{"id":196,"date":"2009-04-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009"},"modified":"2017-04-15T22:36:42","modified_gmt":"2017-04-15T17:06:42","slug":"ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Optima Technologies vs M\/S Pragathi Value Added People … on 9 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S Optima Technologies vs M\/S Pragathi Value Added People … on 9 April, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA, BANG\u00a33.LQ_\u00a7?:Evv'4\n\nDATED TI-Iis THE 9TH DAY 0? APRIL_2:{3{\u00a79:   ~\n\nPRESENT;  \n\nTHE I--~i{)N'BLE MR. RD. 13:NA:. nBLy its Mangers,\nc  R...{}}<miLH\u00e9ouse, 'B' Block,\n I35 F.l;6o:*,s'8th Miic:-2,\nV'  \ufb02\ufb01ssarghatta Cross,\n ' _\u00a3S3'_"\u00e9:\u00a5.w\u00e9--; Tumktlr Road,\n Bangalore. ..Respon<3\u20acnt\n\n\n\nThis WA. is \ufb01led under Section 4 of the \nHigh Court Act, 1961, praying to Se: asirie {he"'ortie:f_' dated\n\n3.10.2008 in W.P.Ne.12161\/2008 passed by:"'t1:e_:'\u00a7e\u00e9mfi'e6t'\u00bb\n\nSingle Judge.\n\nThis WA coming up for   "\n\nCourt this day, SABHAHIT J., passeC\u00a5V_'ti1eA'fc311e'e\u00a7i;1g: \u00ab. '\n   AX \n\nThis app\ufb01al 33   _p6\ufb01t;Oner in\nW.P.No. 12161\/2008 beizigt order dated\n3.10.2008, whegfei\ufb01wtiie   has declined to\ninterfere Witlfi"  ' the Permanent Lek\nA\ufb01alath,  anti dismissed the writ\n\npetition 1\n\n2. 'If15;e'a;3pe3;ia:1tV_Vhere;V\u00a7r: \ufb01led W.P.N0.12161\/2008 seeking\n\n  the order passed by the Permanent Lek\n\n \u00e9ated 30.7.2008. It is averted in the\n\n  writ pe'\u00a3itie'I:i "\ufb02at the petitioner is a registered company\n\n Besiness of service provider for teie-calling and\n\n feiaiixeci aetivities. The respondent is a company aecrediied<\/pre>\n
 VT   Reliarlcte Company and Iegetered company, which is<\/p>\n
Kr’<\/p>\n
\u00e9oiflg teie services business through the s13b~oi:\u20aci’1′::r5\u00e9;;.4;i:o:*s.<\/p>\n
The petitioner entered into a contract  <\/p>\n
Communications Ltd. for providing””servic-es _ofi ‘te_1e:-c\u00e9iiiiiig. 91′ V<\/p>\n
The Reliance Commuxiicatiozis  <\/p>\n
respondent as their identity. ._ tot’ entexei
\ninto 3. contract with thev –s;eIvioe”o11″}i{J.5.20(}7
\nwhich Came into effect ‘contract was for
\na period of one the writ petition.\n<\/p>\n
The petitiorzler  its service of tele–\u00a2::al].ing
\nand such”   as envisaged in the
\nagreement’ ‘ijihe iiaiied to perform their part of<\/p>\n
the e.g’eei13et1t”  iii paying the petitioner as age-ed<\/p>\n
‘in,   oo;1t1″a.et;” “”” The respondent after completion of<\/p>\n
  providing leads to the petitioner<\/p>\n
i it    As per the ageement, the respondent<\/p>\n
 \u00absifxetlid haeei’ paid the bills, but the respondent deiayed the<\/p>\n
  anci has not paid the ozltetanding bills. The<\/p>\n
  deliberately with an intention to create confusion<\/p>\n
   -tieed to eolleetively make a consoli\u00e9ated payment in respect<\/p>\n
K?’<\/p>\n
of \u00e9i\ufb01lerent bills which were raised on different date:3V_:f:}:z;’~each<\/p>\n
month. The respondent due to breach of _:\u20ac::f<\/p>\n
contract is liabie ta pay 3 sum 01′ R’s,A1,_9}.,8_.i’2;45’_jo:\u00a3i”:the 1″1t:fs\u00a71ig4 <\/p>\n
bill and is due of Rs.2,68,0I8\/–  o:;:’eti:1e&”eec1’a”te:”ot:”‘ .<\/p>\n
Writ petition. The petitioner negetjatee  ietters: %’<\/p>\n
for the reasons fer delay and  and sat
\nfor reconciliation ef diI’f’erehees_’ ‘;f)igi.\u00e93AV:i7(3pI\u00a53SCI1{8iiV\u20acS of
\nrespondent. Thee’-_’\u00a7;fetiti<}ne15:':: requests for
\ndiscussions,    V respond positively
\nand ie\ufb01i  &'t;"%1:eVV..peiitioner issued a iegai
\nnotice, txfhicix'   r'esp0ndez1t. Therefore, the<\/p>\n
petiuonel' :i'iie'd__4a  "%3.e.1'bre the Pemlanent Lek Adalath<\/p>\n
'..seekiI1g\u00a7;. for sef\ufb01eme\ufb01tv and compmmise between the<\/p>\n
pet:Zticqf1_e1* ..a21(i\u00ab…:4esfpor1dent or in alternative for recovery of<\/p>\n
outetehdmg' wz\u00e9th interest and to decide the dispute<\/p>\n
 GE;  h' The Permanent Lok Adalath conducted<\/p>\n
1 eeVeCi'i1}g$" from 1.2.2008 and subsequen\ufb02y till 31.7.2008.<\/p>\n
   Ale-p\ufb01ieramiee could not he arrived at and Permanent L0}:<\/p>\n
 raised 13 issues, for detexqtnirxatien of issues Neg!<\/p>\n
\\.5<\/p>\n
and 2 for consideration as preiimizla\ufb01s issues; 'xjihe<\/p>\n
Permanent Lek Adaiath heid that in View  <\/p>\n
Arbitration Clause in the e.g'eemeI.1t; the 1:i:a1;tefli'e i'eq"uii"ed \ufb01f A'<\/p>\n
to be decided under the Arbitratjeg  ee::\u00a2n.iae'g\u00a7.gs;ct,%<\/p>\n
1996 and accordingly Passed "Grde\u00a7t5' '\ufb02ee writ
\npetition dated 30.'7.:20C\u00a78 21:16' eii"$'pute between
\nthe parties is oniy contI'e{etA'\u00a7i\u00a7sl"'iI\u00b0::" requires to be
\nerbitrated by a  ,spee:e\u00a7_iic   Section 5 of
\nthe Arbitratiogiefid   1.996.\n<\/p>\n
3. Learned _$i}?i;g1Ve_{}1J.d’gea”e1fter.’considering the contentions<\/p>\n
of the  fer the petitioner held that<\/p>\n
she iznpu’g:1ed drdef dees not suffer from any error or<\/p>\n
 vPem3.anent Lek Adalath has referred the<\/p>\n
pafties*\u00a7’.__ te””t}1_e__ rit\u00a7\u00a7{Iator under arbitratiel} clause in the<\/p>\n
Vagreen:\u00a3ent”ei11ce 3:10 compromise couid be arrived at, the<\/p>\n
H  passeei by the Permanent Lek Adalath I’\u20acf\u20ac’ITiI1g the<\/p>\n
   ‘he the Arbitrator to workout their reme\u00e9y is justified<\/p>\n
  View of the existence of arbitration Clause in the<\/p>\n
\\..\/*~<\/p>\n
agreement in \u00a5’6Sf)\u20ac{3t of which the dispute has  in<\/p>\n
View af Section ‘? of Legal Senrices Authorities  ‘ <\/p>\n
impugned arder is justi\ufb01ed and doesjxot sz1’\ufb01\u00e91″—-f3?01ii’V\u20aci:{‘0r.3:31’\u00bb_ <\/p>\n
illegality and it is open :0 the pefiigiormt :’\u00a3o <g'c)*'~ 3:45:16<\/p>\n
process in Eerms of the procedzj:'e:_Vas \u00a2<3ntcrnpi\u00e93.t\u00e9\u00e9;iv\u00ab1,1I;.der the %'<\/p>\n
Arbitration Act and accQrdh1gly___?:\u00e91is\u00a7_mi\u00a7sec.i 1th\u00a7:_w;{;it petition
\nby ord\u00e9r datsd 3. 3{).f2{3(}$'\u00a7I.' B32313; '4"a=gg:f1';eved by {he said
\norder, the petitiantzr iippeai. There is
\na cieiay of 19     <\/p>\n
4. We   on record.\n<\/p>\n
5. The m\u00e9itgriai  ‘\u00a7fCC(.%i7’3 would dearly sizow that the<\/p>\n
4.,’g:Vi.L,eL %%%%% __N0.20{)i2\/2008 filed by the<\/p>\n
Ap::tit;i;2,:”:_\u00a21*,{ herein for settleznant was ragistered by<\/p>\n
 me%% =E\u00a7i\u00a7:*.m\u00e9;\ufb01{\u00a7:;t Adaiath, Legal Services Authority,<\/p>\n
 Banga1< $:=<=;. '1 ,S.i'1fi<:e no compromise could be \u00a3i.1"I'i;V(':d at, the<\/p>\n
}:9\u00e9;;21ia:1r.\u00a7:ntvV"I.0k Adaiath framed the issues that arise for<\/p>\n
 _de*\u00a3:\u00e9f;\u00a7niIia\ufb01on and answered issue N05,}. and 2 by hoiding<\/p>\n
 that in View of the existence of arbitration ciausa in thti<\/p>\n
M}<\/p>\n
the czrder passed by the Permanent Lois: Adalath  in<\/p>\n
the writ petitien is justified and does not  <\/p>\n
error or iliegaiity and dares not warrar.1tAa:;y ir\u00a7:\u00e9tfere3'1C\u00e9"-Vinij' A'<\/p>\n
exercising the Writ jurisdiction \u00e9u:1\u00e9\u00a7._ii'l'i is' bpelz n\u00ab.*%\u00a5.Z}'..\ufb011T3"'."_(\u00a7'<\/p>\n
petititmer\/appeilant herein
\nterms of the procedure  wu}I1der the
\nArbitratian Act. in vicar" the arbitration
\nclause in the agrfesrzignt  the dispute that
\nhas arisen  it is ciear that the:\n<\/p>\n
Pezmanerzi’   ri_5t” iiave decided the matter
\non   Adalath W33\u00bb justified in<\/p>\n
referring. the  ‘jE–:o A\u00a3h\u00e9’*'”A1″bitrator as per the arbitration<\/p>\n
t:’}r:\u00ab=;._1A,z.se.’:r_i:g’~”1  Aagr\u00e9\u00e9\ufb02ie\ufb01t. We do not \ufb01nd any error or<\/p>\n
  Grder as to Cali for ixiteribrence in<\/p>\n
 ‘–._.,t.his  cqziriiif-fafzpeal. Accordingly, we hoid that there is no<\/p>\n
nierit in ilapptial and pass the foilowing:<\/p>\n
GRDER<\/p>\n
K  “The writ appeal is dismissed 0:1 merit.<\/p>\n
\\\\\/\/1<\/p>\n
in Vi\u20acW of dismissal of the writ appeal,  f:16t- <\/p>\n
it<\/p>\n
nacressary to cansider the app\ufb01catien for L’  H<\/p>\n
delay of \u00a39 dsxys in \ufb01ling the appeal    ‘_ <\/p>\n
    ”\n<\/p>\n
   %  Sd\/1,<\/p>\n
  I\/f\/’   V’
\nWeb I1Ec>st:Yg?\u00e95\/ .\n<\/p>\n
_ Bkm.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S Optima Technologies vs M\/S Pragathi Value Added People … on 9 April, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit IN THE HIGH COURT OF’ KARNATAKA, BANG\u00a33.LQ_\u00a7?:Evv’4 DATED TI-Iis THE 9TH DAY 0? APRIL_2:{3{\u00a79: ~ PRESENT; THE I–~i{)N’BLE MR. RD. 13:NA:. nBLy its Mangers, c R…{}}<miLH\u00e9ouse, 'B' Block, I35 F.l;6o:*,s'8th Miic:-2, V' \ufb02\ufb01ssarghatta Cross, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-196","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S Optima Technologies vs M\/S Pragathi Value Added People ... on 9 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Optima Technologies vs M\/S Pragathi Value Added People ... on 9 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-15T17:06:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Optima Technologies vs M\\\/S Pragathi Value Added People … on 9 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-15T17:06:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":955,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Optima Technologies vs M\\\/S Pragathi Value Added People ... on 9 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-15T17:06:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Optima Technologies vs M\\\/S Pragathi Value Added People … on 9 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Optima Technologies vs M\/S Pragathi Value Added People ... on 9 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Optima Technologies vs M\/S Pragathi Value Added People ... on 9 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-15T17:06:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Optima Technologies vs M\/S Pragathi Value Added People … on 9 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-15T17:06:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009"},"wordCount":955,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009","name":"M\/S Optima Technologies vs M\/S Pragathi Value Added People ... on 9 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-15T17:06:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-optima-technologies-vs-ms-pragathi-value-added-people-on-9-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Optima Technologies vs M\/S Pragathi Value Added People … on 9 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}