{"id":19385,"date":"2008-09-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008"},"modified":"2016-11-28T07:23:04","modified_gmt":"2016-11-28T01:53:04","slug":"kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Kalatmak Residency Owners … vs The Tribunal For Local Self … on 5 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Kalatmak Residency Owners … vs The Tribunal For Local Self … on 5 September, 2008<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 26999 of 2008(L)\n\n\n1. KALATMAK RESIDENCY OWNERS ASSOCIATION,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. SATISH MURTHI, AGED 44 YEARS,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. MATHER & MATHER (P) LTD., MATHER\n\n3. M\/S.EMPIRE BUILDERS, LALAN TOWER,\n\n4. MR.B.V.PAUL, 6A, DEFENSE COLONY,\n\n5. MRS.LOVELY PAUL, W\/O.B.V.PAUL, 6A,\n\n6. SECRETARY, CORPORATION OF KOCHI,\n\n7. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE\n\n8. THE AIR AND WATER APPELLATE AUTHORITY,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.SREEKUMAR\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC\n\n Dated :05\/09\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                     ANTONY DOMINIC, J\n\n    -----------------------------------------------------------\n                    W.P.(C).No.26999\/2008\n    -----------------------------------------------------------\n         Dated this the 5th   day of September, 2008\n\n\n                           JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
     Ext.P2 is a building permit that was obtained by<\/p>\n
respondents 4 and 5 in respect of a plot of land which<\/p>\n
belonged to them. It would appear from the pleadings that,<\/p>\n
in 2006 respondents 2 and 3 purchased the land, in respect<\/p>\n
of which the permit was granted. Thereupon, they applied<\/p>\n
to the 6th respondent for transfer of Ext.P2 permit in their<\/p>\n
favour and that was rejected by the 6th respondent as per<\/p>\n
Ext.P1 order and following that a stop memo was also<\/p>\n
issued to respondents 2 and 3. This led to the filing of the<\/p>\n
two writ petitions before this court as WP(c).No.12567\/2007<\/p>\n
by the petitioners to get the work stopped in pursuance to<\/p>\n
the  stop    memo      and    WP(c).No.20983\/2007         by   the<\/p>\n
respondents 2 and 3 for quashing Ext.P1 order passed by<\/p>\n
 WP(c).No.26999\/08                 2<\/span><\/p>\n
the 6th respondent. Interim orders were also passed in these<\/p>\n
two cases. In WP(c).No.12567\/2007, an order dated<\/p>\n
13.4.2007 was passed permitting respondents 2 and 3 to<\/p>\n
complete the work to the permissible level and in WP(c).<\/p>\n
No.20983\/07, Ext.P4 order was passed, staying Ext.P1 and<\/p>\n
also directing that the Ext.P3     representation filed by the<\/p>\n
petitioners for revocation of the permit be considered.<\/p>\n
     2. In pursuance to Ext.P4, Ext.P5 order was passed by<\/p>\n
the 6th respondent, revoking the permit and also rejecting<\/p>\n
the application made by respondents 2 and 3 for transfer of<\/p>\n
the permit. Against Ext.P5, WP(c).No.30204\/2007 was filed<\/p>\n
by respondents 2 and 3, in which, again, Ext.P6 interim<\/p>\n
order permitting them to do the interior work in relation to<\/p>\n
the building, which was already constructed, was passed.<\/p>\n
Finally, the aforesaid three cases were disposed of by Ext.P7<\/p>\n
judgment, leaving it open to respondents 2 and 3 to file an<\/p>\n
appeal     before  the   first respondent    against   Ext.P5.<\/p>\n
Accordingly respondents 2 and 3 filed appeal No.129\/2008<\/p>\n
and that resulted in Ext.P8 order of the Tribunal, which is<\/p>\n
under challenge in this writ petition.\n<\/p>\n
 WP(c).No.26999\/08               3<\/span><\/p>\n
      3. A reading of Ext.P8 shows that the Tribunal was<\/p>\n
impressed by the contention of respondents 2 and 3 that<\/p>\n
the revocation effected by Ext.P5 was without following the<\/p>\n
procedure laid down in Rule 16 of the Kerala Municipality<\/p>\n
Building Rules and therefore set aside Ext.P5, the impugned<\/p>\n
order, with liberty to the Secretary of the Corporation to<\/p>\n
initiate appropriate proceedings under Rule 16 of the Kerala<\/p>\n
Municipality Rules “if there are any reasons for doing so”<\/p>\n
and with a direction to the Secretary to pass appropriate<\/p>\n
orders afresh on the applications submitted by the<\/p>\n
respondents 2 and 3 for transfer of the permit as well. The<\/p>\n
Tribunal passed such a composite order for the reason that<\/p>\n
it was consequent on the revocation of the permit that the<\/p>\n
application made by respondents 2 and 3 for transfer of the<\/p>\n
permit was rejected.\n<\/p>\n
      4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that<\/p>\n
their only concern is regarding the observation in Ext.P8<\/p>\n
that fresh notice be issued, ”if there are any reasons for<\/p>\n
doing so”. According to the counsel, this has the effect of<\/p>\n
depriving the Secretary of the freedom to take fresh action,<\/p>\n
 WP(c).No.26999\/08                 4<\/span><\/p>\n
which he is otherwise entitled. In my view, the aforesaid<\/p>\n
observation of the Tribunal is inconsequential and even in<\/p>\n
spite of it, if the secretary is satisfied that there are good<\/p>\n
and substantial reasons, it is always open to the Secretary<\/p>\n
to take action in the manner provided in the Rules.<\/p>\n
Therefore, the apprehension is baseless. Having considered<\/p>\n
the aforesaid submission      and also having gone through<\/p>\n
Ext.P8 order rendered by the first respondent Tribunal, I see<\/p>\n
absolutely no justification for entertaining this writ petition.<\/p>\n
     Writ Petition fails and is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                ANTONY DOMINIC
\n                                     JUDGE<\/p>\n
vi.\n<\/p>\n
WP(c).No.26999\/08    5<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Kalatmak Residency Owners … vs The Tribunal For Local Self … on 5 September, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 26999 of 2008(L) 1. KALATMAK RESIDENCY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, … Petitioner 2. SATISH MURTHI, AGED 44 YEARS, Vs 1. THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT … Respondent 2. MATHER […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19385","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nKalatmak Residency Owners ... vs The Tribunal For Local Self ... on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kalatmak Residency Owners ... vs The Tribunal For Local Self ... on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-28T01:53:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kalatmak Residency Owners … vs The Tribunal For Local Self … on 5 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-28T01:53:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":633,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Kalatmak Residency Owners ... vs The Tribunal For Local Self ... on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-28T01:53:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kalatmak Residency Owners … vs The Tribunal For Local Self … on 5 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kalatmak Residency Owners ... vs The Tribunal For Local Self ... on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kalatmak Residency Owners ... vs The Tribunal For Local Self ... on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-28T01:53:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kalatmak Residency Owners … vs The Tribunal For Local Self … on 5 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-28T01:53:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008"},"wordCount":633,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008","name":"Kalatmak Residency Owners ... vs The Tribunal For Local Self ... on 5 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-28T01:53:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kalatmak-residency-owners-vs-the-tribunal-for-local-self-on-5-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kalatmak Residency Owners … vs The Tribunal For Local Self … on 5 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19385","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19385"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19385\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19385"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19385"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19385"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}