{"id":195993,"date":"2010-11-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010"},"modified":"2016-07-24T14:55:54","modified_gmt":"2016-07-24T09:25:54","slug":"adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Adinarayanappa S\/O Adimurthappa vs Ramaiah @ Rangadhamappa on 4 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Adinarayanappa S\/O Adimurthappa vs Ramaiah @ Rangadhamappa on 4 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: N.Ananda<\/div>\n
 \n\nIN '}'I*E MGR COURT OF KARNKTAKA AT B~APIG!\u00a7LC)RE\n\nmmn ms Tim 4% my 01? 2m'.zEr\u00a21azR.@2*,:.3f:%a:.\ufb01'L%%% 2\n\nBEFCIEE\n\nTim HQKELE    \n\ncammm APPEAL r;c;,%:?%6.\u00a2%g 223%'?   %nfI\u00a7\n\n \n\nETWEEN:\n\nSz'i.Adins_rayanappa  _\n\nS10 Adimurthappa ' _ . V\naged abaut 36 Yeam    \nI'\u00a50.4,21**M&inEaa.d  V\nSiddwwara   _ _\nVf_;'s.yan.aga..r_V  g:~* _ _     V\n\n(83    AdV8.}\nSI_i'R%   ma\n \n\n'I   ' V A.  ..... \nMa.cihu_giri Eaizzk\n\n \n\n  ...RE\u00abSP\u20ac3NDEPIT\n\ngay  sax Acivaj\n\n_  \"  Cr1.A 33$ 13% under Sectian 373(3) {3r,P.C\n\n.   in set: aside the  nt anti Garcia\" daty\ufb02\n &T\u00ab%2a1o.2a04 passad 13 the new Additimmal City Civil\n  Sw\ufb01om Judge, Bangalore in Cr1.A.He.412!2OC\u00a53\n  rmiznre fim  and m\ufb01er clatu\ufb01 \u20ac}?5..Q7..\"2G\ufb013\n --~~ passe\ufb01; by the XVI Eaddifmnai Cihief Metropa\ufb01tan\n\nMagxmaze, Bmgaxerc in c.c.x%.3531*z\/2902.\n\n\n\nifizia appeal czzrmiw on far \ufb01nal hearing  day,\nthan Court dglivered the foiiawig:  \n\nJUDGMERT\n\n \n\nThe agnwilant was \n\nC.C.Ho.35817!2002 izxitiatgd f\u00a5ia';r;A 'mi'1 \u00a7\ufb015:=..\u00a31:{2 :+.\" \n\nammn 13.3 af the N.I.A::t ag:.;nv3'%E:\"' 2 raslgm  -%%i;: i;z\u00a7\u00e9' alia\n\nwmideratziong' :i>i.'jE'1;..%:\u00a7\";';ss.  mvspcndasant had\npaid   gt' I~?s.25,DO0\/- on\n   tank place\n  respondent went on<\/pre>\n
pastgsnigg  r  sale consi\u00e9wa\ufb01an<\/p>\n
-.  rely, rmgandmt in order ‘\u00a333<\/p>\n
 sak comidexratien, iaszxc\ufb01 a cheque<\/p>\n
 _ \u00a7c:r a. Rs.I\u00a75i.1,\u20ac&f– En fawn: cf mmp].azx2an’ t<\/p>\n
‘  .c\u00a5z1:i3anars. Bank, Ko  Layeut Branch,<\/p>\n
 G12 presentation, cheque was d\ufb01mnazw.<\/p>\n
V[  mmpla\ufb01mnt causw a statutazy mtiee to which<\/p>\n
3 H them was rm rmpanaa \ufb01wm rmpaz\ufb01ent. Th\ufb01re,<\/p>\n
mrnpiairmi;  8. mmgiaint undm-‘ ;Se:3ti<;\u00a7::;_ 2%<\/p>\n
\u00a3\u00a7r.P.{L<\/p>\n
 d as PW:-*3; and     'V<\/p>\n
czempiainanm win, 1'; campia\ufb01ztg,    ;
\narid:-raexmzzt issued by me  dag  pasta:
\nmm: v\u00a3} yam}.  mg; af legal
\nnatizze vi\ufb01i WSW  E33,?-1 to F'-<\/p>\n
8'<\/p>\n
  thc mama" bafam the<\/p>\n
ma;  Aj denie\u00e9 that he had<\/p>\n
j" "  ragistemd cvwner cf tracts? anti
\n was mat is-spae\u00e9 has discharge lqally<\/p>\n
: VV    <31' liability.\n<\/p>\n
 ‘   mm trial Judge, an apyrmtaon czf<\/p>\n
L  adauoecz by mm has mid that mm the:
\n  sf clmue ?m not disputed, a pmsumption
\n wzcmld afmc that chasing is suppcrtad by acsmidaration.<\/p>\n
3% tria\u00a7J1.1dge hesid the zmpan\u00e9ezz\ufb01 guilty afar: a\ufb01ence<\/p>\n
N’ C gwg\u00e9 Va<\/p>\n
mm Sact\ufb01an 1.38 of R.IAct argi \ufb01gntetmm him  pay\n<\/p>\n
9. 5m sf R5.1_,55,wU\/- in default tn <\/p>\n
impxismmcmt for a peried sf {me year.<\/p>\n
5, The mpondmt &p%1\u00a7\u00a7I H “I
\ncomdm\ufb01an in C\ufb01minal
\nInarnw. Judge sf \ufb01rm: V   hearing
\nIear\ufb01 Eoumel for   judgmintit
\nsf trial Caurt   was
\nnot the   the compiaizmnt
\nhas fa\ufb01\u00a7@_   iasueed ts discharge
\n \ufb01ab\ufb02ity. ‘\ufb01re mmphixmnt
\nhas   ts; prove tha\u00e9 hia brotlwr<\/p>\n
  ts sell the \ufb01waxs\ufb01sr. In the<\/p>\n
 __ prmumptiar: under Se:-cztivm 139 of<\/p>\n
  ta aompfaixxazit, The lmrned<\/p>\n
   Lk Judge  am appellate Ccsurt has Iwl\ufb01 that when
\n&  has aim m prmm that am d\ufb01shamurad
\n was issued tc iwaltmrge the: Ega\ufb01y racwcrahle<\/p>\n
  er Liahiiityg, an 935% m\ufb01aer Section 138 of the<\/p>\n
N.E..Ac’$.: is rm: proved. The: learned Judge cf that first<\/p>\n
appaeliahe Court zwrsw \ufb01ze jzzdgmant af mxnaiciinn and<\/p>\n
7\\)- .,  _.1..~-67b’-“~-(gar<\/p>\n
awtzitte\ufb01 rmpc:-n\u00e9ieniz. marafera, mmpm\ufb01mi is _\u00a7\u00a2f\u00a2re<\/p>\n
thzig \ufb01auri.\n<\/p>\n
aymlhnt 3.-mi Sri <\/p>\n
rmpazsxzdant. I have Maxi  \u00a7:’.:=;'{diizg}1 <\/p>\n
\ufb01ndirm racsmreiad by the:  ”  AT ‘ ”<\/p>\n
2″‘, It is nut in 4’   is a<\/p>\n
pract\ufb01cm   aiisputc that<\/p>\n
raw:  is 9. rmidmt \u00e9f
\nauadengbzaliis % Ma\u00e9hugiri Taluk and<\/p>\n
the d’iap1.1V\u00a7e:?.M S \u00a3V’an\u00e9.s drawn on \ufb01axzzara %.nk\u00a7<\/p>\n
 _   Bfarzch, Baxmaiasre. At tram<\/p>\n
 ta stata that tim diatezme<\/p>\n
b\u00e9t\ufb01rcx\u00e9nv   place of rmpondemt 331$. Carzara<\/p>\n
   Layout Branch, Bangalare is about<\/p>\n
8.; The haw is fairly waif satt\ufb01ed that prasumptinn<\/p>\n
V U ur\ufb02er Sectian 13% rxf the H.\u00a7.Ac*t: awn sxtsnds m the.<\/p>\n
emuktenm af Iqally enfarm\ufb01fe debt at \ufb01abilityg hcgvevarg<\/p>\n
n}  _.__ T\ufb01..\\,\\\u00a2(,\/L’<\/p>\n
wmi\ufb01era\ufb01gn 9f Rs.1,5G,OG9l=- a\ufb01zar tam m\u00a2:1t?m _._ Tm
\nmmyiainant agapmachw accnmed an aeveml
\nbut witheut any mspcma mam ac2::1me&.   <\/p>\n
month af \ufb01\ufb02mher, 2391, c~cm3,;:Ia1n_4 ”  ‘Q<\/p>\n
awumsl ma aamamm the  H
\n\ufb01jer\ufb01ere, amua\ufb01  far a
\ngum sf Rs.1,5G,C\ufb02Glv-3..  fa\u00a7\u00bb:;z.\u00a7’L_:c:f and the
\nsaid cimue was  Kcmiala
\nLayvczut Bmr;\u00a2f2g:A:V    awrmsnts are<\/p>\n
mam’ tad           <\/p>\n
 has depans\ufb01 tlmt ha<\/p>\n
mu mg-my   Rs.1,*;r5,w9;- am rawived<\/p>\n
_ a sjig\ufb01’ af   advarxm sa\ufb01a cansidera\ufb01azz.
\n   of m  sale ermaidcration f<\/p>\n
L\u00bb 1% ; ;.&;\u00a2cu3ed had isaud a cheque dated.
\n \u00abV   tha same: day’, aha cemalainant prwcnmsi<\/p>\n
‘ H H K  with his banker. Time chmue was \u00e9.i5hz:r1.aor~&
\n  an maamement that mm was as same-‘mu: fund<\/p>\n
j \u00bb  \u00a7i t}1e amzsnt of accusa\ufb01. Duxmg mansa mm1na’ tinn,<\/p>\n
: wmp\u00abEai11ant has admitted that has was mt the
\nrwkterad owner af mactar m\ufb01 his hrather was tkm<\/p>\n
N:  \u20ac?L”~”C\u00a3!t’\u20ac'<"'<\/p>\n
mg\ufb01tmw swam" cf tmctacsr. H5 hm nest mmt\ufb01ng\ufb01 the<\/p>\n
_'mT*'-\n<\/p>\n
mm sf his brother} ‘either in the mmplaimi<\/p>\n
widezm. 1: \u00a35 am not mcntiszm-ad in the  <\/p>\n
piacae where the rwktere\ufb01  sf  2 ‘ <\/p>\n
I11 the igal mtice marlmd as
\nthe asmplaixmnt had  cfhad’   <\/p>\n
d Ed payment azzrfu  \u00a5\u00e935fh3’\ufb01d3;’a’tiQ\u00a7} af
\nRa.1,5\ufb01:,\u00a7GET3}~ in the  2991 and the
\na\ufb02\u00e9u\ufb01\u00e9cli   fcsr a saw at’
\nRs.i,5(3;G{\u00a7{}f:’\u00a55\u00ab..V  mriderxm; it in sweat
\nthat   is the mmplafmant
\nan   m t pzmenze\u00e9
\nthe  Thus, \ufb01om the evidence af<\/p>\n
 v   it   that clmue is sa\ufb01 is have been<\/p>\n
  \ufb01.a :.2T;”i?as<:.;]ii1_:..aI*ga the zwirxirzg sa\u00e9a mmiclaraniang<\/p>\n
  it is mcsmsary to ssta\u00e9ze that in ordar is<\/p>\n
 an e\ufb01enae ux\ufb01ar Smticsn 139 of R'.f.Az:t, the<\/p>\n
   hag tr) pmw {fiat chequa was issued :9<\/p>\n
' V'  \ufb01i\u00e9\ufb01lwrge  Exafarcamhla debt :31' iiab\ufb01ity.<\/p>\n
19. in the case an ham, am aemplairiant was met<\/p>\n
the I@7s’be2’ecZ awner af waemr. Even be has met<\/p>\n
my.  &Wv”-*’-\ufb02)\\=<\/p>\n
…. 3 ..\n<\/p>\n
hot\u00e9xcrad is Sf\ufb01i\ufb01 th: rgistzratian iiumbar of thc tfactar<\/p>\n
and traiiar. ‘& xzomplainant has not Stated <\/p>\n
sf’ Hm brother, wha acccnrdjm as him waa
\nawmr. The mmplaizmnt has mt stata\u00e9   K 2<\/p>\n
has} aut\u00e9zarised him ta sell the tr}.e:.ct:}f.”  <\/p>\n
has not amamixa his  <\/p>\n
namsary is 25%:  not
\namm that t:ran.5fm’ of  in mm
\nsf ma rskvag;   Am. The
\nmmpiainaz\ufb01     1’55 is a pra.c:b?z::’11g
\naciwcate   him awn b\u00a2f\u00a7?zr\ufb01
\nthe date of ‘\u00a3113 avermnta sf Iqal<\/p>\n
natzice, cxzmplaint   the trmzsac\ufb01\ufb01n had<\/p>\n
   ‘ ‘ vi\ufb02agc, mzddmalur Post,
\n ‘\ufb01le amusaci is a na\ufb01ve szf<\/p>\n
 He is allmad ta haw issua\ufb02 as<\/p>\n
A —  dr\ufb01zz\u00e9f\ufb01 rm Gamma &nk, Kara  Layaut
\n   cxrid\u00e9zm on rwcrd aiaca net \ufb01stablish that
\nV .  had any business G1’ avacatian in Baxzgalsre ta
\n1 115$ aweunt it} Gamma Bmk, Kera  Layeut<\/p>\n
S vV.Bmmh, It is m\ufb01ar digwul ts cgnceiva that amuzs\u00e9d<\/p>\n
…..  ..\n<\/p>\n
mm is a rzatixre {sf Bucldanai\ufb02 villaga, hmi spgiwd a<\/p>\n
 Bank Ancauzit in Cazwra Bank, Ksrsg\ufb02axgak<\/p>\n
Laycut Branch and ha was trave\ufb01ing ali  <\/p>\n
his m\ufb01ve piazze to Bangaiox-e   2 ‘ <\/p>\n
is smzz \ufb01nm the awn’ tun:  ‘<\/p>\n
chmue that amused is  I  Eve:c:  V<\/p>\n
the a\u00e9agmhzre aubsexiiped _\u00a7:io$oa\u00a7’ ‘z’:,z:f\u00a3:~<\/p>\n
1% esvf tha  x\u00e9zhc ahmue was
\ndrawn.   in Eng\ufb01sh in
\n  ihat apart \ufb01om the
\n\u00a3a’j\u00a7r\u00a2a=D “<3f"   that the cheque was<\/p>\n
mm m   ' ruyk ensmmbga debt or Eiabilirty,<\/p>\n
   crf aehaque is shmucied<\/p>\n
   the ci2*c:L;%ta\ufb023, the fixx\ufb01ixg cf the<\/p>\n
i\ufb02mxrt that the an-mplaixzzant 13% fa\ufb02evd ta<\/p>\n
  the diaputed cheque was issued to discharge<\/p>\n
X     rewszerabia debt or Iiab\ufb01ity carirmt has found fault;
\n%%   rm mmpmm ms ram to pr\ufb02ve that amused
\n %  eommittze\u00e9 an e\ufb01axm mm: sec\/mi 133 c:=f1fI.I.Act,<\/p>\n
0<\/span><\/p>\n
L\\\u00bb<\/p>\n
Z\ufb01mere am rm reaaem ta intmfare with \u00a3115 <\/p>\n
aczvapiairzant would submit   ‘<\/p>\n
nwaaxy :1acu%m akmg,
\nswam 391 :::r.P,c. 1: is   that 9::
\n75435313,  under
\nSaxctiesm 391 \u20ac’.r=AP”.C. ‘\ufb01vitnvwsaa wha
\nare as   <x:mp\u00a7a.ina.11t has
\nnot  dcmumcnts. The
\n the 1-wasting whisk had
\n  thme witrmseai befare
\n  mmpb\ufb01mnt Ema mt stated any
\n  atmpt befcm the f\ufb01at
\n Above ax; the apeplicatian is not
\nH Vv \u00abV  by any dcscumcnt in prave &"&I'}B\u00bbf5'\u00a3' of
\n mm of the mmn: provisions ef the
\n  _ *'  The app\ufb01caiien evm \u00e9aw mm: imimw tha
\n .f$:%e for wlrliczh it was mde. The mmpla\ufb01mtxt has
\nnet atajtad the reaanns ag to why the Wi'\u00a3I}.,%3 ilii\ufb01d in the<\/p>\n
list cxzxulri mt be mamined befare the via} {Scary Ewan<\/p>\n
N! C \/T{i;__,,,H0,_.\n<\/p>\n
\u00a31. The learn\ufb01 Cnuzmei  <\/p>\n
…..  ..\n<\/p>\n
0 , in vim {if ‘\u00a3125 a\u00e9mittw poaiticn  the
\nmmplainant was mt tfm x\ufb01terad cxww ef the\u00bb <\/p>\n
and he eot\ufb02d mt have sold the traetcsr   <\/p>\n
\ufb01xated am in fact,    <\/p>\n
in thc mmplaint that the trar1sfr\u00a7;#VofA_Atr\u00e9c\u00a3br_v’%\u00e9s*a=\u00a7s <\/p>\n
in term cf the releumat  \u00a2i”3&smf  V<\/p>\n
‘fie  ‘ tier} of  in fh:::*~Aa;):g31icaation
\nwauld mt smmae    apphca-” tixm<\/p>\n
czamzothe ante”-\u00a7;a_  in_m\u00a77  V’ 1′  V <\/p>\n
12.     czrder:\n<\/p>\n
A’   …..\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Adinarayanappa S\/O Adimurthappa vs Ramaiah @ Rangadhamappa on 4 November, 2010 Author: N.Ananda IN ‘}’I*E MGR COURT OF KARNKTAKA AT B~APIG!\u00a7LC)RE mmn ms Tim 4% my 01? 2m’.zEr\u00a21azR.@2*,:.3f:%a:.\ufb01’L%%% 2 BEFCIEE Tim HQKELE cammm APPEAL r;c;,%:?%6.\u00a2%g 223%’? %nfI\u00a7 ETWEEN: Sz’i.Adins_rayanappa _ S10 Adimurthappa ‘ _ . V aged abaut 36 Yeam I’\u00a50.4,21**M&inEaa.d V […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-195993","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAdinarayanappa S\/O Adimurthappa vs Ramaiah @ Rangadhamappa on 4 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Adinarayanappa S\/O Adimurthappa vs Ramaiah @ Rangadhamappa on 4 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-24T09:25:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Adinarayanappa S\\\/O Adimurthappa vs Ramaiah @ Rangadhamappa on 4 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-24T09:25:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1327,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Adinarayanappa S\\\/O Adimurthappa vs Ramaiah @ Rangadhamappa on 4 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-24T09:25:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Adinarayanappa S\\\/O Adimurthappa vs Ramaiah @ Rangadhamappa on 4 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Adinarayanappa S\/O Adimurthappa vs Ramaiah @ Rangadhamappa on 4 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Adinarayanappa S\/O Adimurthappa vs Ramaiah @ Rangadhamappa on 4 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-24T09:25:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Adinarayanappa S\/O Adimurthappa vs Ramaiah @ Rangadhamappa on 4 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-24T09:25:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010"},"wordCount":1327,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010","name":"Adinarayanappa S\/O Adimurthappa vs Ramaiah @ Rangadhamappa on 4 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-24T09:25:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/adinarayanappa-so-adimurthappa-vs-ramaiah-rangadhamappa-on-4-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Adinarayanappa S\/O Adimurthappa vs Ramaiah @ Rangadhamappa on 4 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195993","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=195993"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195993\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=195993"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=195993"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=195993"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}