{"id":190115,"date":"2007-10-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-10-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007"},"modified":"2014-05-27T23:31:25","modified_gmt":"2014-05-27T18:01:25","slug":"c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007","title":{"rendered":"C.P.Divakaran vs Subhadra on 22 October, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
C.P.Divakaran vs Subhadra on 22 October, 2007<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl Rev Pet No. 1775 of 2002()\n\n\n1. C.P.DIVAKARAN, KOCHUKALEEKKAL,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. SUBHADRA, SREENILAYAM VEEDU,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. MALOOTTI, SREENILAYAM VEEDU,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.S.NANDANAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.R.PADMAKUMAR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR\n\n Dated :22\/10\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                            V. RAMKUMAR, J.\n\n                ````````````````````````````````````````````````````\n                     Crl. R.P. No. 1775 OF 2002 A\n                ````````````````````````````````````````````````````\n               Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2007\n\n                                  O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
            In this revision filed under Section 397 read with<\/p>\n
Section 401 Cr.P.C. the revision petitioner, who was the counter<\/p>\n
petitioner in M.C. No.27\/1994 on the file of JFCM, Mavelikkara,<\/p>\n
challenges the orders concurrently passed by the courts below<\/p>\n
directing him to pay maintenance to respondents 1 and 2, who are<\/p>\n
the wife and child of the revision petitioner. While the quantum of<\/p>\n
maintenance fixed by the Magistrate was Rs.150\/- per month to<\/p>\n
the wife and Rs.100\/- per month to the child, in a revision at the<\/p>\n
instance of the respondents the Additional Sessions Judge-II,<\/p>\n
Mavelikkara in Crl.R.P. No.85\/1995 enhanced the quantum of<\/p>\n
maintenance to the wife and child at the rate of Rs.500\/- and<\/p>\n
Rs.200\/- per month respectively.              It is the said order which is<\/p>\n
assailed in this revision.\n<\/p>\n
      2.    The marriage between the revision petitioner and the<\/p>\n
1st respondent was on 10.2.1991. The second respondent was<\/p>\n
born on 5.10.1991. According to the wife, after the birth of the<\/p>\n
child, the husband started behaving cruelly towards her after<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.1775\/02
\n                                  : 2 :<\/span><\/p>\n
consuming alcohol and demanding more dowry.              He used to<\/p>\n
question his paternity over the child.        She alleged that her<\/p>\n
husband was employed in the government ferry service. He had<\/p>\n
refused to cohabit with the wife on the allegation that the child was<\/p>\n
not his. He filed H.M.A.O.P. No.89\/1991 before the Sub Court,<\/p>\n
Mavelikkara, for declaring the marriage with the 1st respondent null<\/p>\n
and void on the ground that she was pregnant on the date of<\/p>\n
marriage. The wife and daughter claimed maintenance at the rate<\/p>\n
of Rs.500\/- and Rs.200\/- per month.\n<\/p>\n
       3.    The application for maintenance was resisted by the<\/p>\n
revision petitioner contending inter alia as follows:-<\/p>\n
       The 2nd applicant is not the child born to him in the 1st<\/p>\n
applicant. At the time of the marriage itself the 1st applicant was<\/p>\n
pregnant and the marriage was conducted suppressing the<\/p>\n
pregnancy. The 2nd applicant was born as a fully matured child<\/p>\n
after 236 days of marriage. He has not demanded dowry nor has<\/p>\n
he ill treated the 1st applicant as alleged. He is not in the habit of<\/p>\n
taking alcohol as alleged. Since the 1st applicant was pregnant on<\/p>\n
the date of marriage and the said fact was concealed from him, he<\/p>\n
filed H.M.A.O.P. No.89\/1991 for declaring the marriage to be null<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.1775\/02
\n                                 : 3 :<\/span><\/p>\n
and void. That petition was, however, dismissed. The application<\/p>\n
for maintenance is without any bona fides and may be dismissed.<\/p>\n
      4.     Both the courts below have concurrently held that the<\/p>\n
2nd applicant(2nd respondent herein) was a premature baby born to<\/p>\n
the revision petitioner and the 1st respondent herein and that the<\/p>\n
allegation of pre-marital affair made by the husband was not true,<\/p>\n
that absolutely no evidence was adduced by the revision<\/p>\n
petitioner\/husband to show that the wife was living in adultery and<\/p>\n
that since he was indulging in physical assault of his wife after<\/p>\n
coming home drunk, the act of the wife leaving the matrimonial<\/p>\n
home and claiming separate maintenance was justified.<\/p>\n
      5.     The fact that the revision petitioner was employed in<\/p>\n
the government ferry service at Ernakulam is not disputed. The<\/p>\n
only objection raised by the revision petitioner is that the court<\/p>\n
below was not justified in enhancing the maintenance as there<\/p>\n
was no evidence to show the income of the revision petitioner. It<\/p>\n
is true that the wife and child had only alleged that the revision<\/p>\n
petitioner is employed in the government ferry service and that<\/p>\n
besides his salary income he was also having a monthly income of<\/p>\n
Rs.250\/- from other properties. But then, the revision petitioner<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.1775\/02
\n                                   : 4 :<\/span><\/p>\n
did not adduce any acceptable evidence to show his income which<\/p>\n
is a matter within his exclusive knowledge and by virtue of Section<\/p>\n
106 of the Evidence Act the burden was on him to show his<\/p>\n
income. The applicants had discharged their initial burden and in<\/p>\n
the absence of any material produced by the revision petitioner the<\/p>\n
Sessions Court was justified in enhancing the monthly allowance<\/p>\n
to Rs.500\/- and Rs.200\/- respectively.       Even that amount is a<\/p>\n
paltry amount with which one cannot make both ends meet.<\/p>\n
      6.     The argument of the learned counsel for the revision<\/p>\n
petitioner that the direction to pay the maintenance from the date<\/p>\n
of petition, namely, 7.9.94 is illegal, also cannot be continenced.<\/p>\n
All that sub section (2) of section 125 says is that if the court so<\/p>\n
orders an application for maintenance may be made operative<\/p>\n
from the date of application for maintenance.      No reasons are<\/p>\n
expected to be stated by the court for directing that the order for<\/p>\n
maintenance shall relate back to the date of application.       The<\/p>\n
above provision is to prevent vagrancy and destitution and a<\/p>\n
person in utter poverty knocks at the door of the criminal court for<\/p>\n
a pittance and if the trial of the case takes months or years to ripe<\/p>\n
into a final order and if the courts were to give the applicant<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.1775\/02
\n                                 : 5 :<\/span><\/p>\n
maintenance only from the date of the order, that would be a<\/p>\n
negation of justice.      In the normal course, the order for<\/p>\n
maintenance should relate back to the date of the application for<\/p>\n
maintenance and it is only in exceptional cases that it can be<\/p>\n
made operational from the date of the final order. It is for no fault<\/p>\n
of the applicant that the court is denying him maintenance for the<\/p>\n
period from the date of application till the date of final disposal.<\/p>\n
Hence, no reasons need be stated if the order for maintenance is<\/p>\n
made operational from the date of the petition.<\/p>\n
      7.     After considering the facts and circumstances of the<\/p>\n
case, I see no reason to interfere with the revisional order passed<\/p>\n
by the Additional Sessions Court.\n<\/p>\n
      This revision is accordingly dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
      The revision petitioner is given three months’ time to deposit<\/p>\n
the entire arrears.    He shall, however, continue to deposit the<\/p>\n
future maintenance without fail.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                           (V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)
\naks<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.1775\/02
\n                       : 6 :<\/span><\/p>\n
                                 V. RAMKUMAR, J.\n<\/p>\n
                      “““““““““““““““““““““““““`
\n                            Crl. R.P. No. 1775 OF 2002 A
\n                      “““““““““““““““““““““““““`<\/p>\n
                                       O R D E R<\/p>\n
                             22nd day of October, 2007<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court C.P.Divakaran vs Subhadra on 22 October, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl Rev Pet No. 1775 of 2002() 1. C.P.DIVAKARAN, KOCHUKALEEKKAL, … Petitioner Vs 1. SUBHADRA, SREENILAYAM VEEDU, … Respondent 2. MALOOTTI, SREENILAYAM VEEDU, For Petitioner :SRI.P.S.NANDANAN For Respondent :SRI.R.PADMAKUMAR The Hon’ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR Dated :22\/10\/2007 O […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-190115","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nC.P.Divakaran vs Subhadra on 22 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"C.P.Divakaran vs Subhadra on 22 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-05-27T18:01:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"C.P.Divakaran vs Subhadra on 22 October, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-27T18:01:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007\"},\"wordCount\":1039,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007\",\"name\":\"C.P.Divakaran vs Subhadra on 22 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-27T18:01:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"C.P.Divakaran vs Subhadra on 22 October, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"C.P.Divakaran vs Subhadra on 22 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"C.P.Divakaran vs Subhadra on 22 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-05-27T18:01:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"C.P.Divakaran vs Subhadra on 22 October, 2007","datePublished":"2007-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-27T18:01:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007"},"wordCount":1039,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007","name":"C.P.Divakaran vs Subhadra on 22 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-27T18:01:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-p-divakaran-vs-subhadra-on-22-october-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"C.P.Divakaran vs Subhadra on 22 October, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190115","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=190115"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190115\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=190115"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=190115"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=190115"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}