{"id":194192,"date":"2010-07-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010"},"modified":"2016-10-25T21:37:43","modified_gmt":"2016-10-25T16:07:43","slug":"mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Narender Prasadyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Narender Prasadyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 July, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                             Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n\n                                                                                           CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000823\n                                                                                                     Dated\u00a0July\u00a030,\u00a02010\n\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant                                    :    Shri\u00a0Narendra\u00a0Prasad\u00a0Yadav\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority                             :    DRM\u00a0Office\n                                                              East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Sonepur\n\n\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p>        1.        The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 an \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 application \u00a0 dt.17.9.09 \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 PIO, \u00a0 DRM \u00a0 Office, \u00a0 Sonepur\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        requesting \u00a0 for \u00a0 the \u00a0 following \u00a0 information\u00a0 with\u00a0 regard\u00a0 to \u00a0 CIC \u00a0 Order \u00a0 No.CIC\/OK\/A\/2009\/000049\u00adAD\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        dt.3.8.09.\n<\/p>\n<p>        i)        Is\u00a0it\u00a0correct\u00a0that\u00a0an\u00a0option\u00a0was\u00a0invited\u00a0vide\u00a0G\/Suchhna\u00a0dt.8.3.02\u00a0signed\u00a0by\u00a0Shri\u00a0Gun\u00a0Sagar \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        singh,\u00a0DPO\u00a0on\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0DRM(P),\u00a0Sonepur\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0post\u00a0of\u00a0point\u00a0man\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0scale\u00a0Rs.2650\u00ad4000\u00a0fixing \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        last\u00a0date\u00a0as\u00a026.3.2002.\n<\/p>\n<p>        ii)       Is\u00a0it\u00a0also\u00a0correct\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0letter\u00a0i.e\u00a0G\/Suchhna\u00a0dt.8.3.02\u00a0contained\u00a0a\u00a0format\u00a0having \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        serial\u00a0number\u00a01\u00a0to\u00a011.\n<\/p>\n<p>        iii)      Is\u00a0it\u00a0true\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0filled\u00a0the\u00a0columns\u00a0of\u00a0option\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0i.e\u00a0G\/Suchhna\u00a0dt.8.3.02\u00a0itself \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        whereon\u00a0signature\u00a0of\u00a0Shri\u00a0Gun\u00a0Sagar\u00a0Singh\u00a0was\u00a0there.<\/p>\n<p>        iv)       Once \u00a0 he \u00a0 had \u00a0 used \u00a0 the \u00a0 copy\u00a0 of \u00a0 letter \u00a0 G\/suchhna\u00a0 dt.8.3.02 \u00a0 for \u00a0 exercising\u00a0 option\u00a0 was\u00a0 it \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        possible\u00a0for\u00a0him\u00a0or\u00a0for\u00a0anybody\u00a0to\u00a0exercise\u00a0the\u00a0option\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0letter\u00a0on\u00a025.2.02<\/p>\n<p>                                                             (OR)<\/p>\n<p>        Once\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0G\/Suchhna\u00a0dt.8.3.02\u00a0was\u00a0signed\u00a0on\u00a08.3.02,\u00a0how\u00a0was\u00a0it\u00a0possible\u00a0to\u00a0use\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0letter \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        on\u00a025.2.02.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>        v)        Did\u00a0you\u00a0depose\u00a0white\/plain\u00a0lie\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Hon&#8217;ble\u00a0CIC,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0on\u00a03.8.09\u00a0that\u00a0applicant \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        had\u00a0opted\u00a0on\u00a025.2.02\u00a0i.e.\u00a0before\u00a0letter\u00a0of\u00a0invitation\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0option.<\/p>\n<p>        vi)       He\u00a0had\u00a0never\u00a0submitted\u00a0any\u00a0hand\u00a0written\u00a0option\u00a0dt.26.2.03\u00a0but\u00a0according\u00a0to\u00a0para\u00a05\u00a0of\u00a0the \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        referred\u00a0order\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commission,\u00a0respondent\u00a0had\u00a0deposed\u00a0that\u00a0applicant\u00a0submitted\u00a0option\u00a0in\u00a0hand \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        written\u00a0letter.\u00a0\u00a0A\u00a0certified\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0that\u00a0letter\u00a0and\u00a0permission\u00a0to\u00a0inspect\u00a0the\u00a0original\u00a0of\u00a0that.<br \/>\n        On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0reply,\u00a0he\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.15.10.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0reiterating\u00a0his \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       request\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0information.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Shri\u00a0Chetram,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a024.12.09\u00a0inviting\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0to\u00a0inspect\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       31.12.09. \u00a0 The \u00a0 Applicant, \u00a0 however \u00a0 filed \u00a0 a \u00a0 second \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 dt.31.3.10 \u00a0 before \u00a0 CIC \u00a0 stating \u00a0 that \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Appellate\u00a0Authority&#8217;s\u00a0letter\u00a0inviting\u00a0him\u00a0for\u00a0inspection\u00a0\u00a0on\u00a031.12.09\u00a0was\u00a0sent\u00a0by\u00a0speed\u00a0post\u00a0on\u00a021.1.10\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       and\u00a0was\u00a0received\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0on\u00a024.1.10.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0sought\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0relief\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Commission:<\/p>\n<p>       i)        The\u00a0PIO\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0produce\u00a0the\u00a0very\u00a0document\u00a0as\u00a0mentioned\u00a0in\u00a0Para\u00a06\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       application\u00a0as\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0pleaded\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0about\u00a0option\u00a0dt.26.2.03.<\/p>\n<p>       ii)       A\u00a0penalty\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.250\/\u00ad\u00a0per\u00a0day\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0imposed\u00a0on\u00a0PIO\u00a0u\/s\u00a020(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act.<\/p>\n<p>       iii)      The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0be\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0compensate\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0loss\u00a0or\u00a0detriment\u00a0suffered\u00a0due\u00a0to\u00a0false \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       statement\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0authorities.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>2.     The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0scheduled\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0\u00a0for\u00a0July\u00a030,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       2010.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.     Shri\u00a0M.K.Gupta,\u00a0Sr.DPO\u00a0&amp;\u00a0PIOrepresented\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority.<\/p>\n<p>4.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.\u00a0He\u00a0arrived\u00a0after\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0left.\u00a0His\u00a0arrival\u00a0was\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       delayed\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0late\u00a0running\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0train.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>\nDecision<\/p>\n<p>5.     Shri\u00a0M.K.Gupta,\u00a0Respondent\u00a0PIO\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0received\u00a0on\u00a025.9.09\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       point\u00a0 wise\u00a0 reply\u00a0 was\u00a0 provided\u00a0 by\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0on\u00a011.11.09.\u00a0 \u00a0He\u00a0further\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a026.2.03\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       mentioned\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0CIC\u00a0Decision\u00a0No.\u00a0CIC\/OK\/A\/2009\/000049\u00adAD \u00a0dated\u00a03.8.09,\u00a0regarding\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Appellant\u00a0had\u00a0sought\u00a0clarification,\u00a0\u00a0was\u00a0wrongly\u00a0\u00a0reported\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0\u00a0it\u00a0should\u00a0have\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       been\u00a0 \u00a026.2.02\u00a0 \u00a0instead\u00a0of\u00a026.2.03.\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0M.K.Gupta\u00a0further\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0option\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       from\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0shows\u00a0the\u00a0reciever&#8217;s\u00a0signature\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a025.2.02\u00a0whereas\u00a0the\u00a0option\u00a0itself\u00a0was\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       floated\u00a011\u00a0days\u00a0later\u00a0thus\u00a0raising\u00a0questions\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0veracity\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0date.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0who\u00a0\u00a0arrived\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       late\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0\u00a0after\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0left\u00a0\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a025.2.02\u00a0was\u00a0marked\u00a0wrong\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       by\u00a0the\u00a0receiver\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0option\u00a0who\u00a0was\u00a0drunk\u00a0at\u00a0that\u00a0time\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0option\u00a0was\u00a0handed\u00a0over\u00a0after\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       notification.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0brought\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0attention\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0the\u00a0signatures\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0Station\u00a0Master\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       and\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0option\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0ie.\u00a0 \u00a020.3.02\u00a0as\u00a0also\u00a0that\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0DPO\u00a0ie.\u00a08.3.02,\u00a0both\u00a0<br \/>\n                existing\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0option\u00a0letter.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Commission\u00a0noted\u00a0at\u00a0this\u00a0stage\u00a0that\u00a0these\u00a0signatures\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>               dates\u00a0were\u00a0\u00a0not\u00a0brought\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0attention\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commissioner\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>6.             After\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0of\u00a0both\u00a0sides\u00a0and\u00a0 \u00a0noting\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0signatures\u00a0and\u00a0dates\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     Station \u00a0 master \u00a0 and \u00a0 the \u00a0 DPO \u00a0 did \u00a0 indeed \u00a0 exist \u00a0 on \u00a0 the \u00a0 \u00a0 option \u00a0 form \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant. \u00a0 The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     Commission,\u00a0\u00a0u\/s\u00a018(2)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act,\u00a0\u00a0directs\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0to\u00a0conduct\u00a0an\u00a0enquiry\u00a0into\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     related\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0option\u00a0form\u00a0claimed\u00a0to\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0submitted\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0on\u00a0time,\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0take\u00a0appropriate\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     action\u00a0based\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0outcome\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0enquiry.\u00a0Copies\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0enquiry\u00a0report\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0information\u00a0on\u00a0action\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     taken\u00a0on\u00a0it\u00a0 \u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0 \u00a0as\u00a0well\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a015\u00a0September,\u00a02010.\u00a0The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0submit\u00a0a\u00a0\u00a0compliance\u00a0report\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a030\u00a0September,\u00a02010.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>7.             The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                              \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                                      Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\n     Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy:\n<\/p>\n<p>     (G.Subramanian)<br \/>\n     Deputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>     Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>     1.        Shri\u00a0Narendra\u00a0Prasad\u00a0Yadav<br \/>\n               Gateman,\u00a0Kurhni<br \/>\n               Vill\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0Chot\u00a0Jhawa<br \/>\n               PO\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0Jhawa\u00a0(Naraw)<br \/>\n               Saran<\/p>\n<p>     2.        The\u00a0PIO<br \/>\n               East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n               Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office<br \/>\n               Sonepur\u00a0Division<br \/>\n               Sonepur<\/p>\n<p>     3.        The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n               East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n               Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office<br \/>\n               Sonepur\u00a0Division<br \/>\n               Sonepur<\/p>\n<p>     4.        Officer\u00a0incharge,\u00a0NIC\n  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Narender Prasadyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 July, 2010 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000823 Dated\u00a0July\u00a030,\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant : Shri\u00a0Narendra\u00a0Prasad\u00a0Yadav Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority : DRM\u00a0Office East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Sonepur Background 1. The \u00a0 Applicant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 an \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 application \u00a0 dt.17.9.09 \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 PIO, \u00a0 DRM \u00a0 Office, \u00a0 Sonepur\u00a0 requesting \u00a0 for \u00a0 the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-194192","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Narender Prasadyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Narender Prasadyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-25T16:07:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Narender Prasadyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-25T16:07:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010\"},\"wordCount\":850,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.Narender Prasadyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-25T16:07:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Narender Prasadyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Narender Prasadyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Narender Prasadyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-07-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-25T16:07:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Narender Prasadyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-07-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-25T16:07:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010"},"wordCount":850,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010","name":"Mr.Narender Prasadyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-25T16:07:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-narender-prasadyadav-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-july-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Narender Prasadyadav vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194192","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=194192"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194192\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=194192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=194192"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=194192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}