{"id":19290,"date":"2008-06-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008"},"modified":"2018-07-19T17:26:07","modified_gmt":"2018-07-19T11:56:07","slug":"raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Raviraj Shettigar vs Dts Raju S\/O Fs Dharmaraj on 23 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Raviraj Shettigar vs Dts Raju S\/O Fs Dharmaraj on 23 June, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n<pre>{N THE HEGH COURT {BF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nGATED THE; THE 235% {)A'(' 0?: JUNE 2008, .. \n\nEEFORE\n\nTHE HO\u00a5\\j=\ufb01LE zmmusncs SUBH$S.H:$;ADAi.:::  T T\n\nCR\u00a5M!NAL Rgvzsgon Pg_xfmo;\u00e9JT 'r\u00a235.lay--a, Nagas\ufb01ettihaiii\n .F2MVii$ta;ge.:+' \n __.\u00a35'\u00a7n g'aio;regV5$Ci' q9;\u00a7. 5. RES?-'ON9ENT\n\n &amp; Assta. Advs.)\n\n Crimiaai Rev\u00e9s\u00e9en Peii\u00e9\u00e9cn Ea fi\u00e9ed under Seczians 39?'{'%) and\n\n L'..j\u00bb..4L;~m) ems. praying to set aside the impugned order \u00e9t.2'i.2.200?'\n* T ' passed by the Lower Appeiiate \ufb01aurt and P.(3., F\"\u00a5\"i;'-'sf, Eangaiore in\n--  f3ri.A.N\u00a2.16G9!2{}% at Am'1exure\u00ab-A and reverse the ordef of conviction\n\nv  'grid the judgment dt,1.920{3$ passed by the xi! A.!a_i_r;t %.+f?\u00a5:&lt;:&#039;l&#039;\u00e9&quot;;&quot;&#039;::S\u00a7ve\u20ac\u00a7f\u00a7a\u00a3&#039;\u00a7_ &#039;E3$&#039; Vuf <\/pre>\n<p>Neaatiabie instruments Ac: interaiia, ai\u00e9egitig  \u00a7e!i\ufb01c\u00a7:\ufb01Ae{&#8220;:&#8217;\u00a7%geraain &#8220;= &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>had issued three cheques dated&#8217;<br \/>\nfor Rs$1,400;&#8217;&#8211;, Rs.1(3.0\u20ac30i- and $1.3-,\u00a7zo,3\u00a2e;\u00a7&#8217; &#8216;:*&lt;-;s;f:;3;\u00ab.%ti~&#039;s;\u00e9iy, The said<br \/>\ncheques weye returned    p\u00a7t\u00a7\u00a7icner with an<br \/>\nendorsement &#039;fundg_E:asuf\ufb01;i.eenf&#039;_.&#039;&#8211;,\u00a7\u00e9 i\u00a7\u20ac\u00a7;% re\u00a7&#039;g&#039;:Va,.\u00a7\u00e9\u00bb\u00a7VV.&#039;Efv}&lt;\u00a7&#039;V&quot;\u00a7ssued a \u00e9ega\u00e9 ncstise,<br \/>\nhcwmser, the said&#039; \u00a7:&#039;f:#5 \u00a7.:*;e f%stu:?\u00a7e&#039; 3 a s1&#039; :&#039;:&#039;:s o&#039;t&#039;&#8211;V&#039;r:\u00a7a\u00a7s.r.:%\u00abed. Based on the same,<br \/>\nhe f\u00e9ieegzga  \u00a7j{;\u00a7v\u00a7&quot;&quot;%12:v\u00a7_;f::$e\u00a72&#039;:V\u00e9\u00e9zamined 21$ PW-33 am predussed<br \/>\nEx:-:..P&quot;\u00a7 id ?&#039;3&quot;\u00a7:&quot;=,%  %2\u00a7mse\u00a7f examined as SW\u00bb? and got<br \/>\nmarked -.E;;*.\ufb01s5=,\u00a7\u00a5::2\u00a7%\u00a7\u00a7facncu\u00a7e\u20ac$ for want of suf\ufb01ciem fun\u00e9 arzd the of\u00e9mce<\/p>\n<p>pa\ufb01\u00bb\u00a7.$\u00e9\u00a7abEe\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7e% Sectierz 23% cf !\\i.\u00a7\u00abAct is prcvedw &#8220;\ufb02ag iewer agpeiiate<\/p>\n<p>Hcouzt oizyg\u00e9-appieciatien of the evidence ?2e.Ed ihat me judgment of the<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; \u00a7;\u00e9~a_\u00a7 c ?e_\u00ab:s;*% does 529*: mi; fey \u00e9nterfeyence.\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9, Leamed Ceunsei for the petitioner sabmitted t\u00e9wat the<\/p>\n<p> igangaci\u00e9gn \u00e9tse\ufb01 is :29&#8242;: proved. as the case of the respondem is that he<\/p>\n<p>used ta s:.:;:m\u00a7y goods and zze\ufb01eet the chezzzzze, He pointed cut from the<\/p>\n<p>f%<\/p>\n<p>32-\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>evidence 9? PW\u00bb-\u00abE that, csmpiainant used &#8220;:0 coliact the sheque in<br \/>\nadvance as against the supgiy ef goods and has animated that. he has<br \/>\nme documents ta show that he had aupp\ufb01ed the gaads,  %&#8211;lg further<br \/>\nsubmitted that when the tzansaci\u00e9on is net proved, t\u00a5&#8217;:e\u00a7&#8217;:&#8217;::,&#8217;:ia\u00a7ife$&#8217;t:%9n of<br \/>\ne\ufb01eezce {grader Sectian 138 does net wise, Sesar3d!y.&#8211;.&lt;!f2:e<br \/>\nnotice is aisc not served on the pei\u00a7t\u00a7Q%&#039;\u00bb%%!&#039;..__ &#039;Ha\u00a75\u00e9Vi&quot;;i\u00a7\u00e9;\u00a25 &#039;\u00a3$s;:t _&quot;\u00a7;\u00a7c:r%_V$261.<br \/>\nevidence 5? SW-E that the a\u00e9dyess Z\u00e9z\u00e9jess-gt: \u00a7\u00a7&#039;;s\u00a7*{f:\u00a7\u00a7: [_\u00a7s j$\u00e9&#039;r:&lt;;2&#039;:9 <\/p>\n<p>address and when the notice %s&quot;_r2&#039;e.1;. served; it wi\u00e9\u00e9 f\u00e9xzitvccznst\u00e9tute <\/p>\n<p>e\ufb01eeme under Sect\u00e9en &#039;\u00a338 !~\u00a7.\u00a7*Ast. i_\u00a7{{&#039;i-\u00a53:%_*.~:~ ggar\u00e9i,&#039; \u00a7%\u00e9;f e\u00a7\u00e9eV;\u00a3i cm the sway<\/p>\n<p>E3-:,P?;2 and subm\u00e9s thatV\u00a3%2;\u00e9:&quot;\u00a3{\u00a7&#039;af._   mwer agasekate cczsrt<\/p>\n<p>have %gr;e:&#039;ed the e \\_:\u00a7dersce&#8230;r.:.r\u00a7_ &#039;s.e\u00a2&#039;9.mf._a:*\u00e9&#039;:iv.\u00e9rr%Q;*:\u00e9ou$%y cenv\u00e9cted the<br \/>\naccused:  \u00e9  &#039;I      <\/p>\n<p>5:.:__Lea;;*n\u00e9;d\ufb01cgzaz\ufb01szai&#039;\u00e9he r\u00e9spendent submitzed \u00e9hat, PW-$ {:9<br \/>\nmm: hag \u00e9$tia:%e::vt\u00a5\u00a7;?.tf\u00a7&#039;3:\u00a7e .&#8211;2,\u00e9\u00a7\u00a2\u00a7\u00a3ic se\ufb02ect chequea in csnneczian w\u00e9zh<\/p>\n<p>suppfg gs: gccd\u00e9, \u00a7;;\u00a7\u20acV_\u00a7?:&quot;theV&#039;aavide;;ce he has s\u00e9atec\u00e9 that, ExsP\u20ac5, &#039;$6, 1?<\/p>\n<p>Rand&#039;V:\u20ac&quot;\u00a7.a\u00a7\u00e9&#039;AV\u00a3?:\u00e9&quot;b\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9 bee\u00e9\u00e9gfor having de\u00e9iazered the goods and sv\ufb01\u00e9si: are<\/p>\n<p>Ai3i3:\u00a3\u00a7\u00bb3TE?\u00a7\u00a7f\u00a5&amp;:\u00a7v;:\u00a3;\u00a7h$3{3: b5\u20ac..1:he pegsen in-charge of the canteen and these<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9eci;-:r3f_:er2i;_s;: f\u00e9mdagced befere the tr\u00e9ai court. \ufb01e further su\ufb01mitted<\/p>\n<p> &quot;\u00bb-w__ &#039;:%2a5:, th\u00e9 v\ufb01z\u00e9t\u00e9ca sent is the get\u00e9t\u00e9caner is rammed as mt cia\u00e9med, a<\/p>\n<p>  V :;fi%\u00a7&#039;ef$;\u00a7:.E&#039;f\u00a7&#039;,*}?\u00a79\u00a5&#039;2 az\u00e9ses under Sesiian 2? cf the Genera? C\u00e9aaases Act and<\/p>\n<p>sui\ufb01amit\u00e9e\u00e9 that {$35 psesumgeaicrs is required is be {emitted $14 the<\/p>\n<p> &#039; patit\u00e9enes 3y a\u00e9duc\u00e9sg necessary m\u00e9ense. He aiss szsbmi\u00e9s that, the<\/p>\n<p>natice \u00a35 serg\u00e9 ire coszesi aacires\ufb01 and the gostmars has made an<\/p>\n<p>(91%<\/p>\n<p>..o- -.\n<\/p>\n<p>endmsement as mt cfaimedg He aiso submitted that if the ngtise is not<\/p>\n<p>seat to me correct address, the pastm:-an would act have\u00e9:&#8217;-rzpjaeje an<\/p>\n<p>en\u00e9cxsement stating that it is rm: cia\u00e9rzaeci, instead,-&#8220;s;9.\u00a5{:\u00a7*ui\u00a7*ih\u00e9a;e<\/p>\n<p>stated that 21\u00a2 such adcfyessee. Tfhe vegfy fa-2% t%&#8217;:&#8217;ai=ihas<\/p>\n<p>made such an endcrsemant and thaf:__evid.er;\u00e9;e&#8217;-[is&#8217; zz o7&#8217;t- \u00a7eE&gt;}::.\u20ac:;te&#8217;ai,[_At%&#8217;:e <\/p>\n<p>presumption arms in faazcur of the cgjompiaina\ufb01t \u00a31i&#8221;E\u20ac\u00a7C:i&#8221;&#8216;;&#8221;:i:;3,*(,+fl\u00a7vi9{&#8216;a  \u00e9f \u00a359<\/p>\n<p>Genera\u00e9 Ciauses Act<\/p>\n<p>ea PW-3 in his eusaenge he ased to coiiaczt the<br \/>\ncheque for the suppiyvof th\u00a7:&#8221;&#8216;g?1&#8217;3 0t\u00a7\u00a7.= iafmji\u00bbL,h\u00e9.\u00e9.h&#8217;a\u00e9\u00a7:$V\u00a7$$ staied mat, he ha$<br \/>\nso document fqg&#8217; \u00a7z_fg4.4V\u20ac:if;-:,\u00a7&#8221;\u00e9\u00a7{i&#8217;\u00e95e7&#8242;;&#8217;:ce, he has stated ihat<br \/>\nExs,P&#8217;!5i 15. \u00a33 :%3j%&amp;;%g:\u00a7\u00e9 \u00a7\u00a7Lkk\u00e9%re\u00abL  \u00e9oaxs, which am; that me<br \/>\ngao\ufb01s wz\u00a7 \u00a7 d;v\u00ab.%:*&#8221;A\u00a7\u00a7A*.,?se3j:&#8221;.:=;\u00ab;d_&#8217;\u00a7v}n#:*zVr.,&#8217;&#8211;\u00a7 a\u00a7:!v.Vif&#8217;%*;e,-s;_\u00a7.a bj\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9g have been signed eii\u00e9aer $32 the<br \/>\nmt\u00e9tierset :55:  *i:?V:e&#8217;*-..:.,e:.\u00e9&#8221;\u00a7;;::\u00a7z7;rei;&#8217;\u00bbs{_;&#8221; were them in &#8216;me can\u00e9eer: at the time<\/p>\n<p>of saapgiga, Th\u00e9$e.,:daci;&#8217;*m\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7ts\u00e9.&#8217;$$ pwve the guppiy cf goads. Farmer,<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;mere\u00e9ffnesause. the &#8216;\u00a75\u00e9t&#8217;\u00a7ts&#8217;\u00e9:rzer has sta\u00e9ed that, he used is ao\u00e9\u00e9ect the<\/p>\n<p>V&#8221;&#8216;.;t,%_i2f:efq;a;;:=e&#8217;:&#8217;3rf:;1&#8217;s&#8217;x\u00a7.\u00a7_s;T:; when PW\u00bb? En his ezx\u00e9\u00e9erme baa pmduceci the<\/p>\n<p>  :3;cume::?:\u00a7&#8221;,&#8217;\u00ab;r:sth\u00a7ng esntaary izag men aiie\u00e9ze\u00e9 by the setitmrger. Er:<\/p>\n<p>  V.7a\u00a7dd:%\u20aci\u00e9&#8217;\u00a7-ma this. same sf the c\u00e9rsumatarsaes\u00bb, *\u00ab@;%:\u00a7ch are zequized ta ha<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;-\u00ab[A&#8217;;mA5:;&#8217;g:e\u00a7d&#8217;Aare. shegues are cf September &#8211; \ufb01c\u00e9cber 2003 whereas&#8217; the<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;~ ur\u00e95t&#8217;\u00a7ce is \u00e9sgue\u00e9 Er: Secember 2093. if rea\ufb01y the she-was are \u00e9saued as<\/p>\n<p>u A againat the amply af goe\u00e9sg in the mama; ceurse sf business, there<\/p>\n<p>shoui\u00e9 ham been demand by \u00e9ha petitioner fa; wppiy of gems or in<\/p>\n<p>case there is no szgpp\u00e9y, them wouid be demand for ietpiga of the<br \/>\nchange. SW-&#8216;\u00a7 has net stated. as to why demand was far<\/p>\n<p>sugapiy sf gocds, as to why &#8216;the cheques were tying for?:\u20ac?\u00a7\u00a79\u00e9&#8217;e&#8221;&gt;;$:&#8217;:\u00a7%&#8221;;t%etia_.$3-&#8216;\u00e9ih<\/p>\n<p>the responderzt and why he has not Enfcrmed the.\u00a3Ea\u00bbn4$&lt;:j\u00a79%&quot;\u00e9\u00a7\u00e9o\u00a7&amp;p%nQ&#039; *&#039;:he V-<\/p>\n<p>payment, if rea\ufb01y gecds wage not su;:::&#039;piie:;c &#039;.  :.F:!&#039;Q3&#039;\u00a5;!&#039;._&#039;.\u00a7\u00a7&quot;?\u00e9&#039;\u20ac&#039;\u00a7\u00e9&#039;\u00a7{\u00a5_\u00e9%&#039;\u00a7$\u20ac!:&#039;0\u00a5&quot;\u00a7&#039;l.<\/p>\n<p>record&#039; \u00e9t ciea\ufb01y shevzez shat t?::ee ::%!&#039;1_\u00a7qu\u00e9S&#8211;sr_.e&#039;*\u00e9;*-e iasg\u00e9\u00e9  \u00a7\u00a7\u00e9\u00a3i\u00e9i\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9e{<br \/>\nand they were dishoncure\u00e9 far wa\u00e9f\ufb01s\u00bb:affic\u00e9\u00a7%:t~fu\u00e9\ufb01djh\u00e9ngv\u00e9ir\u00e9w\u00e9i\u00e9\u00e9s iegay\u00e9f,<br \/>\nnet\u00e9ca was issued. \ufb01ne in.%5s\u00a7a_\u00a7._;3res&#039;u&#039;%\u00e9?%;i$\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7fr:;&#039;f\u00a7 gm-d\u00e9 er S:e:\u00a2tibr% $39 $5 proved<br \/>\nby the reswn\u00e9ent. Far thea&#039;:*\u00e9b\u00a3;\u00a7ii\u00a7;.\u00e9zide%\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9.;_&#039;.;$5\u00bb\u00a7&quot;_.aetitioner has rei\u00e9ed<br \/>\nomy on the sizgy..\u00a7s;\u00a7:e&#039;\u00a7e:x;;\u00a7V\u00a7%2&#039;\ufb01e.::V\u00e9\u00a7;\u00a7s\u00a7\u00a7x$r:%Er:ai\u00a7on cf PW&#039;-&#039;E that,<br \/>\na\u00e9zeqzsas war?  of geeds, but that is 3:50<br \/>\nciarified  &quot;i:ee&#039;\u00a7%\u00e9s cieariy $%zs%:: the supp\u00e9y cf<br \/>\ngoada. \u00a7:E;.Av\u00a7e~:\u00a7z cf&#039; &quot;rs-:~co:d, 3 \ufb01nd no: reassr: is \u00e9nteifere<\/p>\n<p>with the \u00a7ndii*2g_s&quot;\u00a2\u00a7 if\u00e9\u00e9 _::.\u00a75&#039;2\u00a7rtsw ow.\n<\/p>\n<p> V&#8217;  _ \ufb01csiard\u00e9agiy, :Eie \u00a3&#8221;\u00ab?&#8217;:e%:\u00a7s\u00a7an faiis and game Es \u00e9ism\u00e9sse\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-<\/p>\n<pre>\nJudge\n\n  '    %  \" ~ L V\"V;-{'wz\u00ab\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Raviraj Shettigar vs Dts Raju S\/O Fs Dharmaraj on 23 June, 2008 Author: Subhash B.Adi {N THE HEGH COURT {BF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE GATED THE; THE 235% {)A'(&#8216; 0?: JUNE 2008, .. EEFORE THE HO\u00a5\\j=\ufb01LE zmmusncs SUBH$S.H:$;ADAi.::: T T CR\u00a5M!NAL Rgvzsgon Pg_xfmo;\u00e9JT &#8216;r\u00a235.lay&#8211;a, Nagas\ufb01ettihaiii .F2MVii$ta;ge.:+&#8217; __.\u00a35&#8217;\u00a7n g&#8217;aio;regV5$Ci&#8217; q9;\u00a7. 5. RES?-&#8216;ON9ENT &amp; Assta. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19290","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Raviraj Shettigar vs Dts Raju S\/O Fs Dharmaraj on 23 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raviraj Shettigar vs Dts Raju S\/O Fs Dharmaraj on 23 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-19T11:56:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Raviraj Shettigar vs Dts Raju S\\\/O Fs Dharmaraj on 23 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-19T11:56:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1128,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Raviraj Shettigar vs Dts Raju S\\\/O Fs Dharmaraj on 23 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-19T11:56:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raviraj Shettigar vs Dts Raju S\\\/O Fs Dharmaraj on 23 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raviraj Shettigar vs Dts Raju S\/O Fs Dharmaraj on 23 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raviraj Shettigar vs Dts Raju S\/O Fs Dharmaraj on 23 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-19T11:56:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Raviraj Shettigar vs Dts Raju S\/O Fs Dharmaraj on 23 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-19T11:56:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008"},"wordCount":1128,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008","name":"Raviraj Shettigar vs Dts Raju S\/O Fs Dharmaraj on 23 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-19T11:56:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raviraj-shettigar-vs-dts-raju-so-fs-dharmaraj-on-23-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raviraj Shettigar vs Dts Raju S\/O Fs Dharmaraj on 23 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19290","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19290"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19290\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19290"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19290"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19290"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}