{"id":192414,"date":"2009-08-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009"},"modified":"2017-07-20T01:47:45","modified_gmt":"2017-07-19T20:17:45","slug":"city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"City Municipal Council … vs N Sreedhar Rao S\/O Narayana Rao on 5 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
City Municipal Council … vs N Sreedhar Rao S\/O Narayana Rao on 5 August, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n
 _C\u00bb0urf_.:  'V \n\nAND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMEEQT ANS QECREE\nBATED 3C*,\u00a336.'2{}O4 PASSED {N OS.}C~\u00a7Q.280\/2001 '[92? THE\nFILE OF THE II ADDLLEIVIL JUIJGE (SR.I)N,} CH{TZ\u20acAf}\u00a7,?VEi'\u20ac3A,\n\nTHIS RSA COMING ON FGR HEARINGV '--m-',7;:I%:':TIS.:\u00ab\u00a7':;'2'\u00a7':{',:\".If'1'~\u00a7}3\"3\n\nC-UURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T\nJ U n G M i     A\n\nThis seccnd appea} f1l.r:i:1-   \nNo.280\/2001 on the rag _A%c:\u00a5\u00a7i1  (Sr. B11),\nChitradurga, is directe was\n\naccepted as high\ufb01st bid. Upon the piainti\ufb02' \ufb01le\n\nentim bid azmbunt of Rs.94,00{)\/- sale: deed was  \n\nhis favaur conveying the said sitebea\ufb011:,g 'N_0.-:8'2,:_\"anVd h\u20ac: was  L\n\nplaced in possession of the same@--.. Su}:)s;:':\u00e9A'1i';1<~iI1*\u20ac;i:;?,"'%t\u00a7;:=:\n\nplaintiff after obiah\ufb01ng 11ecess'%et$;:jV;}j"1i(;e\u00a7:1(i{~:~.V;91;\u00a7f1ci7 fmm th\u00e9\nMunicipa\ufb01ty construCi\u00a7':1.\u00e9_ a   However,\nsoma time during  '\u00a30 have re-\nsurveyed the   \ufb01grs area capabla cf\nbeirig    \ufb01f\u00e9\ufb01fem side af site No.82\nand the};  tried to aucticm. the same.\n\n(311 accoui\ufb01 { )f%{:1"ii:~:   part Gf the appeliant, the sits\n\nof the;pia;:ift1t.iff I0.$f*t:'h\u20ac be:1e\ufb01t sf comer site. Therefore, the\n\n    p\u00e9iititm before this Ci\u00e9jurt in W19.\n\n__ vt\ufb01ie\u00e9king a \u00e9iraction '\u00a30 the Zxihmicipaiity.\n\n.\u00a7~\u00abI0we\u00a7\u00e9'ar;t.E1t:"'V said; writ petition came in be dismissasd an\n\nH 'A   Thereaftar, {ha pl3.i11tiff \ufb01isd ihe prags\ufb01t Sui: in\n\n 1290}. seeking a ma\ufb01datary iflju\ufb02ifii\ufb01\ufb02 ta 513::\n\n"~}$\u00e9iiniCipa}ity :13': 'to farm \ufb01fjiff Siie an the '\u00e9fastarn Si\u00e9\ufb01 G?'\n\np1:*c}p\u20acr'\u00a3\u00a7,~* purshasa\u00e9 '\ufb02y him in 'aha pzmiic a'\u20ac,\u00a3Ct\u00a7_0E"i 0;" 2:1 {ha\n\n\n\n4\naiternative, not to 3110: the same its any one Wi\ufb01ioufi. public\n\nauction and also for damages of R$.63,G00\/-- with igzt\u00e9rest.\n\nT}::us3 suit was contested by the appeilantf def\u20acI1d :a}f\ufb02.f{_j.'~._fvE'h\u20ac\n\ntrial Court dismissed the suit on the  \n\nplaintiff has faiiad to prove that thssite    . \n\nwas a corner site, themfere, ha is I110':- ;\u00a5::itit1\u00e9\u20aci_v":A'c:;if \u00b05:3f1e\n\nreiiefss sought in the plaint. Ag\u00a7f\u00a7:=:ved 'i:y\ufb01_ ih.\u00a7:'j'i;:dg'fen1e1'\ufb01 \n\nand decree, the plaintiff ,.,if..1ed a,\u00a7;p$;%;fl. ii;-.R.A.   of 2884.\n3) The Lower   .?e--a$ses$mem; of\n\noral and dacumetitary (\u00a7izi\u00e9c\u00a2:'fice\u20ac "$ <:::__aSic1c' {I16 ju\u00e9gement cf\n\nthce \u20ac3'iaiV '{\u00a7o114:t' 31\u00a2 suit 0f the plaintiff in part\n\ngraxzting  "Gf."-~i2$.35,0{)<}\/ - with iI1'\u00a71\u20acf'\u20acS\u00a7; at 9%\n\n"V.\u00a7}.'a. f\u00a7{sr1;3.Vv7G8. 'I99E.\u00bb....t;i}1 paym\u00e9tni. The Lmvar Appeiiate\n\n~ajs:}:_'<$i;*eg\u00a2i=5:d iih\ufb01 apgzallant-Munigipaiiiy ts dispose of\n\n  sit\u00e9' ix}. pubiic auction. ag per ruies. Being\n\n \u00e9:.gg*ie\u00a5edib..\u00a7* vthe saici ju\u00e9gement arid dacrae, tbs app\u20ac}1am~\n\n  \ufb01iizr\ufb01\u00e9ig\u00e9aiity has presante\ufb01 tinis a\ufb01paeai.\n\n 4) {)1} 14.11.2008 While a\ufb01mitting the appaaig this\n\n  "   framed the faliewiizzg substantial question 0%' law,\n\n&\/.\n\n\n\n"Whether the Lower Appellate (3013r$:.V.-was\n\njusti\ufb01ed in reversing the judgement of the.\n\nCourt and awarding compensation.   .\nrespondent an the face of the order pasV_$e\u00a7'  ;\u00a71eV'  <\/pre>\n
(:GuI*tiz1W.P. N0,13G32\/99″g'”m  t     ‘ A<\/p>\n
5) i have heard 3:1,: 3. Meaeesn,  \u00a2:;1:mg;e
\nappeer\u00e9ng fer the appeiiam   fee-g\ufb01eiide\ufb01t\/plain\ufb01if,
\nwho appeared in \u00a7ersc:e:1 _”:Ifte-i; S5–*3:3T\u00a7?i\u00e9Z\u00a73\u00bb_T\u00a7\u00a7 notice of appeal 2<\/p>\n
have peruseci the rec0rds..3e_c–ur’e.d Vfreiiz. Cfietxrts below.<\/p>\n
6) Ti1e:*’\u00a2;:..Vis”‘7i..;G{‘dj}S15L1\u00a3\u20ac_\u20achat’t}1e plain\ufb01\ufb02” was the
\nsuccessf?g;1e’bi:i\u00a7ie1′ ii*;{:,;1’;es”\u00a7;eet of\u00e9Tsi1″;e beari3:1g No.82 Ixiaeasuring<\/p>\n
4{‘\u00a5’x60’  ‘ nu;\u00a7:ic:j euet.iez1 held by the<\/p>\n
appeileultj3\ufb011;L<3icipe\u00a3it\u00a7*'~V_ef;' ":12.{i6. 1996. Aeeeptfmg highest<\/p>\n
" 'bid   and "zipen deposit"; of the ez1t:ire bid<\/p>\n
Vaif\ufb01exiirit,  \u00bb.\u00a5vI1,\u00a7r;\u00a7eipa1ity executezi saie deed in favour ef<\/p>\n
' VV   the p}eEi:1tii\u00a7 of the said site and else place\u00e9 him in<\/p>\n
  i'370SS6SSit".;I}; {)f the same. Subsequently, the piainti\ufb01" has put-<\/p>\n
V' eexxettuetierl thereon. There is also no serieus dispute<\/p>\n
.  this site bearing 930,82 was putnzp fez' public auctien<\/p>\n
+m (ma? 4<\/p>\n
VA “–\u00aben the premise that it was a gamer site having roads are ~g,,.,,<\/p>\n
e<\/p>\n
West and South. It is the specific case ef the piaiziii\ufb01’ thes:<\/p>\n
he offered higher price to the said siie only bece.~:1S_e\u00bb.i};’ ‘iaiiegziea<\/p>\n
comer site as aec<:)::'ding to him, the  $i"i:es" of <\/p>\n
same measurement have been seld    Tat 3<\/p>\n
Rs.38,{}(}()\/-. It is the further .4__speeif1e' " easeV\u00bb'efV..t}}e <\/p>\n
that on aceeunt of the    site to
\nthe 'West of site No.82,'   all  advantage
\nof a earner site and he  well as usage of
\nmad 1\u00a7;'mg   of this, the
\nvalue of    he is entitled
\nto be  the appe\ufb02ant-Muiiieipality.\n<\/p>\n
I3″; is 3:10: in sre:’\u00a7;0uS”:iiS’;\u00a7ute”f;}iat subsequent to auction of site<\/p>\n
_VNo.82,_%f&iheA.Munieii\u00a7eiityiformed another site bearing No.82-\u00abA<\/p>\n
 ‘~\u20ac:<:a'.' t}i3e:'?J;eetA \u20ac2f"Si__Ee $0.82. On aeeeuni ef this, the preperty<\/p>\n
ee}dAV&ii7z'faT\u20aczei1: {he glain\ufb01ff' lost a}: me eheraetezietiee ef a<\/p>\n
 -c:e:*1″;e\u00a7” site’, E5 the light cf the substantiai qzzeetien of 13552<\/p>\n
 V’ by this Ceuri, What is required to be seen is, in View<\/p>\n
  A’\u00a3\u00a71e’Aerder ef this Ccmrt in the aforesai\ufb01 ‘\u00a3\u00a5’i”\u00a7\u00a7’ petition,<\/p>\n
 V   “‘*\u00e9\u00a7?\u00a7e\u00a7:her the 13”: respondent] plaintii? had :10 right :9 seek<\/p>\n
damages’ A eoey of  ercier in the writ petition has been<\/p>\n
&\/<\/p>\n
nxa\ufb01ezed as EXP4. As (101116 be seen frem th\ufb01 $a:i\u00a3i,T0r{i\u20ac;:<\/p>\n
passed, this Caurt after referring ‘:0 {ha e::o11t.a:=,t3i:at_iQ:’:1:_s1L:4i:\u00bbf ‘the<\/p>\n
writ petitioner rzamely, the plainti\ufb01 _})\u00a2f:3.,i:1′  T’ \ufb01tzg\u00e9 <\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
respondent namely, Mzu\ufb01cipa\ufb01ayg  ‘g03E;f1’g, _ \u00a3316 <\/p>\n
merit of H16 case amd withglgj:\n<\/p>\n
mereiy disposed of the    cf the
\nsubmissions made   %CO\u00aeSg; {gr mg
\nrespondent th\ufb01f\ufb01ifl.  by the learned
\ncounssi for    that during r\ufb01-\n<\/p>\n
survey, iher\u00e9  gxxeasurememt of several
\nsites   aszaiiable next the site $39.82,<\/p>\n
t.}:’:ar\u00a2fore, ‘t}15ai%Vs\u00a7\u00a3\u20ac-b\u00e9:r:Vani\u20ac3.LVt}ie comer site, as such, it has to<\/p>\n
V be difsgxdsed cf *i;},;’,_V_ a};1(:\u00a5:i:e33*1 and the petitioner is at iibertfi is<\/p>\n
 p}a\u00a7:”eicipa{.:\u00a7_ igi\ufb01fiie auctisn and ggurchase the same. ‘f’\u00a7\u00a51is<\/p>\n
C\u20ac;:.1f*:.,.Wfii\u00a7\u00a3%_”d_is\u00a7\u00a7t\u00a7V\u00e9ing 0f the Wadi petition did :19: restrict 3.11};<\/p>\n
V pf   of th\ufb01 piag\u00e9ztttiff nor this Court issue\u00e9 am;<\/p>\n
 “\u00a7\u00a7iri\u00a2cij.;\u00a7:r;.  By merely noticing the submissiu\ufb02g made by the<\/p>\n
K   counsai for the I”6Sj\u00a73OI’1d\u20acI1t th$re:\u00a5I1 that the<\/p>\n
” g\u00a3p\u00e9iiti0:1\u20ac:r Th\u00e9f\ufb01ifi is at liberty to participate in the auction 61’<\/p>\n
nawly formed Cf.}I”‘I”1\u20ac:I’ site [Site \u00a7\\*f0.82–~A), the writ petitisn has<\/p>\n
been dispc:-$ed of. May be that in the subseq”L1ent  grublic<\/p>\n
auctio\ufb02 in respect sf site No.82–A, the plainti\ufb01’<\/p>\n
participate nor offered any bid. That does  4_<\/p>\n
right to seek damages or  ”  “3:hE:’ ; z<\/p>\n
Mumclpa\ufb01ty for its act in  Lh\ufb01:\n<\/p>\n
advantage of site N382,  Aa”:..;;\u00a7;jii’1\u00e9j:r si’a\u00a33′.
\nThe appeliaxzi by its  c’a;ri1’1’\u00ab:;tVA-:’1\u00a7<=:pI1've the
\nadvantages attached 1.:e' "Sti_'_t\u20ac:   declared at the
\ntime of  3. corner Siiti.\n<\/p>\n
Having made:   price to that siie, on
\nthe   _ 205%? site, subsmuelitiy’, the
\nMunicipe\ufb01tj ‘%:;\u00a7,,;*  cam}-at conver\u00e9 the earner<\/p>\n
site int-3 an ‘:m;e1’*;\u20aci:eciV*ia1*;? site by forming another 31%.<\/p>\n
 .’F\u00a31r:?:1fv\u00a3\u00e9f”:_;1:'<E\u00a7'~,5'L :'Lh%:A~}50we1;2\u00a3\ufb01pel1ate Caurt was justified in holding<\/p>\n
  is iiable t0 pay damages to<\/p>\n
 fthe pZmintj\ufb01' c\ufb01i account 9f the action by the Municipaiity in<\/p>\n
H 4.4"\u20ac=.V\u00a7*ian\u00a7ng""t}1e nature ef site N082 \ufb01'{3II\u00a3'1 comer site to an<\/p>\n
'ig\u00e9t\u00e9l\ufb01n\u00e9diaxy sites The ordar passed by this Ceurt in writ<\/p>\n
VT : *p:':\u00a3i'f;ica:1 K9. E3032\/989 has 330 Effect 01"; the right of tha<\/p>\n
&\/<\/p>\n
piajiatiif, as this Court has not decided the: rights Q\u20ac__aI2jsr' 0f<\/p>\n
the parties in the said Wr\ufb01: petition.\n<\/p>\n
7) when the Iviunicipality  <\/p>\n
disputed that Site No.82 was 3. c0i*_{:1c:r:.s_i:3t\u00a7t:  ;_’\u00a3hC{>jt_;1*t gwg\u00e9ks   <\/p>\n
dismissing the suit only’ on    has
\nnot proved that site     The said errar
\nCommitted by the-tfial   corrected by
\nthe Lower     of the matter, the
\njudge;1;.cj:if:”Ejf  does not suffer from
\nany   :’wa.:{1″ar1fir1g intezrference by tins<\/p>\n
Court. _Th\u00e9m:v’\u20ac:r – App\u00e9liate Court having regard K: the<\/p>\n
 V’\u20ac:vid\u20acif1\u00a3i\u20ac5\u00bb–o\u00a71 \u00a7\ufb01r’:gc0:\ufb01\u00abfii\u00e9;s5Vdir\u20acCted the appeilamj 15? \u00e9efendanf.<\/p>\n
\ufb01n.  Vc:j\ufb01;\u00a7\u20ac:\u00a7:safion 0f Rs.35,00G\/ \u00bb with i,11tereSt at 9% p.3..<\/p>\n
  frc:-1:1: till the date of payment. Though the<\/p>\n
”  ‘–..if\u20ac:spQnd\u00e9n\u00a3\/ piaizjzti\ufb01’ contends that the Lower Apge\ufb01ate<\/p>\n
  has omitted to take irate mnsideraiion the evidence cm<\/p>\n
  promrly While ayriving at me quaiitum of damagtig,<\/p>\n
 ” “ii: is necessary is; new tha: the p\ufb01ainti\ufb01’ has neither filed an<\/p>\n
&\/<\/p>\n
1%<\/p>\n
appeal Iii}? crass-objection to this appeal \ufb01aying<\/p>\n
necessmy Court fee seakirzg enhancement 0:”  Gf<\/p>\n
damages. In this View of the matter, them issf:  ti: 4_<\/p>\n
enhance the damages aWardedv.<by\u00bb—-?he~'_:  .;\u00a7x;4}peI1atue'j' <\/p>\n
Court. Direction issuad by the  ?:<:\u00a7:'i;.?1;e
\nappe\ufb02ant to dispose of sit.\u00e9    sjpubiic\u00bb
\nauction is also just\ufb01\u00e9edz';  it  "'0'11"";;ec0rc% that
\nsubsequently site Nc;.8f\u00e9-A..'\u00a71\u00a3i$ of in public
\nauction. Themii\ufb01ffg,     has aiready been
\ncomplied Wif\ufb01.  ,'.:1;Ii\u00e9:,\u00a7Inat\u00a3er, 3 see no merit in
\nthis   question of law fI'\u20ac;\u00a5E1'it*{i<\/p>\n
is 8I}S1\u00a5\u20acf6:G..V_i\u00a71 <\/p>\n
  pvf tlji\u00e9 'a-;L\u00a5.3ve, the apmal is disiiaisse\ufb01 with: cost<\/p>\n
 i\u00a7m\ufb01ghm\u00a7;f ;\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n
 “.f\u00a7GR*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court City Municipal Council … vs N Sreedhar Rao S\/O Narayana Rao on 5 August, 2009 Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana _C\u00bb0urf_.: ‘V AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMEEQT ANS QECREE BATED 3C*,\u00a336.’2{}O4 PASSED {N OS.}C~\u00a7Q.280\/2001 ‘[92? THE FILE OF THE II ADDLLEIVIL JUIJGE (SR.I)N,} CH{TZ\u20acAf}\u00a7,?VEi’\u20ac3A, THIS RSA COMING ON FGR HEARINGV ‘–m-‘,7;:I%:’:TIS.:\u00ab\u00a7’:;’2’\u00a7’:{‘,:”.If’1’~\u00a7}3″3 C-UURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-192414","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nCity Municipal Council ... vs N Sreedhar Rao S\/O Narayana Rao on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"City Municipal Council ... vs N Sreedhar Rao S\/O Narayana Rao on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-19T20:17:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"City Municipal Council … vs N Sreedhar Rao S\\\/O Narayana Rao on 5 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-19T20:17:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1144,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009\",\"name\":\"City Municipal Council ... vs N Sreedhar Rao S\\\/O Narayana Rao on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-19T20:17:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"City Municipal Council … vs N Sreedhar Rao S\\\/O Narayana Rao on 5 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"City Municipal Council ... vs N Sreedhar Rao S\/O Narayana Rao on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"City Municipal Council ... vs N Sreedhar Rao S\/O Narayana Rao on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-19T20:17:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"City Municipal Council … vs N Sreedhar Rao S\/O Narayana Rao on 5 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-19T20:17:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009"},"wordCount":1144,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009","name":"City Municipal Council ... vs N Sreedhar Rao S\/O Narayana Rao on 5 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-19T20:17:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/city-municipal-council-vs-n-sreedhar-rao-so-narayana-rao-on-5-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"City Municipal Council … vs N Sreedhar Rao S\/O Narayana Rao on 5 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192414","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=192414"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192414\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=192414"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=192414"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=192414"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}