{"id":188914,"date":"2009-11-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009"},"modified":"2016-11-15T13:53:34","modified_gmt":"2016-11-15T08:23:34","slug":"s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"S H Nadaf vs T K Althaf Pasha on 23 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">S H Nadaf vs T K Althaf Pasha on 23 November, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.K.Patil And Gowda<\/div>\n<pre> \n\n2. The 'i'1'ibu1'1al by iis j'lldgI11\u20ac1'1T and award,\n\nawarded a sum of Rs.\u20ac3O,-442\/W with interest. .211\" 6%' as\n\nagainst the claim of the appellant for fiie\n\ngrievzlncxz of the appellant'  that file anioa;1'\u00a7'i.~-..awarded 'byu \n\nthe Tribunai is iI18.d\u20acqLlE1T,\u20ac and it,1lreqiiirsgs\"'&lt;;1&#039;i\u00a7&#039;iai&#039;1Ceizvi\u00e9rii, f\n3. The brief facts 0i7&#039;i:.1&#039;1r:_ case&#039;-,are:V  A\n\nThai: on 23w9-O3. at :ab}_3fu:_i &#039;3._.OOh&#039;  aivheii the\nappellant was ret11r11i&#039;m.\u00a7M&#039;*t()  finishing his\nduty, near &#039;l&#039;e1epho1&#039;1e  truck bearing\nregistration  f&#039;rr5m-~&#039;i3ackside in a rash\nand Iiegiigeini.   and dashed against\nhis  ;d*\u00a31_.e._tojlivhicihx----\u00bbh.e&#039;}fe1! down and sustained\n\ninjuries;; and m_o&#039;tr)r&#039;\u00ab::y&quot;c1.e was also damaged Completeiy.\nHe was &quot;ad&#039;mitt&#039;ed.&#039; {to &quot;h_;d\u00abir1g_' huge  of money towards co1'1veyan(:e._\n\nI'\";f_\"V)VLVl'I'iVS\u00a71-i_f1V,f__~'\u00a7 '\u00ab.fd'1;2:1 and ai:{e1'1cia1'1i_ crllarges and medical\n\nexpe1'1ist-ill All}-';'.. V\u00a3l\u00bb:\u00ab.1t_\"e (5? 1D\u00e9iymei'1i':.V\n\n'1' he COn1p\u20ac11S.':1t,i01'1   TI'ibL1I1E11 under\ndifferent heade,   0 0 V 0\na}   _  3I_ 0 :WRs.30.000\/-\nbl, ----D\u00bb'{ed'ie:v2\"il  \" *  Rs. 13,668\/A\n  disability Rs. 8,000 \/-\nd) F aiid loss\n \"of e1me;nji.iErs '  8,000\/~\n\n 'l3eii:1g;\u00a7 e1ggrieV'ed by the impugned Judgement\n\n .i,2:1r1di_.;1iur\u00e9ird, the claimant: -- appe1_lar1t: has presented this\n\n  alpple\u00e9i.l on the g1'OL1l'1(l that the said c()i'npei1sat_i&lt;)n awarded\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\nby the T 1&#039;lbL.11&#039;1\u00a31l is i1&#039;1e&#039;1clequaie and requires \u20ac&#039;.&#039;.I&#039;1l&#039;1E11&#039;1(.&#039;.(3I1]t&quot;.11l.\n\nby n10di.fyi1&#039;1g the jiiclgineiii arid award oft.l&#039;1e &#039;l&#039;rib1.11&#039;1al.\n\n6. We have hearcl the learned C0L1:r1sel apjpea1*i11g\n\nfor the appellaiatz. amid the lCEll&#039;l1t&quot;.d Counsel 9ip&#039;p&#039;e.\u00e91i&#039;i.ii\u00a7];;__ikir\n\nthe respondent. No.3.<\/pre>\n<p>7. After careful perusal the <\/p>\n<p>aware}. it emerges ih\u00e9llj, the cillainiariivf \\2;rze1&#8242;:~&#8217;~_ag&#8217;;e&#8217;C1&#8243;\u00e9i&#8217;bo&#8217;ui: 30&#8243;<\/p>\n<p>years and is a l})oet.01&#8242; by pr.Si1;5i:aii&#8221;1ecl.ll,;aeerated wound<\/p>\n<p>in the lateral asp&#8217;e&#8217;e_t of lqurgsr uof &#8216;right. leg extending<br \/>\nupwardv\u00e9. l:;1&#8217;i&#8217;ii?e1-A-vlv aS&#8221;&#8216;pe(:i, &#8216;o.f@1i&#8217;ik}e joint measu1&#8243;i1&#8217;1g 8 X 2 cm<br \/>\nand iossA&#8217;nVf&#8217;ski1&#8217;i  ll.i;ir;_\u00e9&#8221;ra&#8217;iic2d wound on the sole of the<\/p>\n<p>right: feel; on l.211;.eral7&#8217;asj3eet: measu1&#8243;ing 10 X 1 em extending<\/p>\n<p> micldle of sole. pain and tenderness over<\/p>\n<p>ArJig9l1i1:&#8217; d\u00e9tir\u00e9itizri f0()t, X~ray of right leg with zinkle Show no<\/p>\n<p>frac_:tl&#8217;t\u00ab1re:V__&#8221;Ksray on 1&#8217;igl&#8217;it. foot ci.isel0ses &#8216;c&#8217;1b()lll&#8217;.&#8217; the fl&#8221;c&#8217;1C'{.Li1&#8242;(?<\/p>\n<p>dT&#8217;.lsll1a1&#8217;i.&#8217;\u00ab3:f 8&#8243;&#8221; and -ill&#8221; Me1rat.a11&#8217;sal. which are simple in<\/p>\n<p>ii e.11&#8217;a,_t\u00e9;1re&#8217; except: fracture of i&#8217;ig;\u00a7l1i&#8217;: sliall 01&#8242; mei:ai.a1&#8217;sal. The<\/p>\n<p>.l &#8220;d0(l&gt;t,()r l&#8217;1as &#8216;r1SSCSS\u20acC,l the (iiseibiliiy :11 20 in 25% to right<\/p>\n<p>(3<br \/>\nankle and the Tribunal has assessed the same at 1.0% in<\/p>\n<p>respect. of the whole body. He has 1.mde1&#8217;g0ne trea&#8221;\u00a3mem<\/p>\n<p>for a period of 30 days in hospiifeil 2-Hid su;{&#8216;1&#8243;er.e~ci.%1i&#8217;a..d<\/p>\n<p>agony. The &#8216;I&#8217;rib1.ma1 has not taken into c:()11s&#8217;i-c1e1&lt;zi&#039;iiQ1&#039;; &#039;t&#039;i&#039;:&lt;::u <\/p>\n<p>nature and ciL:r.ati()1&#039;1 of t_1*e:21t:1&quot;;g1e.11t_AAi,m&#039;de:9}go11e&#8211;..byAueihe<\/p>\n<p>Claimant. and it has awal\ufb02eej c)11ly_Rs.3O.eQC&#039;O_\/P .i()i;va\u00e9i1*des&quot;,<\/p>\n<p>pain and sufferings. The same\u00e9iish&#039;i:1adeCf:,1ate&quot;anti we deem<br \/>\nit fit to award Rs.35,00..O&quot;\/&quot;\u00ab.&#8211; tc.;war.d&quot;s\u00ab..pe;i&quot;h,and siifieririgs.<\/p>\n<p>8. The _&#8221;&#8216;Tif_ribu-riai&#8217; * f&#8221;&#8216;l1eis,7._awa;jd&#8221;ed a sum of<br \/>\nRs.13,668\/ 7.-\u00a2s&#8217;w\u00e9ii1_i(:11s &#8220;m&#8217;e_d&#8217;ic:al &#8211;._&#8217;e2\u00e9penses. As the same is<br \/>\nbased Qi&#8217;ifi1edi\u00a3ia} tiiiiiis &#8216;p~ij\u20ac)&#8217;dL1(ted&#8221;&#8216;by the (_:1a.imam&#8217;:. the same<\/p>\n<p>is just aizd r.e2isc)nabiei&#8217;a.1jd..d.:)es not Call for interi&#8221;erence.<\/p>\n<p>9. F&lt;&quot;i:rth.e1-f. thei&quot;I&#039;ribur1a1 has crorrimitted error in<\/p>\n<p> not -ax}\/agfdixsvg any E{fI&#039;IUilE1f towards coiweyance, nourishing<\/p>\n<p>&quot;&#039;f_Qc5d._a\u20ac.fe1_1t\u00a7.2111i: (&#039;2}1i;1E&#039;g(;&#039;S. As a matter of fact, as<\/p>\n<p>meriigiolied z3{if;\u00a70Ve._ it is 110i&quot; in dispute that the c:1a1&#039;mam has<\/p>\n<p> -*\u00ab__V&#8217;t.;I1derg'{:1V1\u00e9, i,reat.me11i.  inpai:ie.1&#8217;1i: in the hospital for 30<\/p>\n<p> durixig &#8216;W1&#8217;1i(&#8216;,1&#8217;1 p&lt;:1&#039;ioc:i he might lflave spent<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><br \/>\nfor 30 days  inpatient in hospital. He has s1,1i&#8217;fered pain<\/p>\n<p>and agony and fm&#8217;1&#8242;:hei&#8217;, doctor has assessed the disability<br \/>\nat 20 to 25% to riglli ankle and the &#8216;I&#8217;ribunal has assessed<br \/>\nthe percerit.age of (iisability to we W&#8217;1&#8243;1()]\u20ac body,<br \/>\nwhich is reasonable. lnspite of best. I]&#8217;]\u20acd.i(&#8216;,&#8217;c&#8217;lLi&#8221;&#8216;{;&#8217;lf@\u00e9t::lf1f%\u00e9&#8217;l~l&#8217;,.<br \/>\nthe claimant: has developed pain in his<br \/>\nknee, right ankle joint and he not &#8216;4<br \/>\nwork, cannot sit. on the floor. norl&#8221;:att:en\u20aclV to.th\u20ac:&#8217;i&#8217;ist.Vtii1euaoratll<br \/>\nas usual and he (&#8216;:21i&#8217;1i1ot. ri-:l_e i11oto1&#8243;Wey(:l(fa\u00a7.c?lii&#8221;nb ii;;r[eps;s\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>stand for long time and lie ht;isi.contii1i,iou.s p\u00e9iin. agony<\/p>\n<p>and cliscomt&#8217;ori:~,- \\1%\u00a7hie:li_ c:o1&#8243;1&#8211;tiiW  be there throughout. his<\/p>\n<p>life. 011 the of iIh,i_s&#8217;-rnaitferizil on record, the &#8216;I&#8217;ribL1nal<\/p>\n<p>ought to &#8220;naive $1.&#8221;\/V&#8221;l\u20ac1.f&#8217;:(-,\u00a5&lt;&#039;eCi}Ei::}S&quot;t: and reasonable crompensatioii<\/p>\n<p>t,owa.1_\u00a7ds loss o1&quot;~a,me1&#039;1i1;ies, disability and discomfort. The<\/p>\n<p> E.lL1&quot;Ii;\u00ab()I:,i&#039;11&#039;1_&#039;r vAa&#039;\u00bbsir\u00a7ii&lt;.ded by the Tribtirial at Rs.i6,OOO\/W is<\/p>\n<p>il&#039;i%1d\u20ac:qIi\u00e9tttf&#039;_;&#8211;__ fHer1(:e. we deem it lit to award a sum of\n<\/p>\n<p>-V Rs.3C,O(}Q\/.4&#8243; toWa.r(:ls loss of 21.menit.ies. disability and<br \/>\n&#8216;jdiAsC:e.{nf()i*t as against. Rs.l6,000\/~ awarded by the<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;I&#8217;1&#8243;ibt11121l.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">9<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<p>12. In the light of ihe facrtzs emcl circ\u00e9i.1n1st::11&#8217;1Ces<br \/>\nstated above, the appeal \ufb01led by the claimam: &#8212; e1j:$&#8217;p.ella1nt.<\/p>\n<p>is allowed in part and the jLidg&#8221;I}&#8217;l\u20acI&#8217;1l, and 21\\.w&#8217;21i*d..dt,&#8221;_&#8217;i8:010-<\/p>\n<p>05 passed in M.v.c.No.5ss\/2005 (old Nc)_..l&#8230;0:&#8217;2&#8243;-20034} 4g:&#8217;)i1.3t&#8217;i1.e:&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>file of the Principal Civil Judge  ;1i1.;l  0<\/p>\n<p>Accident. Claims Tribunal. Ii}a.ye1i1g&#8217;c-.r_e&#8217;,&#8217;*  liigtfeby .1&#8243;11()i&lt;:li.i&quot;i&lt;\u00bb:-dis,<\/p>\n<p>The breakup is as uiider 2\n<\/p>\n<p>a) Pain and SLEfl&#8217;\u20acAfll:&#8217;.igS   vi  &#8220;~&#8211;.__&#8217;\u00bb.H.Rs.35,000\/-<br \/>\nb]Medi(2alA11sxi~.s:._H.\n<\/p>\n<p>C.) Co\u00e9ivegfa I1OLliii\u00a7\u00a7}*]_ii;1g0f\u00a7)O.ii<br \/>\nand=.ic1t&#8217;t+::\u00a5:iidaIii.&#8217;c&#8217;h&#8217;ai&#8217;g(:_s   5,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>d&#8211;.)_ Loss &#8216;:5?&#8217;.m;\u00a2\u00a3:snie..d&#8217;u.ring<br \/>\n3t1&#8217;c3atn&#8221;ie11&#8217;1&#8242;;  .. _  Rs. 1 2 , 000\/ &#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p>_e_] Loss of a11i&#8211;e1&#8217;1ivi.ie%s&#8221;__ disabilities<\/p>\n<p> and dlS'(.?_QiT1I&#8217;OlflT Rs.30,000\/&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;l.&#8217;l*iLis.,Vx the appellant is entitled to a iotal<\/p>\n<p> 0.1&#8217;cE)Ih&#8217;p\u00a2nsat,i01&#8217;1 of Rs.9E3,668\/~  agai.nsi: Rs.60,4-42\/~<\/p>\n<p>\u00abZ<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;X &#8216;&#8211;~*&#8212;&#8212;\u00bb~&#8212;-._..\n<\/p>\n<p>\/<\/p>\n<p>In<br \/>\nawarded by the Tribunal with ir1t&#8217;e1&#8217;est at 6% 13.21. from the<\/p>\n<p>date of petition till 11119 date of reaii$ati01&#8217;1.<\/p>\n<p>The third 1&#8217;espo11dent&#8217; \u00bb II1S1II&#8217;.&#8217;;11&#8217;1(&#8216;\u20ac&#8217;. <\/p>\n<p>directed to deposit the e1&#8217;1ha11ced C_Qn1pe1&#8217;1.s&#8217;:it.i&lt;9.i1&quot; aVi3=1c)&#039;L11&#039;11._ df&#039; .L <\/p>\n<p>Rs.35.226\/~ (rounded of to RsVi\u00bbA35.:20fj\/i)\u00bb. tc$\u00a7\u00a7effi\u00a7\u00e9&#039;i~.._ix;%i1\ufb01h<\/p>\n<p>interest, within a period oE _f&#039;(3-LH&#039; weeks .f&#039;rCiII1HcEate uf. <\/p>\n<p>receipt. of copy of the  <\/p>\n<p>The enhanced   of Rs.35,200\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>with pr0p0ri.iqvn\u00e9;:1;\u20ac:. in favour of<br \/>\nthe appellaini   by the Insurance<\/p>\n<p>Compaiiyf&#8221; = <\/p>\n<p>Office is dirt-:(:i;&lt;3d \u00bb_t4k;=._gii&#039;\u00e91w the award. e1c:(:()1&#039;di11g]y.<\/p>\n<p> &quot; aaaaa  gd\/..\n<\/p>\n<p>JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>sa\/\u00abH *<br \/>\ngpnea<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court S H Nadaf vs T K Althaf Pasha on 23 November, 2009 Author: N.K.Patil And Gowda 2. The &#8216;i&#8217;1&#8217;ibu1&#8217;1al by iis j&#8217;lldgI11\u20ac1&#8217;1T and award, awarded a sum of Rs.\u20ac3O,-442\/W with interest. .211&#8243; 6%&#8217; as against the claim of the appellant for fiie grievzlncxz of the appellant&#8217; that file anioa;1&#8217;\u00a7&#8217;i.~-..awarded &#8216;byu the Tribunai [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-188914","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>S H Nadaf vs T K Althaf Pasha on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"S H Nadaf vs T K Althaf Pasha on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-15T08:23:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"S H Nadaf vs T K Althaf Pasha on 23 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-15T08:23:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1058,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009\",\"name\":\"S H Nadaf vs T K Althaf Pasha on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-15T08:23:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"S H Nadaf vs T K Althaf Pasha on 23 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"S H Nadaf vs T K Althaf Pasha on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"S H Nadaf vs T K Althaf Pasha on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-15T08:23:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"S H Nadaf vs T K Althaf Pasha on 23 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-15T08:23:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009"},"wordCount":1058,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009","name":"S H Nadaf vs T K Althaf Pasha on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-15T08:23:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-h-nadaf-vs-t-k-althaf-pasha-on-23-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"S H Nadaf vs T K Althaf Pasha on 23 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188914","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=188914"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188914\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=188914"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=188914"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=188914"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}