{"id":188762,"date":"2008-06-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008"},"modified":"2016-12-25T13:33:05","modified_gmt":"2016-12-25T08:03:05","slug":"gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Gudusab Husensab Hubballi @ … vs State Of Karnataka on 27 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Gudusab Husensab Hubballi @ … vs State Of Karnataka on 27 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Jawad Rahim<\/div>\n
1\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 27*\" DAY OF JUNE, 2008\nBEFORE\nTHE HONELE MRJUSTICE JAWAD RAHIM\nCRIMINAL APPEAL NO.:861\/2003\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nGUDUSAB HUSENSAB HUBBALLI' @ NA DDIMU'L:,'A  '\nAGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, A 1.  A  \nR\/O MULGUND CHMAN PETH,\nTQ AND DIST : GADAG \u00bb  A\n' ._  APPELTANT \n(BY SR1. CHANDRASHEKAR\"P,P\"ATIL, ADV. '3, --  '\n\nAND :\n\nSTATE OF KARNATAKA  E' \n\nBVY\"C'P1\"O.Ef.GAi5?A'G RURAL CiFiC'LE\n\nR'EPRESENT'ED._E3Y  _ .\nSTATE _PUE:~'LIC.'\u00ab.PROS_EC|,II;O R,\nHIGNcO.URT._EUTL:)IN--r5,'\nBANGALORE. -_ \n\n \u00bb _   -  RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
 ‘5:,(E3Y’ SR1. B. E3’A.E_..A\u00a7\u00a7RISHNA,ADv.,)<\/p>\n
  ‘cRL.A – T-<I_LE.O U\/S. 374(2) cR.P.c. AGAINST THE
\nJU.D'G.EME'NT;-.OT;,5.11.2003 PASSED BY THE P.O., FAST TRACK
\nCOURT, GA,D'A<3,T IN S.C.NO.3\/Oi CONVICTING THE APPELLANT\/
\nACCU'SEDf Noii FOR THE OFFENCE P\/U\/S 307 OF IPC AND<\/p>\n
 'v.,SENTEN.r:1Nc3 HIM TO UNDERGO R.I FOR THREE YEARS AND
\n ALSO TOPAY A FINE OF RS.10,000\/~ I.D., OF PAYMENT OF FINE
\nfAMOU–NT, FURTHER UNDERGO R.I FOR SIX MONTHS.<\/p>\n
"This appeai coming on for hearing this day, the Court<\/p>\n
 Ii'  .d_eiivered the foiiowing:\n<\/p>\n
5\/’I<\/p>\n
3UDGMENT<\/p>\n
The convicted accused is in appeal against the<\/p>\n
judgement in S.C. No.3\/2001 on the file of 3udt_j:e,:.:”L:’Fsa’s.t<\/p>\n
Track Court, Gadag, passed on O5~11~20i33,  <\/p>\n
appellant for the offence punishableurider ]3d7–‘.}1’PC;..& it<\/p>\n
2. The material facts on :4t.he”.Vldasi6.’.’I3.f”whicVl*iT’the’~.VV<\/p>\n
trial was tried and convicted
\nOne Giriyappa ,  was”””r’e’siding I in
\nHolalpur village alonga’   and sister ~.\n<\/p>\n
Gangawwa:    his wife. His sister
\nGangawwa  was married but due to some
\ndispute  devse’rte’c’.VA’lieirrnyushband and had been living with<\/p>\n
her\ufb02ijiother an’d..\u00a7\u00a7iriyai:ipa. She was vending milk and thus<\/p>\n
 innlilcodntavct with accused No.1 ~ Gudusab Husensab<\/p>\n
A”‘:-lu-b_l3al’i’i4:’@.,\u00bbV__Na:’ddimu|la. It is alleged that both developed<\/p>\n
illicit in’ti’n’-:a’cy and continued it for quite some time.<\/p>\n
.yGiriyap’p”a and other family members learnt of such carnal<\/p>\n
e.L:telati’onship and advised Gangawwa (Accused No.2) to<\/p>\n
 -desist from such indulgence but she continued. In the<\/p>\n
U<\/p>\n
rushed to the spot and nursed her husband Giriyappa
\ngiving water and then they arranged Horse cart (Tanga)<\/p>\n
and shifted him to the hospital, after conveying messa_ge_Vto<\/p>\n
the Mulagund Police Station. Message was<\/p>\n
PW12 – Fakkirappa Adiveppa Iti, ASI,  <\/p>\n
and on the way to the spot, he saw tanga app’roachf.ri\u00bbg:_”arid?<\/p>\n
found G iriyappa and Laxmamrna    the  S.\n<\/p>\n
injured in a tempo and brougvhtiithe inV};u~reVd’to irxflulagund
\nHospital, but the doictor was \u00a7nAo’t~\u00ab._V_;ayia’:\u00ab!able. if tience, he
\nshifted the injured to the:l”_GVoi\/ernmenlt’lifiolspital in Gadag<\/p>\n
and informecif  inciiderit “to  “–~—it)urgappa Basappa
\nDoddaihani, wvhvo.’*w:as_’i’nchva_rge of Shirahatti Police Station
\nand he re=eregist\u00e9’red.Vtn-eiiga\u00e9se in Cr. No. 40\/99 and handed<\/p>\n
ove,r_\u00a7”‘ti*.e ca”se_Jl*or: further investigation to PW11-<\/p>\n
it    lmalla’-ppa.\n<\/p>\n
 5., ~”Viiinl::the meanwhile, PW7, visited the hospital at<\/p>\n
“v..,Gadag~_’\u00e9:ind questioned Laxmawwa, who gave her<\/p>\n
“s”_st,ate’rnent about the occurrence. He obtained her thump<\/p>\n
  impression and registered a case for the offence punishable<\/p>\n
under Section 504, 114, 307 r\/w 34 IPC, which was<\/p>\n
X:\n<\/p>\n
submitted to the jurisdictional Magistrate on O3-O7~1999.
\nThe injured was then shifted to KIMS Hospital at Hubli for<\/p>\n
better treatment and his statement was also recorded.-.___<\/p>\n
6. During investigation, the Investigatin;g:’fd”fjii\u00a7ft-2r<\/p>\n
learnt the incident was witnesses by Hanun*j:a’ntha:pba <\/p>\n
PW8, Kamalawwa — PW10, Mohan\u00e9.-mad.gYu–nis’_.;\u00a7f.W.li’3..and–.A if<\/p>\n
Jakirhusen Chamansab Walikar —  firliiho”=.+ijes-..’\u00a7__g <\/p>\n
on the land. Their statement ingjci”i.ctedA’the ‘and 2. ”<\/p>\n
The medical officer exa.mineds.the..’victim and ‘is–si.i.e’d wound
\ncertificate and described’t’h_e- irijuiriies as’.%_sirnpsle I n nature.<\/p>\n
 ._ Bavsledonl th”eg::irri_ate’rial so collected the charge
\nsheet was-filed a’i1d””lVear:ried’jurisdictional Magistrate after<\/p>\n
taking cognizancesicomrnitted the accused to stand for trial<\/p>\n
before  Sessions Court. During trial before the learned<\/p>\n
l\u00a7u_dg.e\u00ab,A  Court, the prosecution examined in all 15<\/p>\n
witn”esse’san’d placed reliance on 15 documents and Mos ..<\/p>\n
   the basis of evidence brought on record the learned<\/p>\n
 j__’J”tidge: convicted the accused No.1 for offence punishable<\/p>\n
if  ‘under Section 307 IPC and sentenced him to undergo RI<\/p>\n
  ‘ ..\n<\/p>\n
V’ . ” E!
\n‘ H. 2,1<\/p>\n
for a period of 3 years and fine. The case against accused
\nNo.2 was split up. Aggrieved by the said order accused
\nNo.1 is in appeal.\n<\/p>\n
8. The {earned counsel Sri Chandrasheig,aVrV’\u00bb:i4l\u00a7atil,
\nassailed the impugned judgement
\nlearned trial judge has based his
\ninterested testimony of PW2 to
\nLaxmawwa, the Complainant’
\ninvestigation had commence_d_l:’%w’as_\u00bb not ..Va_l’l\\’:re ‘and her
\nstatement had remaivriedf’ _uriV:prorv.ed-.,_’grSecondiyr, the wouid<\/p>\n
contend llll  gist\/en”‘V’V:by Laxmawwa reveals
\ndifferen’t.\\re\u00abrsion:o.l9:_the’\u00abincident tha–n what is mentioned in
\nthe chargelshe’et..:V’V-_ A it it
\n   to the learned counsel for the
\n t4h’e::vcomplainant has stated that Kandii (sickle)
\n  of second accused — Gangawwa which the
\n‘*.,first acc’usVed Gudusab took and assautted Giriyappa.
\n Giriyappa’s statement is that he was holding the<\/p>\n
l  sickle. Secondly, he would contend that in the complaint<\/p>\n
V.  wa.s4_noi3″l3y A3. but was by Gangawwa the second accused<\/p>\n
 imam the victim had skapped. In retaliation, she might<\/p>\n
ll   <\/p>\n
there is a statement of the deceased complainant that the
\nvictim Giriyappa had siapped second accused Gangawwa
\nhaving seen her in compromising position
\naccused. This is aiso absent in the state’;r’nentA_.:’ol:’!the
\ncomoiainant. Lastly he contends:’tha:t”
\nthe accused for offence unde.r_Sect’i’on”‘–3l.07
\ntotally unsustainable as the  sufferedr
\nwas described by thevdo~c_tor_\u00ab’as’V_ natu’rei.”l He also
\ncontends that the staterne-nt ‘ulinrlvitnes’SA\u00e9i\u00a71’l\u00bb.l\u00a7.self shows that
\nthe accused  injury on victim if<\/p>\n
his intention  sickle as aileged is the<\/p>\n
objectlof   is used to hit at a person, the
\ninjuries  woluicl:   would be very severe. In the
\ninstant case,’  suffered by Giriyapoa are described
\n in nature and therefore, the accused
\n1″co”u:l.gi\u00abA teen’ convicted for offence under Section<\/p>\n
of’i’PC. Aitematively it is urged._that the assault<\/p>\n
have hit him to save her, but the complainant has fatseiy<\/p>\n
implicated the appellant accused.\n<\/p>\n
10. Per contra, the learned Government Pleader<\/p>\n
Sri.Balakrishna would contend that the evidence on ‘record<\/p>\n
ciearly estabtished is that it is At who has cAa_us:ed”,j”th’e<\/p>\n
injury to the person of the victim and as  <\/p>\n
only identified him but described h-i’s””o’ve.rt  tin-dlinx’gg<\/p>\n
recorded by the Trial Court is Vjustif\u00bbi’e.c_l.’-U”<\/p>\n
11. I have heard bothj”sidesV. a–n_d’VV.e_”>A;aVmined’V the V<\/p>\n
material on record for,r’e:_appraisal,..of evjdence.”‘ <\/p>\n
 =  ..i’n”-d_.i’S–pute that A2 – Gangawwa is<\/p>\n
younger sister,,ot” the victim. She was married<\/p>\n
 but.~d_evse~rted he’-rlhusband and was living along with her<\/p>\n
 \u00bbm’o–ther..:_in Balehosur for some time and then, at Mulgund<\/p>\n
 occurred. The report regarding incident<\/p>\n
-V was4″gzivven”‘by Shantawwa wife of Giriyappa. However,<\/p>\n
 ‘:g.(3ii*i-\u00bb,r,_apvf:3″a has atso been examined by the 1.0. in which he<\/p>\n
—  had directty alleged that A1 had stabbed him. The incident<\/p>\n
Wis said to have occurred on the land bearing Sy. N0.108<\/p>\n
 -‘Q7\/.\n<\/p>\n
5 \/<\/p>\n
situate in Holialapur owned by the accused. On 2.7.99 at
\n3.00 p.m., when he had gone to his land and while
\nworking, he noticed A2 and A3 were indulging in physical<\/p>\n
intimacy. He approached them and questioned hVis7si’ster<\/p>\n
the second accused and reprimanded the fir_st””a.c’;:u:sVecl.’wy<\/p>\n
This has been clearly spoken to by the   <\/p>\n
and I find no reason to disbeiieve tAhat:.stafte’m\u00e9nt’.–.  <\/p>\n
13. About the assault,,the \\\u00ab\/ictim hasgiyreniia clear <\/p>\n
narrative account that A1 w’as.._iii’nf_uriated’:and snatched
\nkodii from his hand an’d…_s’t–abt.ied\u00a7.him, ~.H’eysuffered injury to<\/p>\n
his ne’cik”‘iian..dVf,_fei:i?;f fTh:e inEid’\u00e9rit is noticed by PW–8
\nHanuma-nthappa;”‘owa’er_:i”-.o:f..- the adjoining land. His<\/p>\n
statement iw~ou’ld. cshoiiv that he saw A1 and A2 on the date<\/p>\n
“‘>._of  inczidlent aVt”ti1’e”iand of the victim and after hearing<\/p>\n
 he rushed there and found Giriyappa had<\/p>\n
fallen  land with injury on his neck and was<\/p>\n
“V..ybleedi’n_g.’:. He tied towel around his neck to stop bleeding<\/p>\n
“:T”_a\u00abn:d”shifted him to Mulgund hospital in a tanga. But as the<\/p>\n
  doctor was not availabie in the hospital, he was shifted to<\/p>\n
Gadag where he was examined by doctor Satyabodha –<\/p>\n
I \\ (N
\n, 5 – g
\ne<\/p>\n
:\u00a7\\”:”\u00a5\u00a3-” ‘-\n<\/p>\n
. .:desc.ribed those injuries as sufficient in the normal course
\n_’ ofiiature to cause death. The victim has since been<\/p>\n
  -discharged after treatment and his fife appears to be out of<\/p>\n
PW–9 on 3.7.99. Since the neck of the victim was cut, tube
\nwas inserted for respiration and admitted for further
\ntreatment. Ex.P1\u20ac) is the case–sheet. The evidence of PW–
\n1 — Dr.R.N. Patil and doctor Satyabodha — PW-9 le:a.t_{e.s’i*io
\ndoubt that the injured was first examined
\n8.40 pm. then, he was shifted- _to  ” 2
\nFollowing injuries are found on his:”Qers_orr.’ 4′ 1 l l V A
\n“1. Cut iacerated injur*\/hir1.easurivnr;:; 3’fxr:.jh’i2;ji$s.-xVV
\n1 V2″ insize just below  carrtiilvajge\ufb01iat
\nthe front aspect  Trachea<\/p>\n
and cut and   V<\/p>\n
 Cutlilac-eraitedl’inju–ry* measuring 2″ x 1 1\/2 ”
\nabout  a-bove  injury above cricoid<\/p>\n
” _{ ‘ caurti|age’.”._u V I<\/p>\n
 have no doubt stated the injuries<\/p>\n
ares-imgole nature. But doctor Satyabodha -~ Pi\/V-9 has<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
danger but subsequent to trial, it appears, he did not<\/p>\n
survive and is now dead.\n<\/p>\n
15. The circumstances in which the offence has<\/p>\n
been committed reveals that Al and A2 had indu,lV\u00a7ie:dr._Vin<\/p>\n
carnal reiation which had upset the <\/p>\n
including Giriyappa. On 2.7.99, he   <\/p>\n
physical intimacy and thus approac,hed..th\u00e9En5–._  is  <\/p>\n
that he might have acted,\u00bbr’a-g__gressive’ly at”u’tije,_sec;onld <\/p>\n
accused who is his sister andV’vl’i’acjainst i’!\\’i–.::”lE:’>utv’fthe fact
\nremains that he has su;.fif”e–red–‘_VAinjV.ury..\u00a7~s,i”r:oted above which<\/p>\n
in the  d:ojctors\u00bb.,:c’ould’._”b’\u00e9caused by kandli seized
\nthroughinvestigatio_n,”~E{rt:.rr1.\u00ab-such material evidence, it is<\/p>\n
clearthat th-edvictirnA’had”lVnot indulged in act of vioience<\/p>\n
;_the._accusedwi”and 2 but it is Al who appears to<\/p>\n
 injury on his neck. Neck, undoubtedly,<\/p>\n
alvital pa\u00e9rtofeithe body and injury on the neck could have<\/p>\n
 ‘r__been f’at’a’l. Evidence of doctor Satyabodha — PW~9 would<\/p>\n
A “:,sh,ow”\u00ab_\u00abthat because of damage to trechea and tube was<\/p>\n
 inserted to enable breathing. From such finding it is<\/p>\n
 established that the injury if not treated, could have<\/p>\n
u: x
\n2\/FFV – ‘<\/p>\n
: fl
\n.’ \/’<\/p>\n
mu<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
resulted in death of the victim. The statement of the
\ninjured therefore, establishes nexus between the overt
\nacts of A1 and sufference of injuries by the victim. Offence<\/p>\n
is therefore, established and hence act of the accuse’d._Vin<\/p>\n
causing injuries comes within the ambit of Sec’=;’it>r1~\u00ab’.3Vi.1:’.(V’i. _<\/p>\n
the IPC only. The Trial Court has rightly    <\/p>\n
the said charge and for want .’<\/p>\n
This is an unfortunate case w\u00bbhe._re the.yi’ctim  to’; put <\/p>\n
some reason in the mind of A1  A2 but –s.uff’ered injuries
\nat their hands.\n<\/p>\n
  brought to my notice
\nby the learned aVp’p”e’:.l,a’r1\u00abt.ls’~.r::o–unsel regarding possession of<\/p>\n
kandii at tide tyimey\ufb02of Ai’ncVi’d’ent is not of such importance as<\/p>\n
‘3″\u00ab_to  the statement made by the victim himself that<\/p>\n
 had caused injury to him. The second<\/p>\n
inconhsistency is only as to who was in possession of kandli.<\/p>\n
”._The complainant in her report stated that kandli was in the<\/p>\n
\\\u00b0i:and’s of second accused Gangawwa whereas, victim<\/p>\n
  claims that kandii was in the hands of Gangawwa which A1<\/p>\n
 took and stabbed him. Be that as it may, from whom<\/p>\n
,.\n<\/p>\n
1′ ;’\\_
\n  L, .~
\n7 Kay<\/p>\n
Z3<\/p>\n
kandli was procured by the accused is not of such
\nimportance as to render the evidence relating to assault by<\/p>\n
A1 nugatory. Hence, I discount this contention.<\/p>\n
:17. The second contention of the |earn_e.d_’44’co’usn’_:::el3<\/p>\n
is, because the complainant is no more and’ after  V’<\/p>\n
death, the prosecution is using in e\u00a7vild’eiic.e’-Punder:”p.r_o.vi’si’on”1<\/p>\n
of Section 32 of the Evidence Act.\n<\/p>\n
18. The last contention..iyL:.6?ithe”learned’; for V<\/p>\n
the appellant is that the inc.iidentf’oVc”eurred\u00abin l-iollalapur<\/p>\n
which comes under thelterritoiriali|o_c:ai– of Shirahatti<\/p>\n
Police S__tat_ionxVVa’ndV..t:hrat”‘i~nv’estig-ation was done by Mulgund
\nPolice Statvionivitiat\u00e9slyltheprosecution must also fail for the<\/p>\n
following.reaso’ii.:_{V I<\/p>\n
   Basappa Dodarnani — PW–7 was Assistant<\/p>\n
 Police working at Mulgund Police Station<\/p>\n
as on  He was incharge of Shirahatti Police Station.<\/p>\n
 J:\/lit .3__.00’p.:m., he received FIR in Crime No.47\/99 on the file<\/p>\n
 ‘fviulgund Police Station. He re–registered the same in<\/p>\n
it  -Crime No.40\/99 of Shirahatti Police Station vide Ex.P7 and<\/p>\n
1%<\/p>\n
forwarded the same to the jurisdictional Magistrate.
\nTherefore, it is clear that though the case was registered in
\nMulgund Police Station in Crime No.47\/99. It has been<\/p>\n
referred to Shirahatti Police Station for investigatVio’n_:’a.nd<\/p>\n
he being the incharge SHO of that Statiori””‘hfas._:’raft’*_<\/p>\n
registered the case in Crime No.40\/99.\n<\/p>\n
has been filed by the police in ShirahattigPol’i–ce4.Stati*o’n.tg__’ando <\/p>\n
not in Mulgund Police Station; .4__TheA’S_iviO of th”ejVS:hi.rai\u00a7;atti <\/p>\n
Police Station submitted repo”it_ii’toV Circl–e_VV:i:hsp:ector of
\nPolice, Gadag Rural Po_l’i’ce ..Sta\u00a7tio’n.__[This was because
\nShirahatti and Mulgund  o’ne’C’i:rc~i’e and i.e., the<\/p>\n
CPI of Gadag i?\u00a7u”ra:~i._yC’ilrcle,:T”%lo’l|alapur and Mulgund the two
\ntaluks are’aiJndVer”*  Rural Circle and the Circle<\/p>\n
Inspector. of thatgilocali justification took up investigation<\/p>\n
  the same. It is he who has filed the<\/p>\n
cha’rge~s’li\u00e9_e_t_.~.l;”~’i”herefoore, mere registration of case in<\/p>\n
 Mulg”tend–..’:’Police Station will not be impediment for<\/p>\n
,n:Shi.ra’hatt’i. Police Station to investigate the case. Charge~<\/p>\n
‘s’hVeet’is filed by the CPI who was incharge of both these<\/p>\n
T  “Police Stations. ‘There is no infirmity legal or otherwise in<\/p>\n
\u00abJ<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
registration of the case and conducting of the<\/p>\n
investigation. Thus, this ground also must fail.<\/p>\n
19. In the result, I find that the evidence on record<\/p>\n
tendered by PW–2 Giriyappa Yaliappa Bhangi they<\/p>\n
the assauit is fuily supported by the evidencejofidoct’ors’_4’i ”<\/p>\n
Dr.R.N. Patii — PW–1 and Dr. Saty;:ib’ho–dh  ‘ywhic.h~ is; it<\/p>\n
a ciincher about overt acts of A1 in’ <\/p>\n
person of Giriyappa by usingVaingobject.”whichiyvas’~–sh’a’r;$j. If i’<\/p>\n
the accused had no intentioni-~to:..”gigi|i”‘*t,he viictimgcertainiy<\/p>\n
the attack wouid have ubeer: on .ii’o:the:riivV:uir1:y’itai parts of the<\/p>\n
body. {Neck  thesbayrt of the body for attack
\nand accused VsucVceeded.._:ii”n\u00bb.causing injury in such speed<\/p>\n
that trecheia’~w’as_CutA”van’d’Vdoctors had to insert tube for<\/p>\n
“”w._eas’in.g :jegsp~i.ration.”””T’hVe victim was saved by chance and<\/p>\n
i’   circumstances, the charge against the<\/p>\n
d”~\u00ab..’*..accuse’d_ffor offence under Section 307 of the IPC was<\/p>\n
 framed and the finding recorded thereon by the<\/p>\n
 Trial Court is after appreciating evidence which is in the<\/p>\n
V sac*x_f”\n<\/p>\n
16<\/span><\/p>\n
correct perspective. Hence, the order regarding convi–ction<\/p>\n
of the accused for offence under Section 307 <\/p>\n
needs no interference and I confirm the same.   <\/p>\n
21. As regards the order of sentences is4r_concer.n’ed, f<\/p>\n
it is submitted that the Courtgchas b\u00e9\u00e9eni’harshiviV’rnrVV’..\u00e9:yir.ard;in’.g
\nthree years imprisonment to a’;5o.ei’:.ant   fine of
\nRs.10,000\/–. I do not  harsh.\n<\/p>\n
In the resuit, the same’iihe.’\u00ab’appeai of the
\napileliant –  judgement in
\nS.C.   Judge, Gadag, is<\/p>\n
confirm\u00e9d. H A.\n<\/p>\n
sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
FUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Gudusab Husensab Hubballi @ … vs State Of Karnataka on 27 June, 2008 Author: Jawad Rahim 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 27*” DAY OF JUNE, 2008 BEFORE THE HONELE MRJUSTICE JAWAD RAHIM CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.:861\/2003 BETWEEN: GUDUSAB HUSENSAB HUBBALLI’ @ NA DDIMU’L:,’A ‘ AGED ABOUT […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-188762","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nGudusab Husensab Hubballi @ ... vs State Of Karnataka on 27 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gudusab Husensab Hubballi @ ... vs State Of Karnataka on 27 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-25T08:03:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Gudusab Husensab Hubballi @ … vs State Of Karnataka on 27 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-25T08:03:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":2688,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Gudusab Husensab Hubballi @ ... vs State Of Karnataka on 27 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-25T08:03:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gudusab Husensab Hubballi @ … vs State Of Karnataka on 27 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gudusab Husensab Hubballi @ ... vs State Of Karnataka on 27 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gudusab Husensab Hubballi @ ... vs State Of Karnataka on 27 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-25T08:03:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Gudusab Husensab Hubballi @ … vs State Of Karnataka on 27 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-25T08:03:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008"},"wordCount":2688,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008","name":"Gudusab Husensab Hubballi @ ... vs State Of Karnataka on 27 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-25T08:03:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudusab-husensab-hubballi-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gudusab Husensab Hubballi @ … vs State Of Karnataka on 27 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188762","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=188762"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188762\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=188762"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=188762"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=188762"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}