{"id":195282,"date":"2009-01-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009"},"modified":"2017-09-21T12:54:22","modified_gmt":"2017-09-21T07:24:22","slug":"narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Narayana Swamy vs State Of Karnataka on 30 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Narayana Swamy vs State Of Karnataka on 30 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
.the compl\u00e9int ~ Ex.P.1, FER M<\/p>\n
“M\u00a7g;s\ufb01:\u00e9te \ufb02\ufb01d thereafter vi\ufb01ited the spot in the<\/p>\n
V”ma\ufb01a2ar”~ \u00a3x.P.2 and zecarded the statem\ufb01nts cf
\n‘y$#$ E2 and 3. It is thereafter that ?W.\u00a7<\/p>\n
V” x gbntinued the investigation an\ufb01 recor\u00e9ad the<\/p>\n
complainant referring to hi3 caste as:<\/p>\n
‘5 –<\u00e9'\u20ac %%-.E'5Jods3  m\ufb02z\u00e9i 55\u00e9rwe,s; \u00a7\u20ac53 535% g\u00e9mgy? wgeaa g\u00e9aim .9oc.i-::h::?
\ngb\u00e9w 255,39 \u00a7\u00e9_,2%\u00a7 5%; \u00e9iootab r\ufb02zg’\/\u00ab\ufb01g; i&:\u00bb\u00a2er\u00a2i%:s:% %
\n\u00e9pc\u00a7ex,&.u\u00a7=’i’_9e’&” .      ~<\/p>\n
beat him on the cheekg andw>havL\ufb01\u00a7 “;\u00a7k\u00e9hVn:h3
\nchappals in the hands to a\u00e9$au@\u20ac hi\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7%\u20ack\u00e9\u00a7w\u00a7i\u00ae’
\nwith the legs and the ihc;de\ufb01\u20ac_\u00aeas a%\u00a3@%\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9 \u00a7y
\nPWS. 2, 3 and others. %Ea%e\u00a7ft%E; \u00e9\ufb01ay assured
\nto settle the matt%f in fh\u00a7”\u00a7;\u00e9$enCe \u00a7f PW.6 on
\nthe Qext day” in t\u00a7\u00a7 A\u00aeO\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7\ufb01g,\ufb02\u00e9\u00a3Q %bout 10 a.m.<\/p>\n
But, though }@he  cQm\u00a7iai\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01t,w\ufb01aited for the<\/p>\n
3ettl\u00a2mentTj%\u00e9 k\u00a7:nQg c$m\u00a7 “tQ} settle the matter,
\nPW.l \u00a7he\ufb01Lap\u00a7\ufb015%#he\u00a7V\ufb01\u00a7\u00e9:\ufb01eiice station and filed
\nhis c0m\ufb01Z\u00a7;ntx Q\ufb01 Lth%$e facts, which \u00e9ame ta be
\nrgg\ufb02\ufb01\ufb01exed 5? \ufb01gig in Crime No.150\/9% and he sant<\/p>\n
x.P.7 to ihe<\/p>\n
E13<\/p>\n
pr\u00e9\ufb01en\u00a7\u00e9~ bf PW.? and athars, held the snet<\/p>\n
sbatements of other witnesses and secured the<\/p>\n
caate Certificata ~M EX.P.3 and after cempletion<\/p>\n
[>4<\/p>\n
‘”.Qf’ \u20ach@=w#i:n@sse\u00e9 “have 3upportedT the version Of<\/p>\n
‘t&\u00e9\u00bbpyg$e\u00a2m{;\u00a2\u00a7 with regard to the abuse 9f the<\/p>\n
47 “3@gord’~with regard to the injury sustaiaed by<\/p>\n
 ‘%N,1 and further ha centen\ufb02s that there are many<\/p>\n
Therefera, he submits th&t the judgement \ufb01ggz<\/p>\n
Aggriavsd by th@ conviciion and sentance the<\/p>\n
accused h&s approached this Cmurt in appeai. ,<\/p>\n
3. I have heard the iearaed. counsei2_rQr<\/p>\n
the appellant and also the l\u00a7arne\ufb01”u;Qgi;5*<\/p>\n
plaader.\n<\/p>\n
4. The point _that’*A\u00e9\u00a3ise \u00a7.fof   my’P<\/p>\n
consideration is:\n<\/p>\n
Whether t\ufb01e, ju\u00e9gm\u00e9mi and cider” cf
\ncanvictisn \u00e9f’Tthe_fapp\u00e9iiant_ for the<\/p>\n
0ff\u00a7n\u00a7e_p\u00a3hi$\u00a7\u00e9b1\u00e9”\u00a7fSV3(l}\u00a7X} of the<\/p>\n
A-::.-;:.[and”‘:\u00a7:;;:T;<:;\u00e9,~*,f-323and 5:35 of the 192<\/p>\n
y is ill\u00e9\u00e9al ahd_perverse?\n<\/p>\n
iJ”|<\/p>\n
.  g1:. i\u00a7_ the 7contention of th@ learned
\ncou\u00a7seL for th\u00e9 agpeiiant that except ?%.1 name<\/p>\n
\u00a3Ompiaihah{A?in vuigar language in referring ts<\/p>\n
his caS:e and that ther@ is HG material placed an<\/p>\n
discrepancies in the avi\ufb01ence of pw.:.<\/p>\n
~\u00bb..,,}<\/p>\n
even with regard ta the abuse by th\u00e9 accused
\nref\u00e9rriag ta the casta of the cemplainant M PW.1<\/p>\n
with an intentien to insuit him.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
8. 3% far as the Qvidegce Q5′ ?%.;’Mig<\/p>\n
many sontradictions and 1%’ tEe\u00b0 dQmpiai\ufb01\ufb01H&” <\/p>\n
Ex.P.1 ha had gtate\u00e9 thai”\ufb01he accused beat ggm G52′<\/p>\n
the left cheek and :\u00bb::L<::s<ea:\u00a3"'\u00ab.i:a.::"-mu. :\u00e9s\u00ab?::.e_;eagf\u00a7:;;: the
\navideace he \ufb01ad stat\u00e9d \u00e9bcutlth\u00e9vasaault en the<\/p>\n
abdamen and also on the Cheexfyv\ufb01pait fram thia,<\/p>\n
th\u00a9ugh= the ,i\u00a75,de\u00a7t'atodk~ place 93 31.8.\u00a7\u00e9 a\ufb01
\nabaat 5.%U p}\u00a7L \ufb01g did sot approach the police<\/p>\n
staiien igii tag E\u00e9x\u00e9 \ufb02ay 1.9., 1.9.94 upto $.13<\/p>\n
p.m.\u00a7'Vn:L i\u00e9~,reievant :0 note that th@ Ma3thi<\/p>\n
 po;icei$ta\ufb01i@n is just adjoiniag ihe piacg of the<\/p>\n
*;nc;@en\u00a7gan\u00a7uihis fact has bea\ufb01 a\ufb01mitted by 9%.}<\/p>\n
in gh:$*'e?idence. ?urthermore, it is in the<\/p>\n
Vevide\ufb01c\u00e9 Sf @w.: that the wiine\ufb01ses \u00ab ?Ws 2 is \u00e9<\/p>\n
u"ba;\u00e9iged to big commugity aua t&at ihaugh about<\/p>\n
4% to 50 persons witne33@& the incident, excegt<\/p>\n
the yersans balonging is :&e Community' cf the
\ncomplainaat me ather p\u00e9rsans ware examined.<\/p>\n
Agaxt from. this, it :3 reievant ta note that<\/p>\n
5\/\\<\/p>\n
'any eEher"meterial. in the Circumstances, this<\/p>\n
A*eeeb\ufb01-eee teaee to the benefit ef the accused.<\/p>\n
",xerrer ix: relying upon i\ufb02ma evidence c\ufb01? PW.1 and
\n'ewegaed the cenviction. Hence, I am of the<\/p>\n
vmeyinien that the judgment and area: ef conviction<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
versiee which is ungeiiebie in View of the<\/p>\n
discrepancies referred to above.\n<\/p>\n
11. ?he presecutiem has exami\ufb01ed 934$ \u00bb
\nthe 982 whe registered the eemgiaiet ae\u00e9rhei\ufb01leege
\neget mahaza: — Ex.P.2 and PW.\u00a7 5~tee,C\u00a7}.y$e\u00bb.
\nrecer\ufb01ed the statement efi tee ;wi:\ufb01\u00a23\u00a7e3e gg\u00a7f<\/p>\n
secured Ex.P.3 ~ the caste *eertifieete\ufb02’ 3The’*<\/p>\n
whole scrutiny of the eevide\ufb01cgg lead by the<\/p>\n
proeecuti0n_.\u00a7QS$ date ;ns9;rg\u00bbuan\u00a7’ confidence te<\/p>\n
heid thae”\u00a3ee eeeeeee{ig_eeeity for the offences
\ncharged~be%Cedkeease\ufb01eele*\u00a7ouet. A serioue deubt
\nerieee as re\u00e9eiee i\ufb01\u00e9 page of the presecutien, in
\nView ef”t\ufb01e_fee\u20ac gage ehe interested versiee of<\/p>\n
?W,\u00a7 has no\u00e9geeen supperted and corroborated by<\/p>\n
l2.’  The trial Court has committed a grave<\/p>\n
is illegai ande perveree. in that View” of the<\/p>\n
04<\/span><\/p>\n
mattex, E answer the gain: in afzirmative and<\/p>\n
prcceed to pass Ede foilowingz<\/p>\n
The appeal is allowed. Canvictg\ufb01n _\u00a7i ”
\nappeilant for the offence puai3h;bL\u00e9wUf\u00a7 3\ufb011}\u00a7K{
\nof the Act and also secs. 323 a\ufb01d 5$6 0\u00a7”iEf aw;
\nthe sentence thereon Far? \u00a7e\u00a7’ a5\u00a7\u20acQg,LW$Eh\u00e9_ <\/p>\n
:.\n<\/p>\n
appellant is acquitted of \u00e9h\u00e9 above said \u00e9haxges.<\/p>\n
Court Order f  ‘appellant. 1. e. 0<\/p>\n
*corrected vidb The bail bonds arg’Hcance}led; “a Fine if an’ \u00a2b.;71
\nN’. N’ – 11   .4′  ‘ 2,24
\nat’ 30. 1. 2999. deposmted :;:na;; be  30 .._~.}j,e ..V\u00a7\u00a7a;atgxxxxaxx.<\/p>\n
the a&;gugedA’V’i$;s\ufb01o_:.+:a t\ufb01\u00e9-..:r1?a1 court.<\/p>\n
m’
\n‘ ‘ 9-A-:r\u00a2’
\nZ: J<\/p>\n
-12-<\/span><\/p>\n
138?} :\n<\/p>\n
:-2o~m*20a9 iirig\ufb01.3*~%’\u20ac:}’?:?\u00a74″!,_i2;fJi_2–3\u00a7: ‘-<\/p>\n
Grders on Being Sp\u00e9lf\u00e9\ufb01-E0
\nE”\u00a7{‘:’.2i3i’\u00a7i the iearrzcz\u00e9 counse\u00e9 f\u00a3;zf”\u00a3}3& a;.;3}_,%\u00bb:%,i.iVg’:iw’L:.’s3r; \u00b0\u00a3\u00a71$ \u00a5i;It::*:;:9
\nfierd. \u00a7 :1 the oyerzativs parfic\ufb01 {3\u00a7..\u00a7?”‘\u00a3.'{i{f”v_’:CI*gLi1′-1″‘\ufb02a{E\u00a7\u00a7 f5.’3:.;2Q9Q, in<\/p>\n
tha East 1312:, it hag been na\u00e9ixiioziri\u00e9fais ~_: “-E\u00a5”f’:s.’:’;\u00e9  3231:; Ci6pC3Si’if3{i<\/p>\n
5321311 be :\u20acfunded’_:fc.__ “‘E:I_*:e\u00a7’\u00a3rcV\u00a7V\ufb011″;:\u00a7’i213’4:1aAL;:2::\u00a7;\u00a7,*..’_’. V\u00a7rLf;:iVC’\u00e9;, it has is be<\/p>\n
r\ufb01funti\u00e9d is 11714::  \ufb01”;31\u00a3i””.’g’E i_(.’~?\u00a7_3,”z5′>f.’3{i h\u00e9if\u00e9ra \u00e9he Triai<\/p>\n
(bur: He:_};(,\u00a7;j:, “:i:*;._\u00a3S  tijx\u00e9zi ;…_.,’,’\u00a7.”z:51\u20ac: if  d\ufb01tpasiieii SE33}<\/p>\n
b\ufb01 ‘z1=:fm;3.di:{\u20ac ii: f\u00a31\ufb01”‘V:1;;’j;\u00a73\u00e9}}ai1t\u00a5,hi;-62;, t\u00e9zs accza\ufb01eii \u00a7)\u20ac3f:3I’\u20ac \u20ac116 ‘F3:iaE
\nSmart”, Mama}. is Vziigg\ufb01og\u00e9\u00e9gi.’ of \u00e9jccer\u00e9izzgifg.<\/p>\n
        sai\u00e9,
\njuag\u00e9<\/p>\n
” >.–J;=<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Narayana Swamy vs State Of Karnataka on 30 January, 2009 Author: A.S.Pachhapure .the compl\u00e9int ~ Ex.P.1, FER M “M\u00a7g;s\ufb01:\u00e9te \ufb02\ufb01d thereafter vi\ufb01ited the spot in the V”ma\ufb01a2ar”~ \u00a3x.P.2 and zecarded the statem\ufb01nts cf ‘y$#$ E2 and 3. It is thereafter that ?W.\u00a7 V” x gbntinued the investigation an\ufb01 recor\u00e9ad the complainant referring […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-195282","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNarayana Swamy vs State Of Karnataka on 30 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Narayana Swamy vs State Of Karnataka on 30 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-21T07:24:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Narayana Swamy vs State Of Karnataka on 30 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-21T07:24:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1075,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Narayana Swamy vs State Of Karnataka on 30 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-21T07:24:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Narayana Swamy vs State Of Karnataka on 30 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Narayana Swamy vs State Of Karnataka on 30 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Narayana Swamy vs State Of Karnataka on 30 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-21T07:24:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Narayana Swamy vs State Of Karnataka on 30 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-21T07:24:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009"},"wordCount":1075,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009","name":"Narayana Swamy vs State Of Karnataka on 30 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-21T07:24:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayana-swamy-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-30-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Narayana Swamy vs State Of Karnataka on 30 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195282","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=195282"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195282\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=195282"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=195282"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=195282"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}