{"id":191604,"date":"2009-01-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009"},"modified":"2014-07-21T03:04:34","modified_gmt":"2014-07-20T21:34:34","slug":"shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shri Shridhar Padmanab Bhat vs Shri Anant Parashuram Tupare on 19 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Shri Shridhar Padmanab Bhat vs Shri Anant Parashuram Tupare on 19 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n
RSA 50423069\n\n111 THE HIGH mum at? KARzIA'rA1\u20acA_.~  '  Q  r.- \n\ncmcwr smzcu arr  \"  -- Cf   \"\n\nDATED was THE 1911! DAY ol\u00a7'\u00bb.,3A',\u00a7l1\u00a3;IiY,_h'2G0!'\u00a7\"~ f; & ;\n\nBEFOR_E\u00ab--.. V _ V\nTHE I-IOIPBLE  3_.s;r2.'i?:1_1}': \"\nmama  \nBetw6m'\u00a7=    \"   \"\n\nShr.i.Shric1ha:r Pac3:i1i\u00e91;;T:.\u00e9tb Bizatg;   A:   V. \nAgc:Ma3'or, Occ:B'oL-sin<:s*.--s, V ' "\n\nR[o:12\/A, Datt.a,."ii:u;;;j",  Road,\nR.P.D.Cross,~--Ti1a1cwacii;,.  * "  \nBelgaum.  1"  7. V ' ' APPELLAKT\n(By  Adv)\n\nAnd:\n\n 'V  apart,\n' ~.Agt.=.-: Major, Doc; I:h1sincs$,\n\nR,f_o:"12 i E\ufb01ia\ufb01aput Road,\n V'  . . . RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
 any  may for cim;\n<\/p>\n
” v  V ‘ .. ;This”appcal is \ufb01led under Section 100 of CPC against the<\/p>\n
 _judm\u00e9I..1t and dctcree dated 30. 10.12008 passed in<\/p>\n
‘R.A.I’\u00e9o._:?;91\/2&5 on the E}: of the III Addi. Civil Judge<\/p>\n
” “(Sr.Dn.), Bclgaum, dismissing the appeal and con\ufb01rming the<\/p>\n
T  judgment anti decree dated 31.08.2085 passed in<\/p>\n
 “uO.S.NO.15\/2003 on the file of the IV Addl. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.),
\n \u00abBelg-aum.\n<\/p>\n
RSA 5042:’2i}\u00a3)\u00a7<\/p>\n
3. The defendant resisted the suit stating that the  ~<\/p>\n
not maintainable after the Karnataka Rent Act,   *  M<\/p>\n
into force. It was also urged that the  etightiiete.  <\/p>\n
filed a petition either under the I\u00a2Le1jnata4\u00b01:.aiRent  <\/p>\n
1961, or under the pm-visions of  Reiiti  All
\nthe other allegations made ._the_’ a1e”dex1ied. It<\/p>\n
was urged that the oecupatioxr   was continued<\/p>\n
by the fam\ufb02y of 3thc;.\u00a2iefenda:\u00a2l~ana”*eig:sM  pxamm did not<\/p>\n
implead all t11e\u20ac.gee.\u00a7eiE3eie”–nf  was bad for new
\njoinder of  V<\/p>\n
4. In sup1.~ert of p1ainti\ufb01’ examined himself as<\/p>\n
   Exs.P.1 to 13.5 whereas the<\/p>\n
A”yc_1efenda:;t’Ae:;a:iii:ied himself as DW\u00ab-1 and relied on Exs.D.1 to<\/p>\n
 Vi\ufb01sii  had also taken up a contention that<\/p>\n
V . notice”– 11\/ vs’  ef the Transfer of Property Act was defective,<\/p>\n
M K   .:ie\u00a3*eesarjr~–*iesues with regaui to the validity of the notice and<\/p>\n
  regaxti to the application of the provisions of the<\/p>\n
   Rent Act, 1999, were framed.\n<\/p>\n
RSA 5042\/2099<\/p>\n
the members of the family of late Padmanabha weref\ufb01iot\u00bb  _<\/p>\n
parties. I  b’<\/p>\n
7. Counsel appealing for the  <\/p>\n
judgment and decree under <\/p>\n
8. Having heard. the    and an
\ncareful ctonsidexatioxg of   I do not find
\nany substance  i;3r’..t:i;ie’ learned counsel
\nfor the appenafeg.   submission that the<\/p>\n
 Ren t”  to the instant case.\n<\/p>\n
9. Though i_4t”isv  the counsel for the appellant<\/p>\n
4… that  ai;  of the property was used for :no11-<\/p>\n
 unless the extent of the property made use<\/p>\n
of purpose was established to show that it<\/p>\n
V V was  14 sq. mts., the trial Court could not have<\/p>\n
W  “jinisdiction. A careful perusal of the written<\/p>\n
  \ufb01led and the evidence adduced as referred to and<\/p>\n
  by both the Courts below wouid reveal that no<\/p>\n
A  ”  contention was taken by the defendant stating that the<\/p>\n
premises was less than 14 sq. mts and was used for non-<\/p>\n
J%,,<\/p>\n
RSA 50423909<\/p>\n
residcntial purpose and therefore the suit ftgva\ufb01j” <\/p>\n
maintainabie. Under such circumstances, it is nQ1;__<\u00a7 p::n'f\u00a7r  <\/p>\n
appellant to advance such a contcntien:vi;1{V1:'1it:\u00abs;e{=:<)n:{\u00a5.   <\/p>\n
10. As regards the other contenficn.  nov\ufb01-jpizgficrji %<\/p>\n
necessaxy par\ufb01cs, it is seep that  a  att \u00a7;mpt is
\nmade in the written statsmv\u00e9\ufb01f\u00e9  ..\u00a7\u00a71_:\u00a2i1Ma co\ufb01fc\ufb01\ufb01on, no
\nissue is fram\ufb02d in    has not
\ninsisted for  isiisu\u00e9 any steps to
\nlead cvidc::.c:@-inj’  it is not open. for
\nthe defen\u00e9iant  that the suit. was bad for<\/p>\n
nomjoindcr (if At any rate, it is feund from<\/p>\n
\\V fghe \ufb01pgfgixggs mcdrz\ufb01\u00e9d’ by ‘both the Courts below that the<\/p>\n
 the premises and has been in occupation<\/p>\n
  pfemiscs subjecting it for his residential use.<\/p>\n
V In s\ufb01ch t\ufb01irr\ufb01imstances, the gound urged cannot be<\/p>\n
H ”  .44″cg$13;n?r;na:1::\u00e9:d. No substanti.-a1 question of law falls for<\/p>\n
 [cbi\ufb01silsfa\ufb01on to entertain the appeal 11\/ s 100 of the CPC.<\/p>\n
VT  ‘\ufb02eniee, the second appeal is dismissed.<\/p>\n
RSA 504252099<\/p>\n
11. The appellant is given four months’ \ufb01me tn vagat\u00e9t’ ” K<\/p>\n
deliver vacant possession of the premises on condit;i\u00a7\u00a7il.V  ‘<\/p>\n
shall pay rents regularly and shall not    <\/p>\n
party into tha premisas and shall :_naintaml’~A’r*~.th\u00a2 <\/p>\n
good oondi\ufb01on without causing ..;lamagc}” ..V_’l’h\u00e9:’.=
\nshall \ufb01le an a\ufb01davit in  tlolV\u00a3:ir:li\u00a5}er the<\/p>\n
pmmisscs on or bcfargw   within a<\/p>\n
period of two week__\u00e9.4 ‘l’;;;_ <\/p>\n
Jml ~<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Shri Shridhar Padmanab Bhat vs Shri Anant Parashuram Tupare on 19 January, 2009 Author: B.S.Patil RSA 50423069 111 THE HIGH mum at? KARzIA’rA1\u20acA_.~ ‘ Q r.- cmcwr smzcu arr ” — Cf ” DATED was THE 1911! DAY ol\u00a7’\u00bb.,3A’,\u00a7l1\u00a3;IiY,_h’2G0!’\u00a7”~ f; & ; BEFOR_E\u00ab–.. V _ V THE I-IOIPBLE 3_.s;r2.’i?:1_1}’: ” mama Betw6m’\u00a7= […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-191604","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nShri Shridhar Padmanab Bhat vs Shri Anant Parashuram Tupare on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Shridhar Padmanab Bhat vs Shri Anant Parashuram Tupare on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-07-20T21:34:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Shridhar Padmanab Bhat vs Shri Anant Parashuram Tupare on 19 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-20T21:34:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":665,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Shri Shridhar Padmanab Bhat vs Shri Anant Parashuram Tupare on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-20T21:34:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Shridhar Padmanab Bhat vs Shri Anant Parashuram Tupare on 19 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Shridhar Padmanab Bhat vs Shri Anant Parashuram Tupare on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Shridhar Padmanab Bhat vs Shri Anant Parashuram Tupare on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-07-20T21:34:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Shridhar Padmanab Bhat vs Shri Anant Parashuram Tupare on 19 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-20T21:34:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009"},"wordCount":665,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009","name":"Shri Shridhar Padmanab Bhat vs Shri Anant Parashuram Tupare on 19 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-20T21:34:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-shridhar-padmanab-bhat-vs-shri-anant-parashuram-tupare-on-19-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Shridhar Padmanab Bhat vs Shri Anant Parashuram Tupare on 19 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191604","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=191604"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191604\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=191604"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=191604"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=191604"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}