{"id":195679,"date":"2010-02-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010"},"modified":"2018-03-20T22:23:27","modified_gmt":"2018-03-20T16:53:27","slug":"bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Bangalore Metropolitan vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Bangalore Metropolitan vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. BANGAEGREA\n\nDATED TI-IIS THE 2% DAY 01? FEBRUA:RgY. 2:Of.iI'oT  *\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUsT1cE  \n\nWRIT PETITION No.V15S2'3 C) ;\"'3'V:2.('}()8'\u00bb'v_:(IuQ---..:VI\"{')'  \nBETWEEN . ' A' '\n\nBANGALORE MI3\"i'ROI-'OI.i\"i';'XN   \nTRANSPORT CORVP0RA'1i10_N  '\nCENTRAL ow-*1c:.;:'12.._   _   \nK.H.ROAI),    \"   \nBY ITS C1\u00abi1EI* '1'EAEE--;c' MANN; H\u00bb\n\nRE:PRES'EN'i*\u00a3%:i}'). \u00a73\\?'ii:gj1's   _\nCI--IIEI' =.:,A\\2+q.c_)1%*r=>\";{3.1\u00a7;N K  1{ ~ .  _ -- . . . .1-->1-\u00a3'I'I'I'IONER\n\n(BY sivrrf H, N.T12I'\u00ab:NUKA.  \n\nAN 1'?) ; ' \"\n\n \"1 2 . V' '*1'1~s1:\u00abi\"'%{)r.<:uiv~: ETY LABOUR\n\n "1i:R\"EfT1\u00ab-\u00a7:EI1~: PAYE\\\/1I:'.NTOF GRATUITY ACT\n\n\"-E3AN_CiAEL.OI5{i%2. RPZGIONTI\nKARMIKA B1-~u\\w'AN. E.(;.RoA:J\n13A_N\u00a7:;A_1_.oN__1\u00ab:\n\n .,_'I;}f--'IIf. ASSIS'I'.AN'I' LA!-SOUR COMMISSIONER\n\nAN D CON'f'ROI_.I,IN(} AU'I'I---IORITY\nUNDER TH E PAY1\\\/EI\u20acN'1'OI' GRA\"E\"UI'I'Y' ACT\nDIVISION 11.\nI.3ANNERGH'.A'YI'A ROAD.\nEANGA1,oR\u00a3\u00ab: 560 076 WK\nEX.\n\n\n\n3 . HAN U I\\\/iAN\"I'H.ARj\\YA.I-3PA\nS \/ O LATE HAN U MAIAE TI\n\"I'A\\\/'ARI\u20acKERI\u00a3 V I LLAG E\nI:{Ul..U\\\/ANAI'\"'IALLI POST\nNELAMANGALA 'E'ALU K\n\nBANGALORE if)ES'E'RIC'I'  ...Ia;a3\u00a7QNm%:Ni;'s0'  \n\n{BY SR1 JAGADESI--I MUNEDARAGI. 1---1,-FQI-i'Ri .&'=9.';'   7\n\nSMT S.}3.LAKSI---IME. ADV. FOR R3}  \n\nW15 1'>I::*:\"m01\\1 FEI,I33{.) UN_;j~L:_R ART{jCI-'Ij3S.:226V\"&' 227\nOF Ti--IE cowsrrmmow OF INDIA _PRAY'1-Ncwro VQUASH\nTHE: ORIJIERS mi 27.032008 _u~.-NN1Ia:x~1gz2E:wG)-PASSED BY\n\"rm: FIRST RISSPONi)F:NfI\"'AND.' I'\u00a7'I_'C\u00a7' ,_ , \n\nGROUP THIS 1)\/\\Y;'~'1f;---115 Pig' Ix\/\u00a3203.13 '1';-1 \u00a35: I-'OLLOWING:\n\nTHIS PE\"E'I'I'ION COMING (SN ?;i\"o.m'3i':%;I;.I-?\u00a3\u00a3;ARING IN 'I-3'\n\nIn \" jc:.1\" VVprmjreezti-i17ig;;.___\"'b\u00e9'i\"<)re the Asst. Labour\n\nCc)r1m1'isasji01'1e1~ Aarxi <%'m*1r4r011i11g A1..1t.h()rity under the\n\n  Act' I972. i1'1s1:m11r3d by the\n\nf<-3sp"or10de\ufb01t{w'z51fk'r11a11'1 for ci<ir'u?.1*n1ination of ggra1'ui"{y. an\n\nV _ appi.'i'\u00ab::a{*.i.__(i\u00a31~10 zmmnd the claim peiition was filed by the\n\nit-;:%p0(_')r1dVE.'I'.1.t--wo1'km2111 ml 9.10.2007 1,0 whicfh th<:'\n\n_ -_p"C1ii't1i():ne1'. 2'-1r1'2.1ig11c?(i as a pa1r1.yv;'esp<,)11de11:i did not fiie\n\n srja13em\u20acr11 of 0bhje(.'Iions. '1'E\u00b01e C(.)1T}l"{]iSSi()I](:'Z" for Labour\n\naIi()We(.i the said app1i('a'{1'<)r1 in the final Order dig\n\n30.10.2007 A1'11'1(:x:...:r(.:-E a1l0w'a'.1'1g tihc <'*.]a.i_a.11 p<:=.t'i*'{.i(')n and\n\nM\n\n\n\ndetermi11i1'1g3; the ba1a1'1c.e of gratuity payable._Tha*t[_'(3--rdas};\nwas (tailed in q1.1cs:-;1.i()n in twoVg1ppea1s;""c3----1ie9by=th=:: \n\nworkman and the other by 7,t:}1\u00a2"b..R0\u00e9:<:_1T1'2ii::S\u00a7)Gz::i__A\n\nC01'p0:'at.i(m in PGA CR 463'\/[Q7208 'en-'.1(V:1l  \n\n08, whence by a (tc)mn}().1':L:A'<u1'e-E:\n\n\u00a7\u00a7~"L\n\n\n\nci]i1h2-11 the pcI.it'i()11c'1* xvais not exte:1'1dr:.'d_\u00bb E1\nre2\u00bb1._'.r7:__(>t'jj't-r;\n\n  \n\nand no c)ppo1'1:1..mitty to file addi1,ir.m211_:\"'~;st.;1t:V\u00e91n1.ions to 11116 mai1'1.c'1z\u00bb1:\"1*1'1;..anti-I'  '-\n\ne) allowing of the 2ipp1i(3e11.{('31:1 \n\nby the resp(m${E,!,f(%~<E ()f;"t1?1:\u00e9j3' :Covi:1t.r()11ing\nA'L.1tho1'it.y 21;'1'\u00a7i_'_;'i'2:tc\u00e9s_';pcj1iVC\u00a7jsiiy--pf \u00a7)l'(}0\u20acdU1"G and\n\nta1'1tamou111;s to d\u00e91'1i:31v100f' j'_L1St;iA{f:\u00bb:-3,0 \n\n3. I1)" L\u00a71;31'3?-j1\u00a7'\" l\u00e9'-ar1\"1~c%(}-----wz\ufb01cmrlsel for the\n\nresp()ride1\"1t:ww()'riif:~'1.;i01T1.v'V(::0Qi'i't\u20ac1\"\u00a3ds (21) that on 9.7.2007\n\nl;here VVE-'1;'.':~I.._V no ._11:pi'&:\u00a7a.E.:111'at'i01'1 for t}'1\u20ac pei.i1:i()ner\u00ab\n\n C(>.:\"}3Ija_1\ufb01I\":i;wV;'1 anti'Illcreibre a Copy of the appIi('a1.i0n for\n\n 'zanienAd':x1E~.~f1't_%. gitmld not be served on the counsel and that\n\nlfhs'\"z1ppIi(::\u00a7tiE)1'1 was }'l'd1'1(1\u20acC'1 over 1.0 t\"1'1e C()1T1E'.1*(,)I_1ing\n\n'v,,'ALl1\u00a7h()1'i1A\u00a7,<'. who kl;-1vi1'1g__\u00a7 1101. 1nade a 1"1(')t.:\"1\u20aci0r;'r1e\"t'1~1\"\u00a2_ on 9.10.2007' by the respondent.-workman<\/pre>\n
  the C)x’der Siwet dt. 9. E02007. Learned<\/p>\n
ec5’ur1s._e’i’hafstens {‘0 add that on 9.10.2007 RW~i. ‘(he<\/p>\n
0 A.\\7s:’i\u00a711eS’s for the pet}t.ic)ner~\u00abe11’1pioyer was examined and<\/p>\n
“.t1*1e’orcie1’ sheet. clisacimses the sigr’1a’s11re of the ieamed<\/p>\n
‘”e()L11’1seI for the emp3(_)yer. Learned counsel furr.}1e.r<\/p>\n
submits that the appii(\u00a7a1i0n for an1endme11i’ oi the<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
Jaw<\/p>\n
claim pe1,it’.i01’1 is ibund in the 1’ec01’ds without:”there<\/p>\n
being 21 Ce=1nce1Iati01’1 of the adhesive COUFII ff;7″(V'”.’….S’La.l.{–.I”1′}’)VV:’C33,].<\/p>\n
the applicatioii. but a short sig11at’_i.11*e is f()ili’i1d’ iV’i1.11 ifh\u00e9u 0<\/p>\n
date as 9.10.2007. Lemned (‘.()L::i1’1SC_1:A’i},\u00a7ii:]_y <\/p>\n
tliere is no a1(:kx1c)w1crdgen1.c13t. 0f”geiiher i’hE;:A.\u00e9nip1’i;>ye~r~”~.<\/p>\n
Corp0ra1′.i0n or 1′:h21i_ of  .’:’\u00a73)vei1* 1111:”-
\napplicatioxi for amcrn’0.\u00a7iie21j1i.7_\ufb01 a copy of
\nthe same. Learned  that the
\napp1iCat.ior1’_V  workman was
\nnot   separat’.ely before the
\ncon Cliisiiiii _Vi0)i’.1″ .\n<\/p>\n
  .__Haviiig~-mhttard i..h\u20ac:’ Ecamed Counsel for the<\/p>\n
 _ p\u00e9i”‘*1.is’ed the pleadings and egxamiiied the orders;<\/p>\n
im_pi.1gI1ed;’1.i:;ie qLlt:’S1,i()l1 for d.ecisi()r1 inaikimg  whether<\/p>\n
 in i:h\u00a2;”:.fa.(:i_.s and c”-i1′(‘\u00e9umst’.a.n(:es the orclers of the<\/p>\n
Cg)r\ufb01:_1*()I1ing Au1h01*i1″.y and that of the Appellsue<\/p>\n
_[‘xL1t.ho1’ity am-1-. sustiainable in law ‘PK<\/p>\n
.951<\/p>\n
6. indisputably the laws in the coumry are<\/p>\n
ingrairied on the p1’i1’1(:ip1es of 1’1atura1 justice.:”~.._’Fh\u20ac3<\/p>\n
Constinitional philosophy has its i”(‘)1.1I1cie\u00bb1’ii(:):f1’:–:)i’1_tfi’1\u00bb.V”A.\u00a77: (‘xi<\/p>\n
Rule does 1101″ compiy with the C()l’15I–5UA.I:L1t.iC’\ufb02\u20ac11.I1}..E1I'”‘,iti’&1fEa.<\/p>\n
there is no deemed C’X(‘,11.1SiQi\u00a7’r_b1.l1. xiig’iS-jII’}:pVI’i\u20ac?’dV”iIi the”<\/p>\n
Siiaiiute.\n<\/p>\n
7. Vie:w::(1 iI1_.~~~33,~h..C7:”‘~ liggjliig E51′. viiijg’jr\u00e9xcmstitutionai<\/p>\n
phi10s:_0p1’1yI” 7:’}”:’;_.. goes *.\\fii~JT1c)i,_:1\u00ab saying that the laws and
\npr0cedz_1r\u00a3=._ fc:1.eit.’i.ti”g.\u00a7V’i’t'(gh’-aduf;udication in quasi _;’L1dicia1
\npr0(‘1eedi1ig.$\u00a7_n’a’1.isi_7_(“‘0i_\ufb01”()i’ni 1.0 the 1’L1Ec’.s of natural<\/p>\n
jLr.$;1i;ic”e.u. in tVh\u20ac”.__ViV1’1F-31a4%.1’\u00a3 case. respcmdentt~workman filed<\/p>\n
 ah” 21\u00a7)\u00a731it$&z1;.i()13 to (iE’I’,CI’l”\ufb02il’1(“‘. the grat1.iii.y on the<\/p>\n
 _  ..4’\u00a3i:h_z\u00a711;.–.. the gra1’ui1’.y paid by the petitiioner A<\/p>\n
C()rp(‘)r2it.\u00a3V(}\u00a71VA’iIw21s not”: in E:’1C(_’.(.)l’d8.I1(‘,\u20ac with law. Havitig<\/p>\n
tlohe:  an 2-imendmem? of the c’:c:)mc2i’11’s of the<\/p>\n
 e1pp1i’t:..2fi__\u00a5”i()1″: rliusit be pi’e(::e(ied by an appiicatiori aficr<\/p>\n
 sVer:v\u00abi.11g 2.1 copy of the sanie on the Corpmaiiion. l’I’he<\/p>\n
ft
\n2<\/span><\/p>\n
-8″\n<\/p>\n
record r1121i111′,ain1ec] by the Controlling Au1.horit:y and the<\/p>\n
orcier sheet dated 9.10.2007 a1’1in’1at.es an 21pp1i(T&1t’I”0i1 for<\/p>\n
ame1’1drnem of the 01211111 petition by the res;\u00a7Q’:”1.\u00a7i\u00e9’:u.”;_f–~.<\/p>\n
w0rkmar1 was not filed. T116 not’:ing in 1~1f:-%;%._:'(s.;j(iEt;%::’ sheet <\/p>\n
dated 9.10.2007 ciiscloses i_}12{\u00a7_ ()1js-1:: \ufb01vitn\u00e9\u00e9s.S”—R’\\5;=.\u00a7. v\u00a3”g_.n5<\/p>\n
the Corporation was exz’im.i_1’1ed ‘arid t:}.1\u00e9”_,a_se was;_”b<\/p>\n
‘c1d_jOllI”I’l\u20ac’d for f1.11″t11e1* 11c:z1rii’igV: (>11 . “i’?”1e
\nOrder Sheet fu1″1he1′”~.(i’1s(11\u00a3)se:?.\u00a7.v ‘i;’i’-“16:siggI1at.ums of the<\/p>\n
Iearlied c()L1r1se\u00a7=f()r the” ‘paf’i’i\u00a2s.y;111ci Pfesidirmg Officer.<\/p>\n
Hcnxxrtzifcr .11: ‘\u00a7Vh-‘e,fii\u00e9vy1ha.\u00a7i’t’:~–.;wa;11ab1c by the State Counsei
\ndisc1c’)se3 2:1) e1ppii.0(iatbi’c).(1″”dif. 9.30.2007 &1(.’.(%()rr1paniCd by
\nan :\u00ab1ffide1vi’f.~V<)i"'ex7e:–11 ti._e1'kfc?()i'1.he% workman for amendment
\n0i'..\u00ab13;he0'~:.r1ai1ri'*–:afV_ R:-7.1.1 1.048 1.0 Rs_4.56.032. This<\/p>\n
 apfjliC\u00e9iif'i(')h;__as rightly p0i1'1E1e(i out by {.116 1c:*ar1'1ed Govt.<\/p>\n
  A\u00a7iyC';<';i'1\u00bbg\u00a70 ~  hot. a('tkr1c.Jw1edgc:c.i by the'-r pet._it.ioher\u00ab<\/p>\n
CA('_:1fpris<:ci c.)ffi.oe1*.\n<\/p>\n
N<\/p>\n
8. in the Ci:”‘ statcmeni; ()1T<)b'e(?*t.10t1s. \/j1'hh1i:_':.7 is ')er=ha.r)s'-.V
\n J A _  } . I.\n<\/p>\n
the reason why the C()11t_1’c)1’i’\u00a7:jg\u00bbA1.1t.h0rity.ciid’jnot pass
\norders t_here011 bef()r:\u00a5: t:h_e c_if)hI1clA1.;rst%i0.\u00bbIV’:s’of the prbceedings.
\nA question (teniainly 21:*is’es_V:<1s'_i(f) xv}r1\u00e91': at: what point<\/p>\n
of time U118?"\u00e91pI}).li(~zlfL:\u00a7()I?i f'ix)Ll'I4'1d VEi"})1Ei~;(TE? in the file. An<\/p>\n
ansxzver to tj.I1L%."'q;.i'csf,'i~Qh~=._is -not f01't:111ni11g from the
\nrc01*ds\u00a7_ ._si,1gggc’s1.i12g _f’f*}.g1″If $211′; enqui1’y be-: herlcl by the<\/p>\n
C0r1f’r.r_Ql1ing’AL:t211\u00e9:ri\u00a331.\n<\/p>\n
h  ‘i”E.1e a1n1\u00e9\ufb01drne11i. proposed was to increase the<\/p>\n
 :;::1\u00a7n:_a’*\u00bb.:}gtn.L —35.1.:1,048\/– to Rs.4.52.O32\/M which<\/p>\n
app’lic:at’,ioij_ csiuglli 1.0 have had :1 (:c)r1sidera1.i(‘m and an<\/p>\n
 ()rde1i passed t’he:’eon. e11t.itliI1g the panics” to advem(fe<\/p>\n
 i.1iei.;’ c::011te11t,i0ns. by l’\u20acCO1″(iiI’]g aciditiional evidence. In<\/p>\n
7ti191E1″e1bsc1’1<re of an order on the app1i(:al'.i01 %{t:11c<\/p>\n
YHL<\/p>\n
C()nt'1*()1}i11g' Aut.110rity did 110i. I121\\:e~ the _jL1ri:%dig:t.i_\u00a7'11i' <\/p>\n
a\ufb02ow the claim in excess of  1. 1 1,048\/s…., _ ' <\/p>\n
10. ‘I’}’1us the only c>0n(‘1usi;o11 t’_I% 13t \u20ac:g11’i r3<:_ {1.1jz1wf'1_<\/p>\n
thai me C0111:r()1}i1'1g A1,1f;}'!Ql'iT.y. " \u00a3i}3])1iETdx' \u00a21A[5\u20acI'{:'t?i'V&3\u20ac '.<\/p>\n
pr()cedu1'e in allowing ihe :':{;,V\\…_1..j1v1'iz*.._z:V1t.irp()r21i.i0;j;   the balance of
\n of the clairn 1.0
\nRs.4.1A1 .1_8’0\/9.  (:a1mot but be said to<\/p>\n
he1vg:\u20ac octnteisioi-kid”ggrave i11j1..1s1’.ice as also denial ofjust,ice<\/p>\n
‘A tr.) {I163 $16t’,it.I’;1ppEic::1t.i(m could<\/p>\n
n.(_)t.”_\u00ab.11ave been made 21v21i1ab1e to the pe1″.it’:i1*p()re1t,io1’1 .<;ir1c:e ('.ou11se1 was not available on<\/p>\n
9.10.2007. in the fac:t'.ua.1 mat'.ri.x that submissi(')1'1 has no<\/p>\n
grain of t',rLtt',i'1. I am compelled to my so since. as<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
'' p.1\u00e9.\u00e91.\n<\/p>\n
n0i:i(..*ed $17!)!-kit on 9.10.2007. RW1 was e>xa1n1in.cici.i\u00e9ujid<\/p>\n
the Comisel for the C(_)rp0ra’\u00a3i0n afi’i.x(=”d his _:-:%__gI14\u00e91’i–‘1}’i’r:} ‘7t.:i)_.’ .<\/p>\n
the order sheet.   _<\/p>\n
12. ‘1’i1()1.zgh ixhc-2 siforesaid, <::c;'i'1L\u00a2;9r11fi\u00a3.)_r1's;_":;1dV'.\u00e9L:.1\u00e9\u20ac.d<\/p>\n
by the lc;-a1'r1ed C()1.:11sc1 ibr"i;h'\u00e9:_pertitionczvC.orp0;<aIion  L<\/p>\n
for the filfstz time b('fQl'(" i'hiS_..Ci;5't,EI'T'-.jI1V(.)i{iI1gHA1"'i.i(\u00a7l\u20ac 227<\/p>\n
of the Co1'1si;it.uti(')1'i <:)"i" 1i:1d'it\u00a21.f';~.V1':t\u00e9if'e*i1fi}1'\u00a3r'icss violation of<\/p>\n
principl\u00e9s oi"ii1.21l'.L71*V\u00e9iViV"-j1.:$i:i\ufb01fex \u00e9iiieged and duly<\/p>\n
esiab:_ishec_i."\u00e9i1')i1:14.\u00e9i'i;r;r.d in the record maini;aiI1cd by
\nthe C<)fi1;_rE;Ii1i11g.._Au'i_1it3::_it'y,". it car11'i()i: be said that. the<\/p>\n
p\u20ac{'.i:i.i('J!'1_E?1'-C()'fpiJT2i1.i(,\u00a7'\u00a7'] is di_sem:itied to advzmce such a<\/p>\n
  En'f'2}eV:;=19c:sL.1it. the writ petitioii is allowed. The<\/p>\n
O1"ciers\u00a7\ufb01()i; the C()n'm)1li1'1g Auiihcirity and i',E1e1i'. of the<\/p>\n
 A1;$'ps:il21t:e Aui.I'iority are (11.12-zshed and the px'():~; 0rc.iers in the li ht.” .<\/p>\n
6:9′<\/p>\n
()bsewz\u00bb1t..i(>1’1s and st.r’i(*t’1y in 2′-1(r(‘(>1ici;\u00a2;1V1}(:e \\#g>’i’t:I*1″}\u00a3::.wh <\/p>\n
In.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Bangalore Metropolitan vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2010 Author: Ram Mohan Reddy IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. BANGAEGREA DATED TI-IIS THE 2% DAY 01? FEBRUA:RgY. 2:Of.iI’oT * THE HON’BLE MR.JUsT1cE WRIT PETITION No.V15S2’3 C) ;”‘3’V:2.(‘}()8’\u00bb’v_:(IuQ—..:VI”{‘)’ BETWEEN . ‘ A’ ‘ BANGALORE MI3″i’ROI-‘OI.i”i’;’XN TRANSPORT CORVP0RA’1i10_N ‘ CENTRAL ow-*1c:.;:’12.._ _ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-195679","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBangalore Metropolitan vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bangalore Metropolitan vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-03-20T16:53:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bangalore Metropolitan vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-20T16:53:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1427,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Bangalore Metropolitan vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-20T16:53:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bangalore Metropolitan vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bangalore Metropolitan vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bangalore Metropolitan vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-03-20T16:53:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bangalore Metropolitan vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-20T16:53:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010"},"wordCount":1427,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010","name":"Bangalore Metropolitan vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-20T16:53:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-the-deputy-labour-commissioner-on-2-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bangalore Metropolitan vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 2 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195679","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=195679"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195679\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=195679"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=195679"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=195679"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}