{"id":189079,"date":"2010-01-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010"},"modified":"2017-06-18T11:43:22","modified_gmt":"2017-06-18T06:13:22","slug":"shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"Shri vs State on 18 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shri vs State on 18 January, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ravi R.Tripathi,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nCR.MA\/14650\/2005\t 3\/ 5\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nCRIMINAL\nMISC.APPLICATION No. 14650 of 2005\n \n\n \n=================================================\n \n\nSHRI\nASHWINBHAI HARMANBHAI PATEL - Applicant(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT &amp; 1 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nPRADEEP PATEL for Applicant(s) : 1, \nMr.D.C. SEJPAL, ADDL PUBLIC\nPROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) : 1, \nRULE SERVED BY DS for\nRespondent(s) : 2, \n=================================================\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 18\/01\/2010 \n\n \n\nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p>\tThis<br \/>\nis the second round of litigation. The petitioner has come before<br \/>\nthis Court praying that,<\/p>\n<p> 8(a)\tYour<br \/>\nLordships may be pleased to pass appropriate orders and\/ or direction<br \/>\nby exercising powers under s.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure<br \/>\nquashing and setting aside the charge sheet filed in the trial court<br \/>\nagainst the petitioner in the criminal case registered as no.(I) 430<br \/>\nof 2003 on 3.12.2003 in the Anand Town Police Station, after<br \/>\ndeclaring the complaint as well as proceeding undertaken in form of<br \/>\nfiling charge sheet against the petitioner as illegal and clear abuse<br \/>\nof process of law.\n<\/p>\n<p>Earlier,<br \/>\nthe petitioner had approached this Court by filing Criminal Misc.<br \/>\nApplication No.1409 of 2004 which was disposed of by this Court<br \/>\n(Coram: Hon&#8217;ble Mr.Justice P.B. Majmudar) by order dated 5th<br \/>\nDecember 2005, which reads as under:\n<\/p>\n<p> By filing<br \/>\nthis application, the applicant has prayed that FIR being C.R.No. (I)<br \/>\n430 of 2003 registered before Anand Town Police Station be quashed<br \/>\nand set aside, as the applicant, who himself has brought to the<br \/>\nnotice of the society the irregularities going on is unfortunately<br \/>\ntried to be booked as an accused.\n<\/p>\n<p>Mr.Patel,<br \/>\nlearned advocate for the applicant submitted that during the pendency<br \/>\nof this application charge sheet is filed. Therefore, he submitted<br \/>\nthat he may be permitted to amend the application by placing<br \/>\nappropriate material and also by amending the prayer.\n<\/p>\n<p>In my view,<br \/>\nsince charge sheet is filed, the original prayer has become<br \/>\ninfructuous. Under the circumstances, instead of granting amendment<br \/>\nthe appropriate course available to the applicant is either to apply<br \/>\nfor discharge or to file appropriate application calling in question<br \/>\nthe proceedings pending before the Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>In order to<br \/>\ntake appropriate remedy as pointed above, Mr.Patel, learned advocate<br \/>\nfor the applicant wants permission to withdraw this application.\n<\/p>\n<p>Permission is<br \/>\ngranted with a liberty as prayed herein above.  Accordingly, this<br \/>\napplication is disposed of as withdrawn. Notice is discharged.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\tHeard<br \/>\nlearned advocate Mr.Patel for the petitioner.  Mr.Patel invited<br \/>\nattention of the Court to a letter dated 23rd May 2001,<br \/>\nwhich is produced at Annexure &#8216;B&#8217;.  It is addressed to one Shri<br \/>\nPrabhudas, described as Chairman, Sarvodaya Cooperative Credit<br \/>\nSociety Limited, Anand by the petitioner.  In the letter it is<br \/>\nmentioned that when the said Chairman was away from India for a<br \/>\nperiod of one month and 21 days, the petitioner was required to<br \/>\nshoulder the responsibility of managing the society (Sarvodaya<br \/>\nCooperative Credit Society Limited, Anand). The letter refers to<br \/>\nvarious difficulties, faced by the petitioner and also the<br \/>\nirregularities noticed by him while managing the society.\n<\/p>\n<p>It<br \/>\nis surprising that the petitioner complained to the person, who<br \/>\naccording to him is responsible for those irregularities.  The<br \/>\ncomplaint ought to have been made, to the appropriate authority,<br \/>\nabout the irregularities noticed by the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>It<br \/>\nis the case of the petitioner that once the petitioner pointed out<br \/>\nthose irregularities to the Chairman, the petitioner was removed from<br \/>\nthe membership of the Executive Committee of the said society and he<br \/>\nwas kept out of the management of the said society.  It is also the<br \/>\ncase of the petitioner that all the irregularities which are<br \/>\nmentioned in the F.I.R. are pertaining to the period, subsequent to<br \/>\nhis removal as a member of the Executive Committee and he was kept<br \/>\nout, from the management of the society.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.\tIt<br \/>\nis a settled position of law that the High Court is not supposed to<br \/>\ngo into the questions which go to the merit of the matter while<br \/>\nconsidering an application under sec.482 of the Code of Criminal<br \/>\nProcedure. The present application is filed taking shelter of the<br \/>\nobservations made by this  Court in its order dated 5th<br \/>\nDecember 2005 that, <\/p>\n<p>  ..\t..\tthe<br \/>\nappropriate course available to the applicant is either to apply for<br \/>\ndischarge or to file appropriate application calling in question the<br \/>\nproceedings pending before the Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>Taking<br \/>\ninto consideration the submissions made by the learned advocate for<br \/>\nthe petitioner that he has got 100% case on merits, this Court is of<br \/>\nthe  opinion that the petitioner ought to have chosen the case of<br \/>\nfiling discharge application before the Court which could have looked<br \/>\ninto the matter in detail along with perusal of the documentary<br \/>\nevidence in support of the contention raised by the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.\tHeard<br \/>\nlearned Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr.Sejpal appearing for<br \/>\nrespondents no.1 and 2.  The learned APP invited attention of the<br \/>\nCourt to the contents of the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of<br \/>\nrespondent no.2 (Office of the District Registrar, Cooperative<br \/>\nSocieties, Anand) paras 11, 12 in particular and also other relevant<br \/>\nparas.\n<\/p>\n<p>The<br \/>\nCourt restrains itself from going into the merits of the matter, as<br \/>\nit may prejudice the case of the petitioner, when he approaches the<br \/>\ncourt below.\n<\/p>\n<p>In<br \/>\nview of the aforesaid observations this Court finds no merit for<br \/>\ngranting any relief in this matter. The application is, therefore,<br \/>\ndismissed. Rule is discharged.\n<\/p>\n<p>At<br \/>\nthe request of the learned advocate for the petitioner it is<br \/>\nclarified that non entertainment of this application will not<br \/>\nprejudice the  petitioner in filing discharge application and<br \/>\npointing out all relevant material which is placed before this Court<br \/>\nin this proceeding at the time of consideration of the matter on<br \/>\nmerits by the learned Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>(RAVI<br \/>\nR. TRIPATHI, J.)<\/p>\n<p>karim<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Shri vs State on 18 January, 2010 Author: Ravi R.Tripathi,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print CR.MA\/14650\/2005 3\/ 5 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION No. 14650 of 2005 ================================================= SHRI ASHWINBHAI HARMANBHAI PATEL &#8211; Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT &amp; 1 &#8211; Respondent(s) ================================================= Appearance [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-189079","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shri vs State on 18 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri vs State on 18 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-18T06:13:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri vs State on 18 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-18T06:13:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":897,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010\",\"name\":\"Shri vs State on 18 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-18T06:13:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri vs State on 18 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri vs State on 18 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri vs State on 18 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-06-18T06:13:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri vs State on 18 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-18T06:13:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010"},"wordCount":897,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010","name":"Shri vs State on 18 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-18T06:13:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-vs-state-on-18-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri vs State on 18 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189079","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=189079"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189079\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=189079"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=189079"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=189079"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}