{"id":193800,"date":"2008-07-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008"},"modified":"2015-06-18T13:41:29","modified_gmt":"2015-06-18T08:11:29","slug":"state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"State vs Narendrasinh on 28 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n
State vs Narendrasinh on 28 July, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: M.R. Shah,&Nbsp;<\/div>\n
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/9234\/2008\t 8\/ 10\tJUDGMENT \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 9234 of 2008\n \n\n \n \nFor\nApproval and Signature:  \n \nHONOURABLE\nMR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n1\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tReporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n2\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nTo be\n\t\t\treferred to the Reporter or not ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n3\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\ttheir Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n4\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tthis case involves a substantial question of law as to the\n\t\t\tinterpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order\n\t\t\tmade thereunder ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n5\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tit is to  be circulated to the civil judge ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT & 3 - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nNARENDRASINH\nPARVATSINH RATHOD - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nHEMANG PARIKH ASST.GOVERNMENT PLEADER for\nPetitioner(s) : 1 - 4. \nMR SK BUKHARI for Respondent(s) :\n1, \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 28\/07\/2008 \n\n \n\n \nORAL\nJUDGMENT<\/pre>\n
Rule.\n<\/p>\n
\tMr.S.K. Bukhari, learned waives the service of notice of rule on
\n\tbehalf of the respondent.\n<\/p>\n
With
\n\tthe consent of the  learned advocates appearing on behalf of the
\n\trespective parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing.\n<\/p>\n
By
\n\tway of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,
\n\tthe petitioners ?  State of Gujarat and others, have prayed for
\n\tappropriate writ, order and\/or directions   for quashing and setting
\n\taside  the judgement and order dtd.30\/11\/2007 passed by the learned
\n\tPresiding Officer, FTC No.2, Panchmahals at Godhara in Misc.Civil
\n\tAppeal No.105 of 2007 in  allowing the same and quashing and setting
\n\taside  the order dtd.8\/10\/2007 passed by the  learned 3rd
\n\t  Additional Senior Civil Judge, Godhara below application Ex.5 in
\n\tRegular Civil Suit No. 354 of 2007.\n<\/p>\n
The
\n\trespondent herein ?  original plaintiff is having a fair price shop
\n\tat village Sanoli, Taluka ; Kalol, District Panchmahals. That the
\n\trespondent ?  original plaintiff is granted license  to run the
\n\tfair price shop under the Pandit Din Dayal Grahak Bhandar Scheme of
\n\tthe State Government and he has been allotted  782 Ration Card
\n\tHolders having population of 4011.  That the respondent is a
\n\tlicensee  under the provisions of the Essential Commodities Act,
\n\t1955 and is provided wheat, rice, oil, kerosene etc. for selling it
\n\tto the poor people more particularly, to the people leaving Below
\n\tPoverty Line (BPL) as per the Government Policy at reasonable rate.
\n\tThat in the public interest, it was decided  to have another fair
\n\tprice shop by way of division  in two parts of the same village.
\n\tBeing aggrieved by the said decision, the respondent herein ?
\n\toriginal plaintiff filed Regular Civil Suit No.  354 of 2007  for
\n\trestraining the petitioners ?  original defendants from reducing
\n\tthe Ration Card Holders attached with his fair price shop of the
\n\tplaintiff and restraining the petitioners ?  original defendants
\n\tfrom opening any other fair price shop in the said village.  In the
\n\tsaid suit, the petitioner – original plaintiff filed application
\n\tEx.5 for interim injunction. It was contended on behalf of the
\n\toriginal plaintiff that as per the Government Circular \/ Resolution,
\n\tthere  should be minimum certain number of Ration Card Holders
\n\tattached with a fair price shop looking to the population and it was
\n\t further contended that if the Ration Card Holders  are reduced, he
\n\twill not get sufficient commission and it will not be possible for
\n\thim to run the fair price shop. It was contended  on behalf of the
\n\toriginal plaintiff that the said action is in breach of the
\n\tprinciples of natural justice as no notice or hearing has been
\n\tafforded  to the plaintiff. The application Ex.5 was opposed  by the
\n\tpetitioners herein ?  original defendants by submitting that  the
\n\tsuit itself is not maintainable. It was also further submitted that
\n\tas such the discretion is with the authority to allow the number of
\n\tRation Card Holders  and\/or to open the fair price shop looking to
\n\tthe need of the village people and in the public interest. It was
\n\tsubmitted that  the paramount consideration is  the public interest,
\n\t interest of the village people and the Ration Card Holders.  It was
\n\tfurther submitted that the licensee  has no right,  much less any
\n\tlegal right,  to have particular Ration Card Holders. It was also
\n\tfurther submitted that even in the Resolution relied upon by the
\n\tplaintiff and as per the policy, it is provided that as far as
\n\tpossible, but certainly any licensee and\/or fir price shop owner has
\n\tno right, whatsoever, to ask for a particular number of Ration Card
\n\tHolders.  It was further submitted
\n\ton behalf of the plaintiff that  as per the Resolution, there shall
\n\tnot be new fair price shop within the radius of 3 KMs. The learned
\n\t3rd   Additional Senior Civil Judge, Godhara, after
\n\thearing both the sides, vide order dtd.8\/10\/2007 rejected the
\n\tapplication Ex.5 holding that the if the plaintiff feels that no
\n\topportunity of being heard is provided to the plaintiff, the
\n\tplaintiff should approach the defendants for redressal of his
\n\tgrievance and in such event, the defendants will provide opportunity
\n\tto the plaintiff and take appropriate decision. The trial court also
\n\theld that the decision of the defendants is in the interest of the
\n\tpublic in general. Prima facie case and balance of convenience are
\n\tnot in favour of the plaintiff and if the interim relief as prayed
\n\tfor is not granted, no irreparable loss is likely to be caused to
\n\tthe injunction.  Holding accordingly, the trial court rejected the
\n\tapplication Ex.5 preferred by the plaintiff ?  respondent herein.
\n\tBeing aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the order passed by the
\n\ttrial court  below application Ex.5 in rejecting the same, the
\n\trespondent herein ?  original plaintiff preferred an appeal before
\n\tthe appellate court and the learned Presiding Officer, FTC No.2,
\n\tPanchmahals at Godhara, after hearing both the sides, vide judgement
\n\tand order dtd.30\/11\/2007 allowed the side appeal, by quashing and
\n\tsetting aside the order passed by the trial court below application
\n\tEx.5 and further directed the parties to maintain status-quo till
\n\tfinal disposal of the suit. The appellate court observed that
\n\tconsidering the documents on record, the appellate court is not
\n\tagree with the findings recorded by the trial court and the
\n\tplaintiff has  prima facie case and the order passed by the trial
\n\tcourt  is in breach of condition of government resolution and
\n\tagainst the principles of natural justice. Holding accordingly, the
\n\tappellate court allowed the appeal and quashed and set aside the
\n\torder passed by the trial court below application Ex.5 and directed
\n\tthe parties to maintain status-quo till final disposal of the suit.
\n\tAgainst the said order passed by the learned appellate court, the
\n\tpetitioners ?  original defendants have preferred present Special
\n\tCivil Application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.\n<\/p>\n
Mr.Hemang
\n\tParikh, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of
\n\tthe petitioners has vehemently submitted that  the appellate court
\n\thas materially erred in allowing the appeal and granting interim
\n\tinjunction as prayed for by the plaintiff and restraining the
\n\tpetitioners – original defendants from reducing the Ration Card
\n\tHolders attached with the fair price shop of the plaintiff and
\n\tfurthers restraining the petitioners ?  original defendants from
\n\teither opening another fair price shop or division of existing fair
\n\tprice shop in the same village. It is submitted that what is
\n\tprovided in the Resolution is that  as far as possible the distance
\n\tand the Ration Card Holders should be maintained. However, in the
\n\tlarger public interest and   in the interest of  the village people
\n\tand the Ration Card Holders, the same can be reduced. It is also
\n\tfurther submitted that as such the suit itself is not maintainable,
\n\tas it is realm of policy of the Government to open the fair price
\n\tshop and to allot the Ration Card Holders to a particular fair price
\n\tshop.  It is also further submitted that  there is no question of
\n\taffording any opportunity to the licensee, as the licensee\/fair
\n\tprice shop owner has no legal right to  ask for particular number of
\n\tRation Card Holders. Therefore,  it is requested  to allow  the
\n\tpresent Special Civil Application and quash and set aside the order
\n\tpassed by the appellate court.\n<\/p>\n
Mr.S.K.\n<\/p>\n
\tBukhari, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the  respondent ?
\n\toriginal plaintiff  has submitted that as rightly held by the
\n\tlearned appellate court, before reducing the Ration Card Holders,
\n\tno opportunity   has been given and\/or no notice has been issued to
\n\tthe respondent ?  plaintiff  and hence the said action is  in
\n\tbreach of the principles of natural justice and the appellate court
\n\thas rightly allowed the appeal and granted the interim injunction as
\n\tprayed for by the plaintiff. Therefore, it is requested to dismiss
\n\tthe present Special Civil Application.\n<\/p>\n
Heard
\n\tthe learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respective parties.\n<\/p>\n
At
\n\tthe outset, it is required to be noted that the respondent ?
\n\toriginal plaintiff has no vested right to ask for a particular
\n\tnumber of Ration Card Holders attached with his  fair price shop.
\n\tThe plaintiff has been granted license  to run the fair price shop
\n\tunder the scheme of the State Government and it is ultimately for
\n\tthe State Government to decide how many number of Ration Card
\n\tHolders should be allotted to a particular fair price shop. The
\n\tinterest of the Ration Card Holders and the village people is the
\n\tparamount consideration and  as there is no vested legal right in
\n\tfavour of the plaintiff, there is no question of issuing any notice
\n\tand\/or giving any opportunity to the respondent ?  original
\n\tplaintiff  before taking decision to reduce the Ration Card Holders.
\n\tPrima facie, it appears that even the suit itself is not
\n\tmaintainable. However, without entering into the said larger
\n\tquestion, it appears that the trial court has rightly refused to
\n\tgrant the interim injunction as prayed for. As such the relief
\n\tgranted prayed for by the plaintiff by way of interim relief, is the
\n\tfinal relief sought in the suit. As held by the Hon’ble Supreme
\n\tCourt   and this Court in catena of decisions, normally court should
\n\tbe slow in granting the interim relief, which may be ultimately
\n\tfinal relief in the suit.  In very very exceptional cases, final
\n\trelief can be granted as an interim relief.  Under the
\n\tcircumstances, the trial court has rightly refused to grant the
\n\tinterim relief, but the the learned appellate court has committed an
\n\terror  and\/or exceeded its jurisdiction in allowing the appeal and
\n\tgranting application Ex.5  and directing the parties to maintain
\n\tstatus-quo and therefore, the impugned order passed by the learned
\n\tappellate court requires to be quashed and set aside.\n<\/p>\n
For
\n\tthe reasons stated above, the petition succeeds. The impugned
\n\tjudgement and order dtd.30\/11\/2007 passed by the learned Presiding
\n\tOfficer, FTC No.2, Panchmahals at Godhara in Misc.Civil Appeal
\n\tNo.105 of 2007  is quashed and set aside and the  order
\n\tdtd.8\/10\/2007 passed by the  learned 3rd
\n\tAdditional Senior Civil Judge, Godhara below application Ex.5 in
\n\tRegular Civil Suit No.354 of 2007 is restored. Rule is made absolute
\n\taccordingly. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall
\n\tbe no order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t[M.R.\n<\/p>\n
SHAH, J.]<\/p>\n
rafik<\/p>\n
\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court State vs Narendrasinh on 28 July, 2008 Author: M.R. Shah,&Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCA\/9234\/2008 8\/ 10 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9234 of 2008 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-193800","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nState vs Narendrasinh on 28 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State vs Narendrasinh on 28 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-18T08:11:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State vs Narendrasinh on 28 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-18T08:11:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1697,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008\",\"name\":\"State vs Narendrasinh on 28 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-18T08:11:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State vs Narendrasinh on 28 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State vs Narendrasinh on 28 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State vs Narendrasinh on 28 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-18T08:11:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State vs Narendrasinh on 28 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-18T08:11:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008"},"wordCount":1697,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008","name":"State vs Narendrasinh on 28 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-18T08:11:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-narendrasinh-on-28-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State vs Narendrasinh on 28 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193800","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=193800"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193800\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=193800"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=193800"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=193800"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}