{"id":19569,"date":"2009-11-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009"},"modified":"2017-10-10T00:13:23","modified_gmt":"2017-10-09T18:43:23","slug":"parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Parveen vs State Of Haryana And Others on 10 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Parveen vs State Of Haryana And Others on 10 November, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>             Criminal Misc. No. M-27167 of 2009                        (1)\n\n\n              In the High Court of Punjab &amp; Haryana at Chandigarh\n\n                                   Criminal Misc. No. M-27167 of 2009 (O&amp;M)\n\n                                                  Date of decision: 10.11.2009\n\n\nParveen                                                        ..... Petitioner\n                                           vs\nState of Haryana and others                                    ..... Respondents<\/pre>\n<pre>Coram:       Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal\n\n\nPresent:     Mr. JS Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner.\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>             Mrs. Ritu Punj, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana,<br \/>\n             for respondent nos. 1 and 2.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Mr. Sudhanshu Makkar, Advocate, for respondent no. 3.\n<\/p>\n<p>Rajesh Bindal J.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Prayer in the present petition is for quashing of FIR No. 234 dated<br \/>\n2.8.2009, registered under Sections 307 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act at<br \/>\nPolice Station Hodal, District Faridabad, and subsequent proceedings arising<br \/>\ntherefrom.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the dispute<br \/>\nbetween the parties has been compromised with the intervention of the well-<br \/>\nwishers and keeping in view that peace and harmony is maintained as the<br \/>\npetitioner is Chacha&#8217;s son of the complainant. Compromise-deed arrived between<br \/>\nthe parties and the affidavit of respondent no. 3 have been placed on record as<br \/>\nAnnexures P-2 and P-3 respectively, according to which the parties have settled<br \/>\ntheir disputes. He further submitted that since the parties have compromised the<br \/>\nmatter, the FIR in question deserves to be quashed. Reliance has been placed upon<br \/>\na five Judge Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh versus State of<br \/>\nPunjab 2007 (3) Law Herald (P&amp;H) 2225.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Respondent no.2- complainant appeared in Court in person. He<br \/>\nadmitted the factum of compromise and stated that he has no objection in case the<br \/>\nFIR in question is quashed. He has made a statement to this effect in the court also.\n<\/p>\n<p>             From the perusal of compromise-deed (Annexure P-2) and affidavit<br \/>\n(Annexure P-3), it is clear that the petitioner and respondent no. 3 have resolved<br \/>\ntheir differences by a bonafide compromise free from any fraud, coercion or undue<br \/>\ninfluence. A compromise would help the parties to live their lives, without illwill<br \/>\n              Criminal Misc. No. M-27167 of 2009                      (2)<\/p>\n<p>or rancour and contribute to harmony and peace in the community. Dealing with<br \/>\nissue of quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise, a Bench consisting of five<br \/>\nHon&#8217;ble Judges of this Court in Kulwinder Singh&#8217;s case (supra) while approving<br \/>\nminority view in <a href=\"\/doc\/1718829\/\">Dharambir v. State of Haryana,<\/a> 2005(2) Law Herald (P&amp;H)<br \/>\n(FB) 723, opined as under:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>             &#8220;27.    To conclude, it can safely be said that there can never be any<br \/>\n                     hard and fast category which can be prescribed to enable the<br \/>\n                     Court to exercise its power under Section 482, of the Cr.P.C.<br \/>\n                     The only principle that can be laid down is the one which has<br \/>\n                     been incorporated in the Section itself, i.e., &#8220;to prevent abuse<br \/>\n                     of the process of any Court&#8221; or &#8220;to secure the ends of<br \/>\n                     justice&#8221;.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             28.     In Mrs. Shakuntala Sawhney Versus Mrs. Kaushalya<br \/>\n                     Sawhney and others, (1980) 1 S.C.C. 63, Hon&#8217;ble Krishna<br \/>\n                     Iyer, J. aptly summoned up the essence of compromise in the<br \/>\n                     following words:-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                     &#8220;The finest hour of justice arrives propitiously when parties,<br \/>\n                     despite falling apart, bury the hatchet and weave a sense of<br \/>\n                     fellowship of reunion.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                     The power to do complete justice is the very essence of every<br \/>\n                     judicial justice dispensation system. It cannot be diluted by<br \/>\n                     distorted perceptions and is not a slave to anything, except to<br \/>\n                     the caution and circumspection, the standards of which the<br \/>\n                     Court sets before it, in exercise of such plenary and<br \/>\n                     unfettered power inherently vested in it while donning the<br \/>\n                     cloak of compassion to achieve the ends of justice.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             29.     No embargo, be in the shape of Section 320(9) of the<br \/>\n                     Cr.P.C., or any other such curtailment, can whittle down the<br \/>\n                     power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             30.     The compromise, in a modern society, is the sine qua non of<br \/>\n                     harmony and orderly behaviour. It is the soul of justice and if<br \/>\n                     the power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C is used to enhance<br \/>\n                     such a compromise which, in turn, enhances the social amity<br \/>\n                     and reduces friction, then it truly is &#8220;finest hour of justice&#8221;.<br \/>\n                     Disputes which have their genesis in a matrimonial discord,<br \/>\n                     landlord- tenant matters, commercial transactions and other<br \/>\n                     such matters can safely be dealt with by the Court by<br \/>\n              Criminal Misc. No. M-27167 of 2009                      (3)<\/p>\n<p>                      exercising its powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C in the<br \/>\n                      event of a compromise, but this is not to say that the power is<br \/>\n                      limited to such cases. There can never be any such rigid rule<br \/>\n                      to prescribe the exercise of such power, especially in the<br \/>\n                      absence of any premonitions to forecast and predict<br \/>\n                      eventualities which the cause of justice may throw up during<br \/>\n                      the course of a litigation.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             31.      The only inevitable conclusion from the above discussion is<br \/>\n                      that there is no statutory bar under the Cr.P.C which can<br \/>\n                      affect the inherent power of this Court under Section 482.<br \/>\n                      Further, the same cannot be limited to matrimonial cases<br \/>\n                      alone and the Court has the wide power to quash the<br \/>\n                      proceedings      even       in   non-compoundable     offences<br \/>\n                      notwithstanding the bar under Section 320 of the Cr.P.C., in<br \/>\n                      order to prevent the abuse of law and to secure the ends of<br \/>\n                      justice.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             32.      The power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C is to be exercised<br \/>\n                      Ex-Debitia Justitia to prevent an abuse of process of Court.<br \/>\n                      There can neither be an exhaustive list nor the defined para-<br \/>\n                      meters to enable a High Court to invoke or exercise its<br \/>\n                      inherent powers. It will always depend upon the facts and<br \/>\n                      circumstances of each case. The power under Section 482 of<br \/>\n                      the Cr.P.C has no limits. However, the High Court will<br \/>\n                      exercise it sparingly and with utmost care and caution. The<br \/>\n                      exercise of power has to be with circumspection and<br \/>\n                      restraint. The Court is vital and an extra-ordinary effective<br \/>\n                      instrument to maintain and control social order. The Courts<br \/>\n                      play role of paramount importance in achieving peace,<br \/>\n                      harmony and ever-lasting congeniality in society. Resolution<br \/>\n                      of a dispute by way of a compromise between two warring<br \/>\n                      groups, therefore, should attract the immediate and prompt<br \/>\n                      attention of a Court which should endeavour to give full<br \/>\n                      effect to the same unless such compromise is abhorrent to<br \/>\n                      lawful composition of the society or would promote<br \/>\n                      savagery.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>             Compromise in modern society is the sine qua non of harmony and<br \/>\norderly behaviour. As observed by Krishna Iyer J., the finest hour of justice arrives<br \/>\n              Criminal Misc. No. M-27167 of 2009                      (4)<\/p>\n<p>propitiously when parties despite falling apart, bury the hatchet and weave a sense<br \/>\nof fellowship of reunion. Inherent power of the Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C is<br \/>\nnot limited to matrimonial cases alone. The Court has wide powers to quash the<br \/>\nproceedings even in non-compoundable offences in order to prevent abuse of<br \/>\nprocess of law and to secure ends of justice, notwithstanding bar under Section<br \/>\n320 Cr.P.C. Exercise of power in a given situation will depend on facts of each<br \/>\ncase. The duty of the Court is not only to decide a lis between the parties after a<br \/>\nprotracted litigation but it is a vital and extra-ordinary instrument to maintain and<br \/>\ncontrol social order. Resolution of dispute by way of compromise between two<br \/>\nwarring groups should be encouraged unless such compromise is abhorrent to<br \/>\nlawful composition of society or would promote savagery, as held in Kulwinder<br \/>\nSingh&#8217;s case (supra).\n<\/p>\n<p>             Keeping in view the enunciation of law as referred to above and<br \/>\napplying the same to the facts and circumstances of the present case, once the<br \/>\nmatter has been compromised between the parties, no useful purpose will be<br \/>\nserved by proceeding with the prosecution. Accordingly, FIR No. 234 dated<br \/>\n2.8.2009, registered under Sections 307 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act at<br \/>\nPolice Station Hodal, District Faridabad, and all subsequent proceedings arising<br \/>\ntherefrom are quashed.\n<\/p>\n<p>             The petition is disposed of accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<pre>10.11.2009                                                ( Rajesh Bindal)\nvs.                                                             Judge\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Parveen vs State Of Haryana And Others on 10 November, 2009 Criminal Misc. No. M-27167 of 2009 (1) In the High Court of Punjab &amp; Haryana at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-27167 of 2009 (O&amp;M) Date of decision: 10.11.2009 Parveen &#8230;.. Petitioner vs State of Haryana and others &#8230;.. Respondents Coram: Hon&#8217;ble [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19569","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Parveen vs State Of Haryana And Others on 10 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Parveen vs State Of Haryana And Others on 10 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-09T18:43:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Parveen vs State Of Haryana And Others on 10 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-09T18:43:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1251,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Parveen vs State Of Haryana And Others on 10 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-09T18:43:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Parveen vs State Of Haryana And Others on 10 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Parveen vs State Of Haryana And Others on 10 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Parveen vs State Of Haryana And Others on 10 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-09T18:43:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Parveen vs State Of Haryana And Others on 10 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-09T18:43:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009"},"wordCount":1251,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009","name":"Parveen vs State Of Haryana And Others on 10 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-09T18:43:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/parveen-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-10-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Parveen vs State Of Haryana And Others on 10 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19569","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19569"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19569\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19569"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19569"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19569"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}