{"id":191523,"date":"1912-08-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1912-08-07T18:06:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912"},"modified":"2016-04-22T11:43:41","modified_gmt":"2016-04-22T06:13:41","slug":"midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912","title":{"rendered":"Midnapur Zemindary Co. Ld. vs Muktakeshi Dasi on 8 August, 1912"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Calcutta High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Midnapur Zemindary Co. Ld. vs Muktakeshi Dasi on 8 August, 1912<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: 16 Ind Cas 776<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: A Mookerjee, Holmwood<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>1.   This    is   an    appeal    on behalf   of the   plaintiffs in a suit for bastee (homestead) rent.    The   defendant resisted the   claim on the   ground that as crops were cultivated   on a part of the bastee and  the ud bastee   adjoining   thereto,   the   suit   was triable   exclusively   by  the Revenue   Court under    Section   139, Sub-section    (3),   Clause (a), of the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act, 1903. The Court of   first instance overruled   this objection and decreed the suit on the merits. Upon appeal, the   District   Judge   has   reversed that decision on the ground   that the suit is not maintainable in the   Civil Court. In our opinion, this view cannot be sustained. Section  139,   Clause   3, provides   that  all suits for arrears  of  rent due   on account  of agricultural  land,   whether    subject  to  the payment  of rent or   only to the payment  of dues which are   recoverable  as if they were rent, shall be cognizable by the Deputy Commissioner  and shall be instituted  and tried  under   the provisions   of the  Act,  and shall not be  cognizable  in any other Court.    The question, therefore, arises whether this is a suit for arrears of rent doe on account of agricultural lands.    Upon   the   pleadings, it is   manifest that the    rent   is     claimed in respect of bastee or   homestead   land.    The circumstance that crops   have been   grown on   a part of   the land  does   not alter   its character.    This   was    pointed out     in the case of Ramdhan Khan v. Haradhan Paramanick 12 W.R. 404 : 8 B.L.R. 107 note, where Mr. Justice Markby relied  upon  the   observation   of Mr. Justice Phear in the  case  of   Kalee Kishen Biswas v. Jankee 8 W.R. 250 that to determine whether   a case was governed   by the provisions  of   Act  X of 1859, what had to be considered   was whether   the    main   object    was cultivation  or habitation.    In the case before us, the land, in respect of which  rent is   claimed, is bastee land, and, consequently, the suit is prima facie maintainable in the Civil Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. The District Judge, however, has held that the suit is not so maintainable, because the bastee land forms part of a ghalwali property held by the defendant. This finding is open to criticism on the ground that it is based on evidence not adduced in the Court of first instance. As was pointed out by the Judicial Committee in the case of Kessowji Issur v. Great Indian Peninsular Railway Co. 31 B. 381 : 11 C.W.N. 721 : 6 C.L.J. 5 : 4 A.L.J. 461 : 2 M.L.T. 435 : 9 Bom. L.R. 671 : 17 M.L.J. 347 : 34 I.A. 115 which was applied in Krishnama Chariar v. Narasimha Chariar 31 M. 114 : 3 M.L.T. 308 &#8220;the legitimate occasion for Section 568 of the Code of 1832 is when on examining the evidence as it stands, soma inherent lacuna or defect becomes apparent, and not where a discovery is made, outside the Court, of fresh evidence and the application is made to import it; that is the subject of separate enactment in Section 623&#8221;. It has not been suggested before us that the documentary evidence, admitted by the District Judge at the appellate stage, was not available during the pendency of the trial in the Court of first instance. This additional evidence, therefore, ought not to have been received.  But even if the evidence be received, how does it affect the case? The question in controversy is, what is the true character of the land for which rent is claimed; and not whether it is part of a ghatwali property which includes agricultural land. It has finally been suggested that the plaintiff has attempted to split up the rent payable in respect of the ghatwali property. If this objection were well founded, the suit, as framed, would not be maintainable in any Court. But the, previous litigation between the parties shows that the rent in respect of the bastee lands has been successfully claimed separately from the rent payable in respect of the other lands included in the ghatwali property. Consequently, the fact that the bastee land now in dispute forms part of a ghatwali property, does not affect the decision of the question raised before us. The truth appears to be that by some arrangement, the details whereof have not been disclosed in the present litigation, the defendants collected rent from the under-tenants, both in respect of the bastu lands and the agricultural lands and made them over to the plaintiffs, separately, in respect of the two classes of lands. The suit, therefore, is clearly maintainable in the Civil Court. Kumood Narain Bhoop v. Purna Chunder Roy 31 M. 114 : 3 M.L.T. 308.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The result is that this appeal is allowed, the decree of the District Judge set aside and that of the Court of first instance restored. This order will carry costs both here and in the Court of appeal below.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Calcutta High Court Midnapur Zemindary Co. Ld. vs Muktakeshi Dasi on 8 August, 1912 Equivalent citations: 16 Ind Cas 776 Bench: A Mookerjee, Holmwood JUDGMENT 1. This is an appeal on behalf of the plaintiffs in a suit for bastee (homestead) rent. The defendant resisted the claim on the ground that as crops were cultivated [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-191523","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-calcutta-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Midnapur Zemindary Co. Ld. vs Muktakeshi Dasi on 8 August, 1912 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Midnapur Zemindary Co. Ld. vs Muktakeshi Dasi on 8 August, 1912 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1912-08-07T18:06:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-22T06:13:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Midnapur Zemindary Co. Ld. vs Muktakeshi Dasi on 8 August, 1912\",\"datePublished\":\"1912-08-07T18:06:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-22T06:13:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912\"},\"wordCount\":823,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Calcutta High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912\",\"name\":\"Midnapur Zemindary Co. Ld. vs Muktakeshi Dasi on 8 August, 1912 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1912-08-07T18:06:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-22T06:13:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Midnapur Zemindary Co. Ld. vs Muktakeshi Dasi on 8 August, 1912\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Midnapur Zemindary Co. Ld. vs Muktakeshi Dasi on 8 August, 1912 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Midnapur Zemindary Co. Ld. vs Muktakeshi Dasi on 8 August, 1912 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1912-08-07T18:06:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-22T06:13:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Midnapur Zemindary Co. Ld. vs Muktakeshi Dasi on 8 August, 1912","datePublished":"1912-08-07T18:06:40+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-22T06:13:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912"},"wordCount":823,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Calcutta High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912","name":"Midnapur Zemindary Co. Ld. vs Muktakeshi Dasi on 8 August, 1912 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1912-08-07T18:06:40+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-22T06:13:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/midnapur-zemindary-co-ld-vs-muktakeshi-dasi-on-8-august-1912#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Midnapur Zemindary Co. Ld. vs Muktakeshi Dasi on 8 August, 1912"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191523","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=191523"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191523\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=191523"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=191523"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=191523"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}