{"id":188290,"date":"2008-10-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008"},"modified":"2015-06-09T07:16:52","modified_gmt":"2015-06-09T01:46:52","slug":"smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Smt Shobha vs Mahila Samakhya Karnataka on 24 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Shobha vs Mahila Samakhya Karnataka on 24 October, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar & Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala<\/div>\n
-3-\n\nWA No.\u00a7\u00a5\u00a73'~3\/2907\nIN THE HIGH caum' mi' KARNATAKA \n\nCIRCUIT SENS-H AT G\u00a5.}LBARCrA\n\nDATED TPHS mg 2433 SAY GB' OCTOBER :\"\u00bb:\u00a7t)ss..\u00abT   \n\n_ PRESENT   _\nTHE H{)N'BI.-E Mr.     \nTHE ;~:<3N'B1.E. Dr. J\u00a73S'I'ICFA3_I\u00a3:Bf{Et\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01I'H\u00a7\u00a7VA'f$A{v\\:A\nWRTI' APPEAL" \n\nBETWEEN:    . \n\n1. Smtshobha,     . I  \nW] o..\u20ac'mJ11ku1:\u00a5xar .P'a:id'av,b VL \nAged abmit i:!L)=\u00a7ze;:~:r;*'5._, '--\n\n(3923:  "fl "\nR{0.N0.'.2g--60_4! 1;   \nNear STBT Crass, _ V\nJagat, Guibarga. '\n\nSmt.C-hirista \n-"'~5.3f6-fn*Ji\ufb01.i*\u00a73mkar;"\u00bb.. _____ \n\n{Q\n\n Agcd nahoigf'  ~j\u00a75CaI\u00a3'S,\n\n \ufb02ops'  V ._\nR',I<3..\u00a2(;"~f'!'x1"is:.tV\u00a71'*.=a;t1' Ci'tI{):T!'_\u00a7',\nChitguppas Talx\ufb01z,\nV Hungu_11d\u00a7.- ~  A\n'Dist:  V\n\n.  cy\ufb01t\u00e9fmppa Helk\ufb01rc, \n.j\u00e9.'ig\u00a3*d about 44 years, ix,\/\/'"\n\n\n\n. Mzs\ufb01haivar Begum,\n\n. Smt\ufb01eeta D.K-rzzmsf _\n\n,v SzI1t.R\u00a2;1112{a, .,\n   ..... \n1_Ag:::dA 4%) y\u20ac:,a1'\u00a7.:_. \n\n,_  Dhmwad'  'V \n\n'   -- .Sm.t.  "\n A 'W,!b.'Sha1'anappa Ga\ufb02zwad,\n Agcdabimt 44 years,\n\n '-\u00abDec; Salxayogii\ufb01,\n*  Aif. F7031". Yengunriza,\n\n "~.Ta1uk:A}aI1d, \nA " .. Dist: Gulbarga. V\n\nWA Ns::\u00ab.9'E.39\/ 1200?\n\nOcc: Sabayogini,\n\nRf oifkam Jabagi,\nFilterbcd Read,\n\n\u00a5'o:s.\u00a3: Atsihizzzgtmr,\n\n'Taluk 8:. Dist: Cirlslharga.\n\nW] o.Abc1ui Sukur,\nAge: 37 years'\nOcc: Sahayogiui,\nR\/o.H.No.7~995,\nMaomiapnra,\n\nNear Mijaguri,\ncjuibarga,\n\nW\/o.Vi1:1od Kumar,  * '    ,\nAged 30 ycaxssi, _  _\n\nR\/o.Hous.e};:g31d';..V  3i.;._ , V\n\nLate: ('\u00a711ndapjj):aA    \nS\ufb01iseva\ufb02\ufb01iga\ufb01.  --\u00ab  '\n\nNehru Guisj,\n\nGulbarga.\n\n1:::;:c:; Sa1:1a}:dgi_i3i," ----\nN\u20acar'\u00abLaxzE:.i:'?4,Va1ti\u00a7a'ai1 Temple,\nRavivar Path;  f_ \n\n\n\n '(By S';-ri.i'.'.t.Ii:13.f.:;i.<{*1Lz,Ir1.':'1r, Adv.\u00bb\n\n 147  Samakhya Kalnataka\n\nWA 939.9%\/2007\n\n8. Smt,Th1'ppamma,\nW \/ o\ufb01itlarailappa,\nAged 49 yams,\nGoo: Sahayogixii,\nAt Post Vcngunda,\nTalukz Alaxld,\nDist: Guibarga.\n\nQ. Smt.KaIavathi,\nW] 0. Zarcppa,\nAged 49 years,\nDoc: Sahayoghii,\nAt Post Vengtmda,\nTaluk; Aland,\nDist: C}uibarga.. \n\n10. Smt.Ka11amma',~v"  ' ._ __ "  \nW] o.Wharai1ap\u00a73\u00e9i_i'\u00e9'i1\u00e9L=:1g\u00e9;--f'."  V'\n"CC:   V  V  .,\n\nAt Posi:'?Y\u20ac1Lgu1;-da,  '\nTaluk: Maud,   *\nDist: G1:133a.\u00a3"\u00abga4 .\n\n11, Mrs\ufb01sther, -.\nW] 0.4}R'aijL.';1z3:1a1","' .. _ M V\n -  skgczi\u00e9?-"":'?~8; .3\u20ac'm:t"'=3- " ' ----- -~ "\nv. "Of.i'C:' Sa}j.:\u00a71yogi3gi,\n* 9; :';.\u00bbHT. \u00a5aFc;.4--;i;:.-r3'i;*4,l :25 (158),\n  \nNaubad,  Aiand. ...APPELLANTS\n\n   ;;\u00a2[;53:, 22*" Main,\n\n" 491 "1" Black, Jayanagar,  '\n\n\n\ne\/,,,.,fi*{' dated  It makes an interesting reading. H: recites\n the authp\ufb01ties are hagspy to note the service mentality of the\n their commitment to make the warmer: educated.\n\n.. "}'jThe'1;efei;'e, they have decided tit? utilise the Services <:3f the\n\nWA NQ999\/2087\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
This appeal is pneferled challenging the order oi:.’;;%:.e
\nsingle Judge who has set aside the awaxti sf tilt?   _
\ndirecting reinstatement of the appellant
\n\ufb02faoe\/ha  : A.  ~ _  <\/p>\n
2. The facts leading to this appezafeete ae  t R<\/p>\n
The Government of  for
\neducation for eduea\ufb01ng_womee-   women
\n\ufb01em socially and   It provi\u00e9ed
\neducational  for  ezdcalescent girls with a
\nnecessary  ”  leanling envimnment.\n<\/p>\n
The pmgxams\ufb01e\ufb01izas  Samakhya’ in the year 1989.\n<\/p>\n
The State ..Ggveu1:i;t::i:1e11t; ti:-zn\u00ab” . ‘.3Z?.Q1,1989, registered Mahila
\n The’  were engaged as educaters<\/p>\n
3&5 . The order of appointment is at Annexure<\/p>\n
~ .  V}    been distinguisheti. From the aforesaid Judgments,
\n  V  yv tit :}f}’t3C{>’I:JZ1ES clear that before the introduction of Clause (bb) in<\/p>\n
 2(c:x>}, the Courts interpreted that the retrcnchmcznt<\/p>\n
WA 310.999} 2097<\/p>\n
in\ufb02icted by way of disciplinary action, but
\nnot include: ”  4′
\n“2.(9\u00ab:::}(bb) termination of the  V
\nservice of tht: workman as a   ‘the-i’
\n‘non-mnerwal of the  J t\u00e9f  .,
\nemplayment between t\ufb01e \u00ab..\u00a7n1piDjy’\u00e9t’  At
\nthe workman concerned  ex\ufb01\ufb01gr
\nof such contractv bgtng ._undetrVV”‘
\na stipulation. in   <\/p>\n
thcreiscu”    _  ‘<\/p>\n
9.  1 wag  .  period of
\nconaact C\u00a3fVxeI}i%:}:i'(‘?}’1I}Ei:f?i1:f_QV!}.T\u20ac%{t.#&(3f1 ttz\ufb01\u00e9mployer and
\nthe snf\u00e9ritmatif  no questielz of
\nits     ;i:>’ut there existed a
\nS\ufb01pula\ufb01\ufb02lt tin’  that the Executive
\nOf\ufb01\u00a3’\u20ac?I’ h\u00e9t\u00e9  .j{)\u00bbt1}V:.\u00a7’\u00ab’:%I’H.15{) dismms her Without<\/p>\n
_  azgy  v The questient which new
\n.A  :f;xr4vA:”‘cQnsideration, is whether Section<\/p>\n
  ‘Vt  Act is attracted to tlm facts and<\/p>\n
Ci;’cV11m$t\u00e9i1t\u00a3.:a\u00e9’s of this case.”\n<\/p>\n
  \u00a7:9;. _II1  case also the Judgment of the Apex Court 5:1<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
  and not to bug term empioyment anti that
\n  works for 10 years, the said prmrision is net
\n  such inierpretation would Iesult in violatien Qf
\n provision. The learned single Judge, cm careful<\/p>\n
 ‘ ~v.’VAco:1eVi.1{1’eration of the entire material an recent, the catena of<\/p>\n
_ in _<\/p>\n
we M999\/1290?\n<\/p>\n
includes any termination of service in any maxmer and;’vfer.y_r2LI:y
\nreason othewzise than as a punishment in\ufb02icted   .
\ndiSCip\u00a711ElI’_\u00a7?’ aciien. Therefore, that
\nterminaiien simpliciter amounting 1:9 1″ef:”7enc;%1<r\u00ab\u00a7\u00a5_\ufb01t:'
\nbackground, the Parliament amends-pl    L,
\nCiause Qioes} tfbbl. By introdue\ufb01o\ufb01the same  they
\nexciude\u00e9 \ufb02ora the purview of  of the
\nsexvice of the workman as a__    of the
\nContact 03? employn;;ei\u00a7i:;VVe\u00a7\u00a7env:e:en L  \u00abend the workmen
\nconcerned on its  terminated under
\nstipulation       of emploment.\n<\/p>\n
Therefore, o;1\u20ac:e” \u00ab’.tIie–  that a tennination cf
\nempioymen\ufb01  etvsf stipuiatrion 31:1 contxact of<\/p>\n
e3.15p3Q}*ma\u00e9!zi’\u00a7~ does 110:  to retmnchment, it is not possible to<\/p>\n
I3oi.cVi~, said statut-sly pmvision, it appiies only to<\/p>\n
 \u00e9\u00e9iew <3'1'*–{}1\u00e9\u00bb-."1:1ait:r a\ufb01\u00e9i'-'"::\u00a71czmg that the termination is not illega}<\/p>\n
—    a  compeusa\ufb01-311 of Rs.30,{}OOf- to each 0f the
\n~ : .\u00ab..a;;.pE:IIantS,V Which has not 136311 challenged. In fact the same has<\/p>\n
   by the respomtlents to the appellants to Show their<\/p>\n
.. gg ..\n<\/p>\n
WA Nok99’9\/ 2907
\ndecisions cited befgrvc him, having regard to the facts i;1.%f:.yij$~.\u00a2ase,
\nhas rightly hsicl that termina\ufb01on of thsse
\naccordance with the Carder of appointmtglgt. {t
\nthat thfi appoinmlent of app:-;:}Ia1;:t is  ”
\ncan be terminated at any time? Withput
\nfact order of appointment has to  .\ufb011:L:li1’V\ufb022(Z.’ \u00a7Z'(}Bt\u20acXt that
\ntht: service\u00e9 of the   l’I1HgfX\u00a2t11\u00a7}’11g their
\nassistance for the up\ufb01\ufb01i11g’VHc;fT’  the rural areas
\nand they V(}l13.I1″tt*:*{;’I;\ufb01’:{\u00a7\u00a3C3  ‘i.e., to make use of
\ntheir service.    not the saiary.\n<\/p>\n
20.   not Q56 any merit in this appeal.\n<\/p>\n
A-:c:3rdi11g1:v ,’  ap13;\u00a7:.z\u00a71′:_:i:-;.\n<\/p>\n
21 _– .13  $16 1\u00e9s1’\ufb01ied \u00e9;ingle Judge has taken a sgvmpathetic<\/p>\n
  the decisien in S.M.Ni1ajka:r’s C3353, has<\/p>\n
-23-<\/span><\/p>\n
WA No.99?! -200?\n<\/p>\n
22. However, We axe ef the View that haviug_..\u20ac%e:g;’a1t1vj’ the <\/p>\n
admitted facts, the appellants came fozwaxd to_~:*e:;d}f:rrb \u00e9ezviee   <\/p>\n
women. folk and their sexvices are voluntazyiand. t1}ej:A.xx%ere”i\u00a7?<Q:1\u00a7\u00a7;1g<\/p>\n
on honorarium, another sum cf -I_2s.2CV{.{)v0.'{}_!– 3?!\u20ac' a'};?_aI'd$:\u00a7d as<\/p>\n
addiiional compensation.\n<\/p>\n
Ordered accordingly.  ._
\n I   ”  Iudge<\/p>\n
Sd\/..\n<\/p>\n
Iudg\u00e9<\/p>\n
b:1v*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Shobha vs Mahila Samakhya Karnataka on 24 October, 2008 Author: N.Kumar & Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala -3- WA No.\u00a7\u00a5\u00a73’~3\/2907 IN THE HIGH caum’ mi’ KARNATAKA CIRCUIT SENS-H AT G\u00a5.}LBARCrA DATED TPHS mg 2433 SAY GB’ OCTOBER :”\u00bb:\u00a7t)ss..\u00abT _ PRESENT _ THE H{)N’BI.-E Mr. THE ;~:<3N'B1.E. Dr. J\u00a73S'I'ICFA3_I\u00a3:Bf{Et\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01I'H\u00a7\u00a7VA'f$A{v\\:A WRTI' APPEAL" BETWEEN: . 1. Smtshobha, . […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-188290","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Shobha vs Mahila Samakhya Karnataka on 24 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Shobha vs Mahila Samakhya Karnataka on 24 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-09T01:46:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Shobha vs Mahila Samakhya Karnataka on 24 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-09T01:46:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":730,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Smt Shobha vs Mahila Samakhya Karnataka on 24 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-09T01:46:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Shobha vs Mahila Samakhya Karnataka on 24 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Shobha vs Mahila Samakhya Karnataka on 24 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Shobha vs Mahila Samakhya Karnataka on 24 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-09T01:46:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Shobha vs Mahila Samakhya Karnataka on 24 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-09T01:46:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008"},"wordCount":730,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008","name":"Smt Shobha vs Mahila Samakhya Karnataka on 24 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-09T01:46:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shobha-vs-mahila-samakhya-karnataka-on-24-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Shobha vs Mahila Samakhya Karnataka on 24 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188290","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=188290"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188290\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=188290"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=188290"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=188290"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}