{"id":189142,"date":"2008-09-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008"},"modified":"2018-04-01T15:56:58","modified_gmt":"2018-04-01T10:26:58","slug":"adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Adrian G.Miranda vs Brenda Barbara Francis on 25 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Adrian G.Miranda vs Brenda Barbara Francis on 25 September, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 28041 of 2008(L)\n\n\n1. ADRIAN G.MIRANDA\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. BRENDA BARBARA FRANCIS\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR\n\n Dated :25\/09\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                        V. RAMKUMAR, J.\n                     = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n                     W.P.(c).No.28041 of 2008\n                    = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n            Dated this the 25th day of September, 2008\n\n                             JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>      The writ petitioner is the 1st defendant in O.S.No.34 of 1999<\/p>\n<p>on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Thiruvananthapuram. The<\/p>\n<p>said suit was filed by the respondent herein who is the sister of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner seeking a partition and separate possession of her 1\/5th<\/p>\n<p>right over one item of immovable property. The suit was listed for<\/p>\n<p>trial on 26.9.05. On that day since neither the plaintiff nor her<\/p>\n<p>counsel was present, the suit was dismissed for default. On the<\/p>\n<p>same day itself I.A.No.3519 of 2005 was filed under Order IX Rule<\/p>\n<p>9 C.P.C and that petition was dismissed for default. The affidavit in<\/p>\n<p>support of the said petition was sworn to by Jerome Fernandez<\/p>\n<p>styling himself as the Power of Attorney holder of the plaintiff.<\/p>\n<p>Since the defendant could not be duly served after repeated<\/p>\n<p>summons, notice      was eventually served by publication in the<\/p>\n<p>Kerala Kaumudi Daily. On getting knowledge about the filing of<\/p>\n<p>the restoration petition, the petitioner\/1st defendant filed his<\/p>\n<p>objections to I.A.3519 of 2005. One of his objection was that the<\/p>\n<p>person who filed the affidavit in support of the I.A. 3519\/2005 was<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(c).No.28041 of 2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>not the power of attorney holder of the plaintiff who has<\/p>\n<p>permanently settled down in Canada.              The petitioner also<\/p>\n<p>contended that the signature occurring in the affidavit was not that<\/p>\n<p>of Jerome Fernandez. On 2.6.07 Ext.P4 application was filed as<\/p>\n<p>I.A.2287 of 2007 by the plaintiff to delete the name of Jerome<\/p>\n<p>Fernandez as the Power of Attorney holder for the plaintiff.     The<\/p>\n<p>affidavit in support of the petition was sworn to by none other than<\/p>\n<p>Jerome Fernandez, the Power of Attorney holder. On the same day<\/p>\n<p>itself Ext.P5 application was filed as I.A.2288 of 2007 by the new<\/p>\n<p>power of attorney holder for the plaintiff.      The said petition is<\/p>\n<p>sworn to by one Captian Alexander Francis styling himself as the<\/p>\n<p>new power of attorney holder.        Ext.P16 is the new Power of<\/p>\n<p>Attorney deed in favour of        Captian Alexander Francis.     The<\/p>\n<p>signature in both the affidavits in support of I.A.Nos.2287 and 2288<\/p>\n<p>of 2007 appears to be that of the same person. On 7.08.07 the<\/p>\n<p>court below as per Ext.P7 common order, dismissed the said<\/p>\n<p>applications observing that a fraud was practiced in the court by<\/p>\n<p>Jerome Fernandez who had by the time left for U.S.A and observing<\/p>\n<p>that I.A.No.3519 of 2007 should be revived and appropriate orders<\/p>\n<p>should be passed. Subsequently on 5.6.07 the court below allowed<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(c).No.28041 of 2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>3519\/2005 on payment of Rs.1,000\/- as costs. The cost was paid<\/p>\n<p>and the suit was restored to file. Thereafter the petitioner\/ 1st<\/p>\n<p>defendant filed I.A.No.5002 of 2007 requesting the court to take<\/p>\n<p>evidence of the plaintiff only after reviewing the order passed on<\/p>\n<p>I.A.No.3519 of 2005 and to take appropriate action against the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff to the fraud and forgery committed by the plaintiff<\/p>\n<p>     2. The contention raised by the petitioner in the said I.A. is as<\/p>\n<p>follows:-\n<\/p>\n<p>     The court while passing the common order in I.A.Nos.2287 of<\/p>\n<p>2007 and 2288 of 2007 had found that the plaintiff has obtained<\/p>\n<p>the order in I.A.No.3519 of 2005 by playing fraud on the court and<\/p>\n<p>that   on 6.2.07 neither the plaintiff nor her power of attorney<\/p>\n<p>holder had represented the plaintiff in court as per rules and so<\/p>\n<p>I.A.No.3519 of 2005 is to be reviewed and appropriate orders are<\/p>\n<p>to be passed. The plaintiffs has not filed any appeal against that<\/p>\n<p>order. Hence, before taking evidence in this case I.A.No.3519 of<\/p>\n<p>2005 has to be reviewed and appropriate action should be taken<\/p>\n<p>against the plaintiff under Section 344 Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n<p>     3. The court below as per Ext.P15 order dismissed the said<\/p>\n<p>application.   It is the said order which is assailed in this writ<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(c).No.28041 of 2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.  The learned counsel for the petitioner reiterated the<\/p>\n<p>contentions of the petitioner and submitted that a person who had<\/p>\n<p>played fraud on the court should not be allowed to go scot free. It<\/p>\n<p>is contended that the intentment behind Ext.P2 order should be<\/p>\n<p>translated into action by reviewing the order passed on 3519 of<\/p>\n<p>2005 by taking appropriate action against the plaintiff.<\/p>\n<p>      5. The court below has in Ext.P15 order given valid reasons<\/p>\n<p>while reviewing the order in I.A.No.3519 of 2005 regarding the<\/p>\n<p>observation made in Ext.P7 order that fraud had been practiced on<\/p>\n<p>the court and has held that it was only a casual observation and<\/p>\n<p>that actually no such fraud had been practiced on the court. In<\/p>\n<p>fact, on 20.06.05 when the suit was dismissed for default, on the<\/p>\n<p>very same day the power of attorney holder of the plaintiff filed<\/p>\n<p>I.A.No.3519 of 2005 under Order 9 Rule 9 C.P.C. for restoration of<\/p>\n<p>the suit.    On the question whether the affidavit was filed by an<\/p>\n<p>appropriate power of attorney holder or not, the plaintiff has<\/p>\n<p>subsequently appeared before the court and has stated that she is<\/p>\n<p>the plaintiff in the suit and the court was convinced that by filing<\/p>\n<p>the petition on the same day the plaintiff had proved her bona fides<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(c).No.28041 of 2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>also. The learned Sub Judge has given detailed reasons in Ext.P15<\/p>\n<p>order as to why the plaintiff cannot be said to have committed or<\/p>\n<p>played any fraud on the court. The court below has also observed<\/p>\n<p>that the petitioner herein has no case that the power of attorney<\/p>\n<p>holder of the plaintiff had not signed I.A.No.5787 of 2006 or that<\/p>\n<p>somebody had forged her signature in the petition. It is also held<\/p>\n<p>that if the power of attorney had filed I.A.No.5787 of 2006 without<\/p>\n<p>actually knowing the termination of the power of attorney in his<\/p>\n<p>favour, it cannot be said that power of attorney or the plaintiff had<\/p>\n<p>played any fraud in filing that petition or getting the order thereon.<\/p>\n<p>The court below has further observed that if the order in<\/p>\n<p>I.A.No.3519 of 2005 is reviewed on the ground that the same was<\/p>\n<p>obtained by the plaintiff by playing fraud and the suit is thereby<\/p>\n<p>dismissed, irreparable legal injury and loss would be caused to the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff who is entitled to a share in the plaint schedule property<\/p>\n<p>left behind by her deceased mother. The court below has also<\/p>\n<p>observed that the question whether the plaintiff or her power of<\/p>\n<p>attorney holder committed or played any fraud is a matter for<\/p>\n<p>evidence which is to be considered at a later point of time. The<\/p>\n<p>court below thus rejected the request of the petitioner to review<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(c).No.28041 of 2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the order passed in I.A.No.3519 of 2005 which stood allowed as on<\/p>\n<p>5.6.07.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6. I too fully agree with the conclusions reached by the court<\/p>\n<p>below.   It is relevant to note that the other defendants in the suit<\/p>\n<p>have not pursued the matter to such an unreasonable level as the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner who wants to defeat the claim for partition by his sister<\/p>\n<p>by raising hypertechnical contentions.\n<\/p>\n<p>       7. If the petitioner wants to have a liberty to cross-examine<\/p>\n<p>the plaintiff on the proof affidavit filed, he shall make a request in<\/p>\n<p>that behalf before the court below. If the petitioner has not been<\/p>\n<p>given opportunity to cross-examine the plaintiff, the court below<\/p>\n<p>shall furnish an opportunity to do so, provided the petitioner does<\/p>\n<p>not resort to dilatory tactics.\n<\/p>\n<p>      This writ petition which is devoid of any merit is accordingly<\/p>\n<p>dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      Dated this the 25th day of September, 2008.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                   V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>sj<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Adrian G.Miranda vs Brenda Barbara Francis on 25 September, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 28041 of 2008(L) 1. ADRIAN G.MIRANDA &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. BRENDA BARBARA FRANCIS &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR Dated :25\/09\/2008 O R D [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-189142","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Adrian G.Miranda vs Brenda Barbara Francis on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Adrian G.Miranda vs Brenda Barbara Francis on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-01T10:26:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Adrian G.Miranda vs Brenda Barbara Francis on 25 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-01T10:26:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1275,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Adrian G.Miranda vs Brenda Barbara Francis on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-01T10:26:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Adrian G.Miranda vs Brenda Barbara Francis on 25 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Adrian G.Miranda vs Brenda Barbara Francis on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Adrian G.Miranda vs Brenda Barbara Francis on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-01T10:26:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Adrian G.Miranda vs Brenda Barbara Francis on 25 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-01T10:26:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008"},"wordCount":1275,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008","name":"Adrian G.Miranda vs Brenda Barbara Francis on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-01T10:26:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adrian-g-miranda-vs-brenda-barbara-francis-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Adrian G.Miranda vs Brenda Barbara Francis on 25 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189142","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=189142"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189142\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=189142"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=189142"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=189142"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}