{"id":195105,"date":"2008-10-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008"},"modified":"2019-03-29T01:31:47","modified_gmt":"2019-03-28T20:01:47","slug":"kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Kapil Deo Sinha vs Kirandeo Prasad &amp; Anr on 17 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Supreme Court of India<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Kapil Deo Sinha vs Kirandeo Prasad &amp; Anr on 17 October, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: . A Pasayat<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: Arijit Pasayat, Mukundakam Sharma<\/div>\n<pre>                                                                       REPORTABLE\n\n\n\n                  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA\n\n               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION\n\n                  CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1112 OF 2003\n\n\n\n\nKapil Deo Sinha                             ....... Appellant\n\n\n                                  Versus\n\n\nKirandeo Prasad &amp; Anr.               ....... Respondents\n\n\n\n\n                             JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>1.    Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the<\/p>\n<p>Patna High Court directing acquittal of the respondent No.1 (hereinafter<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                        1<\/span><br \/>\n referred to as the `accused&#8217;). Appellant was the informant in the case. Six<\/p>\n<p> accused persons faced trial and learned Sessions Judge, Nalanda, directed<\/p>\n<p> acquittal of five of the accused persons, while holding the respondent No.1<\/p>\n<p> guilty of offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code,<\/p>\n<p> 1860 (in short the `IPC&#8217;). He was sentenced to imprisonment for life. In<\/p>\n<p> appeal, High Court set aside the conviction.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>2.     Prosecution case in a nutshell is as follows:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       In the evening of 25.3.1978 at about 6 P.M. the informant Kapildeo<\/p>\n<p> Singh (PW 6) alongwith his uncle Sukhu Mahton (hereinafter referred to as<\/p>\n<p> the `deceased&#8217;), Somar Mahton (PW 5) and father Ramji Prasad (PW 7)<\/p>\n<p> were sitting in the Dalan and were talking about the rent matter. In the<\/p>\n<p> mean time the respondent no.1 Kirandeo Prasad with gun, the accused<\/p>\n<p> Akhilesh Prasad with Saif and rest four accused persons namely, Nandu<\/p>\n<p> Prasad, Mathura Prasad, Bhagwat Prasad and Umesh Prasad with lathi came<\/p>\n<p> there and started exchanging hot words with Sukhu Mahton. On protest the<\/p>\n<p> respondent no.1-Kirandeo Prasad fired from his gun at Sukhu Mahton<\/p>\n<p> which hit in the right side of his chest and he fell down. The accused<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                        2<\/span><br \/>\nAkhilesh Prasad assaulted Sukhu Mahton with Saif on his head. The<\/p>\n<p>accused Bhagwat Prasad assaulted the informant, Kapildeo Sinha (PW 6)<\/p>\n<p>with Saif on his head and Umesh Prasad with lathi on his right hand. The<\/p>\n<p>accused Mathura Prasad also assaulted the informant on his right shoulder<\/p>\n<p>and the accused Akhilesh Prasad assaulted his uncle Somar Mahton from<\/p>\n<p>the lathi portion of the Saif which caused injury on his both hands. On<\/p>\n<p>hearing their cries the co-villagers including Rajendra Mahton (PW 2)<\/p>\n<p>arrived there and he was also assaulted by the co-accused, Nandu. The<\/p>\n<p>injured Sukhu Mahton died of fire arm injury at the spot.<\/p>\n<p>      The motive behind the occurrence has been alleged to be the non-<\/p>\n<p>participation of the prosecution party at the dinner organised by the<\/p>\n<p>respondent-Kirandeo Prasad on the occasion of Satya Narain Puja, 10\/12<\/p>\n<p>days prior to the occurrence and the respondent had threatened him with<\/p>\n<p>dire consequences.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       The deceased Sukhu Mahton was taken to Islampur Police Station<\/p>\n<p>under Nalanda at Biharsharif District. The informant, Kapildeo Sinha (PW<\/p>\n<p>6) put law in motion and on the basis of his statement a formal F.I.R. was<\/p>\n<p>drawn up by the police and the case under Sections 147\/148\/149\/302\/324<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                      3<\/span><br \/>\nIPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1927 (in short the `Arms Act) was<\/p>\n<p>instituted against the respondent no.1 and five other accused persons. The<\/p>\n<p>Investigating Officer switched over to investigation and ultimately<\/p>\n<p>chargesheeted all the six accused persons for trial and they were tried by the<\/p>\n<p>learned Sessions Judge, Nalanda at Biharshariff.<\/p>\n<p>      At trial the prosecution examined seven witnesses and the defence<\/p>\n<p>examined none.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      The accused persons pleaded their innocence and false implication<\/p>\n<p>out of enmity.\n<\/p>\n<p>      On consideration of the prosecution evidence and other materials on<\/p>\n<p>record, the trial Judge convicted and sentenced the respondent no.1-<\/p>\n<p>Kirandeo Prasad as indicated above. However, he acquitted the rest of the<\/p>\n<p>five accused persons of the charges framed against them. Hence appeal was<\/p>\n<p>filed by Kirandeo Prasad.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      Before the High Court the respondent No.1 pointed out that the police<\/p>\n<p>officer who made investigation of the case was not examined in the trial<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                          4<\/span><br \/>\ncourt causing serious prejudice to him. The doctor who conducted autopsy<\/p>\n<p>over the dead body of the deceased was also not examined.<\/p>\n<p>      The High Court found that seven witnesses were examined to further<\/p>\n<p>the prosecution version. Although PW 1 was the son of the deceased, PW<\/p>\n<p>2 was the injured witness, PW 6 the present appellant was the informant,<\/p>\n<p>PWs. 5, 6 &amp;7 i.e. Somar Mahton, Kapildeo Sinha and Ramji Prasad @<\/p>\n<p>Rama respectively were stated to be eye witnesses to the occurrence. PW 1<\/p>\n<p>the son of the deceased stated that they were singing Holi songs. PW 1 also<\/p>\n<p>stated that due to darkness they could not know as to who was the assailant.<\/p>\n<p>PWs 5, 6 &amp; 7 stated contrary to what PW 1 had stated and stated that they<\/p>\n<p>were not participating in Holi because of the death of the deceased. The<\/p>\n<p>High Court found this to be improbable because death of the deceased by<\/p>\n<p>the attacks took place in the evening. The High Court was of the view that<\/p>\n<p>non-examination of the Investigating Officer (in short the `I.O.&#8217;) and the<\/p>\n<p>Doctor without any explanation being offered by the prosecution and the<\/p>\n<p>aforesaid unreliability of the evidence of PWs 5, 6 &amp; 7 was sufficient to<\/p>\n<p>discard the prosecution version.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                        5<\/span><br \/>\n      The informant-appellant submitted that merely because the I.O. and<\/p>\n<p>the Doctor had not been examined, that cannot be a ground to discard the<\/p>\n<p>prosecution version. Further the Holi celebration by singing of songs was<\/p>\n<p>continuing since morning till late night, therefore, there was nothing<\/p>\n<p>unreliable in the evidence of PWs 5, 6 &amp; 7.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.    Learned counsel for the accused-respondent supported the judgment<\/p>\n<p>of the High Court.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4.    In the instant case it is noticed that neither the I.O. nor the Doctor<\/p>\n<p>have been examined. No reason has been indicated as to why they were not<\/p>\n<p>examined. Added to that, the evidence of PW 1 assumes significance. He<\/p>\n<p>has clearly stated that the accused respondent No. 1 was not there when the<\/p>\n<p>alleged incident took place. Further as rightly noted by the High Court,<\/p>\n<p>PWs. 5, 6 &amp; 7 stated that because of the sad demise of deceased they were<\/p>\n<p>not celebrating Holi and were not singing Holi songs from the morning.<\/p>\n<p>Prosecution version itself is that the attacks took place in the evening and,<\/p>\n<p>therefore, the family member could not have anticipated that in the evening<\/p>\n<p>there will be an attack and loss of life and therefore they would not<\/p>\n<p>celebrate Holi. These factors have not been taken note of by the High Court<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                         6<\/span><br \/>\nto direct the acquittal. We find no infirmity in the conclusions arrived at by<\/p>\n<p>the High court to warrant interference.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>5.          Appeal is accordingly dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                               &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;&#8230;.J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                (Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT)<\/p>\n<p>                                                &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                               (Dr. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA)<br \/>\nNew Delhi;\n<\/p>\n<p>October 17, 2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                          7<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of India Kapil Deo Sinha vs Kirandeo Prasad &amp; Anr on 17 October, 2008 Author: . A Pasayat Bench: Arijit Pasayat, Mukundakam Sharma REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1112 OF 2003 Kapil Deo Sinha &#8230;&#8230;. Appellant Versus Kirandeo Prasad &amp; Anr. &#8230;&#8230;. Respondents JUDGMENT Dr. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-195105","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-supreme-court-of-india"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Kapil Deo Sinha vs Kirandeo Prasad &amp; Anr on 17 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kapil Deo Sinha vs Kirandeo Prasad &amp; Anr on 17 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-28T20:01:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kapil Deo Sinha vs Kirandeo Prasad &amp; Anr on 17 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-28T20:01:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1038,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Supreme Court of India\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Kapil Deo Sinha vs Kirandeo Prasad &amp; Anr on 17 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-28T20:01:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kapil Deo Sinha vs Kirandeo Prasad &amp; Anr on 17 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kapil Deo Sinha vs Kirandeo Prasad &amp; Anr on 17 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kapil Deo Sinha vs Kirandeo Prasad &amp; Anr on 17 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-28T20:01:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kapil Deo Sinha vs Kirandeo Prasad &amp; Anr on 17 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-28T20:01:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008"},"wordCount":1038,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Supreme Court of India"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008","name":"Kapil Deo Sinha vs Kirandeo Prasad &amp; Anr on 17 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-28T20:01:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kapil-deo-sinha-vs-kirandeo-prasad-anr-on-17-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kapil Deo Sinha vs Kirandeo Prasad &amp; Anr on 17 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195105","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=195105"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195105\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=195105"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=195105"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=195105"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}