{"id":188681,"date":"1978-07-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1978-07-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978"},"modified":"2015-06-26T11:26:01","modified_gmt":"2015-06-26T05:56:01","slug":"chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978","title":{"rendered":"Chaparala Nageswara Rao vs Authorised Officer Land Reforms, &#8230; on 3 July, 1978"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Andhra High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Chaparala Nageswara Rao vs Authorised Officer Land Reforms, &#8230; on 3 July, 1978<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: AIR 1979 AP 21<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: J Reddy<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p> 1. The declarant is the petitioner. He filed a declaration under Section 8 (1)  of the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling and Agricultural Holdings) Act (Act 1 of 1973). The first Tribunal held that he holds an excess of 0.0580 standard holdings. On appeal, the Appellate Tribunal gave some relief and the surplus got reduced to 0.0256 standard holdings.\n<\/p>\n<p>    2. In this revision, Shri Tatarao, the learned counsel  for  the petitioner contends that the declarant sold an extent of Ac. 2-28 cents an 22-10-1971 to one  Potluri  Mallikharjuna Rao, P. W. 2. and it was registered On 30-10-1971 and ever since the sale, the purchaser has been in possession and enjoyment of the said land and therefore, the same ought to have been excluded.   The lower Appellate Tribunal rejected this contention mainly on the ground that the transferor has not satisfactorily established the necessity for selling the land and that the cist receipts for all the continuous faslies have not been filed and ultimately held that the transaction  was  not a genuine and bona  fide one.   This finding of the lower Appellate Tribunal is erroneous.   Admittedly, the land has been sold under a registered sale-deed executed on 30-l0 1971. The recitals in the document show that the property was sold with a view to improve the other property. It also mentions that Re. 3,500\/- was paid in Cash at the time of execution of the document and the balance of consideration of Rs. 7,500\/- is paid by executing a promissory note in favour of the vendor. The promissory note dated 22-10-1971 is also marked as Ex. A-2 by the Tribunal.  That  apart, the land revenue receipts filed. viz. Exs. A-4 to A-6, would show that the purchaser, P.W.2 paid the land revenue for the year 1975-76. The declarant stated that the revenue reteipts for the earlier years have been lost.  So, under these circumstances, the question is whether the transaction was a genuine one or not. The nature of evidence insisted upon by the Appellate Tribunal would be needed in a case where be transaction is merely under an agreement of sale. But in a case of sale-deed executed prior to of registers nature of proof and nominal one is different of proof  required to show that it is not a sham and nominal one is different.  In C. Pitchamma v state of Andhra Pradesh, (1978) 1 APLJ (HC) 35, Ramachandra Raju, J., held that if the surrounding circumstances show the transfer to be a Sham and nominal one then only the question of the proof  that it is a true  and genuine one arises and the declarant has to discharge the necessary burden.  In this case, the transfer is under a registered Sale-deed. There should   be strong circumstance to indicate that  transfer is a sham and nominal one and  was entered into with a view to avoid and defeat the objects of Act 1 of 1973.   Such circumstances are not to be found.  The sale itself is in favour of a stranger and at least   Exs.  A-4 to A-6 show that the transferee has paid the land revenue for some years,   P. W. 1 as transferee entered into the witness box and deposed that he has been  the cist. That apart  there is ample material to show that the declarant had some necessity and accordingly add the lands. A Division Bench of this Court in <a href=\"\/doc\/723412\/\">State of Andhra Pradesh v. Balarami Reddy,<\/a> (1977)  1 APLJ (HC) 452,  held further that a landholder can even sell the land with a view to reduce his ceiling area and if such transfers are true and valid and if they have been acted upon, they should be accepted and that by satisfactory evidence, the declarant can discharge the necessary burden. These principles  very much apply to the facts of this case.\n<\/p>\n<p>     3.  In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The Land Reforms Tribunal is directed to exclude the extent of 2-28 cents, which was sold by the declarant under EX A-2, and determine the surplus, No costs. Advocate&#8217;s fee Rs. 100\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>  4. Petition allowed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Andhra High Court Chaparala Nageswara Rao vs Authorised Officer Land Reforms, &#8230; on 3 July, 1978 Equivalent citations: AIR 1979 AP 21 Bench: J Reddy ORDER 1. The declarant is the petitioner. He filed a declaration under Section 8 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling and Agricultural Holdings) Act (Act 1 of 1973). [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-188681","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-andhra-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Chaparala Nageswara Rao vs Authorised Officer Land Reforms, ... on 3 July, 1978 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chaparala Nageswara Rao vs Authorised Officer Land Reforms, ... on 3 July, 1978 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1978-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-26T05:56:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Chaparala Nageswara Rao vs Authorised Officer Land Reforms, &#8230; on 3 July, 1978\",\"datePublished\":\"1978-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-26T05:56:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978\"},\"wordCount\":698,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Andhra High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978\",\"name\":\"Chaparala Nageswara Rao vs Authorised Officer Land Reforms, ... on 3 July, 1978 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1978-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-26T05:56:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chaparala Nageswara Rao vs Authorised Officer Land Reforms, &#8230; on 3 July, 1978\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chaparala Nageswara Rao vs Authorised Officer Land Reforms, ... on 3 July, 1978 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chaparala Nageswara Rao vs Authorised Officer Land Reforms, ... on 3 July, 1978 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1978-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-26T05:56:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Chaparala Nageswara Rao vs Authorised Officer Land Reforms, &#8230; on 3 July, 1978","datePublished":"1978-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-26T05:56:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978"},"wordCount":698,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Andhra High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978","name":"Chaparala Nageswara Rao vs Authorised Officer Land Reforms, ... on 3 July, 1978 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1978-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-26T05:56:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chaparala-nageswara-rao-vs-authorised-officer-land-reforms-on-3-july-1978#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chaparala Nageswara Rao vs Authorised Officer Land Reforms, &#8230; on 3 July, 1978"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188681","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=188681"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188681\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=188681"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=188681"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=188681"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}