{"id":190000,"date":"2010-12-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010"},"modified":"2017-04-07T04:29:51","modified_gmt":"2017-04-06T22:59:51","slug":"sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri. Mahesh K Chawla S\/O Late &#8230; vs State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri. Mahesh K Chawla S\/O Late &#8230; vs State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar<\/div>\n<pre> Sections 1[3] and 28[1] of the Karnataka\n\n  Development Act, 1966 [for short 'the\n\n  Inain grievance on behalf of the petitioners as\nA \":l:'si.IbIiiitted by Sri. Vardhaman V Gunja}, learned Counsel,\n\n  that the petitioners have been clamped with the notice\n\n3\n\n{By Sri. Ashok Haranahalli, Advocate General a\/1W\".\".\nSri. Venkatesh Dodc1eri,AGA for R1; '  \nSri M IArun, Adv., for R2; \nSri Harish, Adv., for M\/S. Aareng' \nAssociates, Adv., for R3]  \n\nTRIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARIIICLES -22S\"AND 227 OF --.\nTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYINC TO QUASHA.Al\\lNEX~_C;i' &amp; \"\nE ISSUED BY KIADB FOR BENEFIT OF BENEFICLARY ~i3MRCL\nVIZ., NOTIFICATION U\/S. 3I1].ARD IISIPAND 2S\u00a71';;oIaf RIAD ACT\u00bb\nVIDE GAZETTE PUBLICATION --DTB.31.1.09,' BANGALORE VIDE\nANNEX-F NOTICE UNDER SEC 2315; _OF  ACT DTD\n22.10.2009 AND ANNEX--G DTD.l.9,\/23--..4;'3..0 AND' CQNSEQUENTIAL\nORDERS INSOFAR Asa PEfl'I'IfIOi\\1ERS~-. PROPERTEES ARE\nCONCERNED AND THE\"ACQUISI:I*1;ON'--_OF*-SUCH PROPERTIES\nWHICH, IF ACQUIRED AFFEC'IS'y'IRE _.i?_f\u00a3'1'lfl'IO_NER RIGHTS AND\n\nTHIS PI\u00ab:'35:1TI(;:aN'_.Co:II4ING\"ON' EO'R\"I:t3RTIIER ORDERS, THIS\nDAY, TI-IE CQ'Ui?'_I'._ ll\/fA'{.T:__B'.  FOLL_OWiN_G:-\niiii 'V   I \n\nWrit\"  in number belonging to one\n\nfamily have_JquestiOnesd\u00ab...'the legality of noti\ufb01cation issued\n\nA.c\":,\"_'}'f\n\n \n\n\n\nit .'&lt;&#039;oi:j;j.ections, if on behalf of the respondents.<\/pre>\n<p>&#8216;-.7Indii&#8217;strisal Areas Development Board which<br \/>\n pfoflcltffls it is a statutory authority brought<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;l&#8221;&#8216;\u00ab-._indulged in all sorts of illegal activities, found<br \/>\n&#8221; to have misused the powers and authority to<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p> writ petition was admitted on&#8217;;\n<\/p>\n<p>23.IO.201O by issue of rule and the ir1terirn.._&#8221;&#8216;&#8211;_<br \/>\norder granted earlier was extended   ,_ &#8221;<br \/>\ndisposal Of the writ petition.   ~ * 3<\/p>\n<p>First Respondent &#8212; S_tate__ Governmie_nt&#8221;r!;s&#8217;A.<br \/>\nrepresented by Sri Venkatesh Dodd&#8221;e_ri;7iea1 &#8216;V _<br \/>\nAdditional Government &#8220;gAd_vo&#8217;cate.  _ thi:-q~.,,.<br \/>\nrespondent ~&#8211;~ Bangalore Metr&#8217;oR&#8217;o.il Corporationf 3<br \/>\nLimited is represerate&#8217;d..V_  _M\/Vs&#8217;_..V&#8217;<br \/>\nAssociates, Advocates&#8217; &#8221; u_Jhereas\u00b0 &#8216; &#8216; second<br \/>\nrespondent &#8212; &#8216;KarnaAtal:a-. Industrial&#8230; Areas<br \/>\nDevelopment Board and&#8221; ~.i_ts_p&#8221;&#8216;a.special land<br \/>\nacquisition o\ufb02icer&#8217; thoughkserved&#8217; \u00bb has blissfully<br \/>\nremained non-responsive_.  &#8216; \ud83d\ude41 &#8212;-\n<\/p>\n<p>3,35; i\u00a7L~&#8217;Venk.atesh  =.vD&#8221;odd\u00e9ri, learned<br \/>\nAdditiorial &#8216;Gov_feri1tyne&#8217;t&#8217;it__Advocate appearing for<br \/>\nthe first&#8217;-re.spor&#8217;id&#8217;ent\u00abA\u00bb~\u00ab  and Mr. Srinivas,<br \/>\nlearned&#8217;) co&#8221;i:trisel~_&#8221;-appearirig for the third<br \/>\nf&lt;espvo&#8211;ntde7nt;.._ppray._jI:Ir some more time to file<br \/>\ncounter astheprocess of getting instructions<br \/>\nfrornthe res_pective&quot;clients is on etc.,.<\/p>\n<p>A  :week&#039;s time is granted to file<br \/>\n &quot;l&quot;t_EVi&#039;l_l..~ second respondent &#8212; Karnataka<\/p>\n<p>into existence for acquiring private lands to<br \/>\ndevelop it as an industrial area, having<\/p>\n<p>bene\ufb01t a few private industries at the cost of<br \/>\ngeneral members of the public by acquiring<br \/>\ntheir lands in the name of public interest, J<br \/>\nhave adopted an attitude of evasiveness, it is<\/p>\n<p> \ufb01gures relating to the instances of<\/p>\n<p> proceedings initiated by the Board and the<\/p>\n<p> ,:ld~e*s;*elopii1lg the area as an industrial area by the Board<br \/>\n  \u00e9tcfand some time is required to place all the necessary<\/p>\n<p>S &quot; &quot;information before the court, points out that in the instant<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>high time that such Board warrants to<br \/>\nwound up.\n<\/p>\n<p>Learned Advocate General is directedpplto&#8221;<br \/>\ntake notice of this petition to examine V<br \/>\naspect of the matter and to assistpthe cou&#8221;r*t.] V  <\/p>\n<p>Learned counsel forthe &#8216; petitioner \u00ab.  &#8221;<br \/>\nfurnish copy of the .t&#8217;ur._i_t pelltition. toleparnedpl<br \/>\nAdvocate General. &#8216;  r    <\/p>\n<p>List next week. &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>5. It is in this backgroui&#8217;;dl,&#8221;t.he_   coming up for<\/p>\n<p>hearing today\u00a7&#8217;*.V 2  &#8216; 1<\/p>\n<p>6.  appeared on behalf of<br \/>\nthe State has submitted that while there<\/p>\n<p>is no&#8217;i:npedi1nen&#8217;t.&#8217;lfor&#8221;&#8216;the State Government or the Board<\/p>\n<p>lands acjcgluireld by the State Government for the purpose of<\/p>\n<p>case, that aspect alone is not necessary to keep this<\/p>\n<p>95\/<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">8<\/span><\/p>\n<p>matter pending, particularly, as it has been noticewillby the<br \/>\nrespondents -\u00bb~ State Government and the <\/p>\n<p>is a clear lapse or shortcoming in the<br \/>\npart of the State and the Board   T&#8217;<br \/>\ninadvertence or mistake, it.\u00bbis.__a fact. that<br \/>\nof the petitioners did not injithe preliminary<br \/>\nnoti\ufb01cation issued    the act and the<br \/>\nnotice issued   28[6] of the Act<\/p>\n<p>cannot be d.eienL5;fe_d;_ asjvai-id in law. <\/p>\n<p>7. In view  made by the learned<\/p>\n<p>Advocate General;iSri..:&#8221;&#8221;Vardhaman V Gunjal, learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel_ for thenpetitioiners, submits that if the State<\/p>\n<p>  readyland willing to go through the process<\/p>\n<p>inf =a_cqu~is&#8217;i\u00abti_onj-afresh in accordance with law, in respect of l<\/p>\n<p>the&#8221;&#8221;pet.i_&#8217;tioners&#8217; lands then the petitioners may not press<\/p>\n<p>  of alternative prayer prayed for in this writ<\/p>\n<p>  petition and will rest content if the noti\ufb01cation under<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;section 28[-4] of the Act insofar as it relates to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners&#8217; lands are concerned is quashed.<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">9<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<p>8. Learned Advocate General points out that there is a<\/p>\n<p>technical impediment for this to happen as the .p&#8217;etitio&#8217;ners<br \/>\nhave neither prayed for this relief nor havje&#8217;* has<br \/>\ncopy of the declaration issued Llild-31&#8242;.   ; <\/p>\n<p>Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>9. Objection is well taken,v&#8221;&#8216;~~Houre\\rer,.toi.rna1$e-..aniends,d&#8217;<br \/>\nSri. Vardhaman V __Gunja1,&#8230;Vddiieained &#8220;ice-unsefl for the<br \/>\npetitioners has placeduaa&#8217;irnieniotieh-efo1*e_ the_C0urt seeking for<\/p>\n<p>additional prayei-,,__in =petitio:1:VV&#8217;V&#8217;for quashing the<\/p>\n<p>declaration  28[4] of the Act, copy of<\/p>\n<p>which is availabxlvei._hefor.e&#8217;..&#8217;i&#8217;this court as Annexure&#8211;R2 to the<\/p>\n<p> staVte;1ne_;nt of objections \ufb01led by the Board and therefore<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;the&#8217; &#8211;need&#8221;forTproducing a separate copy of the Very same<\/p>\n<p>notiiicatioii;j_&#8217;hiy the petitioners is avoided.<\/p>\n<p> me finai declaration bearing No.01 335 SPQ 2009,<\/p>\n<p>e._&#8217;B:AN(\u00a7ALORE, dated 16.10.2009 issued under section<\/p>\n<p> ~&#8217;28{4] of the Act by the State Government insofar as it<\/p>\n<p>relates to the property of the petitioners are concerned,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">11<\/span><br \/>\nand a Comprehensive sketch of all the metr0__. tracks<br \/>\nproposed for construction, before this<br \/>\npetition Nos.24120&#8211;24124 of.2010 which<br \/>\nbefore this court on 6.1.2011.   V.  4&#8242; <\/p>\n<p>14. Registry is directed to place&#8217;\u00ab.e0:f)Ay&#8221;ef  iitfie<\/p>\n<p>file of the writ petition N0&#8243;s,_2412&#8217;O&#8217;w2;%1:411&#8217;Z4-.&#8217;Qf 26110. <\/p>\n<p>AN\/~<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri. Mahesh K Chawla S\/O Late &#8230; vs State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010 Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar Sections 1[3] and 28[1] of the Karnataka Development Act, 1966 [for short &#8216;the Inain grievance on behalf of the petitioners as A &#8220;:l:&#8217;si.IbIiiitted by Sri. Vardhaman V Gunja}, learned Counsel, that the petitioners have [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-190000","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri. Mahesh K Chawla S\/O Late ... vs State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri. Mahesh K Chawla S\/O Late ... vs State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-06T22:59:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri. Mahesh K Chawla S\\\/O Late &#8230; vs State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-06T22:59:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010\"},\"wordCount\":809,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri. Mahesh K Chawla S\\\/O Late ... vs State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-06T22:59:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri. Mahesh K Chawla S\\\/O Late &#8230; vs State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri. Mahesh K Chawla S\/O Late ... vs State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri. Mahesh K Chawla S\/O Late ... vs State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-12-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-06T22:59:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri. Mahesh K Chawla S\/O Late &#8230; vs State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010","datePublished":"2010-12-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-06T22:59:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010"},"wordCount":809,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010","name":"Sri. Mahesh K Chawla S\/O Late ... vs State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-06T22:59:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-mahesh-k-chawla-so-late-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri. Mahesh K Chawla S\/O Late &#8230; vs State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190000","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=190000"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190000\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=190000"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=190000"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=190000"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}