{"id":1889,"date":"2011-08-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011"},"modified":"2017-01-07T00:41:38","modified_gmt":"2017-01-06T19:11:38","slug":"mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Manohar Lal vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 August, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Manohar Lal vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 August, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                     In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                   at\n                                                New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                         File\u00a0No.\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001257\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a025,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a025,\u00a02011\n\n\n\nParties:\u00a0\u00a0\n\n\n\n         Appellant\n\n\n         Shri\u00a0Manohar\u00a0Lal,\n         Gulmahia\u00a0Chak,\u00a0Sabalpur,\u00a0\n         Patna800\u00a0009\n         Bihar\u00a0\n\n         The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present.\n\n\n\n         Respondents\n\n\n         East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway\n         Office\u00a0of\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager\n         Danapur\u00a0Division\n         Danapur\u00a0\n\n         Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Shri\u00a0Manoj\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0PIO--present\u00a0at\u00a0NIC\u00a0VC\u00a0facility\u00a0at\u00a0Patna.\n\n\n\n                       Information\u00a0Commissioner           :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n                                                          at\n                                                  New\u00a0Delhi\n                                                                                      File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001257\n\n\n                                                       ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.     The\u00a0Applicant,\u00a0through\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0dated\u00a006.01.2011,\u00a0filed\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Danapur,\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know:\u00a0whether\u00a0the\u00a0amount\u00a0of\u00a0pension\u00a0being\u00a0paid\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0is\u00a0correct;\u00a0if\u00a0not,\u00a0then\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       why\u00a0it\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0yet\u00a0been\u00a0corrected;\u00a0by\u00a0what\u00a0time\u00a0it\u00a0would\u00a0be\u00a0corrected;\u00a0when\u00a0would\u00a0he\u00a0get\u00a0the\u00a0full\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       payment.\u00a0The\u00a0 PIO,\u00a0 on\u00a006.01.2011,\u00a0gave\u00a0an\u00a0interim\u00a0reply\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0informing\u00a0him\u00a0that\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       request \u00a0 for \u00a0 information \u00a0 has \u00a0 been \u00a0 forwarded \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 concerned \u00a0 sections \u00a0 for \u00a0 response. \u00a0 Since \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Applicant\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0receive\u00a0the\u00a0desired\u00a0information\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0stipulated\u00a0time\u00a0period,\u00a0he\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a01 st\u00ad<\/p>\n<p>       appeal\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0(AA)\u00a0on\u00a017.02.2011\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0apparently\u00a0not\u00a0decided\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0AA.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>       The \u00a0 Appellant, \u00a0 therefore, \u00a0 filed \u00a0 the \u00a0 present \u00a0 petition \u00a0 dated \u00a0 22.04.2011 \u00a0 before \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       complaining\u00a0against\u00a0non\u00adsupply\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents.\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>2.     During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0they,\u00a0after\u00a0examining\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Appellant&#8217;s\u00a0pension\u00a0case\u00a0and\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0certain\u00a0orders\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0them,\u00a0have\u00a0come\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       to\u00a0a\u00a0conclusion\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant&#8217;s\u00a0case\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0genuine\u00a0one\u00a0and\u00a0needs\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0considered\u00a0positively\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       therefore\u00a0 are\u00a0 \u00a0 trying\u00a0 to \u00a0 calculate\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0based\u00a0on\u00a0records\u00a0that\u00a0are\u00a0available\u00a0since\u00a0an\u00a0earlier\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       calculation\u00a0that\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0made\u00a0in\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0found\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0incorrect.\u00a0.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>3.     In\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents&#8217;\u00a0statement\u00a0above,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0shall\u00a0provide\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0factual\u00a0position\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0pension\u00a0payment\u00a0case\u00a0by \u00a030.09.2011. \u00a0It\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0recommended\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       public\u00a0authority\u00a0take\u00a0a\u00a0decision\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant&#8217;s\u00a0pension\u00a0payment\u00a0case\u00a0preferably \u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       date.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.     Appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                      \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                              Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\n Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Shri\u00a0Manohar\u00a0Lal,<br \/>\n         Gulmahia\u00a0Chak,\u00a0Sabalpur,\u00a0<br \/>\n         Patna\u00a0800\u00a0009<br \/>\n         Bihar<\/p>\n<p>2.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<br \/>\n         East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n         Office\u00a0of\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager<br \/>\n         Danapur\u00a0Division<br \/>\n         Danapur\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>3.       Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\u00a0<br \/>\n         East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n         Office\u00a0of\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager<br \/>\n         Danapur\u00a0Division<br \/>\n         Danapur\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>4.       Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC<br \/>\n Note:\u00a0In\u00a0case,\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0above\u00a0directives\u00a0have\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0complied\u00a0with\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0<br \/>\nmay \u00a0 file \u00a0 a \u00a0 formal \u00a0 complaint \u00a0 with \u00a0 the\u00a0 Commission \u00a0 under\u00a0 Section \u00a0 18(1) \u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0 RTI\u00adAct,\u00a0 giving \u00a0 (1) \u00a0 copy \u00a0 of \u00a0 RTI\u00ad<br \/>\napplication, \u00a0 (2) \u00a0 copy \u00a0 of \u00a0 PIO&#8217;s \u00a0 reply, \u00a0 (3) \u00a0 copy \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 decision \u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0 first \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority, \u00a0 (4) \u00a0 copy\u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nCommission&#8217;s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(5)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0considers\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\ncomplaint.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Manohar Lal vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 August, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No.\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001257 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a025,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a025,\u00a02011 Parties:\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant Shri\u00a0Manohar\u00a0Lal, Gulmahia\u00a0Chak,\u00a0Sabalpur,\u00a0 Patna800\u00a0009 Bihar\u00a0 The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present. Respondents East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway Office\u00a0of\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager Danapur\u00a0Division Danapur\u00a0 Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Shri\u00a0Manoj\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0PIO&#8211;present\u00a0at\u00a0NIC\u00a0VC\u00a0facility\u00a0at\u00a0Patna. Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001257 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant,\u00a0through\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0dated\u00a006.01.2011,\u00a0filed\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0 Danapur,\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know:\u00a0whether\u00a0the\u00a0amount\u00a0of\u00a0pension\u00a0being\u00a0paid\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0is\u00a0correct;\u00a0if\u00a0not,\u00a0then\u00a0 why\u00a0it\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0yet\u00a0been\u00a0corrected;\u00a0by\u00a0what\u00a0time\u00a0it\u00a0would\u00a0be\u00a0corrected;\u00a0when\u00a0would\u00a0he\u00a0get\u00a0the\u00a0full\u00a0 payment.\u00a0The\u00a0 PIO,\u00a0 on\u00a006.01.2011,\u00a0gave\u00a0an\u00a0interim\u00a0reply\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0informing\u00a0him\u00a0that\u00a0his\u00a0 request \u00a0 for \u00a0 information [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1889","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Manohar Lal vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Manohar Lal vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-06T19:11:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Manohar Lal vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 August, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-06T19:11:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011\"},\"wordCount\":433,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Manohar Lal vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-06T19:11:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Manohar Lal vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 August, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Manohar Lal vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Manohar Lal vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-08-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-06T19:11:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Manohar Lal vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 August, 2011","datePublished":"2011-08-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-06T19:11:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011"},"wordCount":433,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011","name":"Mr.Manohar Lal vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-06T19:11:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-manohar-lal-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-25-august-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Manohar Lal vs Ministry Of Railways on 25 August, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1889","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1889"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1889\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1889"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1889"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1889"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}