{"id":190964,"date":"2009-08-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009"},"modified":"2018-07-21T21:01:25","modified_gmt":"2018-07-21T15:31:25","slug":"smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt Susheela P Bettanagouda vs The District Treasury Office on 3 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt Susheela P Bettanagouda vs The District Treasury Office on 3 August, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Anand Byrareddy<\/div>\n<pre>3\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 3*\" DAY OF AUGUST 2r;\u00a3}9%%%% j%Lk%  \n\nBEFORE:\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Asamn    &amp; '\n\nWRITPETITION No.1951%t%.Qr?gr;09is-REQ    \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSmt. Sushctsla P. Be1\u00a3a1i'\u00e9%_uu(1?\u00a5\u00a7''''' \" ~: 4 \nWis. Late P. Bcnanagoudsi, _ ' \"  \"\nAge 59 years,  _ J\n\nResiding at: Lax1t:eshwaf',\"\"*V.\":  I  \u00bb\nTaiuk : ShiraI'a}s14ui}I3.ist,ri:\u00e9:L 2:    \nGadag  u  A .j      . PETETIONER\n\n(By ShriA,Hs_1I1:a,:1lVi:i  '\ufb01\ufb01z\u00e9idi\ufb01geudar. Advoeakc)\n\n...--u-.u-uuyusa  . . . . . \n\n '   Treasury Gf\ufb01cer\n\n_ \"i'_})\u00e9Vrai3'g\u00a7re.T'VDistzict,\nA Davazggafe\n\n 2. Th&lt;;f. 1;}epu\u00a3y Commissiuner for\n\n&quot; = Public instmctians,\n\nV&#039; *  Iiavangerc Bisirici,\n\nV&#039;   The Deputy Dimciur of\n\nDavzmgere\n\nPublic Instnzetians,\nDaxrangerc Distz*iL&#039;L\n\n\n\nDavangere\n\n2%. The Bioek Education Officer,\n\nDavangsrc District,\nDavange-re\n\n5. The Accuuniant Gcnara},  \nBangalore -\u00ab 560 GEO    RES\u00ab?QNE5ENTS\n\n(By S\u00a7r1ri.Shashidhar S;   &#039;Cuurt Gtwcmmcni\n\nPicadcr)   _ _ _ AV\n&quot;   &#039;   \n\nThis -f\\VVi=i1;&#039;,VPcli\ufb01on. &#039;iS: f.&#039;i\u00ab3:\u00a7(\u00a7&#039;Vu11E.ic:r Articles 226 and 227 of\nthe Csnstitrgtign \u00e9*\u00a7TI-ndia1\u00ab&quot;pra3&#039;iiig&quot;*i\u00e9 direct the respondents to\ngrani\ufb02ihc.&#039;i&#039;a1\ufb01iEy--\u00ab.g\u00a3:n:siun&quot;&#039;ia_ faiuour uf (ht; pcliiioncr or in the\naiternzitive, direcfth\u00e9&#039; xt\u00e9sposadcnt 30.3 to 5 to seaside: the\nrepresentatirm fin&#039; &#039;$;ai:\u00a3.:ti\u00a3&#039;;t1 at&#039; \ufb01annily pens\u00e9mw in accmdamte\nwith iaw i:\u00a7Su:_\u00a7}<i>:~1rt made 316 foilmving: --\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p> &#8220;i&#8221;}1c p\ufb01iiliun naming on for Freliminary Hearing is<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &#8220;&#8216;V.Vv\u00a7\u00a3{31ii\u00a7i(i::rc&lt;i fur \ufb01nai disposal,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Govtzmmeul Advocate: ii&#8217;+1='(i&#8217;ii&#8217;-&#8220;.-.-&#8216;(.&#8217;J.&#8217;:}(.\u00a7._&#8217;  riciicg: {An &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>behalf of 1371:: respondtznm.\n<\/p>\n<p>H is stated that (ht: pt:\u00a7;i:.[iuner &#8220;is:  um&#8217;: <\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;. Bciianaguuda xvhu&#8217; ~..g.ras &#8220;as a &#8216;Headmaster in<br \/>\nGnvcmmcnl High Schoui, skated to have<\/p>\n<p>rc\ufb01rcd on  ;Th\u00a3~:  &#8220;\u20ac&#8217;3\u00a7IIIS to be the Idgaily<\/p>\n<p>xwcddg\u00e9ii P. Vii via\u00bb: her case that the marriage<br \/>\nwas sufeagin\u00e9gcd   May i\u00a767, according tu Hindu<\/p>\n<p>diets &#8216;and cusiums;&#8217; &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>  1 &#8216;petitioner was estranged frum Bciianaguuda and<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;ii .i&#8217;$:&#8217;%&#8217;thc:.&amp;y;\u00a7e\u00e9;ii_i_i\u00ab;.\u00a7ncr&#8217;s alisgaiiun that Bcilanaguuda had dcvelupsd<\/p>\n<p> relaiicynsilip with other women and she: was not being iakcsn cam<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;Accurdingiy, she was cunsiraincd it} prefer a uia\u00e9m in<\/p>\n<p>  _\u00a7l&#8217;x*iminaI Miscclianmus Nu.39x&#8217;2003, scathing maintenance<\/p>\n<p>uniier Smiiun 125 iht: Code: :3? Criminai Procedure before {fuzz<\/p>\n<p>C:3:;:&#8217;\u00a3 uf Lht; 31&#8217;viFC\u00a7 Lakrshmeshgara agaigsi hats&#8221; husband<\/p>\n<p>entitled to see}: any such paymtmi as ciaimcd by <\/p>\n<p>background, that the petitiuncr is before this  V  ii&#8221; i <\/p>\n<p>5. The pctiiiuncr wuuid  <\/p>\n<p>appeared before the Lukadalat   &#8216;{;iaim&#8221; \u00bb it<\/p>\n<p>of the; petitioner for .  \u00e9i\u00a3siA.._his iwouid be<br \/>\naduquatc \u00abevidence ts.) disckisi;   was infant her<\/p>\n<p>husband.\n<\/p>\n<p> ::irc&#8217;tii:ii:~i;tai.?1t:r:\u00bbV.L&#8217;i}i.=.t in Cri.Misu.Nu.2(}!20C42,<br \/>\nBettaxiegciuda  that the petitiurmr was his<\/p>\n<p>lcgaily w\u00a3ii}d\u00a7c\u00a7~}.a%if\u00e9,;=_iiS&#8221;&#8216;\u00a7&#8217;et ancthtzr dcecumcnt which would<\/p>\n<p>i  irziiitiiitaiiiih &#8220;tag:  being his legaity weaddcd wife. The<\/p>\n<p>A  : driven tn yet anuthtzr civil suit, tn cstablish that<\/p>\n<p>She isgiii  the iegaiiy wecidcd wife: 0.? Bcttanaguuda and to<\/p>\n<p>it   = mg b\u00bb.-mix; due, tu km, which is withheid by the<\/p>\n<p> iieiigytgndunts ii} the: ciisadvautagc ef the petitioner is iiitzrsfum a<\/p>\n<p>cimumsiancc, which has warmatcd the yutitiuncr to appmach<\/p>\n<p>this Court-\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>6. &#8216;While: the: Guvcmmsnl Advocate  <\/p>\n<p>the respundcnls art: hcipicsss in cast-.3 sutsh as Ehis;-. pmccgd pn&#8221; = . <\/p>\n<p>the basis uf scanty material It) disclaim l3j;&#8217;ai.. <\/p>\n<p>wife of the dccaased Guvt:mni\u00a2xi&#8217;1._scrxrani.V In  &#8220;bf Lhcw V<\/p>\n<p>name uf the petitioner, as 3 nom\u00a7n\u00a7:;e_ifi&#8211;\u00bb..\u00a3he nbminai\u00e9irn column<br \/>\nof the service records \u00a331&#8217; I &#8216;{}1\u00e9L._;icg:;e:z;t\u00a7e%.i&#8217;*\ufb01z\ufb01zployca, ii is m:\u00a3<\/p>\n<p>possible for   ma; {he ptriiliuncr is the<\/p>\n<p>legally    &#8216;L\u00a7:\u00a3\u00a7:\u00a7 &#8220;&#8221;BzA&#8221;i:anaguuda. It is \ufb02lcmfurc<br \/>\nincumggni Q21   a decfaraiiun to this effect<\/p>\n<p>from _1hc:  Court, which would mumps] the<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; V&#8217;  . resp\u00e9in\u00e9fenis in acecd\u00e9fiu the ciaim.<\/p>\n<p>   &#8216;  {rue that the respundcm can in law accept the<\/p>\n<p>claim qf  such as the pciiiimwr uni}! an produe\ufb01un {sf<\/p>\n<p>  insggrnvtirfibie duczsmcnis such as a, judgmcnl and decree by 3<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;.VC1i&#8217;vi*E&#8217; Cuuri. daclaring her status  the wife :3? the deceased<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   &#8216;\u00e9mpiuyttc, given the abject siattz ufpenury, and {he pciiiiuncfs<\/p>\n<p>pitsading {hat them are Qih\ufb01\ufb01l&#8217; documents such as Cuuri orders, \u00a30<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>cstablish lhal she was infaci the Iegaily wtgdded w\u00a5i&#8217;f*; cf<\/p>\n<p>Bc\ufb02anagouda an that: basis which she is iaying claim <\/p>\n<p>pension.\n<\/p>\n<p>The rcspundcnls would not b\u00e9:,&#8217;pro:c:\u00a7\u00a3;(i\u00a7i:\u00a7g, <\/p>\n<p>cunsidering the claim of the-..__pciiiVitunc&#8217;iz&#8217;  V121&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>documcnis avaiiabh: which ma3_(_4_L:IisI:I_ rghprl judg\u00e9mmt and<br \/>\ndecree of 2: Civil Cuuft.   Q3135 as the Icgaiiy<br \/>\nwedded wife urawmg\u00a2uagT%;r.1:mrga,3;W ether claimants<\/p>\n<p>in the   9  <\/p>\n<p>7. &#8216;Having   fact that legit: Bttiianagoada has<\/p>\n<p> dit.&#8217;:4&#8242;.\u00a7.i&#8217;f.&#8217;\u00a5.VI?1 rezspundc:-ni; wouid hL&gt;wc:vt:&#8217;r pmcwd<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; ygiii;\u00a7!V\u00a3i1.g;:&#8217;*::a:;:&#8221;&#8221;as_ to {hart being my other claims insofar as the<\/p>\n<p>c.i=:~.*:f.*a,&#8217;i;&#8217;}V2Ab&lt;.*vzA:\u00a2:.1vfV\u00a7,i_._:~1V.?T_&#039;\u00a3&#039;Vr.Vtc to the family sf Bellaaaguuda are conccrnt.-d.<\/p>\n<p> gzvz-cziiiicn stands disposed of; while [his wspondcn\u00e9s are<\/p>\n<p>&#039; .   to reconsider ihc re cscniaiiun cf {he -iiiiuncr an the<br \/>\n. _ P&#039; P&quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;    ofdocumenls ihai art: aiready avaiiab1c_<\/p>\n<p>E<\/p>\n<p>The pciiiiencr is at liberty to prudnuc\ufb01\u00e9ijyv .V <\/p>\n<p>ducumcnis with her in support of  t:a:;;t:T _ 1<\/p>\n<p>J}<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt Susheela P Bettanagouda vs The District Treasury Office on 3 August, 2009 Author: Anand Byrareddy 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3*&#8221; DAY OF AUGUST 2r;\u00a3}9%%%% j%Lk% BEFORE: THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE Asamn &amp; &#8216; WRITPETITION No.1951%t%.Qr?gr;09is-REQ BETWEEN: Smt. Sushctsla P. Be1\u00a3a1i&#8217;\u00e9%_uu(1?\u00a5\u00a7&#8221;&#8221;&#8217; &#8221; ~: 4 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-190964","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt Susheela P Bettanagouda vs The District Treasury Office on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Susheela P Bettanagouda vs The District Treasury Office on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-21T15:31:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Susheela P Bettanagouda vs The District Treasury Office on 3 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-21T15:31:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":673,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt Susheela P Bettanagouda vs The District Treasury Office on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-21T15:31:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Susheela P Bettanagouda vs The District Treasury Office on 3 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Susheela P Bettanagouda vs The District Treasury Office on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Susheela P Bettanagouda vs The District Treasury Office on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-21T15:31:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Susheela P Bettanagouda vs The District Treasury Office on 3 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-21T15:31:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009"},"wordCount":673,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009","name":"Smt Susheela P Bettanagouda vs The District Treasury Office on 3 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-21T15:31:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-susheela-p-bettanagouda-vs-the-district-treasury-office-on-3-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Susheela P Bettanagouda vs The District Treasury Office on 3 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190964","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=190964"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190964\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=190964"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=190964"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=190964"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}