{"id":193806,"date":"2009-10-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009"},"modified":"2015-08-24T20:07:07","modified_gmt":"2015-08-24T14:37:07","slug":"m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"M.Nandakumar vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 14 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M.Nandakumar vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 14 October, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRP.No. 190 of 2008()\n\n\n1. M.NANDAKUMAR, MITTATHULLIL HOUSE,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. M.VIJAYAKUMAR, MITTATHULLIL HOUSE,\n3. M.SREEKUMAR, MITTATHULLIL HOUSE,\n4. RAJAKUMAR @ RAJAGOPALAN,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, KSE BOARD,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.S.AJITH PRAKASH\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN, SC,\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :14\/10\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n            S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.\n          -----------------------------\n          C.R.P.Nos.190 AND 38 OF 2008\n           --------------------------\n     Dated this the 14th day of October 2009\n     -------------------------------------\n\n\n                       ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>            These two revisions are filed against<\/p>\n<p>the order dated 18\/08\/2007 in O.P(Ele) No.204 of<\/p>\n<p>2004 passed by the learned Additional District<\/p>\n<p>Judge(Adhoc II), Ernakulam.    The above Original<\/p>\n<p>petition was filed under Section 10 and 16(3) of<\/p>\n<p>the Indian Telegraph Act 1885 r\/w Section 51 of the<\/p>\n<p>Indian    Electricity    Act    seeking    enhanced<\/p>\n<p>compensation for the damages caused on the drawing<\/p>\n<p>of overhead lines through the property of the<\/p>\n<p>revision  petitioners  in  C.R.P No.190   of  2008,<\/p>\n<p>having an extent of 2.05 Acres comprised in survey<\/p>\n<p>numbers 815\/1, 815\/2, 1079\/3 and 814\/2 of Elamkulam<\/p>\n<p>village in Ernakulam district.   The respondent in<\/p>\n<p>the above revision, namely Kerala State Electricity<\/p>\n<p>Board, herein after referred as the Board, took<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.Nos.190 AND 38 OF 2008  Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>possession of an area of 11.154 cents from the<\/p>\n<p>above property for installation of towers to draw<\/p>\n<p>110Kv    line   for    drawing  Bhrahmapuram  Panampally<\/p>\n<p>Nagar electric line.         Fixing a market value of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.52,618\/- (Rupees fifty two thousand six hundred<\/p>\n<p>and eighteen only) per Are compensation for the<\/p>\n<p>area injuriously affected for erecting the tower<\/p>\n<p>was fixed at 60%, and a sum of Rs.1,40,860\/-<\/p>\n<p>(Rupees One lakh forty thousand eight hundred and<\/p>\n<p>sixty only) was assessed.         Towards the drawing of<\/p>\n<p>the overhead lines an area of 64.325 cents was<\/p>\n<p>determined as injuriously affected, and towards<\/p>\n<p>compensation      thereof,   assessing    such  injurious<\/p>\n<p>affectation at 40% of the aforesaid market value,<\/p>\n<p>compensation was fixed at Rs.5,41,502\/- (Rupees<\/p>\n<p>five lakh forty one thousand five hundred and two<\/p>\n<p>only).    Thus a total compensation of Rs.6,82,362\/-<\/p>\n<p>(Rupees six lakh eighty two thousand three hundred<\/p>\n<p>and sixty two only) was provided for loss and<\/p>\n<p>injury suffered by the claimants.            Dissatisfied<\/p>\n<p>with the compensation so awarded and impeaching the<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.Nos.190 AND 38 OF 2008   Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>assessment made as unreasonable and inadequate, the<\/p>\n<p>above claim petition was filed before the court.<\/p>\n<p>The Board resisted the claim by filing objections<\/p>\n<p>contending       that       reasonable      and   adequate<\/p>\n<p>compensation      had    been   paid.     In  the  enquiry<\/p>\n<p>conducted over the petition, on behalf of the<\/p>\n<p>claimants PW1 was examined and Exts.A1 to A5 were<\/p>\n<p>exhibitted.      Board got examined one witness as RW1<\/p>\n<p>and exhibitted as R1.         The learned District Judge<\/p>\n<p>after    appreciating      the  materials    produced  and<\/p>\n<p>hearing the counsel on both sides reassessed the<\/p>\n<p>compensation payable taking a view that, towards<\/p>\n<p>compensation      for   erection    of   the  tower,  100%<\/p>\n<p>compensation has to be provided for the entire area<\/p>\n<p>taken for putting up the tower.            So far as, the<\/p>\n<p>diminution of land value on account of the drawing<\/p>\n<p>of line, on the materials placed, the court formed<\/p>\n<p>an opinion that a larger extent than what was<\/p>\n<p>determined     by   the    Board   had    been injuriously<\/p>\n<p>affected and with reference to a registered title<\/p>\n<p>deed produced showing the market value of a nereby<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.Nos.190 AND 38 OF 2008  Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>property which is stated to be situated closeby<\/p>\n<p>fixing    the    centage    value  of    the  property at<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,31,000\/- (Rupees One lakh thirty one thousand<\/p>\n<p>only)     the     learned     District     Judge   awarded<\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs.10,29,200\/- (Rupees Ten lakh<\/p>\n<p>twenty nine thousand two hundred only).          Thus the<\/p>\n<p>claimants      were    found    entitled    to   a   total<\/p>\n<p>compensation     of    Rs.14,75,360\/-    (Rupees  fourteen<\/p>\n<p>thousand seventy five thousand three hundred and<\/p>\n<p>sixty only) from which deducting the sum already<\/p>\n<p>paid to the petitioners, enhanced compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.7,92,998\/-      (Rupees    Seven    lakh   ninety  two<\/p>\n<p>thousand nine hundred and ninety eight only) was<\/p>\n<p>awarded.       In the award, 6% interest was also<\/p>\n<p>directed to be paid from the date of filing of the<\/p>\n<p>petition for enhanced compensation.         The Board has<\/p>\n<p>challenged the compensation so awarded by filing<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P     No.38\/2008,      and   the    claimants,   C.R.P<\/p>\n<p>No.190\/2008.\n<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.Nos.190 AND 38 OF 2008   Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>          2.     Since both the revisions arise from<\/p>\n<p>the same order, after being heard together theyare<\/p>\n<p>disposed by this common order.         I heard the counsel<\/p>\n<p>on both sides.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>          3.      Perusing the      order   passed by the<\/p>\n<p>learned District Judge, impugned in the revision,<\/p>\n<p>it is noticed that the guidelines enunciated in<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;K.S E.B v Levisha&#8221; (2007(6) SCC 792) have not been<\/p>\n<p>considered in determining the enhanced compensation<\/p>\n<p>payable towards the drawing of the overhead lines<\/p>\n<p>through    the    property    of   the    claimants.    The<\/p>\n<p>impugned order would show that after fixing the<\/p>\n<p>centage value of the property on the basis of a<\/p>\n<p>registered     document     at  Rs.1,31,000\/-(Rupees    One<\/p>\n<p>lakh    thirty    one    thousand    only),    the  learned<\/p>\n<p>District Judge proceeded to fix the area which is<\/p>\n<p>injuriously affected by drawing of the line and<\/p>\n<p>also   the    percent    at   which   such   land  suffered<\/p>\n<p>diminution in its value.        A reference is seen made<\/p>\n<p>to the commission report as to the proximity of the<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.Nos.190 AND 38 OF 2008  Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>land through which the line was drawn,       to a nereby<\/p>\n<p>road.     There is no more discussion in the order as<\/p>\n<p>to   the    importance     of  the   land  to close   by<\/p>\n<p>institutions, concerns and such other factors which<\/p>\n<p>are relevant in determining the potential value of<\/p>\n<p>the land and also assessing of its diminution on<\/p>\n<p>account of the overhead lines drawn.        In the above<\/p>\n<p>reported decision rendered by the apex court, it<\/p>\n<p>has been pointed out that the citus of the land,<\/p>\n<p>the distance between the high voltage electric line<\/p>\n<p>laid there over, the extent of the land thereof and<\/p>\n<p>whether the line was drawn over a small track of<\/p>\n<p>land or middle of the land and such other matters<\/p>\n<p>are relevant, from which, determinative steps have<\/p>\n<p>to be taken for assessment of the compensation<\/p>\n<p>payable.     Citus of the land and its proximity to<\/p>\n<p>public offices, educational institutions etc. may<\/p>\n<p>also be of much significance in determining its<\/p>\n<p>potential value and how far overhead lines drawn<\/p>\n<p>through that property will injuriously diminish its<\/p>\n<p>value.     Of course, the Board has a case that the<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.Nos.190 AND 38 OF 2008  Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>land at the time of drawing of line was water<\/p>\n<p>logged.    If that be so, that circumstance also has<\/p>\n<p>to be taken into account with such other relevant<\/p>\n<p>factors applicable for determining the          potential<\/p>\n<p>value of the land and, then, ascertaining of its<\/p>\n<p>diminution in value on account of the drawing of<\/p>\n<p>the    overhead     lines.       Since    the  principles<\/p>\n<p>applicable for determination of compensation have<\/p>\n<p>not   been    considered    by  the   court  below while<\/p>\n<p>passing     the    impugned    order,     it has   become<\/p>\n<p>imperative      and necessary to set aside the order<\/p>\n<p>and remit it for fresh disposal taking note of the<\/p>\n<p>decision rendered by the apex court referred to<\/p>\n<p>above.     Both sides will be given opportunity to<\/p>\n<p>lead further evidence, if sought for, to prove<\/p>\n<p>their respective case.       During the pendency of the<\/p>\n<p>revision, conditional stay of operation of the<\/p>\n<p>impugned Order was ordered directing the Board to<\/p>\n<p>deposit 25% of the enhanced compensation.           Such<\/p>\n<p>deposit being made the claimant was permitted to<\/p>\n<p>withdraw the sum.            Amount     so deposited and<\/p>\n<p>C.R.P.Nos.190 AND 38 OF 2008  Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>released to the claimant shall be given to credit<\/p>\n<p>to in the enhanced compensation by the court after<\/p>\n<p>redetermination of compensation, on remission of<\/p>\n<p>the case.     Bond already executed by the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>for release of the amount deposited as indicated<\/p>\n<p>above shall continue to be in force, and will be<\/p>\n<p>subject to the final orders to be passed in the<\/p>\n<p>petition.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>          4.     The court below is directed to give<\/p>\n<p>the petition top priority in hearing and dispose it<\/p>\n<p>as expeditiously as possible, at any rate before<\/p>\n<p>the closing of the courts for mid summer vacation.<\/p>\n<p>Petition is disposed as indicated above.<\/p>\n<p>                                             Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                                    S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN,<br \/>\n                                            JUDGE<br \/>\n                \/\/TRUE COPY\/\/<\/p>\n<p>                                        P.A TO JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>vdv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court M.Nandakumar vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 14 October, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRP.No. 190 of 2008() 1. M.NANDAKUMAR, MITTATHULLIL HOUSE, &#8230; Petitioner 2. M.VIJAYAKUMAR, MITTATHULLIL HOUSE, 3. M.SREEKUMAR, MITTATHULLIL HOUSE, 4. RAJAKUMAR @ RAJAGOPALAN, Vs 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, &#8230; Respondent 2. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-193806","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M.Nandakumar vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 14 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M.Nandakumar vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 14 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-24T14:37:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M.Nandakumar vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 14 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-24T14:37:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1260,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009\",\"name\":\"M.Nandakumar vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 14 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-24T14:37:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M.Nandakumar vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 14 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M.Nandakumar vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 14 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M.Nandakumar vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 14 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-24T14:37:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M.Nandakumar vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 14 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-24T14:37:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009"},"wordCount":1260,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009","name":"M.Nandakumar vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 14 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-24T14:37:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-nandakumar-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-14-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M.Nandakumar vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 14 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193806","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=193806"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193806\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=193806"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=193806"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=193806"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}