{"id":189383,"date":"2008-11-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008"},"modified":"2019-04-04T21:05:51","modified_gmt":"2019-04-04T15:35:51","slug":"sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri Nataraj vs The Manager (Tech) on 11 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Nataraj vs The Manager (Tech) on 11 November, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: S.Abdul Nazeer<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT B;ANGAL9m3 it i   ~ .\n\nDATED T1113 T1113 11*\" DAY 01? NOVEMBER zu\u00e9js A 1.: \"  \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHEHOMBLE MRJUSTICES. '4I\u00a7D\u00a3i1:.g\u00a7?AZEE;i?\" A = \" \n\nMz__mI1'PETIrI0NN0,65a1z2\u00a7e? Q4-Rag}    k\nBetwee\ufb02i n V' ' ' V\n\nSri Nataraj, ~. vv\nSE0 Mohan Nagara}1al1i.,    . \nAged about 33 years,\u00bb    g   \" \nOcc; Busimss, R;'o.No.3??1,._~65v\"'}Cru~$s,  3 A\n5\"' Block, Rajajin%1ga1 :,[\"   .     \nBanga!ore---5_6_(_.? Oi'{):'\u00bb~. i:.;;._ V   \"    Petitioner.\n\n(By Sn Mad\u00e9m A&gt;\u00a3\u00a7&gt;h2m I\\%f:'VI\u20aci1a:ff\u00a7ur;\u00a3%3g;iv;)\n\nAnd :\n\n . A ifs;-mzgxager  \u00ab\n\n Aiid cd\u00e9izpeient authority\n ' ,.FG!L&amp;if1ii'A\u00a3(\u00a7iiiSiii011,\n'--- Natii:u1aI'g1iWavys Authority of India,\n*sam- Co1:51;}(,'T1'Vidyagi\ufb01,\nDzzagwgmsao 001.\n\nH  x Sri  Sazrthosh Swamy,\n\n\u00bb [_' \" VUEF A Muragjswamy, Gurusllivanandaswanzy,\n V_'UfFASanga1mbasaswan1y Viraktamath,\n1}\/'F Shiggaexvn. Math,\n\n = V.--Station Road, Hubli.\n\n\n\nBy His PA Holder Sri Pralcash Swamy\nEsliwaraiah Viraktamatll, '\nMajor, ace; Supervision of Math,\n\nRic: Hubli, new {fa Shiggaon-581  43%; ;. .;1{e\u00a7}x3A11d'\u00a711is.V  '  \n\n(By Sri Singhania &amp;. Partners, Advs. rm RI  A\nSri BR. Satenahalli, Adv. for R2)  '*-  2\n\nThis Writ Petition is \ufb01{\u00e9d u::d'cr_  35 227 ofthe\nConstitution, praying to direct\". VRI.__te '_.re1ea3ev the ; cmnpensation\nan1ount as per award  23.:1'0.20\u20ac}3,  - ~ '\n\nThis \\*efrit:.E'e*fit;f\u00a7xi\u00a7::\u00a7::&lt;:t1iir\u00a7g.,g-ix-..fer*-. Pf\u00e9iinzizzary Hearing in &#039;B&#039;\nGroup this day, \u00a321; Cipazn n1&quot;ade4f9i&#039;iowm&#039;g: &#039;\n\nThe   measuring 4 acres 15 guntas\n\nsituated ajsi:    District, was acquired by the\n\n   the\u00e9groxrisions of Na\ufb01orxal Highways Act,\n\n15556: The award was passed as per \u00e9kxmextxre\n\n_  &quot;As   by the competent authority. It appears that\n\n~  also the second respondent claimed compensation\n\n  the said land on the ground that they are its tithe-\n\nVT  In the meantime, the second respondent \ufb02ied a civil suit in\n\n5\n\n5%\n\n\n\nO.S.No.13(}:&#039;2%l for a declaration that he is the ewner of the \n\nproperty and for a \ufb01mhez&#039; deciaration that he is entitled fer ..\n\ncompensation amount in respect of the said land \ufb01orn  &quot;ii  \n\nrespondent. During the pendency of the said&quot; stair, the .; V  \n\nrespondent filed a wet petition _beft:tret__ titie cotet - in i L\n\nW.P.No.13742f2002 directing the first tee,:oodent&#039;&quot;not_&#039;to.  V\n\nthe compensation amount to the ;$\u20actitienefiihet*eii:.ii&quot;i&#039;}1is CoLti&#039;t&quot;b}&#039;? its\norder dated 16.2.2004 disposed of to tift$re.st;iittii.&#039;.:ott\u00a5;t&#039;t petition\n\ndirecting the first respondeitt degroeit iameunt in 3\n\noetioeotieeo  parties is settled in\nthe Civil cotttt; i._&#039;rote  liberty to the parties to\napproach  first   sztithdrawal of the said amount in\nttto} eotooiietttiteir right to the property in question\n\nin tf1e&quot;&#039;(?iVi.i  suit was dismissed for non-prosecution\n\n 16.1.2636.  has averted that the second respondent has &#039;\n\n e , Miseelianeous ceeo Ne.2r&#039;2{H}6 for t-oetototioo of\n\n4i&quot;if&#039;_&#039;--.:_i:0.i_Si;\u00a7Ie.Vi3t3?2t)01 before too Civii Judge (Sr.Dn.)., Shiggaon too\n\n  it . V __   is pending. Learned Counsel for the first respondent\n\n,--~---Mr\u00bb\n\n\n\nsubmits that the Miscellaneous Case has been dismissed \n\nCivil Court. Therefore, petitioner has \ufb01led this Writ petitioii   \n\nmandamus directing the first respondent to-release the   \n\nPer the award at Annexure &#039;A&#039; dated   A. 3\n\n2. The respondents have any .&#039;  of\nobjections. H A  l\n3. I have heard the learned   \n\n4. It    lands in question have been\n\nacquired !A)y_Vthe  the Act. Section 3-9 of the\n\n xfor  a declaration. Sub-section (2) of\n\n  makes it clear that on publication of the\n\nl  &quot;&#039;vdeclat*3&#039;tion Es-uli)-section (1), the land shall vest absolutely in\n\n&quot; i;&#039;v&#039;tl;\u00e9&#039;\u00bbCAentral&quot;Gi\u00a7vemtne:1t \ufb02ee from all encumbrances. Section 3-H\n\n &#039;of  provides for deposit and payment of amount. Sub-\n\n  (3) of Section 3-H of the Act is relevant for the purpose of\n\ni\n\n\n\nthis case which states that where several persons claim to.~~be?_;  &quot; \n\ninterested in the amount deposited under sub-section&#039;  \n\ncompetent authority shall determine the     X\n\nare entitled to receive the ernount payableto__eachlof_ \n\n5. In the instant case, the  and  \n\nrespondent contend that they are \namount. Material on record clearly  _*suit.__\ufb01led by\n\nthe second respoz1dent:.,e\u00abE\u00e9.:i:rr;ing   has been\n\ndismissed. Therefore&#039; A&#039; {is etttpediment for the frst\nrespondent to deeidethe  with sub-section ( 3)\nof Section 3511 or the.VAe-t,_V_V&#039;Slr1ceV&#039;the suit has been dismissed for\n\n upon the first respoudent; to decide\n\n the  &quot;award amount in accordance with sub-\n\nVfseetirm (3) orsectim  ofthe Act.\n\n     result, I pass the following:\n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>(i) The first respondent is directed to issue   .<\/p>\n<p>petitioner as also the second respondent  therea\ufb02erv&#8217;deeideas&#8217;to   <\/p>\n<p>who is entitled for payment of eom;5e\u00abnsa&#8217;tieni&#8217; &#8221; 2:]<\/p>\n<p>nationalised bank pursuant to the  by in i<\/p>\n<p>W.P.N0.13742.\/2002 dated 15.2.2oo4,ii\n<\/p>\n<p>(ii) It is needless to    entitled for payment<br \/>\nof the award amounxgre algse&#8217;    iof the interest<\/p>\n<p>aeerued en the&#8230;\u00e9ii=1fie2iinLt&#8211;.&#8217;.inv  ;:_:ufSu.ant.iite the order in the<\/p>\n<p>aferesaictwrit p\u00e9ti:i.\u00a2n,__  ,\n<\/p>\n<p>(iii) Writ petition accordingly. N0 costs.<\/p>\n<p>  &#8230;..\n<\/p>\n<p>Iudge<\/p>\n<p>   _m.4MJi.21i&#8217;2(re$*&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Nataraj vs The Manager (Tech) on 11 November, 2008 Author: S.Abdul Nazeer IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT B;ANGAL9m3 it i ~ . DATED T1113 T1113 11*&#8221; DAY 01? NOVEMBER zu\u00e9js A 1.: &#8221; BEFORE THEHOMBLE MRJUSTICES. &#8216;4I\u00a7D\u00a3i1:.g\u00a7?AZEE;i?&#8221; A = &#8221; Mz__mI1&#8217;PETIrI0NN0,65a1z2\u00a7e? Q4-Rag} k Betwee\ufb02i n V&#8217; &#8216; &#8216; V [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-189383","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Nataraj vs The Manager (Tech) on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Nataraj vs The Manager (Tech) on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-04-04T15:35:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Nataraj vs The Manager (Tech) on 11 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-04T15:35:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":111,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri Nataraj vs The Manager (Tech) on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-04T15:35:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Nataraj vs The Manager (Tech) on 11 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Nataraj vs The Manager (Tech) on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Nataraj vs The Manager (Tech) on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-04-04T15:35:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Nataraj vs The Manager (Tech) on 11 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-04T15:35:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008"},"wordCount":111,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008","name":"Sri Nataraj vs The Manager (Tech) on 11 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-04T15:35:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-nataraj-vs-the-manager-tech-on-11-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Nataraj vs The Manager (Tech) on 11 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=189383"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189383\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=189383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=189383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=189383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}