{"id":19208,"date":"2009-12-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009"},"modified":"2014-05-09T01:37:17","modified_gmt":"2014-05-08T20:07:17","slug":"the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Branch Manager vs Smt Basamma W\/O Late Pujari on 10 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Branch Manager vs Smt Basamma W\/O Late Pujari on 10 December, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n<pre>__. 5:351; ..  'V\n\nMFA No.20943\/2009\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\n\nCIRCUIT BENC8 AT DHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 10th DAY 01-' DEcEMBER--;'.\u00a7Oo\u00a7.1'%;*---   T.\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUsTi(;E r3;s.3PAT_iL'  T\nMISCELLANEOUS FIRST AP3?EA_L NT)'.-26943i'2'i)DvS\u00a7_ gw\u00e9} VA\nBetween: K M T T T\n\nTHE BRANCH MANAGER,    \nOREENTAL INSURANCE COMPANE l;TD._,   \" .\nBELLARY, V      \nTHROUGH ITS HUBLI..RE(_}IONA,L OFP'i--CE;  '\nREPRESENTEDBY    \"  \nCHIEF REG:Q:eAL,MA.N-A6313\"  g \nORIENTAL 1NsuR;A1\\;cE\"c:QM}\u00e9A.NYAALTD.;\nSUMANGALA    \nLAMINGTON ROAD,  \nHUBL1. 1 '  ' *  APPELLANT\n\n{By sri.M.K.s9uc1aga;~;'\"Advj'~;_ '\n\nV.  ' v..,\u00e91\u00bb5T'.'\u00e9,A.SAMMA\n\n'V _w,10v.1,ATE;T_PLIJARI\n._ \"'AGE';53.,YEARS, OCC:I-IOUSEHOLD,\nA R'\/0 CA1\\ETONi\\\/IENT,\n\"DISTEBELLARY.\n\nH \" \"   '  A. , TSHRI~'.i).DANAYYA\n\nV SXO HANUMANTHAPPA\nVd\"-.GE:MAJOR, OCCBUSINESS,\nR\/O VILLAGE I-IALAKUNDI,\nDI ST: BELLARY. ... RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p>MFA No.20943\/2009<\/p>\n<p>[By Sri.y.Lakshmikanth Roddy, Adv for R1,<br \/>\nSri.B.Chidananda, Adv for R2)<\/p>\n<p>This appeal is \ufb01led under Section 30 (1) of<\/p>\n<p>against the judgment and order dated 18.11.2008 passed&#8217;  _<br \/>\nW.C.47&#8217;7\/200&#8242;?&#8217; on the file of the Commissioner for._Worl&lt;;merx&#039;s_&#039;1<br \/>\nCompensation, Sub Division-II, Bella.&#8211;ry,&#039;v&#8211;..:f..awardi1ig<br \/>\ncompensation of Rs.4,48,000\/\u00ab- along :wiith&#039;inte1&#039;:est.  12\u00b0\/o  <\/p>\n<p>This appeal coming on for admission; this  the  ._<\/p>\n<p>delivered the following:\n<\/p>\n<p>JUDGMENT&#8217; _<\/p>\n<p>1. This is an appeal  Irisuranee&#8217;i\u00e9ompanviriAchallenging<\/p>\n<p>the award passed by   Workmen&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>C0mP\u20acT1S3~ti0D, f i it  &#8216;  awarding<\/p>\n<p>compensation: in  \/4 along with interest at<\/p>\n<p>12% pa with &#8216;effeet  &#8220;of expiry of 30 days from the<\/p>\n<p>date of death&#8217;;,__&#8217; &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p> Claimant-respondent being the mother of the deceased<\/p>\n<p>A\ufb02rnmired _g the Clainis Tribunal seeking compensation contending<\/p>\n<p>interalia that&#8217;v_vo_n&#8217;V~i.:i&#8217;2.i01.200&#8242;? when her son was discharging his<\/p>\n<p>V .duties.&#8221;as &#8216;cleaner under the 2nd respondent, due to an<\/p>\n<p>.,&#8221;\u00a2A&#8221;&#8216;&#8211;a\u00a7;&#8217;cidVaent that arose out of and during the course of<\/p>\n<p> employment, he suffered serious injuries resulting in his death.<\/p>\n<p>MFA No.20943f2009<\/p>\n<p>Lo)<\/p>\n<p>The claimant examined herself and deposed that her son was<\/p>\n<p>earning Rs.-4,500\/&#8211; as a cleaner. She relied on <\/p>\n<p>Ex.P.8. The respondentminsurance Company  i.<\/p>\n<p>claim denying the assertions. I  _<\/p>\n<p>3. Based on the evidence on recorci, the Cominvissioneriii&#8217;has.y<\/p>\n<p>recorded a \ufb01nding that the  was earning \/&#8211; &#8221; S<\/p>\n<p>p.m. as a cleaner. The age of th\u20ac;r.deiceased was foundito be 20<br \/>\nyears at the time of   .:the_relevant factor<br \/>\nnamely 224.00, coii1pensatio&#8217;r1 Rs.4,48,000\/-<br \/>\n(400ox5ox22z} \/. isioyoiii    iiaiirarded along with<br \/>\ninterest  ,   V. , <\/p>\n<p>4. Learned&#8217;  appellant contends that there<\/p>\n<p>was violation.eofithe&#8221;&#8211;permi.t &#8216;conditions inasmuch as the owner<\/p>\n<p>V of thej-jehicle ha&#8217;c1.._taZsreni&#8217;the irehicle into the State of Andhra<\/p>\n<p>i?_Prad.e_sh  the accident in question occurred while the<\/p>\n<p>viehici-&#8220;e__ voperated beyond the jurisdiction of the State<\/p>\n<p>i ii of Kar&#8217;nata_ka.._&#8217;Et is his next contention that the income taken<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;.  Rsy.4,()z0vQi7- per month is unsupportable from the evidence on<\/p>\n<p> reeo1&#8217;d..f=i He has also urged that interest awarded at 12% pa.<\/p>\n<p>M? A No.20943\/2009<\/p>\n<p>from the date of expiry of 30 days from death is illegal and<\/p>\n<p>opposed to the principles laid down in the judgment<\/p>\n<p>by the Apex Court in the case of ORIENTAL .<\/p>\n<p>COMPANY LIMITED VS. MOHD. 1\\ms;3g1ND1.&#8217;ANo?1fHERV&#8221;;AL\u00a7l &#8221; &#8216;V V<\/p>\n<p>2009 sew 371 7).\n<\/p>\n<p>5. Counsel appearing for t&#8217;he&#8221;&#8216;~1jespoiide1:ts  the * it<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01ndings recorded.\n<\/p>\n<p>6. Having heard the learned  parties and on<br \/>\nperusal of the rnater__ials ;on&#8221; that there is no<\/p>\n<p>substance in urged&#8217;  thewappellant regarding<\/p>\n<p>the violation  l&#8217;permit:i.cond&#8217;itions.  of all, there is no such<br \/>\nplea takenirl the vxrilttenstaterrient. Unless a specific plea is<\/p>\n<p>raised, no arnount of. evidence adduced on this aspect will come<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;lite-..the-help&#8217;-iof the appveilant-Insurance Company. Secondly, as<\/p>\n<p>per &#8220;&#8221;.:li1_e&#8217;sproyisionvs&#8221;&#8216;contained under Section 88 of the Motor<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   Vehicles  a perusal &#8216;of the second proviso appended<\/p>\n<p> topsub section 1 of Section 88 would disclose that where both<\/p>\n<p>   starting point and the terminal point of a route are situate<\/p>\n<p> ___&#8221;Witl?i;in the same State, but part of such route lies in any other<\/p>\n<p>MFA N-3.20943\/2009<\/p>\n<p>State and the length of such part does not exceed sixteen<\/p>\n<p>kilometres, the permit shall be valid in the other ..St.a&#8217;tei*-ri,n<\/p>\n<p>respect of that part of the route which is in that ~<\/p>\n<p>notwithstanding that such permit has not beerniict\ufb02ntersigned <\/p>\n<p>by the State Transport authority or&#8217;-._thr_.:&#8221;&#8216;eRiegi&#8217;onal:i&#8217;Tran&#8217;spott&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Authority of that other State. All further&#8217;perusal&#8217;Voif}Se.ction 88 <\/p>\n<p>will make it clear that the requirernienty of\ufb01obtainina  counter<br \/>\nsignature from the authoiritiieisol&#8221;   subject to<br \/>\nother conditions. __In this the..irnatter, unless the<br \/>\nInsurance ihaiiispiecij\ufb01c&#8217;contention with regard<br \/>\nto the violation.   go for trial on the<br \/>\nbasis of  andissues raised, this court<br \/>\ncannot in zexuercisg.  u\/s 30 (1) of the Workrr1en&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>Cornpensationiiii\ufb02ct\u00bb.rccordh&#8221;lindings which are beyond the<\/p>\n<p>Hence, iethe&#8221;&#8216;&#8221;\ufb01Vrst contention urged is liable to be<\/p>\n<p>r&#8217;e_iet:ted&#8217;.a.\n<\/p>\n<p>Z  &#8216;7. A  se.cond: contention pertaining to the wages earned by<\/p>\n<p> ~._th.e deceased cannot also be sustained as the evidence on<\/p>\n<p>it  record discloses that the deceased was engaged as a cleaner in<\/p>\n<p>  lorry. The assertion of the claimant is that the deceased<\/p>\n<p>MFA No.20943\/2009<\/p>\n<p>was earning Rs.4,500\/- per month. No documentary evidence<\/p>\n<p>can be expected from a cleaner for receiving <\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the Commissioner has recorded his \ufb01nd_i&#8211;n.g  ~<\/p>\n<p>the oral evidence adduced before  Tiftel&#8221;&#8216;aclc,idei1tv&#8221;has <\/p>\n<p>occurred in the year 2007. The dec&#8217;ease&#8217;de <\/p>\n<p>cleaner in a lorry in Bellaryi in connection 7VVvvi..ti:..,_,,mining , *<\/p>\n<p>operations. Hence, it cannot be .that_ythe fearningsvitaken at<br \/>\nRs.4,000\/- per month is  _ if if<\/p>\n<p>8. As regards the last  the appellant<br \/>\nis justified  at 12% p.a.<br \/>\nwith effect 1ttetri..f\u00a2-eepity, the date of death is<br \/>\nnot legallliancll  judgment of the Apex Court<\/p>\n<p>referred to slupra_mal,&lt;es. i&#039;t.c,iear that for the period from the<\/p>\n<p>4_ , date o\ufb01petition till&quot; expiry of 30 days from the date of the<\/p>\n<p>IA&#039;~.order,,interest&#8211;at\u00bb.7V2 &quot;\/0 p.a. could be granted and for the rest of<\/p>\n<p>the .periodV,&quot;statu&#039;t&#039;o&#039;ry interest at 12% p.a. has to be awarded.<\/p>\n<p> _   Accordingly to the aforesaid extent, the award deserves to<\/p>\n<p>  fnodi\ufb01ed. Hence, this appeal is allowed in part. While<\/p>\n<p> .___&quot;ConfI:rming the amount determined as compensation payable,<\/p>\n<p>it<\/p>\n<p>MFA No.20943!2009<\/p>\n<p>the interest awarded is modi\ufb01ed making it clear that the<\/p>\n<p>claimant is entitled to interest at 7&#039;\/2% from the date of petition<\/p>\n<p>till 18.12.2008 and thereafter at the rate of 12%; _<\/p>\n<p>date of payment.  _<\/p>\n<p>10. The amount in deposit sha11:&#8221;gbe:&#8217;_A_Ait15anisfe_r1&#8217;ed <\/p>\n<p>Commissioner for Workrnen&#8217;s C:1rf1pensation.V _&#8217;l&#8217;he&#8221;~app.e1iant&#8211; * V<\/p>\n<p>Insurance Company shall__deposit..the._balance amount, if any,<\/p>\n<p>within four weeks from thddate   a copy of this<br \/>\njudgment. If any vexcesg..~~.,amot1f1t_fis it &#8216;deposited, the<br \/>\nappellant is entitied :ior:V&#8211;_reVt&#8217;u:_r:d&#8217;.  it &#8216;<br \/>\nJudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The Branch Manager vs Smt Basamma W\/O Late Pujari on 10 December, 2009 Author: B.S.Patil __. 5:351; .. &#8216;V MFA No.20943\/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENC8 AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 10th DAY 01-&#8216; DEcEMBER&#8211;;&#8217;.\u00a7Oo\u00a7.1&#8217;%;*&#8212; T. BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR.JUsTi(;E r3;s.3PAT_iL&#8217; T MISCELLANEOUS FIRST AP3?EA_L NT)&#8217;.-26943i&#8217;2&#8217;i)DvS\u00a7_ gw\u00e9} VA Between: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19208","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Branch Manager vs Smt Basamma W\/O Late Pujari on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Branch Manager vs Smt Basamma W\/O Late Pujari on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-05-08T20:07:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Branch Manager vs Smt Basamma W\\\/O Late Pujari on 10 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-08T20:07:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1040,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009\",\"name\":\"The Branch Manager vs Smt Basamma W\\\/O Late Pujari on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-08T20:07:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Branch Manager vs Smt Basamma W\\\/O Late Pujari on 10 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Branch Manager vs Smt Basamma W\/O Late Pujari on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Branch Manager vs Smt Basamma W\/O Late Pujari on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-05-08T20:07:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Branch Manager vs Smt Basamma W\/O Late Pujari on 10 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-08T20:07:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009"},"wordCount":1040,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009","name":"The Branch Manager vs Smt Basamma W\/O Late Pujari on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-08T20:07:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-smt-basamma-wo-late-pujari-on-10-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Branch Manager vs Smt Basamma W\/O Late Pujari on 10 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19208","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19208"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19208\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}