{"id":191808,"date":"2006-12-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-12-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006"},"modified":"2016-01-31T16:14:28","modified_gmt":"2016-01-31T10:44:28","slug":"the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006","title":{"rendered":"The Special Tahsildar vs P.S.Jamal Muhamed &#8230; Claimant on 22 December, 2006"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madras High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Special Tahsildar vs P.S.Jamal Muhamed &#8230; Claimant on 22 December, 2006<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT\n\nDATED : 22\/12\/2006\n\nCORAM:\nTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA\n\nA.S.No.364 of 1997\nand\nC.M.P.No.10792 of 1997\n\n\nThe Special Tahsildar,ADW,\nParamakudi.\t\t\t... Appellant\/Referring Officer\n\nVs\n\nP.S.Jamal Muhamed\t\t... Claimant\n\t\t\t\t    \/Respondent\n\n\nPrayer\n\n\nAppeal filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, against the\njudgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram in\nL.A.O.P.No.23 of 1993, dated 25th March, 1994.\n\t\n!For Appellant   ... Mr.K.M.Vijayakumar,\n\t\t     Additional Government Pleader.\n\n^For Respondents ... Mr.A.Sivaji\n\n\n:JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>\tThis appeal is directed as against the judgment and decree of the learned<br \/>\nSubordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram in L.A.O.P.No.23 of 1993, dated 25th March,<br \/>\n1994.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t2. The parties are referred to hereunder as they were arrayed before the<br \/>\ntrial Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t3. A re&#8217;sume&#8217; of facts absolutely necessary for disposal of the appeal<br \/>\nwould run thus:\n<\/p>\n<p>\tThe grievance of the land owner was that the compensation award was<br \/>\nassessed at the rate of Rs. Rs.8,403\/- per acre which was not based on any sound<br \/>\nrecognised principles.  The Subordinate Judge assessed the compensation at the<br \/>\nrate of Rs.1,400\/- per cent.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t4. Learned Additional Government Pleader during argument would contend<br \/>\nthat the trial Court failed to deduct one-third from the grossly assessed amount<br \/>\ntowards road and other development charges because the trial Court arrived at<br \/>\nthe compensation by treating agricultural land as house site. At this juncture,<br \/>\nlearned counsel for the respondent has brought to my notice the decision of the<br \/>\nHon&#8217;ble Division Bench of this Court relating to similar appeals which arose out<br \/>\nof the land acquired in the same vicinity wherein the land involved in this<br \/>\ncase.  A perusal of the said judgment dated 14.9.2005 in A.S.Nos.671 and 677 of<br \/>\n1997, would reveal that in respect of the land acquired in Kattuparamakudi<br \/>\nvillage, enhanced compensation awarded by the Sub Court was confirmed by setting<br \/>\nout  the following reasons. Excerpts from the judgment of the Division Bench<br \/>\nwould run thus:\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Aggrieved against the enhanced compensation fixed at Rs.1,400\/- per cent from<br \/>\nRs.84 per cent by the Award dated 25.3.1994 in L.A.O.P.Nos.21 and 25 of 1993 on<br \/>\nthe file of the Subordinate Court, Ramanathapuram, both the appeals have been<br \/>\nfiled by the The Special Tahsildar(ADW), Paramakudi.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. An extent of 15 cents of land in Survey No.136\/2B of the respondent in Appeal<br \/>\nSuit No.671 of 1997 and an extent of 1 acre and 57 &#8221;  cents of land in Survey<br \/>\nNo.137\/4 of the respondent in Appeal Suit No.677 of 1997, both in<br \/>\nKattuparamakkudi Village were sought to be acquired for the purpose of providing<br \/>\nhouse sites to Adi Dravidars.  Notification under Section 4(1) was published in<br \/>\nGazette on 30.12.1992 in respect of both the lands.  The Land Acquisition<br \/>\nOfficer\/the Special Tahsildar after observing all the formalities fixed the<br \/>\ncompensation at Rs.84\/- per cent.  At the instance of the owners of the lands,<br \/>\nreference was made to the Subordinate Court, Ramanathapuram and was taken on<br \/>\nfile in L.A.O.P.Nos.21 of 1993 and 25 of 1993 respectively.  The Subordinate<br \/>\nCourt considering the documents Exs.C1 to C3 marked on the side of the claimants<br \/>\nand also the documents marked on the side of the respondent as Exs.R1 to R6 and<br \/>\nalso  considering the evidence of claimants and the evidence of Special<br \/>\nTahsildar in both the appeals as per the separate evidence let in and, more<br \/>\nparticularly, taking into consideration of the Sale Deeds Exs.C1 to C3 and that<br \/>\nadjacent lands in the same village have been sold for from Rs. 1 to 2 lakhs per<br \/>\nacre, fixed the compensation at Rs.1,400\/- per cent, which has made the Special<br \/>\nTahsildar to file these Appeals.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t3. Heard the learned Additional Government Pleader for the appellant and<br \/>\nthe learned counsel for the respondents in both the appeals.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t4. Learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that the Special<br \/>\nTahsildar after perusing several sale deeds of the nearby land and after<br \/>\ninspecting the land for considering the value of the sale deed in respect of<br \/>\nKattuparamakudi Village  and since it is related to the dry land, adopted the<br \/>\nvalue in respect of the sale deeds conveyed in Vendoni village being the dry<br \/>\nland and accordingly, fixed the compensation at Rs.84 per cent and that, since<br \/>\nthe sale deeds related to house sites only, the compensation amount fixed by the<br \/>\nSub Court is very much on the higher side.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t5. We have perused the document Ex.C.1 dated 18.6.1990, which is two years<br \/>\nprior to the notification under Section 4(1).  As per the sale deeds Exs.C1 to<br \/>\nC3, which all relate to the year 1990-1992, the lands have been sold between<br \/>\nRs.1 and 2 lakhs per acre in the years 1990 &#8211; 1992.  The Special Tahsildar has<br \/>\naccepted  in his evidence that the land acquired is very near to the<br \/>\nmunicipality and the acquired lands have been sold as house sites from the year<br \/>\n1989.     Considering as per the Exs.C1  to C3 Sale Deeds, the lesser extent of<br \/>\nlands have been sold and the fact that the acquired lands are situated near the<br \/>\nmunicipal limit and also adjacent lands have been sold as house sites in the<br \/>\nyear 1989, the Subordinate Court fixed the award at Rs.1,400\/- per cent, which<br \/>\nis very much reasonable and cannot be said to be excessive.  We do not find any<br \/>\nground to interfere with the award passed in both the appeals and the appeals<br \/>\nare dismissed accordingly. No costs.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>\t4. As such the ratiocination that could be noticed from the aforesaid<br \/>\njudgment of the Division Bench, would reveal that they have not chosen to deduct<br \/>\none-third amount towards road and development charges.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t5. When I raised a query, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing<br \/>\nfor the appellant would state that no appeal was preferred to the Hon&#8217;ble<br \/>\nSupreme Court as against the judgment dated 14.9.2005 of the Division Bench of<br \/>\nthis Court in A.S.Nos.671 and 677 of 1997.  Learned counsel for the respondent\/<br \/>\nland owner would insist that there cannot be two yard sticks that the Government<br \/>\ncould adopt in paying compensation one for the land owners in those appeals<br \/>\ndecided by the Hon&#8217;ble Division Bench of this Court and another as against the<br \/>\nland owner in this appeal.  There is force in the contention of learned counsel<br \/>\nfor the land owner.  In view of the fact that almost at one period of time the<br \/>\nlands involved in those appeals decided by the Division Bench and the land<br \/>\ninvolved in this appeal were notified and land acquisition proceedings<br \/>\ncompleted,   this Court cannot carve out an exception to this case.  The<br \/>\nreasoning given by the Subordinate Judge is almost the same reasoning as found<br \/>\nset out in the Judgment of the Division Bench.  The Subordinate Judge took into<br \/>\naccount the proximity of the land acquired, to the Municipal area and also about<br \/>\nthe prospective urbanisation of the area.  Hence, in such a case, the assessment<br \/>\narrived at by the Subordinate Judge cannot be found fault with.  No other point<br \/>\nwas urged at the time of hearing of the appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t6. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed and the award passed by the<br \/>\nSubordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram, in L.A.O.P.No.23 of 1993, dated 25th March,<br \/>\n1994, is confirmed.  Consequently, connected C.M.P.No.10792 of 1997 is also<br \/>\ndismissed.  However, in the circumstance of the case, there is no order as to<br \/>\ncosts.\n<\/p>\n<p>rsb<\/p>\n<p>To<br \/>\n Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court The Special Tahsildar vs P.S.Jamal Muhamed &#8230; Claimant on 22 December, 2006 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22\/12\/2006 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA A.S.No.364 of 1997 and C.M.P.No.10792 of 1997 The Special Tahsildar,ADW, Paramakudi. &#8230; Appellant\/Referring Officer Vs P.S.Jamal Muhamed &#8230; Claimant \/Respondent Prayer Appeal filed under [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-191808","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Special Tahsildar vs P.S.Jamal Muhamed ... Claimant on 22 December, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Special Tahsildar vs P.S.Jamal Muhamed ... Claimant on 22 December, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2006-12-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-31T10:44:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Special Tahsildar vs P.S.Jamal Muhamed &#8230; Claimant on 22 December, 2006\",\"datePublished\":\"2006-12-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-31T10:44:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006\"},\"wordCount\":1153,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006\",\"name\":\"The Special Tahsildar vs P.S.Jamal Muhamed ... Claimant on 22 December, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2006-12-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-31T10:44:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Special Tahsildar vs P.S.Jamal Muhamed &#8230; Claimant on 22 December, 2006\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Special Tahsildar vs P.S.Jamal Muhamed ... Claimant on 22 December, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Special Tahsildar vs P.S.Jamal Muhamed ... Claimant on 22 December, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2006-12-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-31T10:44:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Special Tahsildar vs P.S.Jamal Muhamed &#8230; Claimant on 22 December, 2006","datePublished":"2006-12-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-31T10:44:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006"},"wordCount":1153,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006","name":"The Special Tahsildar vs P.S.Jamal Muhamed ... Claimant on 22 December, 2006 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2006-12-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-31T10:44:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildar-vs-p-s-jamal-muhamed-claimant-on-22-december-2006#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Special Tahsildar vs P.S.Jamal Muhamed &#8230; Claimant on 22 December, 2006"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191808","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=191808"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191808\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=191808"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=191808"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=191808"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}