{"id":193931,"date":"2011-05-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011"},"modified":"2015-04-19T06:00:42","modified_gmt":"2015-04-19T00:30:42","slug":"ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011","title":{"rendered":"Ms.Suahma Sharma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ms.Suahma Sharma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                           \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0at\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0                                              \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0       \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0New\u00a0\n                                                  Delhi\n                                                                                           File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000594\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing        :\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a024,\u00a02011\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a024,\u00a02011\n\n\n\n\nParties:\n\n\n       Appellant\u00a0\n\n\n       Ms.\u00a0Sushma\u00a0\u00a0Sharma\u00a0                                                                                           C\/o\u00a0Sri\u00a0\nBaldeo\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0                                                                                   \u00a0         Vill\u00adSitapur,\u00a0\nPobagnan,\u00a0                                                                 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0          Distt\u00adHowrah,\u00a0\n                                                  \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0   West\u00a0Bengal.\n\n       Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0alongwith\u00a0one\u00a0Sh.\u00a0Rajendra\u00a0Sharma\u00a0\n\n\n\n\n       Respondent\n\n\n       South\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railways,\u00a0\n\n       11\u00a0Garden\u00a0Reach\u00a0Road,\n\n       Kolkata\n\n\n\n\n       Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Mr.\u00a0B\u00a0N\u00a0Soren,\u00a0through\u00a0Video\u00a0Conference\n\n                       Information\u00a0Commissioner               :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n\n_______________________________________________________________\n\n                                             Decision\u00a0Notice\n As\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision\n\n\n\n\n        \u00a0\n\n\n\n\n     \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                       at\n                                                   \u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\n\n\n                                                                                        File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000594\n\n                                                        ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>1.      The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0request\u00a0dated\u00a027.07.2009\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0South\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0Xerox\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        copy\u00a0of\u00a0notesheet\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0competent\u00a0authority\u00a0alongwith\u00a0detail\u00a0history\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0as\u00a0intimated\u00a0vide\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Sr.\u00a0Personnel\u00a0Officer\u00a0(IR)&#8217;s\u00a0letter\u00a0No.\u00a0P\/Comp\/HQ\/SS\/L\/50\u00a0dated\u00a004.02.2005\u00a0and\u00a0any\u00a0payment\u00a0if\u00a0due\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Railways\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant&#8217;s\u00a0deceased\u00a0mother\u00a0(Mrs.\u00a0Sumitra\u00a0Sharma)\u00a0who\u00a0was\u00a0employed\u00a0as\u00a0a\u00a0casual\u00a0worker\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        with\u00a0the\u00a0Railways\u00a0till\u00a0her\u00a0demise.\u00a0The\u00a0APIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a029.07.2009\u00a0acknowledging\u00a0the\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant&#8217;s\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        letter\u00a0and\u00a0informing\u00a0her\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0application\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0forwarded\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0departments\u00a0for\u00a0furnishing\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        the\u00a0requisite\u00a0information.\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0the\u00a0First\u00a0Appeal\u00a0on\u00a002.02.2010\u00a0being\u00a0dissatisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        the\u00a0APIO.\u00a0Consequently,\u00a0a\u00a0Second\u00a0appeal\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a012.01.2011\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        seeking\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0information.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nDecision:\n<\/p>\n<p>2.      During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0she\u00a0is\u00a0concerned\u00a0only\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0dues,\u00a0if\u00a0any,\u00a0pending\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Railways\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0account\u00a0of\u00a0her\u00a0mother\u00a0who\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0employed\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Railways\u00a0 \u00a0when\u00a0she\u00a0expired.\u00a0The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Appellant\u00a0contended\u00a0that\u00a0her\u00a0mother\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Sumitra\u00a0Sharma\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0regularised\u00a0before\u00a0her\u00a0death.\u00a0In\u00a0support\u00a0<br \/>\n           of\u00a0her\u00a0contention\u00a0she\u00a0produced\u00a0a\u00a0list\u00a0of\u00a0candidates\u00a0who\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0selected\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0post\u00a0of\u00a0Class\u00a0IV\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          name\u00a0of\u00a0her\u00a0mother\u00a0included\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0list.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0explained\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant&#8217;s\u00a0mother\u00a0was\u00a0a\u00a0casual\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          labourer\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0she\u00a0was\u00a0screened\u00a0for\u00a0regularization\u00a0of\u00a0her\u00a0service\u00a0and\u00a0had\u00a0passed\u00a0the\u00a0test.\u00a0But\u00a0before\u00a0she\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          could\u00a0be\u00a0issued\u00a0the\u00a0regularization\u00a0order\u00a0she\u00a0expired.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0pointed\u00a0out\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had\u00a0approached\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          Supreme\u00a0Court\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0matter\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Supreme\u00a0Court\u00a0had\u00a0turned\u00a0down\u00a0her\u00a0petition.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          further\u00a0stated\u00a0\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0notesheets\u00a0being\u00a0sought\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0in\u00a0her\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          furnished\u00a0 to\u00a0 her\u00a0 by\u00a0 the\u00a0 APIO.\u00a0 \u00a0 The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0further\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0 \u00a0a\u00a0reply\u00a0had\u00a0also\u00a0been\u00a0furnished\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          15.03.2011\u00a0wherein\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0clarified\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0were\u00a0no\u00a0dues\u00a0pending\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Railways\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant&#8217;s\u00a0deceased\u00a0mother\u00a0had\u00a0not\u00a0declared\u00a0as\u00a0regularised.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.        The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0asked\u00a0for\u00a0any\u00a0further\u00a0information\u00a0apart\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0photo\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0notesheets\u00a0which\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          have\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0on\u00a024.08.2009.\u00a0This\u00a0information,\u00a0as\u00a0\u00a0submitted\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents,\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0furnished\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4.        Since\u00a0the\u00a0issue\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0case\u00a0has\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0conclusively\u00a0decided\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Supreme\u00a0Court\u00a0holding\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          Appellant&#8217;s \u00a0 mother \u00a0 was \u00a0 not \u00a0 a \u00a0 regularised \u00a0 employee \u00a0 and \u00a0 since \u00a0 the \u00a0 information \u00a0 sought \u00a0 has \u00a0 already \u00a0 been\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>          provided,\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0decides\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0as\u00a0closed.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>5.        This\u00a0Appeal\u00a0is\u00a0accordingly\u00a0disposed\u00a0of.\u00a0<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n\n                                                                                                                                   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n\n\n\n        \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)\n                                                            \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\u00a0(G.Subramanian)                                                                                                     \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Deputy\u00a0\n   Registrar\n\nCc:\n\n1.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Ms.\u00a0Sushma\u00a0\u00a0Sharma\u00a0                                                                                                   C\/o\u00a0Sri\u00a0\nBaldeo\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0                                                                                              \u00a0        Vill\u00adSitapur,\u00a0\nPobagnan,\u00a0                                                                               \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0       Distt\u00adHowrah,\u00a0\n                                                                \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0   West\u00a0Bengal.\n 2.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0A\u00a0K\u00a0Halder,\u00a0APIO\n\n        South\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railways,\u00a0\n\n        11\u00a0Garden\u00a0Reach\u00a0Road,\n\n        Kolkata\n\n\n\n\n3.      Appellate\u00a0Authority\n\n        South\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railways,\n\n        Garden\u00a0Reach,\u00a0\n\n        Kolkata\n\n\n\n\n4.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Officer\u00a0in\u00a0Charge,\u00a0NIC\u00a0\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Ms.Suahma Sharma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2011 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0at\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0New\u00a0 Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000594 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a024,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0May\u00a024,\u00a02011 Parties: Appellant\u00a0 Ms.\u00a0Sushma\u00a0\u00a0Sharma\u00a0 C\/o\u00a0Sri\u00a0 Baldeo\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0 \u00a0 Vill\u00adSitapur,\u00a0 Pobagnan,\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Distt\u00adHowrah,\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 West\u00a0Bengal. Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0alongwith\u00a0one\u00a0Sh.\u00a0Rajendra\u00a0Sharma\u00a0 Respondent South\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railways,\u00a0 11\u00a0Garden\u00a0Reach\u00a0Road, Kolkata Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Mr.\u00a0B\u00a0N\u00a0Soren,\u00a0through\u00a0Video\u00a0Conference Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit _______________________________________________________________ Decision\u00a0Notice As\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at \u00a0New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000594 ORDER Background: 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0request\u00a0dated\u00a027.07.2009\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0South\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0Xerox\u00a0 copy\u00a0of\u00a0notesheet\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0competent\u00a0authority\u00a0alongwith\u00a0detail\u00a0history\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0as\u00a0intimated\u00a0vide\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-193931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ms.Suahma Sharma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ms.Suahma Sharma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-05-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-04-19T00:30:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ms.Suahma Sharma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-19T00:30:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011\"},\"wordCount\":455,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011\",\"name\":\"Ms.Suahma Sharma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-19T00:30:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ms.Suahma Sharma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ms.Suahma Sharma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ms.Suahma Sharma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-05-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-04-19T00:30:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ms.Suahma Sharma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2011","datePublished":"2011-05-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-19T00:30:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011"},"wordCount":455,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011","name":"Ms.Suahma Sharma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-05-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-19T00:30:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-suahma-sharma-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-may-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ms.Suahma Sharma vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 May, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=193931"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/193931\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=193931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=193931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=193931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}