{"id":193317,"date":"2009-01-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009"},"modified":"2018-09-09T03:09:17","modified_gmt":"2018-09-08T21:39:17","slug":"smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt Akkayamma vs The Additional Land Acquisition … on 28 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Akkayamma vs The Additional Land Acquisition … on 28 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
 \n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
The p\ufb01titionerf land laser is befom this  u<\/p>\n
the order passed in EXP, No. A. 3 A<\/p>\n
2. H5311! S:-.1 P. msmggg; Iga\ufb01ea  for the
\npetitioner and Sri K2  gounsel for the
\nrespondent and perused  <\/p>\n
3. Th\u00e9   \u00b0tVhr:: Executing Court
\nseeking ,{o1’~\u00bb jij1fiVt\u00a5\u00a7.1’estAV$\u00a7oIati11m. and additienai
\ncompenga\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01g :9? down in SUNDER VS.<\/p>\n
UNION OF uimjxa (A:.RA’2_dL2~.1′}’scw 3692). The respondents<\/p>\n
_.._hereivn -:,11a_c_1i’ Qbjerff\u00e9zi vv–.tr3~’t11e same by contending that the:<\/p>\n
‘=_am\u00a2\u00ab’un_,1;s <\/p>\n
‘ij\u00e9id.._b\u00a3:en gaid and also the petitioner is not<\/p>\n
er}:LitAIA’ed%’tcv\u00bb   interest in the manner in which it has<\/p>\n
V been dR\u00e9z1.e\u00a7”v.a’I’.11\u00a7i\u00a7 Executing Cerurt While closing the execution<\/p>\n
H  h\u00e9i\u00e9 without detail reasons to the claim made has<\/p>\n
 ;f1o\u00e9;A::id”‘t\ufb01e executign petition by the impugn\ufb01d order which<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
4<\/span>
\n4<\/span><\/p>\n
has been called in question in this petition. A4 a<\/p>\n
reference has been made by the Executing__–i;J@1ii*t’.viiGii  <\/p>\n
decision of the Honfble SupzemeM{,’ourt’.”ii:1″”  <\/p>\n
GURUPREETH SINGH VS LiNION:=\u00a3_)!3′ ,m{3?IA’ee(20\u00a3je A1′?-st\u00e9w<\/p>\n
5813), the applicability of  VIaidv:iiic\u00a7.w:1 <\/p>\n
Honfble Supreme Court_ to  :E3I1ot been
\nconsidered by the  fhis regazd, it is
\nnoticed that even as per   the Execu\ufb01ng
\nCeulf, the  ‘I:1.:-1s:i_”c,ie*\u00a3ie.i}s with regaxd t9
\nthe claim     the petitioner was
\nbefere    eei\ufb01er instances and the
\npe\ufb01tione’-_&v:\u00a2erei   the said position, the<\/p>\n
Executing C'{:si1I*t is  to apply its mind to the feet<\/p>\n
 \ufb01zeiai\ufb01iiig  the neiii11’e–\u00ab–ef the judgment and award passed in<\/p>\n
“:_qtiLei’i:1eta._1Vit= eaee -eami as to whether the earlier execution<\/p>\n
peiiticsris Wf:i’5E’j_ ciosed in satisfaction of the Execution of the<\/p>\n
— judgniiergtxdeczee and if net as to Whether the petitioner<\/p>\n
” ” ; ”’},;vg)ilIti-.’_.’b\u20ac entitled to any \ufb01irther relief in the execution<\/p>\n
 keeping in view the law laid down by the Horfbie<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
p
\nC<\/p>\n
entitle tha petitions: for the interest which has baen; <\/p>\n
by then}.\n<\/p>\n
3. Since these aspects kzf ?Lh:: 3 \ufb011*aiter ” <\/p>\n
reconsidera\ufb01on by the Executing_ C–:31:1i”\u00a3:v_ keepinvngth\u00e9 <\/p>\n
decisicms noticed above and by  ou;\u00a3”::\u00ab:3T:  wiittther in
\nthe nature of the  in.Mt1:V1Ae instant
\ncases and the namm of   pg\ufb02tiens, the
\n\u00a7etitienez* is enti'{i;:#aA%.1VL:VTto    order impugned
\nin this    the same is set
\naside.   V the City Civil Judge
\nBangalori\ufb01   Ex,No.703\/O12 011 \ufb01le and<\/p>\n
reconsider .. samqjight of the observations made<\/p>\n
 ‘.;’flbOV\u20ac_\u00a7 %e.11d___ti1; deci\ufb01\ufb01sas *rencIered in the abgve meted Cases.<\/p>\n
 ‘ :{Sti11tc1:ti%:wn:svM.e}{Ie left open.<\/p>\n
 z R$c\u00a7fdmgl}7, the petitian stands disposed. of. No<\/p>\n
V’ ?\u00a7rd\u00e9:’TLa;~; to costs.\n<\/p>\n
.4<\/p>\n
7, Since the par\ufb01es are represented bjs\ufb02<\/p>\n
respective learned counsel, they shall appear   ~<\/p>\n
Executing Court {:11 5.3.2009 as the  data?’ bf ‘A V’<\/p>\n
and therea\ufb02er the Executing <\/p>\n
pmceadmgs.\n<\/p>\n
Iud\u00a73<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Akkayamma vs The Additional Land Acquisition … on 28 January, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna ORDER The p\ufb01titionerf land laser is befom this u the order passed in EXP, No. A. 3 A 2. H5311! S:-.1 P. msmggg; Iga\ufb01ea for the petitioner and Sri K2 gounsel for the respondent and perused 3. Th\u00e9 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-193317","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Akkayamma vs The Additional Land Acquisition ... on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Akkayamma vs The Additional Land Acquisition ... on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-08T21:39:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Akkayamma vs The Additional Land Acquisition … on 28 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-08T21:39:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":509,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt Akkayamma vs The Additional Land Acquisition ... on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-08T21:39:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Akkayamma vs The Additional Land Acquisition … on 28 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Akkayamma vs The Additional Land Acquisition ... on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Akkayamma vs The Additional Land Acquisition ... on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-08T21:39:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Akkayamma vs The Additional Land Acquisition … on 28 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-08T21:39:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009"},"wordCount":509,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009","name":"Smt Akkayamma vs The Additional Land Acquisition ... on 28 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-08T21:39:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-akkayamma-vs-the-additional-land-acquisition-on-28-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Akkayamma vs The Additional Land Acquisition … on 28 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193317","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=193317"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193317\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=193317"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=193317"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=193317"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}