00a0July\u00a02011\u00a0,\u00a010.30\u00a0am\u00a0when\u00a0another\u00a0hearing\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0held\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         chamber\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0matter.\u00a0The\u00a0PIO,\u00a0DG:AIR\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         be\u00a0present\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0explanation\u00a0in\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0show\u00a0cause\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         notice.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>7.       The\u00a0PIO\u00a0ARU\u00a0\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0forward\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0Order\u00a0to\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0DG:AIR\u00a0.<\/p>\n<p>8.       The\u00a0hearing\u00a0is\u00a0adjourned.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                        (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                               Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<br \/>\nCc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Dr.\u00a0Shashi\u00a0Prabha\u00a0kailash<br \/>\n         Deputy\u00a0Director\u00a0(AR)<br \/>\n         Room\u00a0No.202,\u00a02nd\u00a0Floor<br \/>\n         All\u00a0India\u00a0Radio<br \/>\n         Akashwani\u00a0Bhawan<br \/>\n         New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0001\n<\/p>\n<p> 2.   The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n     O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Director<br \/>\n     DG:\u00a0AIR<br \/>\n     Audio\u00a0Research\u00a0Unit<br \/>\n     Sansad\u00a0Marg<br \/>\n     New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p>3.   The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n     O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Director<br \/>\n     DG:\u00a0AIR<br \/>\n     Audio\u00a0Research\u00a0Unit<br \/>\n     Sansad\u00a0Marg<br \/>\n     New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p>4.   Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Dr.Shashi Prabhakailash vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 30 May, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000833 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a030,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a030,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Dr.\u00a0Shashi\u00a0Prabha\u00a0\u00a0Kailash Deputy\u00a0Director\u00a0(AR) Room\u00a0No.202,\u00a02nd\u00a0Floor All\u00a0India\u00a0Radio Akashwani\u00a0Bhawan New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0110\u00a0001 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0Commission Respondents O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Director DG:\u00a0AIR Audio\u00a0Research\u00a0Unit Sansad\u00a0Marg New\u00a0Delhi Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0K.K.Sundaram,\u00a0CPIO\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Director(AR) Shri\u00a0S.R.Pandey,\u00a0Consultant Shri\u00a0L.S.Bajpai,\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0AIR,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi Shri\u00a0Masood\u00a0Javed,\u00a0Sr.A.O,\u00a0AIR,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi Shri\u00a0Sunil\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0UDC,\u00a0AIR,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi Shri\u00a0Jahan\u00a0Singh,\u00a0HC,\u00a0AIR,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0were\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0 Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ Decision\u00a0Notice As\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000833 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-187982","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Dr.Shashi Prabhakailash vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 30 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dr.Shashi Prabhakailash vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 30 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-05-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-07T17:05:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dr.Shashi Prabhakailash vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 30 May, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-07T17:05:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011\"},\"wordCount\":600,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011\",\"name\":\"Dr.Shashi Prabhakailash vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 30 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-07T17:05:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dr.Shashi Prabhakailash vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 30 May, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dr.Shashi Prabhakailash vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 30 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dr.Shashi Prabhakailash vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 30 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-05-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-07T17:05:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dr.Shashi Prabhakailash vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 30 May, 2011","datePublished":"2011-05-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-07T17:05:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011"},"wordCount":600,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011","name":"Dr.Shashi Prabhakailash vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 30 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-05-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-07T17:05:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-shashi-prabhakailash-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-may-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dr.Shashi Prabhakailash vs Ministry Of Information And &#8230; on 30 May, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187982","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=187982"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187982\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=187982"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=187982"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=187982"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}