{"id":193212,"date":"2010-10-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010"},"modified":"2016-11-19T06:03:23","modified_gmt":"2016-11-19T00:33:23","slug":"laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Laxmamma @ Laxmavva vs Manjunath S\/O Veeranna on 4 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Laxmamma @ Laxmavva vs Manjunath S\/O Veeranna on 4 October, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: N.K.Patil And H.S.Kempanna<\/div>\n
IE3\n\netween:\n\n1.\n\n\" '(.33\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT or' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED mas THE: 4pm DAY OF OCTOBER, 2o14Q e.._ *._V_\n\n:PRESENT:\n\nTI-IE HON'BLE MR.JUsT1(;;\u00ab; N.K.pm:iL., V \nTHE HON'BLE Ma.JUs*r_1__cE   \n\nM.F.A. N0. 1  of 2065 .{'M'vj \n\nLaxmamma @ La3crnaV_<ja, '     \nW\/0. Aj}a1ara._Mahac1.eVappa_.  \nAged ab0ut3\u00e9_i'3Iea;ijs, I  \nHouseho1Vd,VW{5:*}:. ,   V \nManju1a,\u00bb,     .. \n\nD \/r;'."Ajj'a1\u00e9ira Ni;ahaid,evappa;'~~-- \nAged a._bou't'-"1 9.. years  -  _ '\nHousehold      ' \n\n. Nagaraj~ . _   \n 0. 'Aj j a1aL'ra._VMaha.devappa,\n"AgeI:i:a1;~Qut 14' years,\n' \u00bb 8"? .Stan dard Student.\n.' Dlllepfra, \n...S\/o.v.Ajja;.1ara Mahadevappa,\nAged about 12 years,\n\n A 7th Std. Student.\n\n 11$:-'Iampamma,\nW\/0. Late Dilleppa,\nAged about 70 years,\n\n%"""""'---*"*"'"""\n\n3%\n\n\n\n(By Sri. N.K. S1ddeswara,AdV'oc'a.\u00a7e}\n\n[0\n\nHousehold worker.\n\nAppellants 3 8: 4 are minors,\nRepresented by natural guardian\nMother 15\u00a2 appellant and all are\nR\/o. Kunchur Village,\nHarapanahalli Taluk,\nDavanagere District.\n\nAnd:\n\n1.\n\nManjunath.\n\nS\/o.Veeram1a,   .\nAged about 36__years,   _  '\nGangamath_a.Cas_te,  V \nDriver of Han11;irian.Ei--us1; \n\nN0. KA\u00ab1.~"f'\/'B9363, ' '\n\nR\/0. H.c._oa11i;;_ " _\nJubali~~BaVi'l.R0ad,..\u00bb_  ._  v\nD.N.0. 388\/\u00a335, _Davanag_ re-2-.\n\nManoharsa   \u00a2_ "\n\nS \/ o. Lav: Nagoosa' .Ladvi_ra.\nOwner of Hanu.maI1'3B1i's Reg.\nD19. KA 17\/B9363, V\n\n"R\/'o'I;..adwa Street," '\n* Harihar Town and Taluk,\n\nV Davanagere District.\n\n' The Neiveililnclia Assurance Co., Ltd.,\n\nWaliv'..C0m\u00a73lex, Shimoga Road,\nHarihar Town and Taluk,\n\n as ,Repfesentecl by its\n" _ Branch Manager.\n\n{By Smt. Harini Shivanarada, Advocate for R3;\n\n__W_#__W_,M_,,._..\n\nXI\/,.\n\n . J. . . . .Appella,11ts   ''\n\n....Respondents<\/pre>\n
  -~v-Notice to R1 & R2 dis ed with We. dated 19\/12\/2008}
\n*=E\u00a23l=**<\/p>\n
This MFA is filed U\/s. 173(1) of M.V. Act, against the
\nJudgment and Award dated: 30\/08\/2005 passed in MVC No.
\n71\/2004 on the file of the Civil Judge(SI’.Dn] and MACT,
\nHarihar, partly allowing the claim petition for compenlsation
\nand seeking enhancement of compensation. l’  V V<\/p>\n
This M.F.A. coming on for Hearing\u00abl:__lltl1:is.: <\/p>\n
N .K. PATIL J, delivered the following;<\/p>\n
:J u D G M EN   ii <\/p>\n
This appeal by the appellants lisgldirectedl’ ‘agailnstg the <\/p>\n
impugned judgment and award _30,\/ passed in
\nMVC No. 71\/2004 by’ the c.1_’ir:1:_ l;;tig\u00ab;1_g\u00a7’~1:sr.Dn}Al and Motor
\nAccidents Claims ‘i’ribunHalv,’l’  -‘(hereinafter referred to<\/p>\n
as ‘ Tribunal’ frat =i    <\/p>\n
2.. “””  its”-judgment and award has
\nawarded a ‘l–, after deducting 50%<\/p>\n
towards the_Vlcont1*ibu.t’or\u00a75t’ negligence on the part of the<\/p>\n
 with””int.erest at 6% p.a.. from the date of<\/p>\n
 p’petitiQriv..tilll_lit:sT’realisation as against the claim made by<\/p>\n
 for a sum of ?27,10,000\/– on account of<\/p>\n
lgthe death of the deceased Sri. Mahadevappa, in the road<\/p>\n
”  l’tra:\ufb01l’c_\u00ab accident.\n<\/p>\n
3. In brief, the %0f the case are:\n<\/p>\n
{ WMMM<\/p>\n
The appellant No.1 is the wife, appellant Nos. 2 to 4
\nare the minor children and appellant No.5 is the mother of<\/p>\n
the deceased Sri. Mahadevappa and they have filed a–“e.1_airn<\/p>\n
petition before the Tribunal under section 166 of<\/p>\n
claiming compensation of ?27,10,000\/~. on acoountilgiotl 0′<\/p>\n
death of the deceased in the road tIfaffic–a.ccitjlentt <\/p>\n
that, on 19.1.2004 at about 8.30<\/p>\n
was travelling in Motor cyclelbeazring  from ” 0<\/p>\n
Halavagalu to Kunchur village_..a.long”-withlpillionvrider, at
\nthat time, the driver ollthe. 1\/;us–,’beari’i1g’lN_o.KA.17.B.9363<\/p>\n
drove the same in-a rasl”1″anci” ne’glige11t’. manner and dashed<\/p>\n
against: the  deceased. due to Which. he
\ndied at spot rider sustained grievous injuries<\/p>\n
and thereafter  to the injuries in the hospital.<\/p>\n
.0 0. “It&is”the3\ufb011rther caselofl the appellants that. the deceased was<\/p>\n
 it  hale and healthy, running Flour Mill<\/p>\n
and.__earningi’~ per day and looking after the welfare of<\/p>\n
 faII3i,lvT~ and due to his untimely death they suffered lot.<\/p>\n
  claim petition had come up for consideration before<\/p>\n
  the Tribunal. The Tribunal after appreciating the oral and<\/p>\n
a\u00e9ts,<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
documentary evidence and other material available\u00bb on<\/p>\n
file, has allowed the claim petition in part  3<\/p>\n
a sum of ?l,59,000\/- after deducting  <\/p>\n
contributory negligence on the p;tr\u00a3\u00a21′ <\/p>\n
interest at 6% p.a., from the date of peti:t.i;-\ufb01n” till<\/p>\n
realisation. Being aggrievedhby\u00bb the  ._V1frn”d1in’gyolf’ the
\nTribunal that there  negligence on
\nthe part of the deceased.__   with the
\nquantum of”  have
\npresented  reliefs.\n<\/p>\n
   counsel appearing
\nfor the” appellaiitislp’-9laiidg”learned counsel for third<\/p>\n
respogndent–lnsurance Company.<\/p>\n
   counsel appearing for the appellants at<\/p>\n
I  that, the Tribunal has committed<\/p>\n
V _ grave eiirorwof law and mis–carriage of justice in \ufb01xing<\/p>\n
Lthedatconvtributory negligence at 50% on the part of the<\/p>\n
ldelcleased contrary to the evidence available on record.<\/p>\n
T  “;’t”o substantiate the said submission, he has taken us<\/p>\n
as<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
through EX.P2–spot rnahazar, Ex.P3 IMV Report, P4-<\/p>\n
P.M. Report, Ex.P5 police notice, Ex.P6 mcopji<\/p>\n
charge sheet and Ex.P7~ sketch of the accident   <\/p>\n
submitted that, from the contentsdlcsf thepse,<\/p>\n
it is crystal clear that due to the rash <\/p>\n
driving by the driver of the the s–a_i_d’- has
\ntaken place. Further; he  ‘the”‘l’ribunaI
\nhas erred in assessing?’  deceased at
\ni’3,200\/- Std towards the
\npersonal  Muitiplier of ‘ 15′ for
\n  it and it needs to be
\nmodified’in”vilew.,ot down by the Apex Court<\/p>\n
in Sa,r1apAVe’fVmaA’s’wcase. diiurther he submitted that the<\/p>\n
d  aizifarded by the Tribunal towards<\/p>\n
deon;venti.Vo~nVaE he-ads is inadequate and it is liable to be<\/p>\n
V V’ modified} ‘ -.\n<\/p>\n
 ..   against this, learned counsel for third<\/p>\n
 ,.”re_spondent–insurer, inter-alia contended and supported<\/p>\n
 the impugned judgment and award passed by the<\/p>\n
AM<\/p>\n
Tribunal. Further she submitted that, the Tribunal after<\/p>\n
considering the relevant material available on file”—.has<\/p>\n
awarded just and reasonable compensation”<\/p>\n
contributory negligence at 50% on  _& it<\/p>\n
deceased and therefore, it does  for <\/p>\n
7. After consideringthe sublmissionsddnadejAdbyld\ufb01<\/p>\n
learned counsel for both the’i’t\u00bb;;3._arties Vand’tafte’rE careful
\nperusal of the material on ‘”record at
\nthreadbare, including__  and<\/p>\n
award passed”  “paints that arise for<\/p>\n
our      ‘ r
\n{i)”” u the.\/Qcoritributory negligence fixed by
\n T1′.ibuna,1_at 50% on the part of the
\ndeceased is sustainable in law’?\n<\/p>\n
 A4′[ii’)”i:’ V’jV’!hetherW’the quantum of compensation
\n by the Tribunal is just and
\n” .V ‘reaso’nable?\n<\/p>\n
‘ A  Ref;  Point N0. 1:\n<\/p>\n
The occurrence of the accident and the death<\/p>\n
A   deceased in the sfid accident are not in dispute.<\/p>\n
I\/I “–MMwm-W”-“M”\n<\/p>\n
It is the case of the appeliants that, due to the rash and
\nnegiigent driving by the driver of the offending vehicle<\/p>\n
the said accident has taken piace. After evaluation;_of<\/p>\n
the original records at threadbare, it is  _<\/p>\n
from the contents of Ex.P7~ sketchmpreparedi   ‘*<\/p>\n
that, the bus is coming form H2\u00a7i1a..V;aga.i_i1~.’ “tiff<\/p>\n
Kunchur and Whereas the’d_decease.d was_fi”om –. L’<\/p>\n
Kunchur to Haiavagaiu  to..’theV._’praish and
\nnegligent driving by’   bus, the said<\/p>\n
accident has taken pia\u00a2e.~ not in dispute<\/p>\n
that the  beenvfiled against the driver
\nof the offei*1ding.V_.Ve}1icieidhand not against the deceased<\/p>\n
MahadveVappa..,vand” itis Ta conciusive proof of evidence.<\/p>\n
 fclinchingdevidence availabie on file have not<\/p>\n
‘been ivooked.A’.i’-‘into or considered or appreciated or<\/p>\n
recorded’ ‘a~n:jrA\ufb01nding of fact by the Tribunai fixing the<\/p>\n
 Jentire iiahility on the part of the driver of the offending<\/p>\n
 t.__’veVhicie. Therefore, we are of the considered View that<\/p>\n
it  “‘the contributory negI e fixed by the Tribunal at<\/p>\n
“NM_#__W_H_,,.,i.,…\n<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
50% on the part of the deceased cannot be sustained
\nand it is liable to be set aside and accordingly, it is set<\/p>\n
aside.\n<\/p>\n
Regarding point No.2:\n<\/p>\n
9. The Tribunal has erred in assess_i.:1__,\u00a7;’t1.ieiincortiet  D <\/p>\n
of the deceased at ?2,400\/– per <\/p>\n
lower side and therefore, it needs to*b_e”-modisfierli It  the <\/p>\n
case of the appellants that deceased dpagedziabout 35
\nyears, running a \ufb02o’ur”‘~mi1l:Atan’d”  the income of
\n?’300\/– per day.__But not produced<\/p>\n
any    same. Taking into
\nconsideration the’ha’ge;’–~occu’pation of the deceased and<\/p>\n
since-the accident\u00bb”Was occurred in the year 2004, we re-<\/p>\n
. d””ElS$\u20ac\u00e9Shisui11C0II1e”‘a’t’?4,0O0\/- per month. In Vi\u20acW of the<\/p>\n
   the Apex Court in the case of Sarla<\/p>\n
Vetzna others Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation<\/p>\n
 another reported in 2009 ACJ 1298, the<\/p>\n
  ‘appropriate deduction towards the personal expenses<\/p>\n
  the deceased would be 1\/4″] since there are \ufb01ve<\/p>\n
E0<\/p>\n
dependants and the appropriate multiplier wou1d…___be<\/p>\n
’16’ instead of ‘I5′ adopted by the Tribunal. <\/p>\n
we 1’e.-determine the loss of dependency at  V’<\/p>\n
(?3,00{)\/– X 12 X 16] and according\ufb02j\ufb02it   <\/p>\n
3.0. The Tribunal has awarded <\/p>\n
towards conventional heads  sarnezis inazietzppiate and
\nit needs to be enhanced.__’Havin’g:’.rejg\u00a5ard._to the” facts and
\ncircumstances of the case  No.3. has
\nlost her husbaziet  .agpe11ant No.2 to 4<\/span>
\nhave lost   No.5 has lost her
\nson, We  ~ towards ioss of
\nconsortiVnrn,’-  loss of estate, ‘\u20ac20,000\/~<\/p>\n
towards loss\u00e9ylov\u00e9z anddaffection at the rate of ?4,000\/-<\/p>\n
 it to  ‘of the appellants 1 to 5 and a sum of \u20ac10,000\/~<\/p>\n
A’toixrards\ufb01ansportation and funeral expenses.<\/p>\n
A  3.3,; Having regard to the facts and circumstances<\/p>\n
  the  as stated above, the impugned judgment and<\/p>\n
.\u00bb—-\u00bb*'”””””_'””’M'”‘<\/p>\n
  passed by the  na1 is liable to be modi\ufb01ed.<\/p>\n
ll<\/p>\n
The total Compensation payable comes to ?6,26,0_.QO\/–<\/p>\n
and the break\u00bb up is as follows:\n<\/p>\n
Towards Loss of dependency it  ‘ 5,”’76;C’i.t)’OT;’_-  <\/p>\n
Towards loss of Consortium<\/p>\n
Towards loss of love and affeotign . 2(l)v,0(}_0’\/\u00bb–… <\/p>\n
?\n<\/p>\n
. K’<\/p>\n
Towards loss of estate ,   101300 *-\n<\/p>\n
“e
\n?\n<\/p>\n
Towards — funeral<\/p>\n
transportation expenses V -.W-w.W;.LA
\n  s  Total  T .?~s.2e.ooo\/-\n<\/p>\n
 ‘  10.000\/-\n<\/p>\n
12. Aceiordijngly,  the appellants is
\nallowed in  1:’ ‘V T  T T<\/p>\n
 by the Tribunal at
\n50% on the partof  is hereby set aside.<\/p>\n
The irnpngiqed jdtidgnient and award passed by the<\/p>\n
 is hereby modified, awarding<\/p>\n
 A.soff?’6,26,O00\/w with interest at 6% p.a., from<\/p>\n
thedate voflpetition till its realisation.<\/p>\n
 third respondent– Insurer is directed to deposit<\/p>\n
L1;hV\u00e9Te’ompensation of ?6,26\u00a3O0\/- with interest within four<\/p>\n
wM_w__M__#,_,,_…\n<\/p>\n
e ieeop,oo0,\/;”M;:#  7<\/p>\n
weeks from the date of receipt of a. copy of this judgment<\/p>\n
and award.\n<\/p>\n
Out of the compensation of ?6,26.000\/<\/p>\n
i’2,00,000\/\u00abwith proportionate interest shall. ‘be”inVes’tedAVi13.o: it ‘* <\/p>\n
the Fixed Deposit in any Nationaiized or ‘Se’}1.edi1let\u00a7.i_’<\/p>\n
Bank, in the name of the aplpe-1lantlllNo.1.for,:vlaA~\u00bb{period of <\/p>\n
\ufb01ve years and renewable for  ‘fiye  liberty
\nto her to withdraw the interest   periodically.<\/p>\n
A sum of interest shall
\nbe invested.   Nationalized or
\nScheduled.   each of the appellant
\nNos. 2::”tQ   years and renewable for<\/p>\n
another fiye–\u00ab.VWith’\u00ab.t.lliberty to them and a sum of<\/p>\n
  pro’port.ionate interest shall be released in<\/p>\n
 tagger   of the appellant Nos. 2 to 4.<\/p>\n
   at 350,000\/–with proportionate interest shall<\/p>\n
lgbe invested in the Fixed Deposit in any Nationalized or<\/p>\n
lfi\ufb01etietiuled Bank, in the name of appellant No.5 for a<\/p>\n
V.  period of three years and renewabte for another three years<\/p>\n
%v,W<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
with liberty to her to withdraw the interest accrued on it,<\/p>\n
periodically.\n<\/p>\n
The remaining sum of $76,000\/~ with  .<\/p>\n
interest shall be released in favour hpfhthe ap}deii’airit.’VN0vs.V 1.,’ <\/p>\n
and 5 in equal proportion. immediate1y:’,”eoi1 <\/p>\n
insurer.\n<\/p>\n
Office is directed\u00bb to <:1ra\\y4_i:i'V;'i-'3;:\u20ac_: aware}; \u00abaeeorctingly.<\/p>\n
\n\n     Sd\/1\n  r      Iudqe\n\nSd\/-\nJudge\n\ntsn*\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Laxmamma @ Laxmavva vs Manjunath S\/O Veeranna on 4 October, 2010 Author: N.K.Patil And H.S.Kempanna IE3 etween: 1. ” ‘(.33 IN THE HIGH COURT or’ KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED mas THE: 4pm DAY OF OCTOBER, 2o14Q e.._ *._V_ :PRESENT: TI-IE HON’BLE MR.JUsT1(;;\u00ab; N.K.pm:iL., V THE HON’BLE Ma.JUs*r_1__cE M.F.A. N0. 1 of 2065 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-193212","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nLaxmamma @ Laxmavva vs Manjunath S\/O Veeranna on 4 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Laxmamma @ Laxmavva vs Manjunath S\/O Veeranna on 4 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-19T00:33:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Laxmamma @ Laxmavva vs Manjunath S\/O Veeranna on 4 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-19T00:33:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1634,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Laxmamma @ Laxmavva vs Manjunath S\/O Veeranna on 4 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-19T00:33:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Laxmamma @ Laxmavva vs Manjunath S\/O Veeranna on 4 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Laxmamma @ Laxmavva vs Manjunath S\/O Veeranna on 4 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Laxmamma @ Laxmavva vs Manjunath S\/O Veeranna on 4 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-19T00:33:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Laxmamma @ Laxmavva vs Manjunath S\/O Veeranna on 4 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-19T00:33:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010"},"wordCount":1634,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010","name":"Laxmamma @ Laxmavva vs Manjunath S\/O Veeranna on 4 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-19T00:33:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/laxmamma-laxmavva-vs-manjunath-so-veeranna-on-4-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Laxmamma @ Laxmavva vs Manjunath S\/O Veeranna on 4 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193212","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=193212"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193212\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=193212"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=193212"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=193212"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}