{"id":19133,"date":"2009-07-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009"},"modified":"2017-03-28T21:53:30","modified_gmt":"2017-03-28T16:23:30","slug":"b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"B R Ganganna Gowda S\/O Ramanna … vs The State Of Karnataka By Its … on 14 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
B R Ganganna Gowda S\/O Ramanna … vs The State Of Karnataka By Its … on 14 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: K.L.Manjunath And Malimath<\/div>\n
xn TEE H163 coma? or KARNAmAKA Ax sAn\u00e9aLoRE\"%\"\n\nnAman THIS THE 14\"'nAx or JULY\u20ac \u00e9\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9  V ;'\n\n?RESEN'I'\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.3vswi3\ufb01mK.L\u00a7HanJg\ufb01A?E\"\"w'\n\nTHE HON' BLE  _MAL1}~&A'.IfH~'\n\nw.A.No[1i8a7a\ufb01 2db#cgLgA)\n\nBETWEER :\n\n1\n\nB R GAHQANRA QQA sic Ramgmga GOWDA\nR\/O MALLA$3AE\u00a5A_ \u00bb'\n\nKASAEA H0853 1' _\nKuN1GaL:TALBE?a w, , *\nrUMKUR\u00bbnIswRIcT\u00a7.\".'\n\nSINCE nz\u00e9b $Y-;RsI\n\n.RA\ufb01\u00a7k$\ufb013MX B G\"'\"  \"\"\"\n\n'_so\u00a7 at nA$E_\u00a3 R GAHGANNA GownA\n\nr;-.5\n\nR\/OMMALLAGKATTA, KASAEA HOBLI\nKu\u00a7zGAL.mALUx, TUMKUR sxswnzcr\n\nRAMAK\u00a7iSENEGOWnA 3 G\n\n--x*28T\u00a5EAas,\n';;su&,oF LAEE B R GHGANNA Gawna\n\u00ab=&m;mmmmmmm,wwMmzmmJ\n.}.EUxIaAL mALUK, wuumnn nzswaxcr\n\n\"NARAXAHA GownA 3 G\n\n* 27 YEARS,\n\nsea or LA$E B R GANGARNA GOEA\nR\/0 MALLAGHATTA, KASAEA HOBLI\n\n\n\n \n\nK'iJ'I'3C\u00a3\u00aesI. TALUK, TIJMECEFR DISTRXCP\n\nCi) HONHAMMA.\n\n(By Sri\nAPPEZ.12.A2~I*I'S)\n\nAND\n\n1\n\n62 YEARS,\nWIFE OF LATE B R GANGNNA Gowna\n\nR\/O MALLAGHAmwA, KASABA HOEL$ _ T\nKUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DIS?RICT'az 2\n\n.f\u00a2.A?\u00a7ELi&mrs % \n\nL s cHIxKANAsoUn&g*s Assa\u00a2xn\ufb01E\u00e9}\u00e96\u00a7\n\nTHE STAKE or Kanmamgxm BY Ifs $\u00e9G\u00a7E?ARY TO\n\nTHE BEPAR$M3yT.oE_RgvERvE=j,_ 5\n\nM.s,B\ufb01i\ufb01n:\ufb01asffa3'$\ufb013an\ufb01A\u00a7 VEEDHI\nBAN6aLGRE--01f  \u00bb* ~ '-\n\nSM? 2A\u00a7?Am3AHa\u00a7 = :\nWI$E OF 3A$AvAcHAR\"\n\n' *  si\ufb01czvnmaa Bf ER sum MUNIGANGAMHA\n\n'D\/9 Eh$AV\u00a7CHAR, R\/Am JAIE'TEMPLE STREET\n\n'_'3EH:\ufb01m aaz\ufb01 TEMPLE, KUNIGAL TOWN\n\n$xi 3,\u00a7'\u00a7a\ufb01mnAvAcHAa1\n\nHUSBEHB or MUHIGAKGAMA\nR\/Af_\u00a7\u00a7IH TEMPLE STREET\n\n\"\ufb01\ufb01gl\ufb02b JAIN wauynn\n. $D\u00a7IGAL TOWH\n\n'(THE LAND TRIBIRQAL\n\"K'{3NIG@AIa TOWN\n\nKU3.*EIG&L\nTUMK.'{3R DIS'.I'RIC'E\nRESPGNDENTS\n\n(By SM? : ASEA. M.' GERIMATH, HCGP FOR R1 )\n\n\n\nPetition came to be allowed and the  was \"\n\nset aside and remanded  \"tho  \n\n21.2.33. Again after  \n\nconsidering the evidence  \n\nrelying upon the   passed\no.s.1~:o.39o\/53 whiozi ''  in\nre. .A. No . 1 6 \/1979 .  _  in\nR. s . A. no . 1 0:7)     ' application filed\nby the  \"  occupancy rights\non 29.331934; _.'w.i':ic:h again the tenant\n\nfiled a wrii:..%po1-.:1:ioo'.8614\/1993 and Civil Fetition\n\nSf\u00bb).\n\n\n\ncame to be converted into Writ \ufb01etition in\n\nW.P.1~3o.268Ci1\/2000. The Writ Petition \n\ndismissad on merits by holding that the $p\u00a7\u00e9:1aa\u00a3_\n\nherein was not a tenant _of_ t\ufb01\u00e9\" land tand'\u00bb'\n\nconcurring with the orders; of\u00bb'tha\"giri$tn\u00a7l;\n\ndismissed the Writ Petition on-V.V:13?\"\ufb02\u00a715e;ne.VV't\u00e9ees\ufb01\"\n\nChallenging the legality an\ufb01 eorrootnoso of the\norder, the present\" \ufb01yea1;ti$: filed by the\n\nunsuccessfulrap\u00e911ant}=\n\n3. The learn\u00e9\u00a2\"ooun\u00a7o1 for the apellant has\n\nraisedg the fo1io\ufb01ing\"jpoints in support of his\n\nxxargum\u00e9nt\u00e9f  *\n\nVtn;\u00a7\ufb01a\ufb01\u00a2ri5una1 as wall as the learned Single\n\nVtJudeVhav\u00e9~ebmmittad an error in not considering\n\n\"\"5ftn\u00e9 gase of the appellant solely relying upon the\n\n';udgmnt and decree passed in O.S.No.390\/68.\n\n\ufb02kelying upon a Jhdgment of this Court in\n\n7\u00abf \":35aAs:RATaz mm & OTHERS V.LAND TRIBUNAL, unwx\n\nARD OEHERS reported in 1979(1) KLJ 30? contends\n\n$1';\n\n\n\nthat 3 even if a decree passed   \n\nJ\n\nappellant in a Civil Court considexi::=.\u00a7:'.the: \n\nand object of the Karnatake \n\nstill the 'tribunal had  coheider  \n\nappellant was a tenant: asvhlen' \u00a7.V.3.\"1'9fV?:4' it was\nimperative on the  of  ~ to grant a\nrelief to the    'v'alte::-natively\n\ncontends since the ':5-:=:sr\u00e9=,ni1e4_\"entfiee still continue\n\nin the   e\ufb01peliant.V\"exren after: 3..3.19v4,\n\nthe Tr:li3un--el V  \"considered the revenue\n\nentries  , \"';,;?aeu_\u00a7\u00a7;;\u00bbt1cn attached thereto .\n\n_..v1'l1ere%5\u00a7:,\u00a7r;e; on H' these.\u00bb two grounds he requests this\n\nA\"Cou1;;~'t\u00bb    aside the order passed by the.\n\nleex\ufb01ed  and so also the order passed\n\n by  eribunal, I\ufb01tunigal.\n\nVA    Eiaving heard the counsel fax: the appellant\n\n  Government Advocate \ufb01e: the responeents,\n\n are of the opinion that the learned Single\n\nJudge hes. not coztmitteci any error, in Order to\n5%'\n\n\n\ninterfere with his order for the _ foii'e$r.ing\n\n336330113 2\n\nIt is no doubt true that in  E.\n\no-mmns Vs. mm) TRIBUNAL, um;:9:1: \n\nCourt while considering ,'i:h4_e pr;v\u00a3rision}3AV.ic>f \n\nsection (2) of Section   Act\nNo.31\/'19'74 has ---held'    lies been\npassed by the  Civi1,_  and after\n1 .3.1974 , thef   \"&s\u00a3--w\u00e9.ub~section (2)\ncaf SectiVi3n~\u00a23   its ixrmrtancze and it\n\nis furtheghelazl \"  matter can be reopened\n\n ,L~yf fc\ufb01e 1  ';'rii:>ii'nas_-1.' and ear: be considazted.\n\n'i:3c:.aj;se:nde,;-:m;z';*'V  Subsequently, the learned Single\n\n V \"caf  had an occasion to consider\n\n the c.$..~=.;\u00a2\".4;>.f\" BHAGIRATHI mm a o-rm:-\"es vs. LAND\n\n \u00a31069: in the case of VE1~IKA'1'AIAE AND\n\nvs. Izmcmma AND o'rrmRs reported in ma\n\n \"'(:;\u00e9gt\u00e9rLaa=A1<A) seams 3.980 PAGE 693 wherein this\n\n Court has held that" any decree passed prior to\n\n\/'\n1.<\/pre>\n
3.1974 weuld be binding on the parties.<\/p>\n
(2),<\/p>\n
5. From the perusal of the5eQt\u00a7e S\ufb01d\u00a7$@\ufb02tSt 3k<\/p>\n
we are of the opinion that eten tho\ufb01gt theta is<\/p>\n
ne prohibition for the Land tribune; ta dcnsiaer-t<\/p>\n
the tenancy rights as on ;\u00a23\u00a7;9?\u00a7 itteepeetive of
\nthe decree passed thy \ufb01the\ufb02i\ufb01ttil Cburt in
\nVenkataiah’s eaee, ttigitttgttgagjhela that the
\ndecree paase\u00e9 p\ufb01tet tel; g\ufb01gete it binding on the
\nParties\u00bb “”” “wneteferef \ufb01t iemelear that when the<\/p>\n
O  \u00e9ffa 9:,<\/p>\n
appellant has s\ufb01\u00a3\ufb01et\u00e9@”;’aecree s that he<\/p>\n
is not a tenent of the land in question prior to<\/p>\n
tN1,3.1\u00a7?44th;\u00a2n”5u\u00a7gment has been affirmed by this<\/p>\n
!<\/p>\n
tceutt tn Rgsfe, No.10?\/74 dt.18.1.1974, the same<\/p>\n
t7–_ is binding en the appellant. we are also of the<\/p>\n
ta_4epinien.ttet whenever 3 Judgment is rendered by a<\/p>\n
~\u00abeetgpt\u00a2nt Civil Court prior to 1.3.1974, is<\/p>\n
‘V,e$inding on the parties. If there ie a tenancy<\/p>\n
‘ediepute a on 1.3.1974 and if such land is Vested<\/p>\n
in the Gavexnment, then the question cf<\/p>\n
considering the actual dispute between the
\nwe<\/p>\n
parties would arise. In the instant cage–<\/p>\n
the Land Reforms Act: came into   the K<\/p>\n
eoxzpetant Civil Court hats  u  <\/p>\n
cantentian of the appellant thtatthe 3;_s”I._.a” <\/p>\n
at the land in question.  is.   tenant
\nas on 1.3.1974, the ‘q;ia3.5tio1{1Vv”<;f_,j:e.st:i.ng the land
\nin the Government   ?\u00a7.ri'r\u00e9' all. when
\nthe land has    Govezncnment,<\/p>\n
the questiorr    alleged tenancy<\/p>\n
of the \u20ac\u00a7pp:all3iu1t:':–. 'Land '1Z'r:i.1::auna.1 does nczt<\/p>\n
arise at all," _  this point, we are of<\/p>\n
the opi\u00e9ggi\u00e9n thrt-. 3.V\u00a7___a. Judgment; has been passed by<\/p>\n
  Court prior to 1.3.1974 the<\/p>\n
 vsaxtlrejxhzi\ufb01'  on the yartie\u00e9. If a coxmterzt<\/p>\n
 ci.v:i..1 .44"('.f:ai$;;'t'has hald that a person is net a<\/p>\n
 the question of vesting the land in<\/p>\n
  the Government under the :[.and Reforms<\/p>\n
V ' w  H does not arise at all . In such<\/p>\n
 circungstanzzas, the Tribunal aannat entertain the<\/p>\n
application filed. in form I:\u00a5o.?. Similarly, if a<\/p>\n
5*'<\/p>\n
H<\/p>\n
decree has been passed by a conpetent <\/p>\n
declaring a person as a tenant:\n<\/p>\n
goes without saying such  ii,   V<\/p>\n
Gcvernment anti in sugh ‘c::\u00a3.’I:cums\u00a74*.\u00e9\u00a7:\u00bb.n(5.\u00e9s,’:’;  1′.1ie.:<\/p>\n
Tribunal would get; juris\u00e9iu\u00e9tigan  form
\nNo.7 filed. by the  <\/p>\n
6. Tharefqxe, we._ are:    in the<\/p>\n
instant casg\u00e9\u00e9    Civil Court\u00e9<\/p>\n
prior    he_:3.:.\u00a71vW’vi:hat the appellant as
\nnot a  of considering his<\/p>\n
applic-3.t:i.o:{” Tiihunal again daes not arise<\/p>\n
 “at; a-3:1 2 “V’3\u00a7.cco\u00a3*\u00a3ii’ii\u00a7_.3’1y, graunci No. 1 is answered<\/p>\n
‘\u00e9Lg\u00e9,:i._Tx1u$’t.:  aggsellant .<\/p>\n
  as the 2″” point is concerned, when<\/p>\n
 l\u00e9n\u00e9 has not faaen vested, zmre ravenue<\/p>\n
V’  j\u00e9f1t~.:_3′.\u00e9.-5 in the records wi3.3. not enure to the<\/p>\n
 “- 3.:e_\u00a7r\u00a3efit of the amellant: sinaa he has already<\/p>\n
\ufb01eld to be not a tenant. ‘\ufb01herefere, tha<\/p>\n
presumption attached to the revenue entries will<\/p>\n
ex?”\n<\/p>\n
not come tea the aid of the appellant    <\/p>\n
tenancy right unless and unti3:'”a~-c:as–\u00a5_e <\/p>\n
by the appellant that the    .\n<\/p>\n
to the appellant on lease!  ‘”afteJ:”‘<\/p>\n
the dismissal of his suit \u00e9\u00a7\u00a7”hefotev1\u00a73.1974.
\nTherefore, point No.2’ ‘M “against the<\/p>\n
appellant .\n<\/p>\n
8 . At 1thii,=_.”}f_Vst\u00e9ag-\u00a7}’~’:.’t”tiie’  counsel for
\nthe appertilargt’ _* submitted that az\ufb01ter
\nthe dismigsgl of R\ufb01\ufb01 \ufb01\u00a7]1\u00e97\/19?4 dt.1e.1.1974 the<\/p>\n
owner: Q3. xtht\u00e9  .’i*1a..?s filed a suit for bare<\/p>\n
Qinjun\u00e9tioiit ‘  A:\u00bb;fe.=,st:r:a:”:’i’.’ni ng the appellant from<\/p>\n
”  his lawful possession and<\/p>\n
t\u00bb’AA”””enjoyAm:a_ntV_.c;\u00a3;f’4:i?:e: property in o.s.z~:o.2o5\/’23 on the<\/p>\n
“tCfiianqf”M\ufb01hsiff at Tumknr and the said suit is<\/p>\n
Vtpe\ufb01ding} Even if the suit had been filed by the<\/p>\n
 in such a suit the right of the owner<\/p>\n
 na\u00e9xmot be taken away by instituting such a. suit<\/p>\n
against the appellant in View of thejid@\u00a7\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9f\u00a5T~<\/p>\n
passed in O.S.No.390\/68.\n<\/p>\n
9. in the msult, the  ”\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court B R Ganganna Gowda S\/O Ramanna … vs The State Of Karnataka By Its … on 14 July, 2009 Author: K.L.Manjunath And Malimath xn TEE H163 coma? or KARNAmAKA Ax sAn\u00e9aLoRE”%” nAman THIS THE 14″‘nAx or JULY\u20ac \u00e9\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9 V ;’ ?RESEN’I’ THE HON’BLE MR.3vswi3\ufb01mK.L\u00a7HanJg\ufb01A?E””w’ THE HON’ BLE _MAL1}~&A’.IfH~’ w.A.No[1i8a7a\ufb01 2db#cgLgA) BETWEER : […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19133","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nB R Ganganna Gowda S\/O Ramanna ... vs The State Of Karnataka By Its ... on 14 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"B R Ganganna Gowda S\/O Ramanna ... vs The State Of Karnataka By Its ... on 14 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-28T16:23:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"B R Ganganna Gowda S\\\/O Ramanna … vs The State Of Karnataka By Its … on 14 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-28T16:23:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":692,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009\",\"name\":\"B R Ganganna Gowda S\\\/O Ramanna ... vs The State Of Karnataka By Its ... on 14 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-28T16:23:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"B R Ganganna Gowda S\\\/O Ramanna … vs The State Of Karnataka By Its … on 14 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"B R Ganganna Gowda S\/O Ramanna ... vs The State Of Karnataka By Its ... on 14 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"B R Ganganna Gowda S\/O Ramanna ... vs The State Of Karnataka By Its ... on 14 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-28T16:23:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"B R Ganganna Gowda S\/O Ramanna … vs The State Of Karnataka By Its … on 14 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-28T16:23:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009"},"wordCount":692,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009","name":"B R Ganganna Gowda S\/O Ramanna ... vs The State Of Karnataka By Its ... on 14 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-28T16:23:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-r-ganganna-gowda-so-ramanna-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-14-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"B R Ganganna Gowda S\/O Ramanna … vs The State Of Karnataka By Its … on 14 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19133","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19133"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19133\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19133"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19133"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19133"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}