{"id":195509,"date":"2010-11-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010"},"modified":"2014-10-10T16:00:24","modified_gmt":"2014-10-10T10:30:24","slug":"sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri S B Honnur vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri S B Honnur vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar And Nagaraj<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF' NOVEMBER \nPRESENT OOOOOO\nTHE HONBLE MR.JUSTiCE\u00bb~ N    E O' \nTHE HONBLE MR.JUS*i'i-.C:E..ARZXLI__   \nWRIT PETITION  1e793O:.'oE'ii2o%%10O \n\nBetween:\n\nSri S.B.Honny1rK..  _ 1: \n\nS \/ 0 Sri Balap'-pa iH_Q'Il11i1If  _\n\nAged about 54v-\u00b0y_e\u00e9i:r's-- . \"  A' \n\nAddition D'ir\u00e9'ci<-3; of  . ,\nPlanning 81 1\\_\/IemberiV5Seefeta\nBangalore-Mysore Enii'aE.tf'L1oeti11Tre._ Corridor\nArea Pianning'Au'thori.ty  .  \nM.S.Buiiding   " _ " T 2 2 "\nBangalore-560 001   \n\n  '-   V       ...Petitioner\n(By Sri.'\u00e9\u00a7.VHirif,ffc1ni"1~f:'1_, Adv}\n\n  1 .' The state of\ufb01arnataka\n\n.,Re_presented by the Principal Secretary\n'To Governinent\n\n\u00ab.l}'rba,n Development Department.\n.X('_ik'a.Sa 'Soudha\n\n Bangalore-560 O0 1\n\n....'.l"he Director of Town Country Planning\n1VI.S.Buiidi.ng\nBangalore-560 O0 1.\n\n. . . Respondents\n\n(By Smt.Sheeia Krishna. AGA)\n\n \n\n\n\n'i'his Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and\n227 of the Constitution of India praying to call for the\nrecords and issue a writ of eertiorari and quash the\n\norder passed by the Hon'ble Tribunal in Applic4atiox1V.._\n\nNo.6725\/98 dated 20.10.09 Vide Ar1n--A.\n\nThis petition coming on for  D'\nthis day, N Kumar J., passed the fo.ll0\\_m'ng:  "  4'\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
The petitioner has prg;r\u00a7p1.,.3dt1n-5
\nchallenging the order.  passed.  -. _ the it ‘ Karnataka
\nAdministrative Tribunal  to as the
\n‘KAT’ for  interfere with<\/p>\n
the  ,.\/the Disciplinary<\/p>\n
Authority for  ‘prjoxte\u00e9d.\ufb01is(:onduct.<\/p>\n
_ The v_:VpetiitionelI”‘. is Working as Assistant<\/p>\n
‘D  ‘Flanning. He also functioned as a<\/p>\n
  Town Planning in Raichur Urban<\/p>\n
DeV~elop_rn-enltlAuthority (RUDA) from 1988 to 1991.<\/p>\n
palso\ufb02-held regular charge of the post of Assistant<\/p>\n
 a._l’D_Virce’tor of Town Planning, Raichur District during<\/p>\n
it  “‘1\u20ac\u00a789~l99l. Based on the inspection report of the<\/p>\n
Deputy Commissioner\/ Chairman of the Raichur<\/p>\n
Urban Development Authority, disciplinary<\/p>\n
L\/\/’<\/p>\n
proceedings were initiated against the petitioner<\/p>\n
under K.C.S. [CCA) Rules, 1957. Thirty three charges<\/p>\n
were framed against the petitioner. The <\/p>\n
denied the charges. An enquiry Officer  T’ <\/p>\n
and an enquiry was conducted.  J <\/p>\n
submitted a report holding that charge– Nos..?i5′;.  ‘an;:1* ll<\/p>\n
33 were fully proved and char’ge_llpVl\\Ios.3V,l   pwere
\npartly proved and  Vx3}e1?e not
\nproved. After issuing  notice and
\naft” I”\u20acC\u20aciV_iI1s   the<\/p>\n
Discipl:’gnlary’i*A. the report and
\nimposeclutheplpenaltyl’ol:lA”\u00bbvjg.thholding of two annual
\nincrements ‘cumulative effect.<\/p>\n
it order of the Disciplinary Authority<\/p>\n
 _ was”‘\u00abcha.:llenl:gl’ed by the petitioner before the Karnataka<\/p>\n
 .l_uAdrninistrative Tribunal (KAT) in application<\/p>\n
 j__ll\\Eo.”i5lO2\/1994 contending that the domestic enquiry<\/p>\n
~ “conducted was not fair and proper, no evidence was<\/p>\n
recorded, no opportunity was given to him to prove<\/p>\n
his case and the Enquiry Officer could not have relied<\/p>\n
V.\n<\/p>\n
cause notice, there was an obligation cast on the<\/p>\n
Disciplinary Authority to enclose with it the <\/p>\n
report so that the delinquent could send   .<\/p>\n
reply to the second show cause notice. Aslit”
\ndone, the order of imposing punishrneg’ntV::,c_’
\nand the matter was re.rr1’a,rided’-
\nDisciplinary Authority, yvith a,—dVi’:’e_c’tion   the
\nenquiry report, give   cause
\nnotice and   After
\nremand,    furnished to
\nthe  hivslldvetailed objections to
\nthe said  he also sent his reply to<\/p>\n
the second shows-caulse notice.<\/p>\n
  On consideration of the said reply, the<\/p>\n
   ..:AL{thority was of the View that there was<\/p>\n
no.__uwjusti\ufb01cation to interfere with the \ufb01nding of<\/p>\n
 misconduct recorded by the Enquiry Officer as it was<\/p>\n
 on legal evidence. In fact, the fact that there<\/p>\n
  .._.v%vas delay in disposal of files and delay in issuing of<\/p>\n
certificate was admitted.\n<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
6. The defence sought to be made out by the<\/p>\n
petitioner was that he did not have sufficient staff ajndg<\/p>\n
his subordinates were not assisting and he..~was..\\_in’.j’  <\/p>\n
additional charge and therefore when  is if
\ntaken against the subordinate   ..
\nhave been found guilty of
\nsaid argument did not  .faVour’._ll:l_ the
\nDisciplinary AuthorityA”\u00ab-turd  overruled the<\/p>\n
same. The Authorityppassiedv ‘the yerylsarne order of<\/p>\n
withhcldirig  cumulative effect
\nas punishment  misconduct. Aggrieved<\/p>\n
by sgarne’, ._t:vhe-.peti’tio’rier again preferred an appeal<\/p>\n
llbefore the  on appreciation of the entire<\/p>\n
  held that no case is made out for<\/p>\n
inte\u00abrfererice?’ fwith the order of the Disciplinary<\/p>\n
\ufb02iuthority and therefore it dismissed the said<\/p>\n
  ‘application. Against the said order of KAT, the<\/p>\n
  “petitioner is before this Court. <\/p>\n
7. The learned Counsel for the petitioner, while<\/p>\n
assailing the impugned order, contends that<\/p>\n
Disciplinary Authority was in total error in   .<\/p>\n
the report, as the finding recordedby   <\/p>\n
Officer was not based on legal
\nabsence of any evidence he  nothave_b’ee’n;found
\nguilty. The KAT did…’notp..i’pi’operl3?_ appreciavte the<\/p>\n
matter and therefore,  of the<\/p>\n
8V.Hll\\f\/le’d:o_not\u00a7_Vsee”ariy iii\u00e9rit” in this petition. His
\nattack to the  grounds of violation of<\/p>\n
principles justice, not following the<\/p>\n
f””‘procedti.re'”and thlemffinding being based on no legal<\/p>\n
1 .V:vras.’.i*’negatived by the KAT in the earlier<\/p>\n
round ,.__’aiid:”” the said order has become final. The<\/p>\n
  rna_tter*’had been remanded back only on the ground<\/p>\n
“‘of”non-furnishing of the report. Once the report was<\/p>\n
 “furnished, then he offered his explanation and the<\/p>\n
Disciplinary Authority did not accept the explanation<\/p>\n
and proceeded to uphold the finding of misconduct<\/p>\n
Ll\/..\n<\/p>\n
and imposed the penalty. It cannot be said that it<\/p>\n
committed any irregularity.\n<\/p>\n
9. In that View of the matte.re*when <\/p>\n
has taken pains to look into   <\/p>\n
record as well as the  on and
\nrecorded a \ufb01nding that._no ‘ca’se”e_:for”*interference with
\nthe punishment irnooseiycitt out by the
\npetitioner, we not   to interfere
\nwith the  of law is involved<\/p>\n
in th1s;t;’\u00a7eVti*:ietrf;:\n<\/p>\n
, ePetition..etarids”‘di\u00e9}rnissed.<\/p>\n
Sd\/~
\nJUDGE<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n
JT\/m<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri S B Honnur vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 November, 2010 Author: N.Kumar And Nagaraj IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF’ NOVEMBER PRESENT OOOOOO THE HONBLE MR.JUSTiCE\u00bb~ N E O’ THE HONBLE MR.JUS*i’i-.C:E..ARZXLI__ WRIT PETITION 1e793O:.’oE’ii2o%%10O Between: Sri S.B.Honny1rK.. _ 1: S […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-195509","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri S B Honnur vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri S B Honnur vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-10-10T10:30:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri S B Honnur vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-10T10:30:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":786,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri S B Honnur vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-10T10:30:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri S B Honnur vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri S B Honnur vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri S B Honnur vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-10-10T10:30:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri S B Honnur vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-10T10:30:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010"},"wordCount":786,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010","name":"Sri S B Honnur vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-10T10:30:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-b-honnur-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-15-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri S B Honnur vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195509","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=195509"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195509\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=195509"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=195509"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=195509"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}