{"id":193290,"date":"2008-10-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008"},"modified":"2018-12-05T22:17:05","modified_gmt":"2018-12-05T16:47:05","slug":"hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Hukam Chand vs The Post Graduate Institute Of &#8230; on 31 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Hukam Chand vs The Post Graduate Institute Of &#8230; on 31 October, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>Civil Writ Petition No. 18041 of 2001                                    1\n\n\n\n\n       In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh.\n\n\n                  Civil Writ Petition No. 18041 of 2001\n\n                      Date of Decision: 31.10.2008\n\n\nHukam Chand\n                                                               ...Petitioner\n                                  Versus\nThe Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research,\nChandigarh.\n                                                            ...Respondent\n\n\nCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA.\n\n\nPresent: Mr. Gopal Mahajan, Advocate\n         for the petitioner.\n\n           None for the respondent.\n\n\nKanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral)\n<\/pre>\n<p>           Present writ petition has been preferred by Hukam Chand,<\/p>\n<p>who retired as Librarian from the Post Graduate Institute of Medical<\/p>\n<p>Education &amp; Research, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as &#8220;the<\/p>\n<p>Institution&#8221;).\n<\/p>\n<p>           In the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution,<\/p>\n<p>with a prayer for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari seeking<\/p>\n<p>quashing of order dated 29.10.2001 (Annexure P20) whereby even<\/p>\n<p>though petitioner has been granted scale of Rs.2,200-4,000 w.e.f.<\/p>\n<p>1.1.1986 in pursuance of Punjab Government Notification dated<\/p>\n<p>6.4.1989 (Annexure P8) senior scale of Rs.3,000-5,000 and selection<\/p>\n<p>grade of Rs.3,700-5,700 after completion of service of eight years and<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No. 18041 of 2001                                    2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>16 years, has been denied to him though these senior scale and<\/p>\n<p>selection grade formed part of the same notification. Petitioner has<\/p>\n<p>sought further writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents<\/p>\n<p>that he be allowed senior scale and selection grade mentioned above<\/p>\n<p>after completion of eight and 16 years of regular service w.e.f. 1.1.1986<\/p>\n<p>as has been allowed to various Librarians working in the Colleges\/Public<\/p>\n<p>Libraries under the Punjab Education Department.<\/p>\n<p>          Before this Court advert to the facts of the case, it would be<\/p>\n<p>appropriate to notice twofold submissions raised before this Court. It is<\/p>\n<p>submitted that:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>          a)         once    the   Institution   adopted   the   notification<\/p>\n<p>                     (Annexure P8) then the same has to be followed in<\/p>\n<p>                     entirety and senior scale and selection grade as per<\/p>\n<p>                     Annexure P8 has to accrue to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>          b)         Punjab Government subsequently had relaxed<\/p>\n<p>                     certain conditions enumerated in Annexure P8,<\/p>\n<p>                     therefore, the Institution is bound to follow the same<\/p>\n<p>                     course and relax those conditions for awarding<\/p>\n<p>                     senior scale and selection grade.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>          Having noticed these two submissions, it will be pertinent to<\/p>\n<p>notice brief facts of the case.\n<\/p>\n<p>          Petitioner was appointed as Librarian in the Privately Added<\/p>\n<p>College in the year 1966 in the grade of Rs.150-300. Thereafter, on<\/p>\n<p>3.5.1968, he joined the respondent institution as Library Assistant in the<\/p>\n<p>grade of Rs.225-500. Punjab Government revised the pay scales of the<\/p>\n<p>Librarians working in the Colleges\/Public Libraries in the State of Punjab<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No. 18041 of 2001                                  3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>as per their prescribed qualification vide letter dated 9.7.1971 (Annexure<\/p>\n<p>P1). Accordingly, the petitioner was also granted benefit by the<\/p>\n<p>Institution and he was placed in the scale of Rs.300-600 w.e.f.<\/p>\n<p>1.11.1966. This scale was further revised by the Punjab Government on<\/p>\n<p>1.1.1978 to the grade of Rs.700-1,200. Later, Punjab Government<\/p>\n<p>further revised the scale on 18.2.1983 to Rs.700-1,600. On 18.2.1986,<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner was conveyed that his scale has been revised to Rs.700-<\/p>\n<p>1,600 w.e.f. 1.4.1980. These facts have been shown by the petitioner to<\/p>\n<p>urge that throughout his service career, he was getting benefit of<\/p>\n<p>revision of pay scale which was being granted to the Librarians working<\/p>\n<p>in the Colleges\/Public Libraries run by the State of Punjab.<\/p>\n<p>          Grievance of the petitioner was that w.e.f. 1.1.1986, State of<\/p>\n<p>Punjab revised the pay scale of Rs.700-1,600 to Rs.2,200-4,000 and<\/p>\n<p>also introduced two further grades called as senior scale and selection<\/p>\n<p>grade which carried the grade of Rs.3,500-5,000 and Rs.3,700-5,700,<\/p>\n<p>respectively.\n<\/p>\n<p>          This Court need go to details but the petitioner had to file a<\/p>\n<p>writ petition and a contempt petition to get a scale of Rs.2,200-4,000<\/p>\n<p>which was ultimately granted to him vide impugned order (Annexure<\/p>\n<p>P20) dated 29.10.2001. Though the petitioner is satisfied that he has<\/p>\n<p>been granted the scale of Rs.2,200-4,000 w.e.f. 1.4.1986, on<\/p>\n<p>29.10.2001 he has laid claim in this writ petition that he should be<\/p>\n<p>granted senior scale of Rs.3,000-5,000 and selection grade of Rs.3,700-<\/p>\n<p>5,700 on completion of service of eight and sixteen years, respectively.<\/p>\n<p>          Mr. Mahajan has referred to Annexure P8 in which senior<\/p>\n<p>scale and selection grade have been mentioned. It will be pertinent to<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No. 18041 of 2001                                            4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>reproduce paras 5 to 9 of the notification dated 6.4.1989 (Annexure<\/p>\n<p>P8):-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                   &#8220;5.         Every assistant Librarian and Assistant<\/p>\n<p>                   Director of Physical Education in a University and a<\/p>\n<p>                   Librarian    and    Director\/Instructor           of    Physical<\/p>\n<p>                   Education in a College, who is in the scale of pay of<\/p>\n<p>                   Rs.2,200-4,000 will be placed in a senior scale of<\/p>\n<p>                   Rs.3,000-5,000, if he\/she has:-<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                   a)          completed 8 years service after regular<\/p>\n<p>                               appointment with relaxation as provided in<\/p>\n<p>                               para 4 above.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<pre>                   b)          Participated       in        two           refresher\n\n                               courses\/summer          institutes,        each   of\n\n                               approximately four weeks' duration or\n\n<\/pre>\n<blockquote><p>                               engaged in other appropriate continuing<\/p>\n<p>                               education      programme         of    comparable<\/p>\n<p>                               quality as may be specified by the UGC;<\/p>\n<p>                               and<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                   c)          Consistently     satisfactory         performance<\/p>\n<p>                               appraisal reports.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                   Explanation &#8211; All existing incumbents of these posts<\/p>\n<p>                   in the Universities and College Cadre Librarians, ;<\/p>\n<p>                   who are in the scale of Rs.700-1,600 and who have<\/p>\n<p>                   completed 8 years of service on Ist January, 1986<\/p>\n<p>                   will   be     placed,      through       a        process     of<\/p>\n<p>                   screening\/selection as indicated in para 10 below of<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No. 18041 of 2001                                         5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                   this annexure in the scale of Rs.3,000-5,000. The<\/p>\n<p>                   benefit of service provided in para 4 above will be<\/p>\n<p>                   available for the initial placement also.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                   6.        Every Assistant Librarian and Assistant<\/p>\n<p>                   Director of Physical Education in the Universities<\/p>\n<p>                   who have been placed in the senior scale will be<\/p>\n<p>                   eligible for promotion to the post of Deputy Librarian<\/p>\n<p>                   and   Deputy     Director   of     Physical       Education<\/p>\n<p>                   respectively in the scale of pay of Rs.3,700-5,700 if<\/p>\n<p>                   he\/she has:\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                   a)        completed 8 years of service in the senior<\/p>\n<p>                             scale: provided that the requirement of 8<\/p>\n<p>                             years will be relaxed if his\/her total service<\/p>\n<p>                             is not less than 16 years;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                   b)        obtained a Ph.D degree or an equivalent<\/p>\n<p>                             published work;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                   c)        made     significant    contributions      to    the<\/p>\n<p>                             development of Library Services\/Physical<\/p>\n<p>                             Education in the University as evidenced<\/p>\n<p>                             by self-assessment, reports of references,<\/p>\n<p>                             professional improvement in the Library<\/p>\n<p>                             Services\/Physical Education activities etc.<\/p>\n<p>                             as the case may be;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<pre>                   d)        participated       in       two          refresher\n\n                             courses\/summer          institutes      each      of\n\n                             approximately     4     weeks'       duration,    or\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No. 18041 of 2001                                           6<\/span>\n\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n<blockquote><p>                               engaged in other appropriate continuing<\/p>\n<p>                               education programmes of comparable<\/p>\n<p>                               quality as may be specified by the UGC,<\/p>\n<p>                               after placement in the senior scale; and<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                   e)          consistently good performance appraisal<\/p>\n<p>                               reports.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                   7.          Promotion       to     the     post    of    Deputy<\/p>\n<p>                   Librarian\/Deputy Director of Physical Education will<\/p>\n<p>                   be through a process of selection by a Selection<\/p>\n<p>                   Committee as in the case of promotion to the posts<\/p>\n<p>                   of Readers. Posts of Deputy Librarians\/Deputy<\/p>\n<p>                   Director of Physical Education will be created for<\/p>\n<p>                   this purpose by upgrading the post of Assistant<\/p>\n<p>                   Librarian\/Director of Physical Education (Senior<\/p>\n<p>                   Scale).\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                   8.          Those Assistant Librarians and Assistant<\/p>\n<p>                   Directors of Physical Education in Universities in the<\/p>\n<p>                   Senior Scale who do not have Ph.D. degree or<\/p>\n<p>                   equivalent published work, but fulfill the other<\/p>\n<p>                   criteria, mentioned in para 6 above will be placed in<\/p>\n<p>                   the   grade    of      Rs.3,700-5,700       subject     to   the<\/p>\n<p>                   recommendations of the Committee mentioned in<\/p>\n<p>                   para 7 above. They will be designed as Assistant<\/p>\n<p>                   Librarian     and      Assistant    Director      of    Physical<\/p>\n<p>                   Education in the Selection Grade.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<pre>                   9.          The     College        Cadre     Librarians      and\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No. 18041 of 2001                                        7<\/span>\n\n\n\n\n                    Director\/Instructors    of     Physical    Education      in\n\n<\/pre>\n<blockquote><p>                    Colleges, who have been placed in the Senior Scale<\/p>\n<p>                    will also be eligible for placement in the Selection<\/p>\n<p>                    Grade of Rs.3,700-5,700 if they fulfill the criteria<\/p>\n<p>                    prescribed in para 8 above&#8221;.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>          On filing of the writ petition, notice was issued.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>          A written statement has been filed. As it is evident from the<\/p>\n<p>perusal of impugned order, senior scale of Rs.3,000-5,000 has been<\/p>\n<p>denied to the petitioner as he has not participated           in two refresher<\/p>\n<p>courses\/summer institute each of approximately four weeks&#8217; duration or<\/p>\n<p>has not engaged in other appropriate continuing education programme<\/p>\n<p>of comparable quality as may have been specified by the University<\/p>\n<p>Grant Commission.\n<\/p>\n<p>          Similarly, selection grade has been also denied to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner has he has not obtained Ph.D Degree or has no published<\/p>\n<p>work to his credit. To counter this, Mr. Mahajan has drawn my attention<\/p>\n<p>to Annexure P21, a subsequent notification issued by the Director of<\/p>\n<p>Public Instructions (Colleges), Punjab at Chandigarh, to show that the<\/p>\n<p>condition of participation in orientation courses by the Librarians as one<\/p>\n<p>of the conditions for the grant of these grades has already been relaxed<\/p>\n<p>by the Punjab Government upto 31.3.1991. It will be relevant                  to<\/p>\n<p>reproduce a portion of notification (Annexure P21):-<\/p>\n<p>                    &#8220;XXXX                  XXXX                  XXXX<br \/>\n                    Subject: Grant of Senior scale\/selection grade to<br \/>\n                               the    Librarians      working      in      Govt.\n<\/p>\n<p>                               Colleges\/Public\/District        Libraries      in<br \/>\n                               Punjab.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No. 18041 of 2001                                   8<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                              Reference your memo no. DPI-UTC-12<\/p>\n<p>                    (21) 82 dated 24.4.92 on the subject cited above.<\/p>\n<p>                              In this connection it is intimated that the<\/p>\n<p>                    senior\/selection grade of Rs.3000-5000 and 3700-<\/p>\n<p>                    5700 respectively is being released to all those<\/p>\n<p>                    College   cadre    Librarians   working    in       the<\/p>\n<p>                    Government Colleges\/Public\/District Libraries in<\/p>\n<p>                    Punjab, who complete 8\/16 years of regular service<\/p>\n<p>                    as Librarian. The condition of participation in<\/p>\n<p>                    orientation courses by the Librarians as one of the<\/p>\n<p>                    conditions for the grant of these grades has already<\/p>\n<p>                    been relaxed by the Punjab Government upto<\/p>\n<p>                    31.3.1991.\n<\/p>\n<p>                    XXXX                XXXX                  XXXX&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>          The question which I have posed to Mr. Mahajan that whether<\/p>\n<p>it is mandatory for the Institution which is an autonomous body to adopt<\/p>\n<p>Annexure P21 also. Was it incumbent upon the Institution, that having<\/p>\n<p>adopted Annexure P8, also to adopt Annexure P21. To counter this, Mr.<\/p>\n<p>Mahajan has stated that since 1968 when the petitioner joined the<\/p>\n<p>Institution he has been granted all benefits to which Librarians working<\/p>\n<p>in the Colleges\/Public Libraries of Punjab Government were entitled to.<\/p>\n<p>He has stated that all relaxations which were permissible to Librarians of<\/p>\n<p>Colleges\/Public Libraries of Punjab were also available to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>He has drawn my attention to Annexure P19 when earlier revision of pay<\/p>\n<p>scale was granted then also relaxation was made by the Punjab<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No. 18041 of 2001                                      9<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Government and equal relaxation was also construed in favour of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>          Since the petitioner throughout his service career has been<\/p>\n<p>dealt with as the Punjab Government was dealing with Librarians posted<\/p>\n<p>in the Colleges of Punjab and Public Libraries, there is no reason for the<\/p>\n<p>Institution to treat the petitioner differently at the time of granting benefit<\/p>\n<p>after revision of pay scale vide Annexure P8. Therefore, this writ petition<\/p>\n<p>is allowed. It is held that the petitioner will be entitled to senior scale and<\/p>\n<p>selection grade as per notification (Annexure P8) and participation in<\/p>\n<p>two refresher courses\/summer institute, a condition noticed in sub para<\/p>\n<p>(9) of the impugned order shall not be construed against the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>Taking these observations into light, the Institution shall pass a fresh<\/p>\n<p>order for awarding senior scale and selection grade to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>Needless to say that arrears to the petitioner shall be restricted to 38<\/p>\n<p>months before filing of the writ petition.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                              (Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia)<br \/>\n                                                                   Judge<br \/>\nOctober 31, 2008<br \/>\n&#8220;DK&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Hukam Chand vs The Post Graduate Institute Of &#8230; on 31 October, 2008 Civil Writ Petition No. 18041 of 2001 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh. Civil Writ Petition No. 18041 of 2001 Date of Decision: 31.10.2008 Hukam Chand &#8230;Petitioner Versus The Post Graduate Institute of Medical [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-193290","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Hukam Chand vs The Post Graduate Institute Of ... on 31 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Hukam Chand vs The Post Graduate Institute Of ... on 31 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-05T16:47:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Hukam Chand vs The Post Graduate Institute Of &#8230; on 31 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-05T16:47:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1735,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Hukam Chand vs The Post Graduate Institute Of ... on 31 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-05T16:47:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Hukam Chand vs The Post Graduate Institute Of &#8230; on 31 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Hukam Chand vs The Post Graduate Institute Of ... on 31 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Hukam Chand vs The Post Graduate Institute Of ... on 31 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-05T16:47:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Hukam Chand vs The Post Graduate Institute Of &#8230; on 31 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-05T16:47:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008"},"wordCount":1735,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008","name":"Hukam Chand vs The Post Graduate Institute Of ... on 31 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-05T16:47:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hukam-chand-vs-the-post-graduate-institute-of-on-31-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Hukam Chand vs The Post Graduate Institute Of &#8230; on 31 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193290","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=193290"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193290\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=193290"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=193290"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=193290"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}